AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Coupon Eligible Converter Box (CECB) › CM-7000 (S-Video) VS Tivax STB-T1 (Component)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

CM-7000 (S-Video) VS Tivax STB-T1 (Component)

post #1 of 92
Thread Starter 
Hello Everyone,

We have a 2003 27" FST Toshiba 27AF43 TV with:
  • Component, S-video, & composite video inputs
  • 480i interlaced resolution
  • 3-line digital comb filter
  • 4:3 & 16:9 modes
  • Analog tuner
This set is connected to a Channel Master Quantum antenna currently located in the attic. (I may move it to the roof with a rotor.) Currently, neither the component or S-video inputs are being utilized.

We are considering two possibilities for OTA DTV reception:
  • Channel Master D2A CM-7000: S-video out
  • Tivax STB-T1 ATSC QAM digital TV Tuner: 480i component out
I've also read about the Samsung DTB-H260F ATSC HDTV tuner: $170 & probably more than we need for this SD TV.

1.) I'm wondering if the Tivax STB-T1, because of its 480i component out, would provide noticeably better image quality than the s-video equipped CM-7000?

2.) I never heard of Tivax. How is their reception quality?

3.) Is there another model similar to to the Tivax STB-T1 that we should also consider for this application?

(I'm aware the CECB program specifically excludes models that have anything other than RF, composite, or S-video outputs.)

Thanks!
post #2 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by ota.dt.man View Post

We have a 2003 27" FST Toshiba 27AF43 TV with:
[list][*]Component, S-video, & composite video inputs

Currently, neither the component or S-video inputs are being utilized.

We are considering two possibilities for OTA DTV reception:
  • Channel Master D2A CM-7000: S-video out
  • Tivax STB-T1 ATSC QAM digital TV Tuner: 480i component out
I've also read about the Samsung DTB-H260F ATSC HDTV tuner: $170 & probably more than we need for this SD TV.

Maybe so, but by using the component outs, the Samsung will have an edge in PQ, even with your SDTV. I own a Samsung 260, and for watching 16:9 programs, I prefer it over my CECB (an Insignia). My TV (a Sony SD 27" WEGA) is similar to yours in terms of inputs.
I cannot comment on either of the CECBs you've mentioned, but I can say that the 260 has a better program guide then any currently available CECB.
Another advantage of the 260 is that you can utilize an unused input on your TV, leaving the rest free for other items, like a second tuner, DVD player, etc.

In regards to S-Video vs Composite - I cannot see a difference in PQ on my TV when I hook up my DVD player using those methods. Probably depends on your TV more than anything.
post #3 of 92
The Tivax STB-T1 is not a CECB. As you know, it doesn't qualify because, among other things, it has component video and digital audio outputs. Yes, you will see better quality using component video. S-video is little more than upscale composite video. Also, unlike any of the CECB's, you will be able to take advantage of the Dolby 5.1 signal that's encoded into DTV.

I don't know much about the Tivax yet but I will soon enough as I have one on order. In the meantime, there are huge threads on the STB-T9 and CM-7000 CECB's if you want to wade through them.
post #4 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whidbey View Post

Maybe so, but by using the component outs, the Samsung will have an edge in PQ, even with your SDTV. I own a Samsung 260, and for watching 16:9 programs, I prefer it over my CECB (an Insignia). My TV (a Sony SD 27" WEGA) is similar to yours in terms of inputs.
I cannot comment on either of the CECBs you've mentioned, ...

Thanks for sharing your experience with the Samsung 260 VS the Insignia on a TV similar to ours.
Note:
  • Of the 3 models I mentioned, only the CM-700 is a CECB. The Tivax STB-T1 is an external SD (not HD) tuner.
  • Like the Samsung 260, the Tivax STB-T1 also has component outs.
You indicate that PQ should be improved due to component output (Samsung 260 VS the Insignia). A component VS composite comparison I assume? From what I've read, the Insignia doesn't have S-video.
post #5 of 92
Thread Starter 
Hi Don,

Yes I'm aware the Tivax STB-T1 is not a CECB. The reason I posted this question in the CECB sub-forum is because I want to compare the video performance of the CM-7000 CECB (S-Video) VS Tivax STB-T1 (Component).

