AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › 2008 LG XXLG70 Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

2008 LG XXLG70 Thread - Page 20

post #571 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtdiver70 View Post

Hey Everyone,
Thanks for the forum. Had the LG for 3 weeks and very happy and purchasing at Futureshop. Only one issue and I would like to see if anyone has a similar issue on their 70's.

Along the bottom edge where the LCD screen and the frame meet I have a white/translucent glue line (i thinK) that looks poorly finished. At one point it's breaks and there is 1/4 of the strip protruding up into the screen. Tried pulling at it just to test and it was strong enough to not break with tweezers. Anyone else notice this? I'm within my 30 day return policy and am thinking about returning for another unit.

Only factors against the return are that it's wallmounted (effort, sigh) and I don't want a unit that could be more faulty (hdmi port issues, dead pixels ect).

Thoughts? Responses?

Thanks.

PS. Overall would recommend this TV to anyone. Great unit.

I have a 52LG70 sitting in my living room floor I'll trade you straight up! It doesn't have a picture; but neither does it have any stray glue lines.
post #572 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomieDaClown View Post

I've read that countless Radeon HD 4xxx owners are disappointed with the image on their HDTV's. Switch to an Nvidia card and I'm sure your problems will go away.

As I previously posted, I seem to have one confirming data point to that theory. My MacBook Pro has an NVidia 8600 within, and it works like a charm with my LG70, with no big effort on my part.
post #573 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephious View Post

I'm almost positive of this. Virtually all the problems I can find with HDMI output to HDTVs are with HD4xxx series cards. Really disappointing, considering the fact that I was very happy to finally be able to purchase an ATI card worth owning again.

Even worse is the fact that most people, myself included, are going to blame the problem on the TV rather than the videocard as it being the videocard doesn't even make sense.


It's possible to find a perfect one, but it's definitely not worth the effort if the defect you have is incredibly tiny. The Toshiba 40RV525U I have now has no defects whatsoever. No uniformity issues, no dead pixels, no physical defects, and everything seems to work as it should.

I'm sure I can find something wrong with your Toshiba LCD. I know what to look for. I wish I didn't though....
post #574 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephious View Post

I'm almost positive of this. Virtually all the problems I can find with HDMI output to HDTVs are with HD4xxx series cards. Really disappointing, considering the fact that I was very happy to finally be able to purchase an ATI card worth owning again.

Even worse is the fact that most people, myself included, are going to blame the problem on the TV rather than the videocard as it being the videocard doesn't even make sense.


It's possible to find a perfect one, but it's definitely not worth the effort if the defect you have is incredibly tiny. The Toshiba 40RV525U I have now has no defects whatsoever. No uniformity issues, no dead pixels, no physical defects, and everything seems to work as it should.

I'm not sure about the videocard problem, but I guess I'll find out...I just bought this and was going to buy the Toshiba you just got, but BB had a package deal (42", 360 & install) and I'll sell the 360 as I don't need another version of games so I'll be getting a sweet deal...I'll be setting this up later tonight/tomorrow...This is going in my bedroom so I won't be watching it alot but when i do, I want it to look perfect...now I need an new receiver, etc...
post #575 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrj_gamz View Post

I'm not sure about the videocard problem, but I guess I'll find out...I just bought this and was going to buy the Toshiba you just got, but BB had a package deal (42", 360 & install) and I'll sell the 360 as I don't need another version of games so I'll be getting a sweet deal...I'll be setting this up later tonight/tomorrow...This is going in my bedroom so I won't be watching it alot but when i do, I want it to look perfect...now I need an new receiver, etc...

Be sure to update. I know for a fact it's a videocard problem, but whether it affects all HD4xxx series cards or just a ton of them, I do not know.
post #576 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharleyCross View Post

There is one problem with this set, though. Sometimes I find myself being so impressed with the image it's displaying that I get distracted from the content of what I'm actually viewing!

