AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › *Official* Denon AVR 1909/789 Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

*Official* Denon AVR 1909/789 Thread - Page 21

post #601 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by FFF View Post

and Charlize Theron installing it for free in bikini?

LOL. I will take that if nothing else..
post #602 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by scape View Post

Does anyone know if the unit does upconversion/upscaling of all video content, and is it bypassable (hk's was always on)? b/c down the road this may be a nuisance.

This is one area where Denon generalyl gets it right over other companies, they tend not have buggy implementations like the "defeatable... but not really!" video processor on the HK's.

I haven't personally verified it on a Faroudja-based Denon AVR, but this what I know (or think I know!):

1. HDMI video input will not be touched, just passed through the HDMI output
2. Video conversion can be turned on or off by inputs. In the setup menu for Denons you have the option to turn it on/off for each source (i.e DVD, TV/CBL, etc)
3. The video conversion is separate from any i/p deinterlacing or upscaling. i.e. you can set it to NOT convert analog to HDMI; convert analog to HDMI without affecting resolution; convert analog to HDMI with just 480i/p scaling; or convert analog to HDMI with full upscaling of 480i/p material to your choice of 720p/1080i/1080p.

I would be willing to wager that the Denon doesn't screw this up like the HK, they tend do this stuff correctly.

What are you trying to do exactly? Pass analog inputs to HDMI output without touching the resolution?

For pre-outs you have to step up to the 2809ci/989 model ($1000+) or forego the new Audyssey features and grab a close-out price on last year's 2808ci/988 ($600-700ish).
post #603 of 11199
ahh so i couldnt resist and put in an order for one also. thanks guys for the info!
post #604 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by scape View Post

if any of these questions are further up this thread slap me

/slap

There is an out for a sub, but not an amp. Is it a big deal? Hard to say, but it does limit flexibility down the road. I finally figured that I probably won't add an amp down the road as my 10 year old yamaha is enough to blow my eardrums out. I was mulling over the 1018, 254, and 1909; in the end the PS3 issues with the HK kept me from that one, and all the talk of the Audessey features and sound quality of Denon won over the fact that the 1018 had pre-outs at the same price. Good luck!
post #605 of 11199
Got an email from J&R saying it's backordered!?!!
post #606 of 11199
Just picked up the 1909 from Best Buy and used the 10% off coupon. The sales guy was pretty cool..he was going to give me the 10% either way if the coupon was invalid!

I had the Sony DG820 and wasn't too crazy about the way it sounded. I hope this Denon doesn't let me down! I have some KEF 3005 speakers, will it be okay to connect the Sub directly to the AMP? or just straight to my wall outlet?

I'm no audiophile so i hope i can have everything setup to maximize my speakers!

thanks guys for the reviews!
post #607 of 11199
I was in the same boat as a lot on this thread in that I was debating between this and the pio 1018 (as well as the Yammy 633). Yesterday I went to BB and told my wife that if they had the 1909 in stock then I would get it. I asked, the guy, he said they had two so I bought one. (used 10% coupon plus I had a $100 gift card)

This will be my first foray into a "modern" AVR as I am going from an old Sony with DD/DTS. I'm already somewhat bewildered by all the options and settings, HDMI upconverting/upscaling, as well as using the Audyessy setup thingy. But thanks to all of you, I feel I made a good decision in my purchase.

I'll be setting it up tomorrow so wich me luck.

PS: another plus on this purchase for me is that now I don't have to follow so many threads in the forum. Doing so sure took a lot of my free time away.

So, thanks again for all the contributors to this thread. I'm sure I'll be back with a few questions.
post #608 of 11199
My 1909 arrived on Friday. I set everything up the next night and tweaked all day Sunday. I'm very happy with the overall sound and MultiEQ/Dynamic Volume features.

I was worried about video issues because my TV is an older RPTV w/ DVI only, but everything works great.

It was nice to see the display with bitstreamed Dolby TrueHD being processed on the receiver. And I'm also able to experience HD Audio from my PS3 via LPCM for the first time. Couldn't be happier with the sound now for my HD movies. Music sounds good as well, but I'm probably going to use it 80/20 for movies/music. The Audyssey setup was very easy with no errors. The manual isn't the most straightforward and it took a bit to figure out how to get to all the settings, but that is a one time pain.