You make a good point - The STB-T1 definitely has the edge for those who want to take advantage of the Dolby 5.1 signal.

I look forward to reading about your experience with the Tivax STB-T1 you've ordered. When is it supposed to arrive?
post #6 of 92
Why not grab a Hisense DB2010 tuner from ebay for $30-80 (depends on whether brand new or not). It has Component (480p to 1080i), S-video, Compsite video and digital optical out and a very good EPG (with program description, storyline etc)?
post #7 of 92
Here's a link to a thread Don started and I posted on as well. I believe Don's hoping for his T1 this weekend and I was told mid next week for the LX1000. I don't know a lot about the LX1000 yet, but should know much more by next weekend. My Sony is also SD and has component inputs too. I will be using the S-video out to run to a DVDR and am hoping to get better PQ than the standard composite CECB.
I had the Sammy 260 for a while and did notice better PQ via it's S-out vs. a CECB, but had second thoughts on it's $170 price. I also didn't like that it didn't have a display. Looks like both the Tivax units come with a display, just not their CECB, T9.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1026209
post #8 of 92
Hi ota.dt.man,

Generally speaking, I think you get a better picture using component over s-video. Even though both bypass the comb filter, I think the second chrominance signal makes a difference. Maybe it's my imagination.

If the CM-7000 had digital audio, I could easily live with the s-video but it's not worth the little bit of savings to give up the sound quality. I'll probably order in a CM for the bedroom TV if nothing better shows up before my coupons expire.

I should have the Tivax by the weekend. Even though it's not a CECB, I'll post a review in this forum in case others may be looking for non-crippleware.
post #9 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by kousikb View Post

Why not grab a Hisense DB2010 tuner from ebay for $30-80 (depends on whether brand new or not). It has Component (480p to 1080i), S-video, Compsite video and digital optical out and a very good EPG (with program description, storyline etc)?

Wow, that looks like a very good option too.
post #10 of 92
Thread Starter 
Hi, kousikb,
Thanks for suggesting the Hisense DB2010 tuner.
Quote:
It has Component (480p to 1080i), ...

Does it also provide 480i?
post #11 of 92
Thread Starter 
Hi Jeff,
Yes, I saw your thread. It was one of the reasons I started this thread. It will be interesting to hear how your new Tivax works with your 480i component input Sony.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeff View Post

I had the Sammy 260 for a while and did notice better PQ via it's S-out vs. a CECB, but had second thoughts on it's $170 price. I also didn't like that it didn't have a display. Looks like both the Tivax units come with a display, just not their CECB, T9.

Did you try the 260's component out? Thanks
post #12 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Bouldrey View Post

Hi ota.dt.man,

Generally speaking, I think you get a better picture using component over s-video. Even though both bypass the comb filter, I think the second chrominance signal makes a difference. Maybe it's my imagination.

If the CM-7000 had digital audio, I could easily live with the s-video but it's not worth the little bit of savings to give up the sound quality. I'll probably order in a CM for the bedroom TV if nothing better shows up before my coupons expire.

I should have the Tivax by the weekend. Even though it's not a CECB, I'll post a review in this forum in case others may be looking for non-crippleware.

Component over s-video: That's my understanding also. I just wonder if there will be an obvious PQ difference between the two?

I share your interest in "non-crippleware" and look forward to hearing about your Tivax also.
post #13 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by n4yqt View Post

Since you have component inputs, I would get the Samsung H260F. You can find it for a lot less on ebay around the $60.00 range and possibly an open box item at Best Buy for $99 or less, like I did.

Thanks for the BB open box suggestion! However, when I checked out the reviews on their web site I found the following:

Quote:
"Its biggest drawback is that when you lock in the channels in one direction. It will lose them when you turn the antenna to lock in stations from a different direction. It was designed to work with an antenna but does not work with an antenna in this respect. The Manufacturers website and the book that came with it says that you can later add a channel or delete a channel. It is not possible to do either even when the instructions in the book are followed."