LOL. Oh man!! This happens to me too. All the time actually, and I am not new by any means to the High-def (or LCD for that matter) game. The wife all the time will look over and see me in an odd kinda "daydream gaze" and say.."Did you hear what he(the actor) just said?" And I'll look and think a second and respond with..."no..what?" I still love to be..("that guy") who nearly wets his pants toggling back and forth from the SD channel to the HD channel in astonishment. I'm 9 years old again with my first NES!!! LOL!!!
post #577 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by lofar View Post

Have you guys looked thoroughly at the cables you're using? Cable quality/brand shouldn't matter but there have been several HDMI specs released over the past couple of years. The set says it's version 1.3, I'm wondering if maybe these are older version 1.2 cables that are being used? v1.2 cables support 1080p but don't have the badwidth to support deep color of 24p or a lot of the new features. I would imagine that it's possible for the xbox and TV to sync at v1.3 over a 1.2 cable but then to have the 1.2 cable fail when they try to push that much data. That would also explain why 1080i and 720p work fine because the data rate on those is half of what 1080p is and probably 1/4 what 1080p with 24p and deep color is. It might also explain why it may work fine for a while but then fail with lines or other problems, as long as the source data is relatively low and the system is able to compress it for instance on a mostly black motionless screen but then when the source jumps to fast motion or a scene with a lot of color the cable fails again.

Just a thought.

-Nothing against your attempt at trouble shooting as it would make sense on the surface and that is what this forum is about but.... CABLE manufacturing companies that label 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 are just playing marketing games/tricks with people that follow ONLY spec sheets!!!! I will yell that all the way back to the front door of the companies that post that stuff. There is a website that ran tests with signal meters attached to a $7 china-cheap grade HDMI cable, a $25 mid grade HDMI cable, and a MONSTER $100 HDMI premium cable and all were able to pass test signals up to so many Mhz which was the equal of video sent at 1440p and 7.1 surround simultaneously down the barrel. The last thing noted is that the ONLY few things you might loose is less QC hands on, cheaper rubber/plastics used, maybe interference at distances over 10 feet, and a guaranty. Its not like they're adding more pin heads to the HDMI connector. The only pin heads being added are in marketing....bazzzzing!!! My .02 LOL
post #578 of 837
So the 360/hdmi/1080p issue is a TV problem from what I read??

I'm not sure... if I use the official Microsoft HDMI cable, I can send 1080p. If I use the $9 cable from our local place, it doesn't work....

Going to try some higher quality cable to see if that fixes it, otherwise I might just return the set, I only have 15 days to get a full refund and 30 days for in-store credit.
post #579 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by recklessftw View Post

So the 360/hdmi/1080p issue is a TV problem from what I read??

I'm not sure... if I use the official Microsoft HDMI cable, I can send 1080p. If I use the $9 cable from our local place, it doesn't work....

Going to try some higher quality cable to see if that fixes it, otherwise I might just return the set, I only have 15 days to get a full refund and 30 days for in-store credit.

Buy an HDMI cable from www.monoprice.com.
post #580 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by LCDSareKING View Post

-Nothing against your attempt at trouble shooting as it would make sense on the surface and that is what this forum is about but.... CABLE manufacturing companies that label 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 are just playing marketing games/tricks with people that follow ONLY spec sheets!!!! I will yell that all the way back to the front door of the companies that post that stuff. There is a website that ran tests with signal meters attached to a $7 china-cheap grade HDMI cable, a $25 mid grade HDMI cable, and a MONSTER $100 HDMI premium cable and all were able to pass test signals up to so many Mhz which was the equal of video sent at 1440p and 7.1 surround simultaneously down the barrel. The last thing noted is that the ONLY few things you might loose is less QC hands on, cheaper rubber/plastics used, maybe interference at distances over 10 feet, and a guaranty. Its not like they're adding more pin heads to the HDMI connector. The only pin heads being added are in marketing....bazzzzing!!! My .02 LOL

Not always true. You are correct that branding should not make any difference what so ever. However, cable ratings can make a huge difference. There may not be a pin-out difference but they can make vast changes to the inside of the cable, the thickness of the wires, the wrapping of the wires, the shielding between the wires, all of which allow the higher rated cables to carry more bandwidth. Do you believe that the differences between Cat 5, Cat 5e, Cat 6, and Cat 6a are all marketing BS? They all have the same pinout, but try running 1GB over Cat 5. It won't work, at almost any length. It's just like the electrical wire in your house, if you put in a 50 amp circuit for an electric dryer you need to run 10 or 12 gauge wire because the 14 gauge wire that you have in the rest of your house is simply too small to carry that much current and will burn up and start a fire.