Must say I'm glad I chose now to jump in and get a new receiver and can't imagine better way to spend $499 on my current HT setup.
post #609 of 11199
I know this question has probably been beaten to death, but given the recent crash, and the fact that the 988s are still around for $599, I need to reconfirm, especially from those who have actually owned and tested the 1909 against the xx88/08 models, that the actual implementation of Audyssey dynamic volume/EQ, excellently and succinctly summarized in the following post by JohnAV, actually delivers on the promise and hype:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnAV View Post

The Dolby Night-Mode used on Denon's is basically a dynamic range compressor that reduces the peak output of Dolby Digital sources, so that explosions and other effects are rendered at a similar level to speech and music when listening at low volume levels.

Dynamic Volume used with Dynamic EQ selects the best possible frequency response and surround volume levels on a moment-by-moment basis. These two technologies enable the full frequency response of the source at its original level to be reproduced at any listening level. Even at lower listening volumes, Dynamic Volume ensures that the richness and dynamics of the response are maintained.

Audyssey Dynamic Volume employs advanced audio signal processing that operates in both the time and frequency domains. The spectral content in individual channels and the surround mix are continuously monitored in order to maintain proper spatial volume. Both rapid and slow changes in level and dynamics are monitored in order to prevent the common artifacts produced by standard compressor methods.

I feel I need to confirm this not only because of the appeal of the currently low-priced 988 which is quite irresistible, but also because of this post which I retrieved from another forum before the crash:

Quote:
Originally Posted by covmaster View Post

Hey guys, maybe all of you who have been debating between the two models have already made up your minds, but I wanted to add a bit more valuable info in deciding between the 1909 and the 2808/988.
I bought the 988 at CC for the low price and was stoked about it. Then I read more and more about DynamicEQ and thought, man, maybe I'm really missing out on this new feature.
So I called Denon today (had to wait 40 minutes to get through to someone!), but once I did, they guy I talked to was very helpful.
I asked him to talk to me about the differences between the 2 models, and he asked me how important sound quality was to me? I said that's probably the most important thing (I almost thought it was a trick question). He answered, "Then get the 2808/988".
Then I defended DynamicEQ more and asked more questions. He responded that the DynamicEQ is a rad feature, he really thinks it's great, but it's not worth sacrificing the better sound processors (and other things that I didn't really know about) that come in the 988.
Okay, so I said, but if the sound is too low to appreciate that, isn't the DynamicEQ going to bring my more "quality" sound because I'll actually be able to hear it?
He said, if I'm at least above -40db on the receiver, I won't be missing anything. I said I normally watch my movies and games and stuff at around -20, maybe -12.. and he said I wouldn't even be using the DynamicEQ at those levels.
He also said that the 988 has a night mode, that while it's not as advanced as DynamicEQ, it's close.

He finished with this - when you're really really loving your avr and getting the most out of it, it's when it's turned up right? I mean, when you're sitting there and thinking, wow this sounds amazing, it's at a fairly good volume. The DynamicEQ is a nice feature to HELP low listening volumes, but remember that at low listening volumes you're not really getting sound in all its glory anyway.

So I'm happy with that news! I'll keep my 988 - whoo hoo!

Now here's the final question for those who have actually experienced Dynamic Volume/EQ, and also the "Night Mode." How "close" are we supposed to take their alleged "close" resemblance to be? Also if my "neighbor-friendliest" and lowest listening volume is -35, does that mean the dynamic volume/EQ will be ineffectual in my case as alleged by the Denon rep in the above quote? Thanks.
post #610 of 11199
I can only speak for the 1909's Dynamic volume/EQ. At -35 it does still make a huge difference from my old reciever. I love the ability to clearly hear the quiet dialog sections of the movie with out having to crank the volume up (and then having to turn it back down when the actions starts). I've been using it on the Day setting (I need to try the other settings) and the low level dialog sounds just a great as the high level explosions. I didn't know how much I would like this feature because I was worried it would degrade the overall sound, but I have no regrets now.
post #611 of 11199
damn

lost 400 posts
post #612 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amel View Post

damn

lost 400 posts

But 300 of them were about when somebody's 1909 was shipping...
post #613 of 11199
I was going back and forth between the 988 and 1909 and finally decided on the 1909 based on the feedback on the 1909's Audyssey with its Dynamic Volume /Dynamic EQ implementation. Ordered via J&R (backordered). Now waiting to see if the Sony S350 goes down in price.
post #614 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by pruizgarcia View Post

I was going back and forth between the 988 and 1909 and finally decided on the 1909 based on the feedback on the 1909's Audyssey with its Dynamic Volume /Dynamic EQ implementation. Ordered via J&R (backordered). Now waiting to see if the Sony S350 goes down in price.