Is this info accurate in your experience?
post #14 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by ota.dt.man View Post



Did you try the 260's component out? Thanks

Yes I did. The Sammy is not very handy unless you have a display with component inputs since it only displays On screen information to the Component or HDMI output. I used the S-video to feed my DVDR. Truthfully I couldn't tell a lot of difference on my 24" SD Sony Wega between the S-video and component, but on my 32" HD LCD Panny the component and HDMI outputs looked as good as the HD tuner built into my Panny. Much better than either composite or S-video.
I could however notice a improvement between composite and S-video with the Sony. If you have a larger display you might be able to tell a bigger difference between the S-video and component on your SD TV.
post #15 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by ota.dt.man View Post

Thanks for sharing your experience with the Samsung 260 VS the Insignia on a TV similar to ours.
Note:
  • Of the 3 models I mentioned, only the CM-700 is a CECB. The Tivax STB-T1 is an external SD (not HD) tuner.
  • Like the Samsung 260, the Tivax STB-T1 also has component outs.
You indicate that PQ should be improved due to component output (Samsung 260 VS the Insignia). A component VS composite comparison I assume? From what I've read, the Insignia doesn't have S-video.

Component is better than composite, but the comparison between the 260 and the Insignia is as much about receiver quality, not just the outputs.

To do a fair comparison of outputs, I'd have to use a machine that has all types of outputs and see which works best. My DVD player has all three (S-video, Component and Composite) and with it I've found that the Component looks best, and the composite and S-video are about the same.
post #16 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by ota.dt.man View Post

Hi, kousikb,
Thanks for suggesting the Hisense DB2010 tuner.
Does it also provide 480i?

It indeed provides 480i over component, s-video and RCA Composite video. Also as n4yqt mentioned, if you can get the Samsung DTB260F for < $99, it's a better option, because it also has HDMI (I think) and QAM tuner too and I guess has a scheduler too. I don't have the DTB260F. I bought my Hisense DB2010 from the same person marsman (and I guess most of the avs'ers too got it from him) for about $50 one year back. The picture quality is really good.. and the OTA recording using the s-video output is near DVD like. I don't have a component input in my DVD recorder, else it would have been DVD quality totally. You can add channels without erasing the present channel list and it also has signal strength meter OSD and other nice goodies.
You can also view the hisense tuner sitting below my Sammy DVD recorder in my OTA setup picture in my signature.
post #17 of 92
Thread Starter 
Hi Whidbey,

"Component is better than composite" - Yes, that's what I've read. But I've always wondered if it's an obvious difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whidbey View Post

"... the comparison between the 260 and the Insignia is as much about receiver quality, not just the outputs."

Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whidbey View Post

To do a fair comparison of outputs, I'd have to use a machine that has all types of outputs and see which works best. (Agreed. Excellent thought!) My DVD player has all three (S-video, Component and Composite) and with it I've found that the Component looks best, and the composite and S-video are about the same.

What type and size screen did you use for this comparison? Thanks
post #18 of 92
Thread Starter 
kousikb

It sounds like the Hisense DB2010 has many fine qualities:
  • 480i to 1080i
  • component, s-video and RCA Composite video
  • digital optical out
  • picture quality is really good
  • a very good EPG (with program description, storyline etc)
  • add channels without erasing the present channel list
  • signal strength meter
  • OSD and other nice goodies
And all for about $50!!
post #19 of 92
Re the Samsung DTB-H260F:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ota.dt.man View Post

when I checked out the reviews on their web site I found the following:

Quote:


"Its biggest drawback is that when you lock in the channels in one direction. It will lose them when you turn the antenna to lock in stations from a different direction. It was designed to work with an antenna but does not work with an antenna in this respect. The Manufacturers website and the book that came with it says that you can later add a channel or delete a channel. It is not possible to do either even when the instructions in the book are followed."

Is this info accurate in your experience?

Not completely. Doing a full channel scan does indeed erase the previous channel list. You can add channels individually. However, the instruction book omits a crucial detail. When you want to add an individual channel, you must use the physical channel number that the digital signal is on, not the virtual channel number which matches the station's analog channel number.

