Quote:
Originally Posted by
vega509Â

Looks like the article was pulled. In a nutshell, they measured several brands and models of popular tv's out of the box, then took "calibration" settings found on web sites and remeasured the sets. The finding was @ 90% of the sets got worse in most aspects of picture quality.
***sigh***
I would love to speak to Mr Chen regarding his little article.... so many holes in that article. 50 display's eh? Were they all measured by the same person and meter? What meter(s) were used for the measurements? If I recalled I used a 5nm PR-655 to create the 111FD settings. Did Mr. Chen forget about tolerance values for each meter.... and I'm speaking strictly of two identical modeled meters. Expect large variances when using a different brand meter. Hell Two identical modeled meters will never measure exactly the same.
I really don't want to get into the silly "sharing settings" discussion again as I have no desire to hand anyone their ass again (not you vega509).
Reality check... sharing settings is not a substitute for a real calibration. I have ALWAYS stated that. Anyone doubts that, show me one of my posts that says otherwise. However, I do know that in 93% percent of cases where the exact measurement device used to published settings is used to do the actual calibration, my posted settings are better than any stock video mode OOTB on the display.... that includes the fairy-taled THX mode.