AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Direct View (single tube) CRT Displays › 36" Sony Trinitron Component Input
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

36" Sony Trinitron Component Input

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
I have a 36" Trinitron that has been an outstanding TV over the past 4 years. It is only an SDTV, so my question is... what is the point of having component video inputs if you can't even use progressive scan?
post #2 of 11
Better color accuracy and in general improved picture quality.
post #3 of 11
With an RGB to component transcoder, I'd say there is no better way to play old consoles like the SNES than on a big SD Trinitron like yours.

Not sure if you're into video games, though.
post #4 of 11
480i over component will provide a better picture quality than rf, composite or s-video. I you have been viewing DVD on this set and not using component, then you have been missing a lot.
post #5 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkZero24 View Post

With an RGB to component transcoder, I'd say there is no better way to play old consoles like the SNES than on a big SD Trinitron like yours.

Not sure if you're into video games, though.

The transcoder thing again?
post #6 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by raouliii View Post

480i over component will provide a better picture quality than rf, composite or s-video. I you have been viewing DVD on this set and not using component, then you have been missing a lot.


I don't know about missing a lot and I would venture to say that the difference between S-Video and Component to the naked eye is very hard to distinguish. S-Video carries the full DVD resolution. Obviously, if we are talking Component passing Progressive Scan DVD, Component wins because S-Video can't pass a Progressive Scan signal.

It's not a big step up like going from Composite to S-Video.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffo View Post

Better color accuracy and in general improved picture quality.

I don't know how it can provide better color accuracy than S-Video at 480i. S-Video is actually component video as well so they are both one in the same. One passes 2 components separately and one passes 3 components separately.

They both have the same mission.
post #7 of 11
You are correct about the S-Video vs. component comparison. I was assuming the OP had only used composite RCA inputs. I should have been more specific.
post #8 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by googleme7 View Post

I don't know how it can provide better color accuracy than S-Video at 480i. S-Video is actually component video as well so they are both one in the same. One passes 2 components separately and one passes 3 components separately.

Component have more accurate color than S-video by breaking down color information even further than S-video.

The only similarity between component and s-video is that they both carry luma (black&while/resolution) information separate from chroma (color) information. And that is where the similarity end.

The difference begin where in s-video, color information is carried in one wire. But in component, the color information is broke down in two wires where blue cable carry difference between blue and luma, and red cable carry difference between red and luma. Green cable only carry Luma information.

A green color is not sent as the color can be interpolated using the blue, red and luma information. This is done to save bandwidth.
post #9 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffo View Post

You are correct about the S-Video vs. component comparison. I was assuming the OP had only used composite RCA inputs. I should have been more specific.

Yeah, and really he may have been using composite, but lets hope not
post #10 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby_D View Post

Component have more accurate color than S-video by breaking down color information even further than S-video.

The only similarity between component and s-video is that they both carry luma (black&while/resolution) information separate from chroma (color) information. And that is where the similarity end.

The difference begin where in s-video, color information is carried in one wire. But in component, the color information is broke down in two wires where blue cable carry difference between blue and luma, and red cable carry difference between red and luma. Green cable only carry Luma information.

A green color is not sent as the color can be interpolated using the blue, red and luma information. This is done to save bandwidth.


And again, is that extra bandwith going to create a noticably better picture on a 480i to 480i connection?
post #11 of 11
Extra bandwidth saved by using difference leads? Of course that won't make a visible difference vs. RGB at 480i.

S-Video eliminates composite's dot crawl but is nonetheless inferior to component video.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Direct View (single tube) CRT Displays › 36" Sony Trinitron Component Input