Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike2U 
I'm very interested to here responses to this as well. I would think many others are on the fence and considering the LN52A750 vs. the PN58A650 or PNA50650. With the lingering issues with AMP, off axis viewing, clouding, etc. I am surpised at how many people are buying LCds when the price points on plasmas are right there. For me the main benefit of LCD was the reduction in glare from a matte screen and now even that has been taken away on these new sets. So to me LCDs use less eelctricity and run cooler and that's about all they have on plasma. So what gives? Why is everyone buying this LCD instead of the PN5XA650?
Quote: Has anyone here that bought a 52A750 ever consider the 58A650 or 50A650 plasma? If so, why choose the 52A750 over the plasmas? Just curious because this thread has way more traffic and users leading me to think that more people are choosing the LCD over the plasma. It seems that most experts still say plasma is the superior technology but these threads have me questioning that logic. Am I missing something?

I'm very interested to here responses to this as well. I would think many others are on the fence and considering the LN52A750 vs. the PN58A650 or PNA50650. With the lingering issues with AMP, off axis viewing, clouding, etc. I am surpised at how many people are buying LCds when the price points on plasmas are right there. For me the main benefit of LCD was the reduction in glare from a matte screen and now even that has been taken away on these new sets. So to me LCDs use less eelctricity and run cooler and that's about all they have on plasma. So what gives? Why is everyone buying this LCD instead of the PN5XA650?
Quote: Has anyone here that bought a 52A750 ever consider the 58A650 or 50A650 plasma? If so, why choose the 52A750 over the plasmas? Just curious because this thread has way more traffic and users leading me to think that more people are choosing the LCD over the plasma. It seems that most experts still say plasma is the superior technology but these threads have me questioning that logic. Am I missing something?
There is no one superior technology. The answer to why LCD's are being chosen by more people are numerous. The decline and ultimate demise of CRT and RPTV's have basically given the reigns over to plasma and LCD. Now, plasma has been losing OEMS over the years which hasn't helped them compete with LCD's. Also, more and more people are using their displays as an entertainment hub with a PC hooked up as well as XBOX/PS3 etc. This favors LCD because LCD is not phospor based. Plasma owners tend to be non gaming, non PC participents as far as using plasma as the monitor, they primarily are DVD/Blu-Ray, cable/sat users. "Experts" have always tended to be pro plasma because of the "less is better" theory meaning a more purer, less processed picture. In fact, many pure plasma owners will tell you 1080p is not needed...a 720p on a Pioneer or Panasonic will suffice.
But the "experts" are also realizing the gap is closing, expecially with the Samsungs. Samsung has addressed some LCD issues like motion blur and black levels head on. The "experts" have recognized this and have recently mentioned that the 650/750 series has comparable inky blacks to the Kuro. The problem with plasma is lumenence. They are around 2.5 which when shown next to an LCD in a retail store will differentiate the whites. The plasma in store will look murky and dull while the LCD looks bright and vibrant. This gap closes significantly at home, however, many buyers purchase on first impression so plasma loses. Since plasmas are phospor based, you need to be more aware of image retention. Burn-in is almost impossible to achieve nowadays, however, and i have fought tooth and nail with plasma owners about this, but IMO, a plasma dictates your viewing habits instead of the other way around. How does it do this? Well, you must break it in, you have to limit a station like CNN with tickers after a certain amount of time, or you have to limit the black bars on the screen etc. A TV is meant to be enjoyed not babied. The excess mental baggage may be hazardess to your health.
As far as price points, well, if you told me 2 years ago i could get a 52" LCD with all the bells and whistles and generally regarded as arguably the best of the best for less than Michael Jordan's jersey number, well, you know the rest.
I hope i answered some of your questions about why LCD's have taken over as the display of choice.



