Check amazon on the 350!
post #615 of 11199
I spoke with Denon tech support today and asked them to email me the IR codes for the 1909, which they did. It's a 20 page PDF, and I sent it off to Harmony so that they can add it to their database. According to the level 2 Harmony tech I spoke with, this should be completed within 72 hours.

One thing I did notice is that there are discreet codes (I think I am using this term correctly) for the Dynamic Volume settings of Day, Evening and Midnight.

Nice.
post #616 of 11199
^^^ awesome. hopefullly by time i get the denon shipped to me, logitech will have it in their database

also, since some posts were lost .. what was the dongle needed to get the logitech remotes to work on ps3? i dont have ps3 yet but thinking about it.
post #617 of 11199
Sweet.

Thats good to hear about the Harmony...I just hope they have the repeat commands issue fixed when I get home tonight. I swapped in my 1909 this weekend and updated my remote...which broke it. Now I have around 10 remotes sitting on the table.
post #618 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekk View Post

What was the dongle needed to get the logitech remotes to work on ps3? i dont have ps3 yet but thinking about it.

The one I'm using is IR2BT. They're currently sold out, but you can sign up to be notified when they're in stock again.

I know there are other solutions available, but some of them are not able to turn the PS3 On and Off (IR2BT can).
post #619 of 11199
I use the Nyko blu wave remote's dongle with the PS3, but it is one of the solutions that doesn't turn it on/off.
post #620 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugs View Post

The one I'm using is IR2BT. They're currently sold out, but you can sign up to be notified when they're in stock again.

I know there are other solutions available, but some of them are not able to turn the PS3 On and Off (IR2BT can).

Hmm interesting. They're in FL also. Wished it was a little bit cheaper though

Stimpson, I read that the Nyko one has sluggish responsiveness. Is that true?
post #621 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekk View Post

Stimpson, I read that the Nyko one has sluggish responsiveness. Is that true?

Using the Nyko dongle w/ my Harmony has been sluggish. But, I think there are some settings I could try to speed it up. Since my Harmony isn't working right now I've been using the Nyko remote and it seems to respond faster. Of course they are both slow compared to the PS3 controller.

I imagine the IR2BT is the best solution if you want to spend the money. I'm happy for now w/ the cheaper Nyko solution...but might upgrade at some point in the future. I only really use the PS3 to watch movies...so once I get it started I'm not using the remote much anyways.
post #622 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugs View Post

I spoke with Denon tech support today and asked them to email me the IR codes for the 1909, which they did. It's a 20 page PDF, and I sent it off to Harmony so that they can add it to their database. According to the level 2 Harmony tech I spoke with, this should be completed within 72 hours.

One thing I did notice is that there are discreet codes (I think I am using this term correctly) for the Dynamic Volume settings of Day, Evening and Midnight.

Nice.

Can you post a link to this document or email it to me and I can host a link. I have a MX-500 and would like to program some discrete codes, especially for the Dymanic volumes when I receive my 1909.
post #623 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by StimpsonJCat View Post

But 300 of them were about when somebody's 1909 was shipping...

Not quite. There was about 8 responses in a row due to my questioning of the shipping method used as I'm expecting mine later than most from J&R when someone got all pissy about it. Tomorrow can't get here soon enough.

Now OT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ekk View Post

Hmm interesting. They're in FL also. Wished it was a little bit cheaper though

Stimpson, I read that the Nyko one has sluggish responsiveness. Is that true?

No offense to Bugs but he should really link the thread that talks about all the devices, not just the IR2BT so you can compare. Based on your cost preference though, the IR2BT is looking to be about right for you, but it has some inherent flaws that some other users might not want. Check this thread out for yourself. It's got some great info in it.
post #624 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogdoctor View Post

Now OT:
No offense to Bugs but he should really link the thread that talks about all the devices, not just the IR2BT so you can compare. Based on your cost preference though, the IR2BT is looking to be about right for you, but it has some inherent flaws that some other users might not want. Check this thread out for yourself. It's got some great info in it.

