AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › The Descent - 2 different Blu-ray versions CONFIRMED (MPEG-2 vs AVC encoding)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Descent - 2 different Blu-ray versions CONFIRMED (MPEG-2 vs AVC encoding) - Page 8

post #211 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCIFRTHS View Post

This is truly the only way to view this film. The US ending was horrible. I walked out of the theater with a bad taste in my mouth. It didn't make any sense to me .

When it was released on disk, I watched it at a friends house, as he missed it in the theater, and I was treated to the ending the way it was supposed to be.

Forgive me, so the AUS disc has a whole different ending than both of the branched US endings?
post #212 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacklac View Post

Forgive me, so the AUS disc has a whole different ending than both of the branched US endings?

Sorry. I didn't mean to imply that. I was told that the AUS ending was the "extended" ending, on the disk, released here in the states.

Don't click the button below if you don't want to know how the movie ends.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Spoiler  
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
The ending in the movie theater "cut to black" in the truck when Sarah saw Juno sitting in the passenger's seat. On disk, it cut back to the cave where it was obvious that Sarah was hallucinating/imagining that she had escaped.
post #213 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCIFRTHS View Post

Sorry. I didn't mean to imply that. I was told that the AUS ending was the "extended" ending, on the disk, released here in the states.

Don't click the button below if you don't want to know how the movie ends.

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Spoiler  
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
The ending in the movie theater "cut to black" in the truck when Sarah saw Juno sitting in the passenger's seat. On disk, it cut back to the cave where it was obvious that Sarah was hallucinating/imagining that she had escaped.

I'm glad I didn't see it in the movie theatre. That would have been disappointing. However, when I did see that scene on the disc, I wondered if it was as a backup for North American audiences. Guess so.
post #214 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuGsArEtAsTy View Post

I'm glad I didn't see it in the movie theatre. That would have been disappointing. However, when I did see that scene on the disc, I wondered if it was as a backup for North American audiences. Guess so.

i went just to see my friend as well as the audience jump. (sadly, they spoiled one of the most chilling parts in the US trailer) i enjoyed it quite well, regardless of the ending (which i knew about ahead of time .. hell, i'd downloaded it first, and even on a 19" LCD it was intense .. i then promptly bought it in PAL from the UK), and had probably seen it 4 or 5 times before it hit the US.
post #215 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxyMulder View Post

The one i have is MPEG 2 bought from Movietyme and far from sucking it looks excellent....Perhaps you dislike grain.

I will be interested to know though if AVC makes a difference to the image quality so i am looking forward to a comparison screenshot war between the versions.

There is absolutely nothing on the box packaging to suggest the codec used but the packaging does say 6.1 pcm uncompressed audio although the Playstation reads it as 7.1 although i don't have a receiver capable of uncompressed yet so can't say how it plays.

Catalog number on the disc says 20593 if that helps anyone.

I got mine from a Circuit City BOGO around a year ago (October, I think). The catalog IPC is 0-31398-20593-7-80. So is there a different catalog number for the AVC version?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxyMulder View Post

It's BVDL-004320A1 10/BVDL-004320B1 7 that i have. Only difference to Lyris is the very last numbers on each...The 10 and 7.

That's mine as well, 10 and 7.

Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan View Post

Darn, identical to the MPEG-2 package then.

Double darn !

Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan View Post

Well... the good news is I managed to do the exchange and got an AVC copy! The bad news is I wasn't paying attention when I picked it up. I just made sure of the case type and top sticker, then shoved it into the stack of $5 HD DVDs I picked up. Meanwhile there's a massive gash in the front cover and the top of the acetate is cut off! I didn't notice until partway through unwrapping but I checked and there's no slice through the shrinkwrap, so it was hacked up before being sealed!





Here are all of the codes on the data-side rings of my AVC copy.

IFPI L322 A04 BVDL-004320A1 3
IFPI L322 A06 BVDL-004320B1 04

Finally two of us have the same trailing numbers on the BVDL code as this matches Deviation's AVC copy that he also just bought the other day.

My case & cover exactly matches your new cover (including the top seal text and number), and yet I have these codes:
IFPI L321 A04 BVDL-004320A1 10
IFPI L322 A05 BVDL-004320B1 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan View Post

Windows just shows the volume labels for both discs as LOGICAL_VOLUME_ID. AnyDVD can actually read them properly.

AVC version: 71843914_DESCENT_BD
MPEG-2 version: 78862892_DESCENT_BD

Just another difference you can only check out if you've got a BD-ROM drive, but interesting nonetheless

I can't check this !

Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan View Post

Another difference I didn't notice initially, the silk screen art on the AVC disc is much darker than on the MPEG-2 disc. Again probably nothing to do with the disc version as FoxyMulder's MPEG-2 disc pic looks more like my AVC disc than my MPEG-2.



And on the data side, the AVC disc has an added silver ring covering up most of the white backing. This isn't a BV vs EM difference as most of my Lionsgate EMs have it as well. Maybe it's totally random. FoxyMulder, your input is required!