The difference, I might imagine where you would find that HDMI 1.1 cables perform at higher specs might be in the name brands. A brand like monster cable charging $50 a foot for a cable is more likely to use more exacting processes and a higher quality or thicker gauge wire where as the cheaper ones are trying to cut down costs and are going to make the cables to meet exactly to speecifications and nothing more. So the monster 1.1 cable might perform more like a cheap 1.3 cable where as a cheap 1.1 cable will just crap out at anything higher than that.
post #581 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtdiver70 View Post

Along the bottom edge where the LCD screen and the frame meet I have a white/translucent glue line (i thinK) that looks poorly finished. At one point it's breaks and there is 1/4 of the strip protruding up into the screen. Tried pulling at it just to test and it was strong enough to not break with tweezers. Anyone else notice this? I'm within my 30 day return policy and am thinking about returning for another unit.

I see a little bit of this on my unit. But only when I look for it. I can't see when I'm sitting on the couch watching a movie. Not bothered at all.
post #582 of 837
post #583 of 837

My 5 dollar monorpice 10FT. HDMI cable does an awesome job with no artifacts whatsoever.
post #584 of 837
Got my 42LG70 delivered today.. Looks pretty good. I tried Homie's settings on page 10 but everything lookd way too red, not sure if his apply to the 42" though.

My only problem i've noticed so far is when I have my Tivo set to output Dolby Digital i get scratching noises in place of the bleeps and bloops when fast forwarding and playing etc. I also noticed one similar type of scratching noise when un-pausing a DVD. It was kind of wierd, i don't know what to make of it.
post #585 of 837
I got the 47LG70 several months ago when Fry's had it on sale for 1199. My old TV was a 36" HD Panasonic CRT which I owned for 5 years. After having had the TVs set-up side by side and performing countless tests, here's the bottom line:

For sports, cartoons and gaming (console or PC), the LCD has the upper hand. Sports especially look incredible. The 47LG70 does support 1920x1080 over VGA cable and it's perfect - looks better and sharper than over HDMI.

However, movies have been a huge disappointment. The black levels are really poor (non-existent compared the the CRT, really) and the TV has a really bad soap opera effect. I gave up on watching movies on this thing altogether. All I could think about while watching movies was the poor picture quality.

One thing that was discussed here which I also noticed is the audio lag with a home theater audio system. One workaround that works well for me is to leave the input on my receiver set to TV and let the audio flow thru the TV as opposed to going directly from the HD source (sat, dvd) to the receiver. The TV image processing seems to be introducing a delay but as long as you always route the audio thru the TV it seems to adjust for the delay and video/audio are in perfect sync.

In summary, the LCDs seem to have a long way to go before they get even close to picture quality of a traditional CRT when it comes to movies. I have regrets about making the purchase. Should've waited a couple more years for the LED gen.
post #586 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraP View Post

I got the 47LG70 several months ago when Fry's had it on sale for 1199. My old TV was a 36" HD Panasonic CRT which I owned for 5 years. After having had the TVs set-up side by side and performing countless tests, here's the bottom line:

For sports, cartoons and gaming (console or PC), the LCD has the upper hand. Sports especially look incredible. The 47LG70 does support 1920x1080 over VGA cable and it's perfect - looks better and sharper than over HDMI.

However, movies have been a huge disappointment. The black levels are really poor (non-existent compared the the CRT, really) and the TV has a really bad soap opera effect. I gave up on watching movies on this thing altogether. All I could think about while watching movies was the poor picture quality.

One thing that was discussed here which I also noticed is the audio lag with a home theater audio system. One workaround that works well for me is to leave the input on my receiver set to TV and let the audio flow thru the TV as opposed to going directly from the HD source (sat, dvd) to the receiver. The TV image processing seems to be introducing a delay but as long as you always route the audio thru the TV it seems to adjust for the delay and video/audio are in perfect sync.

In summary, the LCDs seem to have a long way to go before they get even close to picture quality of a traditional CRT when it comes to movies. I have regrets about making the purchase. Should've waited a couple more years for the LED gen.

Why don't you turn off the soap opera effect during movies if it bothers you?
post #587 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by taylor34 View Post

Why don't you turn off the soap opera effect during movies if it bothers you?