For example, my nearest NBC station has its analog signal on channel 4, and of course everybody here knows it by that channel number. Its digital signal is currently on channel 59. If I need to add it individually to my Samsung's channel list, I have to enter "59" not "4". If the unit picks up a usable signal, it extracts the virtual channel number from the data stream, memorizes it, and the on-screen display changes from "59-1" to "4-1". Thereafter, I can tune to it by entering either "4" or "59". I've done this sort of thing many times.

There is a small catch that you have to watch out for. The example I gave above would not work if my Samsung already knew about a virtual channel 59. In that case, entering "59" would simply take me to that channel instead of looking a signal on physical channel 59. I would have to make sure to add my "channel 4" (59) first, and then add this other channel by entering whatever physical channel it's on.
post #20 of 92
The Hisense box pales in comparison to the Samsung and newer tuners performance-wise, as far as sensitivity and multipath handling go.

Otherwise, it has exceptional PQ and features. I'd even place it up there with the old LG's and Sony's, PQ-wise (better than the H260F, for sure).

I had one briefly, and it wasn't even as sensitive as some of the other 4th generation chipset receivers that I've ever owned. No better than average for that generation, I'd say.

Good tuner, but unless you have a reasonably favorable reception situation to begin with, I probably wouldn't recommend it. It's very outdated, RQ-wise.
post #21 of 92
Hi Otaguy,

I did A/B comparisons some years back between s-video and component video on a 32" tube. The difference is subtle. Not at all like the huge difference between optical audio and RCA patch cord audio.

There's a good, professional review of the Samsung 260 on the net done by someone like HDTV Magazine where the guy tests reception, etc. It's easy to find by googling. This reviewer doesn't seem to find any of the problems that you find posted by many of the user reviewers who may have been having a bad (under the) hair day. I may have went for the Samsung but I'm boycotting their products due to experience in dealing with them over the last 15 months about one of their "award winning" refrigerators. Samsung definitely doesn't have their act together.

One thing I would wonder about the Hisense unit is the "generation" of it since it's so old. I understand that makes a huge difference in performance.

I don't even know the generation of the Tivax I ordered but I'm hoping it's more modern. I attempted to find out this info from the Tivax tech support but modern tech support people don't know any more about their products than the people asking the questions. Here's what they said in response to my query about the tuner and generation. "The unit uses a off the shelf tuner uses in many devices." Duh! My other questions were equally well answered but I suspected that would be the case before I asked and had already ordered the unit to get my own answers.
post #22 of 92
Hisense DB2010 may not be the best tuner in the market and may not be as good as the newer 6th gen tuner which has gone through the FCC mandated field tests, but if your reception conditions are equal or better than mine, you can consider it. I use indoor directional amplified antenna (about 10dB gain - Terk HDTVa). I get all the signals which I get in my Olevia LCD tuner and Zenith DTT900. All my signals are 10-20 degree apart and within 35 miles and almost in the same direction. tvfool lists the signal strength as -50dBm to -65dBm. I am in the 2nd floor of the apartment and there are lot of trees surrounding my apartments. I don't get channel 61 (WNET 13.x) owing to low signal level it's at -77dBm. I guess lot of multi path problems can be eliminated if the antenna you are using has a very directional pattern. Check the hdtvprimer.com to find the antenna's directional chart and gains for different channels. I didn't want to spend $170 for a dedicated tuner one year back. Now there are more options like CM-7000 which can be better option for fringe area/multi-path reception and given that it has 6th gen tuner and it's coupon eligible. The point I am trying to make is, if you have favourable condition, you can as well try the cheapo hisense box, with optical digital out. But I'd rather buy a upconversion DVD recorder with digital tuner built in (you can get them refurbished for <$100, philips or samsung) then spending more than $100 on a dedicated tuner.
post #23 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtbell View Post

Re the Samsung DTB-H260F:You can add channels individually. However, the instruction book omits a crucial detail. ...

