or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › NAD M15HD Surround Sound Processor
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

NAD M15HD Surround Sound Processor - Page 15

post #421 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrunr View Post

Has anyone been able to compare this processor to the Anthem D2V? I am really curious to see how it would stack up.

I owned the original M15 and the Anthem D2 about two years ago. I preferred the NAD for sound quality. The NAD was smoother and more natural sounding. The Anthem by comparison sounded brighter and more electronic. The EQ and the video processing solutions in the Anthem are slightly better in terms of flexibility than the NAD, but the EQ and video board in the NAD are still very good.
post #422 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

I owned the original M15 and the Anthem D2 about two years ago. I preferred the NAD for sound quality. The NAD was smoother and more natural sounding. The Anthem by comparison sounded brighter and more electronic. The EQ and the video processing solutions in the Anthem are slightly better in terms of flexibility than the NAD, but the EQ and video board in the NAD are still very good.

wow Ive never heard that before! I have had many pre pros including theta casablanca, I now have the d2. I find the d2 very natural and effortless sounding and dialouge is superb. anthem support is top notch and the arc is great.

I have if paired up with the m25 amp and jm lab utopia speakers and love it!
post #423 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post


wow Ive never heard that before! I have had many pre pros including theta casablanca, I now have the d2. I find the d2 very natural and effortless sounding and dialouge is superb. anthem support is top notch and the arc is great.

I have if paired up with the m25 amp and jm lab utopia speakers and love it!

Really? Anthem is good but most shootouts between the two seem to leave critical listeners preferring the NAD for music playback.
post #424 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan_h View Post

Really? Anthem is good but most shootouts between the two seem to leave critical listeners preferring the NAD for music playback.

I was refering to how he described the anthem as "bright and electronic sounding. I havent heard the nad pre yet. I have a dealer very close I might give it a listen
post #425 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post

I was refering to how he described the anthem as "bright and electronic sounding. I havent heard the nad pre yet. I have a dealer very close I might give it a listen

I didn't mean for that comment to be taken in definitive terms, rather comparative. And the differences were slight.

This guy was more firm in his assertions however.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...ghlight=anthem
post #426 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

I didn't mean for that comment to be taken in definitive terms, rather comparative. And the differences were slight, not obvious.

no big deal Tim, but Im curious though, given your extensive sampling of gear what made you choose the classe over the nad?
post #427 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post

no big deal Tim, but Im curious though, given your extensive sampling of gear what made you choose the classe over the nad?

Well, at the time, NAD neither had the capability for HDMI audio nor EQ.

I'm not one to stay with one thing too long though. Speaking of, the Classe is now gone, and I plan to try out the newer NAD "HD" version.

My reason for parting with the Classe had nothing to do with the sound quality. I just got it in my mind that I didn't need a $9K prepro to get good sound. I'm finding now though, that I miss the quality of high end gear, so I'm slowly rebuilding my system to something that I'm happier with in both sound quality and build quality, but still less expensive overall than my last system.
post #428 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Well, at the time, NAD neither had the capability for HDMI audio nor EQ.

I'm not one to stay with one thing too long though. Speaking of, the Classe is now gone, and I plan to try out the newer NAD "HD" version.

My reason for parting with the Classe had nothing to do with the sound quality. I just got it in my mind that I didn't need a $9K prepro to get good sound. I'm finding now though, that I miss the quality of high end gear, so I'm slowly rebuilding my system to something that I'm happier with in both sound quality and build quality, but still less expensive overall than my last system.

We have recently installed a couple of the M15HDs. One is in a dedicated listening/viewing space with great acoustics. I have not compared it to other processors,but the sound is really really good. We are feeding a Sooloos Media Server into one of the Digital inputs of the NAD.Music is phenomonal. I think we are going to get more out of this system with some additional tweaking ,but this is by far our best home theater sound ever. The speakers are 7 custom built line arrays.We are driving them with custom Marchand/Hypex Crossover/amplfiers.
I have come to enjoy using the Dolby Prologic 2x Music mode. Having all the speakers working seems to really work in this room with music playback.
At any rate the NAD is great! Better than it should be for the money.
post #429 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Well, at the time, NAD neither had the capability for HDMI audio nor EQ.

