Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shake1 
BrianD,
Fabric is unbelievably expensive! But, they can have a huge impact on the room's looks. It ended up being a lot more than I planned / wanted to spend, but I am happy that I did. Looks very, very nice and the wife loves them.
For my HT, I spent more of my budget on the aesthetics for the room (paint, draperies, furnishings, etc.). I believe this is where most of the "Wow!" factor happens when friends and family come over to visit. Most people I know cannot tell the difference between DVD and Blu-Ray, and they really don't care.
Remember, these are one time investments in the room, whereas technology changes regularly and is often replaced. I have nice equipment too, but I would say that I am a middle of the road kind of HT technology consumer.
Roger that, but I spent a lot on ACOUSTICAL improvements too, and for the same reason. People don't have a frickin' clue what the difference is between 5.1, and 7.1, or 2:35 vs 1:85, or HDMI vs DVI, or whatever, but they CAN HEAR what good acoustics sound like!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shake1 
BrianD,
I have an audiophile friend, who has a HT setup as well (FP & screen). He has spent tens of thousands of dollars on the equipment, the best you can buy (literally). His HT room is a converted spare bedroom room and looks like crap. And although "he" enjoys his gear, no one else shares in his appreciation. What they see is his HT room, and there is no "Wow!". If he invested more into his room's aesthetics, and put it on par with his gear, he would knock it out of the park.
I know someone who spent >$50K, a LOT more

(wow!!!) for his room, and while it looks STUNNINGLY beautiful, it can't even come CLOSE to what I have, sound wise, with what my acoustical treatments have done for me. He has a major "wow" factor when you "see" it, but when you "hear" it, the wow factor (for me) is more like "you need to see my acoustical guru!!"
Good post!
Best,
Tom
Chinaclipper