LOL that cracked me up. Wish it was that simple! The "soap opera" effect is not something you can turn on and off in a menu. It's a term used to describe a "side-effect" of some LCD TVs which makes movies look like they were shot with a cheap handycam. The lighting looks artificial and generally the picture has a "soap opera" like appearance.
post #588 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraP View Post

LOL that cracked me up. Wish it was that simple! The "soap opera" effect is not something you can turn on and off in a menu. It's a term used to describe a "side-effect" of some LCD TVs which makes movies look like they were shot with a cheap handycam. The lighting looks artificial and generally the picture has a "soap opera" like appearance.

Do you even own an LG70? I can turn off TruMotion "soap opera effect" in the menu and I'm sure every 120Hz LG70 owner can do the same.
post #589 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomieDaClown View Post

Do you even own an LG70? I can turn off TruMotion "soap opera effect" in the menu and I'm sure every 120Hz LG70 owner can do the same.

OK my bad on the soap opera effect...I thought it was the RealCinema setting which I did have set to OFF. With TruMotion=OFF, the soap opera effect is gone! Thanks!

Now, is there a MAGIC OPTION that enables BLACK color? Cause with "Black Level" set to Low or High and regardless of the level of Backlight (even at 0), all I'm seeing is shades of gray... The Star Wars scenes that take place in "space" look like someone poured a glass of milk all over the night sky...
post #590 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraP View Post

OK my bad on the soap opera effect...I thought it was the RealCinema setting which I did have set to OFF. With TruMotion=OFF, the soap opera effect is gone! Thanks!

Now, is there a MAGIC OPTION that enables BLACK color? Cause with "Black Level" set to Low or High and regardless of the level of Backlight (even at 0), all I'm seeing is shades of gray... The Star Wars scenes that take place in "space" look like someone poured a glass of milk all over the night sky...

standard setting
backlight 40-50
contrast 100
brightness 40-50
sharpness 60
color 65

fresh contrast = off
noise reduction = off
gamma = med
black level = low
real cinema = off
trumotion = off
white balance = med

Try that out. I use these settings and absolutely love them.
post #591 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraP View Post

One thing that was discussed here which I also noticed is the audio lag with a home theater audio system. One workaround that works well for me is to leave the input on my receiver set to TV and let the audio flow thru the TV as opposed to going directly from the HD source (sat, dvd) to the receiver. The TV image processing seems to be introducing a delay but as long as you always route the audio thru the TV it seems to adjust for the delay and video/audio are in perfect sync.

I see you got squared away on soap opera effect, but I wonder whether the same solution might just also apply to the sync problem you describe. This is a pure guess on my part, but it would seem that TruMotion takes some serious computation to create the interpolated frames, and I could see that introducing a lag in the image relative to the sound. It would be an interesting experiment now that you have TruMotion off to try your sound direct again. I have TM off for my Blu-ray player, with its 5.1 going straight to my AVR, not via the TV, and I've noticed no sync issues, and I tend to pick up on that sort of thing pretty quickly when others may not even notice.

I also seem to recall seeing something in my Blu-ray menus (a Sony) about configuring an audio delay, though I've never touched it. In other words, what you experience may be a sufficiently standard problem that there's a way to adjust for it, at least on some hardware.

Then again, you solved this as you described, so who cares about my musings?
post #592 of 837
So I think i figured out the audio problem with the TIVO. Apparenly you're not supposed to get those sounds when playing video streams with dolby digital audio because the tivo can't interject noise into the dolby digital stream. Though it doesn't quite explain why I get scratching in the audio instead of just no sound at all.


Now my new problem this morning when the sun hit it just right. There are a bunch of small dimples in the bezel almost like someone threw rocks at the bezel or something. And it's not just one, there's three in the middle of the left size, one on the side of the left side that looks like it was dropped and a bunch accross the bottom. Ugh, is this standard for these sets? Anyone else see this? You can only really see it if you have like reflecting from the sides and you look at an off angle.
post #593 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by lofar View Post

So I think i figured out the audio problem with the TIVO. Apparenly you're not supposed to get those sounds when playing video streams with dolby digital audio because the tivo can't interject noise into the dolby digital stream. Though it doesn't quite explain why I get scratching in the audio instead of just no sound at all.