I'm not one to stay with one thing too long though. Speaking of, the Classe is now gone, and I plan to try out the newer NAD "HD" version.

My reason for parting with the Classe had nothing to do with the sound quality. I just got it in my mind that I didn't need a $9K prepro to get good sound. I'm finding now though, that I miss the quality of high end gear, so I'm slowly rebuilding my system to something that I'm happier with in both sound quality and build quality, but still less expensive overall than my last system.

wow! didnt know you were getting rid of the classe! when are you getting the nad? did you change speakers too?

man I wish you lived closer to you, I would love to come along for the ride while you demo gear. lol
post #430 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddingle View Post

We have recently installed a couple of the M15HDs. One is in a dedicated listening/viewing space with great acoustics. I have not compared it to other processors,but the sound is really really good. We are feeding a Sooloos Media Server into one of the Digital inputs of the NAD.Music is phenomonal. I think we are going to get more out of this system with some additional tweaking ,but this is by far our best home theater sound ever. The speakers are 7 custom built line arrays.We are driving them with custom Marchand/Hypex Crossover/amplfiers.
I have come to enjoy using the Dolby Prologic 2x Music mode. Having all the speakers working seems to really work in this room with music playback.
At any rate the NAD is great! Better than it should be for the money.

Good to hear a bit more first hand experience with the newer M15HD version. I've only heard the previous M15. Well, that is not completely true. I did listen to the HD version about a month ago at the dealer's, but it was with unfamiliar speakers in and unfamiliar room with unfamiliar music, so I have no idea what contribution the M15HD made to the final product.
post #431 of 748
i just picked up the m15hd from my dealer, ill post my thoughts later this week
post #432 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post

i just picked up the m15hd from my dealer, ill post my thoughts later this week

Is it on loan or a purchase?
post #433 of 748
a loan
post #434 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post

a loan

Nice. Will you be comparing it to an Anthem, or something else? Any chance for a blind test?
post #435 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

I didn't mean for that comment to be taken in definitive terms, rather comparative. And the differences were slight.

This guy was more firm in his assertions however.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...ghlight=anthem

"This guy" had a serious hate-on for Anthem, while there was a lot of components he didn't like he was somewhat reserved when criticizing them, but when he discussed Anthem he seemed to go out of his way to cite how bad they were. I question objectivity there.

My take on Anthem is that they never "grabbed" me with their pre-amps' sound despite being a Paradigm fan and hearing them in every showroom I've auditioned Paradigms in. (I loved their PVA amp, a real sleeper IMO.)

The M15 was simply superb for music (over coax) and would still be in my rack if it weren't for the HDMI, or lack thereof. I wonder if anyone has done a comparison of of the M15 over coax vs the M15HD over HDMI with music?
post #436 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post

wow! didnt know you were getting rid of the classe! when are you getting the nad? did you change speakers too?

Yup, WB speakers gone too. I hope to pick up the NAD by the end of the month.

Quote:


man I wish you lived closer to you, I would love to come along for the ride while you demo gear. lol

You'd certainly be welcome to.
post #437 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnrgagne View Post

"This guy" had a serious hate-on for Anthem, while there was a lot of components he didn't like he was somewhat reserved when criticizing them, but when he discussed Anthem he seemed to go out of his way to cite how bad they were. I question objectivity there.

My take on Anthem is that they never "grabbed" me with their pre-amps' sound despite being a Paradigm fan and hearing them in every showroom I've auditioned Paradigms in. (I loved their PVA amp, a real sleeper IMO.)