The inserts are different between the BV and EM.
My AVC BV: 9855VQBLURAY3 and 9855VQBLURAY2
FoxyMulder's MPEG-2 BV: 9855VQBLURAY3 (and 9855VQBLURAY2?)
My MPEG-2 EM: 3000006864

My disc looks the same as yours on both sides, but I've only one insert -- 9855VQBLURAY3.

So do I have AVC or MPEG2 ?
post #216 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuGsArEtAsTy View Post

I'm glad I didn't see it in the movie theatre. That would have been disappointing. However, when I did see that scene on the disc, I wondered if it was as a backup for North American audiences. Guess so.


I read that one of the "conditions" of the US distribution was to change the ending (obviously so there could be a $equel). All they did was chop off the last scene

SPOILER if you follow this link - the ending info is described here on Wikipedia. Scroll down to EDITING. I think it's insulting - even if the market research is true. I also feel that the director just went along with it for the $$$ of releasing it in the US market - even though he claims another reason.
post #217 of 789
I drove to a Circuit City about half an hour's freeway drive from my house and found a couple copies of The Descent there. Both had the numbers on the top sticker, and I crossed my fingers hoping I'd get home and have the AVC encoded version.

Luckily, I did! Looks beautiful too, by the way. Only drag is I had to pay $30 plus tax, but whatever.

The other copy there is likely an AVC one as well, so if anyone's interested, I could make another trip back to pick it up--but ONLY if you guarantee you'll buy it, even if it turns out to be an MPEG-2 copy. Selling it if it isn't an AVC version is your problem. I may just buy it anyway, crack it open, make sure it's an AVC copy, and then sell it on eBay if nobody here is interested.
post #218 of 789
Just checked mine...AVC. Phew.
post #219 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriztoffer Swank View Post

The other copy there is likely an AVC one as well, so if anyone's interested, I could make another trip back to pick it up--but ONLY if you guarantee you'll buy it, even if it turns out to be an MPEG-2 copy. Selling it if it isn't an AVC version is your problem. I may just buy it anyway, crack it open, make sure it's an AVC copy, and then sell it on eBay if nobody here is interested.

If anyone is interested, just sell and mail it sealed so you don't even know what it is until they get it, which would presumably mean no hard feelings directed towards you if it ends up being MPEG2.
post #220 of 789
I wouldn't stress over AVC vs MPEG2 on this title. Both are crappy looking transfers IMO, and though AVC has more film grain it also makes the chroma errors in the transfer (i.e. easily visible during credits) more pronounced.
post #221 of 789
Big difference to me. Even worth the double dip, IMO. I don't watch credits... I like grain though.
post #222 of 789
Considering the AVC version is one of the most filmic and beautiful HD transfers I've seen, I'd say it is worth tracking down.
post #223 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruined View Post

I wouldn't stress over AVC vs MPEG2 on this title. Both are crappy looking transfers IMO, and though AVC has more film grain it also makes the chroma errors in the transfer (i.e. easily visible during credits) more pronounced.

Is this why the AVC is hard to find?
post #224 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriztoffer Swank View Post

Considering the AVC version is one of the most filmic and beautiful HD transfers I've seen, I'd say it is worth tracking down.

Agreed. It astounds me that anyone could call the AVC encode of THE DESCENT "crappy". Then again, some people are happy with [insert title of crummy-looking BD here]...
post #225 of 789
Yes. If all the BDs I've seen looked as crappy as my AVC encode The Descent disc, I'd be one, big, happy camper.

larry
post #226 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiggles View Post

Agreed. It astounds me that anyone could call the AVC encode of THE DESCENT "crappy". Then again, some people are happy with [insert title of crummy-looking BD here]...

I'm similarly astounded anyone could call the AVC encode excellent when there are so many artifacts on lettering in the film (rainbows/chroma fringing/ghosting). While the AVC definitely is sharper and has more preserved grain structure, the visual artifacts are similarly more pronounced as a result. Its too bad that there is no AVC/VC-1 encoding of the unrated cut that looks as good as the end credits of the rated cut.
post #227 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralfi View Post

I just bought the Australian version today, but only realised after bringing it home that the back cover only states "DTS HD 5.1" & "DD5.1" (No PCM!). It's probably MPEG 2, knowing how we get shafted down under....

The thing is, it's a BD-50 disc, so i'm wondering if there is infact a PCM track on it & it's just not mentioned on the back cover....

I'm wondering if I order the Original Unrated Cut from amazon, will I be getting the best picture quality version to go along with the PCM audio, which I know it will have???



EDIT:
I've now tested the disc & discovered some good news for Aussies!

To my surprise, the audio IS actually DTS-HDMA, & the video codec is AVC, so i'm relieved now...no need to import imo.

So the audio stated on the back of the Australian versions' cover (DTS HD) is incorrect. It is DTS-HDMA (5.1, according to my PS3), along with the Dolby Digital 5.1 track stated on the cover.

Hope this helps.

Just to add to what Ralfi said, I already had the US MPEG-2 version (ordered from amazon in early 2008 before I knew about these 2 different versions) and after reading about the Australian version being AVC, I ordered myself a copy.