Now my new problem this morning when the sun hit it just right. There are a bunch of small dimples in the bezel almost like someone threw rocks at the bezel or something. And it's not just one, there's three in the middle of the left size, one on the side of the left side that looks like it was dropped and a bunch accross the bottom. Ugh, is this standard for these sets? Anyone else see this? You can only really see it if you have like reflecting from the sides and you look at an off angle.

My set gets direct sunlight from an angle in the day and I don't see anything particularly wrong on my bezel. So far I'm pretty happy with my 52LG70.
post #594 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by lofar View Post

There are a bunch of small dimples in the bezel almost like someone threw rocks at the bezel or something. And it's not just one, there's three in the middle of the left size, one on the side of the left side that looks like it was dropped and a bunch accross the bottom. Ugh, is this standard for these sets? Anyone else see this?

Carefully examined the bezels on my 42LG70 (sits in a bright room, sun shining today) and didn't see any dimples. Maybe some very slight wavy-ness if I really look hard, but nothing approaching what you describe.
post #595 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharleyCross View Post

This is a pure guess on my part, but it would seem that TruMotion takes some serious computation to create the interpolated frames, and I could see that introducing a lag in the image relative to the sound.

Yeah, I would also think there's some serious computation going on for frame interpolation. Which leads me to ask, does anyone know - or want to speculate - the difference in frame interpolation, computation, etc. between Trumotion/low and Trumotion/high? Is Trumotion/high creating a new interpolated frame for *every* extra frame (accounting for some of the jerkiness because it's nearly pegging the TV's processor) whereas low is creating new frames for only *some* of the extra frames and just doubling the rest?
post #596 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultraP View Post

OK my bad on the soap opera effect...I thought it was the RealCinema setting which I did have set to OFF. With TruMotion=OFF, the soap opera effect is gone! Thanks!

Now, is there a MAGIC OPTION that enables BLACK color? Cause with "Black Level" set to Low or High and regardless of the level of Backlight (even at 0), all I'm seeing is shades of gray... The Star Wars scenes that take place in "space" look like someone poured a glass of milk all over the night sky...

Oh come on! No HDTV is capable of a true black and yes, the blacks on the LG70 look like a grayish-black but it looks fine to me and even superior to a 720p 2008 Panasonic Plasma. It really isn't as bad as you're making it seem. Try setting the Fresh Contrast to Low and Gamma to medium. Raise the brightness to 55 as well. Set the black level to low.

BTW, are you viewing your LG70 at angles or are you sitting in front of it?
post #597 of 837
Damn, thanks. I guess i'll call LG and get them to replace it. Probably better than returning it to amazon considering the screen looks great with no clouding or dead pixels. Returning it for a bad bezel would mean risking getting a replacement with some other problem.
post #598 of 837
The only time I remember seeing grey instead of black on the 47lg70 is when I was seated in a dark room at an angle. All LCDs will wash out when viewed from an angle, especially in the dark. LCDs are best viewed in a well lit environment and directly on.

If you are viewing your TV in a well lit, looking at it directly, and still seeing light shades of grey instead of black, then something is wrong with the panel, such as backlight bleading or clouding.

Let us know how things work out with LG support if you call them.
post #599 of 837
Well, my conversation with LG did not go well.

The sound issue, they said they don't have any documented problems like that. They can send a technician out and if they don't find the problem or find it is a problem with something else they will charge me.

As for the dimples in the bezel, they said it is cosmetic and is not covered under warranty.

I think i'm returning this for a refund and buying another brand. That's really lame.
post #600 of 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by lofar View Post

Well, my conversation with LG did not go well.

The sound issue, they said they don't have any documented problems like that. They can send a technician out and if they don't find the problem or find it is a problem with something else they will charge me.

As for the dimples in the bezel, they said it is cosmetic and is not covered under warranty.

I think i'm returning this for a refund and buying another brand. That's really lame.

Well, if you really do have a sound issue then I'm sure the LG tech will agree with you and fix the problem.

As for the bezel having dimples, it sucks but a lot of HDTV's have bezels with flaws on them. GL trying to find the perfect bezel and sorry about your troubles.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › 2008 LG XXLG70 Thread