The M15 was simply superb for music (over coax) and would still be in my rack if it weren't for the HDMI, or lack thereof. I wonder if anyone has done a comparison of of the M15 over coax vs the M15HD over HDMI with music?

yeah, I'm surprised there is so little action about the NAD Master Series stuff. It is very good sounding gear. But like you, the lack of HDMI audio wqith the original M15 was a deal breaker at the time.
post #438 of 748
I spent the week with the nad and I must say it sounds very nice!, setup is fairly easy and the layout on the back of the unit is similar to my D2 except the nad has no balanced connections and some other minor things. I did not have the ability to blind test nor do I have the desire to I was just curious of the sound and wanted to listen to it. I think the mc15hd has a bit warmer sound compared to my D2, I do prefer the sound of my D2 in my system it sounds a bit cleaner and more natural sounding especially with dialouge. When I bought my focals I found heavenly sound paired up with my D2 and nad m25 amp the center is spectacular to me. The nad is pretty tweak able but with the d2 you can tweak until the cows come home, I also love the the flexibility of the genum vidieo processor.

bottom line is if I was in the market for an ssp Im not sure I would spend the extra 3 or 4k on the D2. The nad is a great value piece and I definitely would recommend the nad mc15hd, it sounds great and priced right, audessy is a plus too!
post #439 of 748
Thanks for the impartial opinion of the M15HD. You bring up a very good point that we all need to remember. Personal preference and system matching play an important role in the decisions we each make, which makes it difficult if not impossible to judge any particular piece of gear as better than / worse than any other.
post #440 of 748
speaking of systems, what speakers are you eyeing now?
post #441 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra 150 pilot View Post

speaking of systems, what speakers are you eyeing now?

Audio Physic Virgo 25's. Ordered them about 6 weeks ago. Not sure when they will arive. Click on the link in my signature for more details. Pics in post #903.
post #442 of 748
What version is the HDMI on the NAD M15HD, 1.3, 1.4...is it upgradeable?
post #443 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replacement View Post

What version is the HDMI on the NAD M15HD, 1.3, 1.4...is it upgradeable?

1.3 and it *should* be upgradeable since the HDMI card in the M15HD can be removed and replaced, BUT there has been no announcement by NAD that they will be upgrading to 1.4 any time soon.
post #444 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

This guy was more firm in his assertions however.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...ghlight=anthem

interesting that this guy thought the NuForce AVP-16 processor (released in 2005) was best out of all products tested. Not bad considering it retails for $999.00
http://www.hometheatersound.com/equi...orce_avp16.htm
http://www.nuforce.com/hi/Documents/AVP-16-manual.pdf
post #445 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

interesting that this guy thought the NuForce AVP-16 processor (released in 2005) was best out of all products tested. Not bad considering it retails for $999.00
http://www.hometheatersound.com/equi...orce_avp16.htm
http://www.nuforce.com/hi/Documents/AVP-16-manual.pdf

Actually, according to Zissou's test, the Nu Force is a class "C" processor, and the M15 is class "A". The list goes from worst to best, top of the post to bottom.
post #446 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Actually, according to Zissou's test, the Nu Force is a class "C" processor, and the M15 is class "A". The list goes from worst to best, top of the post to bottom.

okay, I guess it was too good to be true. Thanks for pointing that out (me stupid)
post #447 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

okay, I guess it was too good to be true. Thanks for pointing that out (me stupid)

That's what you get for skimming.
post #448 of 748
Any news about firmware fix to the forced video fps conversion issue/bug?
post #449 of 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by igor555 View Post

c272 bridge mode not only adds power but it adds "sound" which much much more detailed and transparent. c 272 in stereo and bridge sounds like different level amps.


My same experience with 2x C275BEE amps. Bridged the midrange is much more detailed and highs are cleaner. I really didn't think there'd be an obvious audible difference but there you have it. I level matched everything before even listening to anything.
post #450 of 748
Any news on new MDC cards? Are the 150 and 150x just for the t7*5's or are they going to have something for the m15hd with 1.4. Just hoping for something with maybe audyssey xt32 and 1.4 hdmi.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › NAD M15HD Surround Sound Processor