It arrived the other day, i've compared the two and i'll just say that it is head and shoulders better than the US MPEG-2 version. The grain is back and the PQ looks great. I'm pretty amazed at the difference to be honest. There is also no chromatic aberration on the credits or the rest of the lettering in the film, unlike the US AVC version. It's a BD-50 Blu-ray disc as well. However it doesn't have as many extras as the US version, its missing the US ending (sad I know) and it doesn't have spanish subtitles. The colours in certain scenes seem to me to be an improvement on the MPEG-2 version as well IMO. I wouldn't be surprised if this release was the equal, or perhaps better, than the US AVC version. I'd love to see an image comparison done between the australian version and the US AVC version.
post #228 of 789
End credits just aren't a deal breaker to me...
post #229 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkong650 View Post

Just to add to what Ralfi said, I already had the US MPEG-2 (ordered from amazon in early 2008 before I knew about these 2 different versions) and after reading about the Australian version being AVC, I ordered myself a copy.

It arrived the other day, i've compared the two and i'll just say that it is head and shoulders better than the US MPEG-2 version. The grain is back and the PQ looks great. I'm pretty amazed at the difference to be honest. There is also no chromatic aberration on the credits or the rest of the lettering in the film, unlike the US AVC version. It's a BD-50 Blu-ray disc as well. However it doesn't have as many extras as the US version, its missing the US ending (sad I know) and it doesn't have spanish subtitles. The colours in certain scenes seem to me to be an improvement on the MPEG-2 version as well IMO. I wouldn't be surprised if this release wasn't the equal, or perhaps better, than the US AVC version. I'd love to see an image comparison done between the australian version and the US AVC version.

This AUS disc sounds like the one I want. Too bad its so darn expensive right now!
post #230 of 789
I just checked mine and it seems i have the mpeg-2 (its unopened as i bought it and haven't watched it yet). Suggestions on how to swap em?
post #231 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruined View Post

This AUS disc sounds like the one I want. Too bad its so darn expensive right now!

I ordered mine from dvdorchard for 50 australian dollars including shipping (20 australian dollars for shipping) to Spain, which comes out at around 26 euros. That's around the price blu-rays go for here so I thought the price wasn't too bad, considering it got shipped all the way from australia.
post #232 of 789
I'll assume that the Australian disc in the correct 2.35:1 aspect ratio, as the DVD was cropped to 16x9.
post #233 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by raoul_duke View Post

I'll assume that the Australian disc in the correct 2.35:1 aspect ratio, as the DVD was cropped to 16x9.

Yup, definately 2.35:1, same as the US bluray.
post #234 of 789
Thank you. You've convinced me to sell my US disc and order the Australian one. £12.99 on cdwow.com, where I also got my American Psycho disc from. Looking forward to it.
post #235 of 789
Quote:


its missing the US ending (sad I know)

?? You forgot the smiley.

larry
post #236 of 789
I didn't buy it yet cause many said this previous version cannot playback on many BD player even after FW. update,so this one I must.
post #237 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgohan View Post

Another difference I didn't notice initially, the silk screen art on the AVC disc is much darker than on the MPEG-2 disc. Again probably nothing to do with the disc version as FoxyMulder's MPEG-2 disc pic looks more like my AVC disc than my MPEG-2.



And on the data side, the AVC disc has an added silver ring covering up most of the white backing. This isn't a BV vs EM difference as most of my Lionsgate EMs have it as well. Maybe it's totally random. FoxyMulder, your input is required!



The inserts are different between the BV and EM.
My AVC BV: 9855VQBLURAY3 and 9855VQBLURAY2
FoxyMulder's MPEG-2 BV: 9855VQBLURAY3 (and 9855VQBLURAY2?)
My MPEG-2 EM: 3000006864

Still have to compare CRCs of files and check out the JAR structure. Google told me you can extract it using WinRAR to see the directories inside. Also need to make sure both discs are Region Free.

Just checked my copy and it's AVC - darker silk screen, silver ring, same 2 inserts, etc.

I bought this January 2008 at Best Buy.
post #238 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by butsu View Post

I didn't buy it yet cause many said this previous version cannot playback on many BD player even after FW. update,so this one I must.

One odd thing I noticed about the AVC copy is that when it's paused or left on the menu screen it will stay there. If you play it it will get going but you can eject it and the image will stay on the screen until you close the tray or put another disc in. Everything plays just fine and there are not stutters or anything like that but I thought it was kind of strange. (playing on a Pany BD55)
post #239 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by PooperScooper View Post

?? You forgot the smiley.

larry

Nah, just an english habit of deadpanning I haven't got rid of yet.
post #240 of 789
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkong650 View Post

Nah, just an english habit of deadpanning I haven't got rid of yet.

I wasn't sure if you were sad missing the (inferior) US ending or not.

larry
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Software
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Software › The Descent - 2 different Blu-ray versions CONFIRMED (MPEG-2 vs AVC encoding)