Doesn't offend me in the least. I have one BD player (PS3), one dongle (IR2BT), one DVR (HR21), one AVR (1909) and one TV (LN-52A750). I don't have a financial stake in any of the companies that manufacture or sell these components. I can share my opinions and experiences about this hardware, but I can't really compare them to any others (except the Onkyo 606, which I no longer have). I think we all know that there is more information on virtually any A/V subject available in AVS than is contained in any one post or thread, and we can seek it out if we are so inclined.

But thanks for posting the link, I'm sure it will help others find the information they need.
post #625 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by pruizgarcia View Post

Can you post a link to this document or email it to me and I can host a link. I have a MX-500 and would like to program some discrete codes, especially for the Dymanic volumes when I receive my 1909.

Sent you PM.
post #626 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amel View Post

damn

lost 400 posts

AV Science Forum -- better known as AVSForum -- is the place to go to converse about all things AV-related. In what can only be described as a dramatic bummer, the website suffered a "a major failure in the database and backup storage." Due to the catastrophe, "tens of thousands" of posts were lost over the past week, and the boards have been restored to how they looked on August 2nd, 2008. We get this weird feeling the administrators will be implementing enough backup solutions to keep things humming along 'til the end of time after having this happen,
post #627 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugs View Post

Sent you PM.

Can I get a link/email also Bugs? Discrete for Day/Evening/Midnight would be handy - though I tend to leave it in Midnight mostly.
post #628 of 11199
I've been curious about the power consumption of the 1909 and I finally broke down and picked up a Kill-A-Watt meter to check it out. I got the cheap version (model P4400), which reads only whole watts. The more expensive version claims one decimal place. The claimed accuracy of the model I bought is +/- 0.2%

I began by testing the meter with some appliances and lamps to get an idea if the readings are at least in the ball park. Given that the power consumption of light bulbs and toasters are probably not precisely calibrated, the Kill-A-Watt gave readings that were plausible. Most of the light bulbs measured about 5% low, but I don't know if that's typical of incandescent bulbs or indicative that the Kill-A-Watt reads low.

I then plugged the 1909 into the Kill-A-Watt and got the following results:
  • Standby, HDMI Control OFF: 0 watts (Denon specs say 0.3 watts)
  • Standby, HDMI Control ON: 30 watts
  • ON, volume = -40 dB: 69 watts
  • ON, volume = -20 dB: 72 watts
  • ON, volume = -10 dB: 83 watts
  • ON, volume = 0.0 dB: 110 watts
I have a 5.1 setup, with 8 ohm speakers and a powered SW.

With the 1909 ON, the power consumption varies quite a bit at each volume level, depending on the input source and the material. The readings I listed are roughly the maximum I saw at each level. EDIT: I didn't see any significant difference in the power consumption with Dynamic EQ/Vol On or Off.

The readings are lower than I anticipated. Do they seem reasonable, or is the Kill-A-Watt suspect, or is there something unusual about my setup? If they are right, this AVR doesn't consume much power at all. I suppose that this is consistent with the cool running temperature. The Denon specs list the current consumption at 5.2 Amps, but that is probably a very conservative maximum and factors in something for the switched power outlets, which are rated at 1.0 Amps total. I have nothing connected to the switched outlets, but I never saw the current approach anything close to 5.2 Amps.

As I suspected, turning HDMI Control to ON does draw some power, but not very much, only 30 watts. Before I made the measurements, I was thinking that there might be an economic incentive to leave HDMI Control OFF. There is, but not very much. In a full month of 24/7 operation, leaving the HDMI Control ON would consume about 22 KWH. At $0.12/KWH, that works out to $2.68/month. If you'e off the grid and counting every KWH, you wouldn't want to enable HDMI Control. For everyone else, it's a question of whether the convenience of HDMI Control is worth $2.68/month +/-.
post #629 of 11199
I have a copy of a 20 page Denon PDF that has all the IR codes for the 1909. Is there a way to post this on AFS (2 mb)? I don't have the capability to host a url for the document, but I'm happy to email it to someone who does. PM me with your email address and I'll send it along.
post #630 of 11199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugs View Post

I have a copy of a 20 page Denon PDF that has all the IR codes for the 1909. Is there a way to post this on AFS? I don't have the capability to host a url for the document, but I'm happy to email it to someone who does. PM me with your email address and I'll send it along.

Sent you PM.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › *Official* Denon AVR 1909/789 Thread