Thanks for the detailed explanation! It's good to know the DTB-H260F doesn't have this limitation.
post #24 of 92
Now THAT is a great post with some meat in it kousikb. I'm feeling much more comfortable with the digital dBm projections TV Fool gives me for my coordinates. My dBm's will drop down to a range between -38 and -60. Good have some real confirmation it will probably work out well for me. Thanks.
post #25 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Bouldrey View Post

Hi Otaguy,

I did A/B comparisons some years back between s-video and component video on a 32" tube. The difference is subtle. Not at all like the huge difference between optical audio and RCA patch cord audio. ...

Samsung definitely doesn't have their act together.

... "generation" .... I understand that makes a huge difference in performance. ...

I don't even know the generation of the Tivax ...

Thanks for your observations and experience.
- Was the 32" tube SD or HD?
- Samsung's act: Does their customer service issue also apply to their video division?
- It will be interesting to read your observations of the Tivax.
Thanks again
post #26 of 92
Thread Starter 
What other criteria should be considered to avoid "crippleware"?
  1. 6th-gen tuner chip-set for good fringe reception
  2. Component & S-video out for optimum 480i PQ
  3. Analog & digital audio out
  4. Analog pass through
  5. Add channels without erasing the present channel list
  6. Display menus and CC on both component and S-video outputs
  7. Aspect-ratio adjustment
  8. On-screen guide
  9. Signal strength meter
  10. Good customer service/support
post #27 of 92
Otaman,

It's a plain ol' SD tube.

Samsung is great if nothing ever breaks. My nearly 3 year old DVDR is still in fine shape.

Samsung is also great after you learn to speak Samsungese. It's all very easy once you learn their language and realize:
(1) nothing they ever tell you will ever happen as they say
(2) 3-5 business days is 4-6 business weeks in Samsungville
(3) the first two times they ship out parts, the parts will be wrong

Thankfully, I'm almost done with them. Three weeks ago they authorized a refund for the purchase price of my 2 year old refrigerator in exchange for never having to deal with me again. I expect to see the check within 4-6 business months.
post #28 of 92
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kousikb View Post

I didn't want to spend $170 for a dedicated tuner one year back. Now there are more options like CM-7000 which can be better option for fringe area/multi-path reception and given that it has 6th gen tuner and it's coupon eligible.

Hi kousikb,
It sounds like the CM=7000 would be an attractive S-video alternative if the black RCA jack that was supposed to be digital audio out can be enabled ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by drlava View Post

Excellent info!
Here's a quick visual analysis:

The 1.65V is the rms voltage of the 3.3V biphase manchester encoded data coming from the chip. This goes to the amp/buffer PNP transistor QD10 whose emitter (and base of QD9) is biased by RD60. QD9 may be a NPN transistor with a buffer cap on its collector (CD28). Its output goes to impedance matching/filter network RD61, 62, and CD29, and is finally AC coupled to the coax output through CD30.
RA7 may be necessary for signal integrity to cut down on ringing, or provide additional pull up or pull down current.

With one of these in hand, I could probably have a working solution in an hour or less.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dingo99 View Post

Fry's has the CM-7000 on sale again, so I went and picked one up. See attached for a closeup view of the digital output circuit.

Missing are 4 resistors, 3 capacitors, and 2 transistors. Using a DMM, I measured +1.65V @ RA7, +5V @ RD60, and +5V @ CD28/QD9. Any theories what the missing component values should be?

@drlava, actually it does support anamorphic widescreen. Simply hit the "Wide" button on the remote to select the "Full" picture setting.

See also the thread:
post #29 of 92
Do any of the big box stores carry the cm-7000 or is it only available online ?
Thanks in advance
Owenf
post #30 of 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by ota.dt.man View Post

What type and size screen did you use for this comparison? Thanks

I used a 27" Sony Wega. Like one of the above posters said, the difference was subtle. However, it is enough to make me prefer the 260 over my Insignia. I suppose if the difference is visible on a 27" TV, it would only become more obvious with a bigger screen.

In hindsight however, if the Insignia was available at the time I bought the Samsung, I doubt I would have justified the >$100 price difference. The difference in PQ on an SDTV isn't worth that.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Coupon Eligible Converter Box (CECB) › CM-7000 (S-Video) VS Tivax STB-T1 (Component)