AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › One Antenna Solution for VHF Lo, UHF and FM
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

One Antenna Solution for VHF Lo, UHF and FM

post #1 of 29
Thread Starter 
I did a search, but I didn't find anything. I also realized this should be titled 'VHF Hi, UHF and FM. My Big bad! I live in zip code 48442 and get decent digital reception with a Radio Shack VU90 with rotor, Winegard mast mount amp driven to a passive 4 way splitter into RG6 routed to two TVs, a DVD recorder and my FM tuner. After the Feb '09 analog shutoff, I will have no TV broadcast on VHF-Lo (thankfully,) a few stations on VHF-Hi that I receive pretty well now via their analog counterparts, and most TV will be on UHF. My area is also really rich with FM broadcasting, and a variety of stuff on public radio. Here's my dilemma...

I have a few stations that are a little flaky to receive at times, and a larger antenna for gain seems to be where I am at. However, I am already pushing the envelope a bit with the neighborhood association on the looks issue. The idea of something like the CM2018 is pretty good. However, I'd like to find a compact but high gain antenna that would handle VHF-Hi, UHF and FM only. I don't need the extra size or elements for VHF-lo and want an 'one antenna' solution - the size could be devoted to the higher bands. I tried raising my present antenna, but unfortunately extra height pushes me deep into a canopy of trees that kills my reception for Detroit locals (read multipath.) If I 'look under' some of the foliage I am OK (read no multipath.) Any suggestions?

As a note, if you run the zip code via Antennaweb.org at 150 ft height, I currently receive some reception from everything on the list. The yellows through greens are pretty solid. The red through violet less so. Thanks for the input!
post #2 of 29
You would need a full VHF band antenna if you want a 1 antenna solution that will receive FM also. The Channel Master 2018 and similar channel 7-52 antennas aren't designed for the lower FM frequencies.(There is quite a gap between channel 6 & 7. FM is right above channel 6)

How about a compact Channel Master, or Winegard for TV, and a small separate antenna for FM? (I prefer the Winegard because of the better UHF reception) The separate FM antenna should outperform what you are using now. I have found that FM works best (cleaner sound) without amplifying anyway.
post #3 of 29
Thread Starter 
That separate FM solution might be a plan. Do you lose much signal with a 75 ft cable run of RG6 on FM sans signal amp? That's the approximate distance from the antenna to my receiver.

Thanks.
post #4 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozzmonster View Post

That separate FM solution might be a plan. Do you lose much signal with a 75 ft cable run of RG6 on FM sans signal amp? That's the approximate distance from the antenna to my receiver.

Thanks.

No,

The loss on FM is very low with RG-6 cable. You could easily have 100 or so feet with no noticable loss on FM. I don't quite know what you mean by the "FM sans signal amp" though. I have used a small directional Radio Shack antenna in the past and had no problems with stations up to 100 miles out. I did try amplifying; but it just made the signal noisier when listening in "stereo"
post #5 of 29
I'm running about that far to my multiroom distribution system with no other amp for VHF, and FM is fine.

I'm using a UHF antenna preamped, and no preamp on a VHF/FM antenna, combined right before they go into the multiroom distribution system.

I'm playing with the idea of getting a 7-69 antenna with an FM antenna myself, right now it's just money that is holding me back.
post #6 of 29
Signal loss over 75 feet of RG-6 at 100 MHz is about 1.5 dB, versus 3.9 dB at channel 35. A high-gain, dedicated antenna is more than a match for that loss. And I can vouch for DR: FM from a pre-amped antenna adds noise that can cause noticeable waveform clipping. You might be surprised at how clean even analog FM sounds after removing amplification from the signal source. I certainly was.
post #7 of 29
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the input. I wasn't aware of a signal amp impacting analog sound quality on FM.

I have a spare CM 4221 in the shed. I could pair that with an FM antenna to get what I want via a two antenna/two downlead setup. How does the 4221 perform on VHF Hi? I have three stations that will put their DTV on VHF Hi after the switch over. With two of these (ch 7 and ch 12) I can currently receive a high quality analog signal on these channels via rabbit ear antenna in the house. The other (ch 10) I get a somewhat fuzzy analog picture with my current antenna, but reception of this one isn't a priority for me. Of course, I am making a lot of assumptions comparing analog vs digital reception on the same band. Thanks again.
post #8 of 29
I doubt you will have much luck with the 4221 on VHF 7 & 12. They look too weak based on your zip code results. You will probably need a VHF-Hi antenna for those 2.
post #9 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Rules View Post

I doubt you will have much luck with the 4221 on VHF 7 & 12. They look too weak based on your zip code results. You will probably need a VHF-Hi antenna for those 2.

There are other Fox and ABC stations available on UHF, so perhaps it is not needed, but the stations are all over the chart for this ZIP code.

Bozzmonster, can you provide a TVFool.com plot for your location? A ZIP code plot isn't very reliable if there are any hills around, etc.

An FM antenna does not need to be nearly as wide for a 2-6 antenna, though 2-4 add the most width for a combo L/H/U antenna. I wonder if we will see any FM/Upper VHF/UHF combos down the road.

The 4221 isn't all that bad (or good) for 12, but it's a very poor performer for 7.
post #10 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozzmonster View Post

I have a few stations that are a little flaky to receive at times, and a larger antenna for gain seems to be where I am at.

Your preamp may be your limiting factor. Do you have the HDP-269 preamp, or another Winegard model? If not the HDP-269, I'd try one.

Are the flaky stations any better if you use a two way splitter instead of a four way? If so, use one two way to feed the tuner that you use most often and then a three way for the other devices.

If your preamp is overloaded now you can wait until February and see if the stations that are flaky get better without you doing anything.
post #11 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozzmonster View Post

Thanks for the input. I wasn't aware of a signal amp impacting analog sound quality on FM.

The preamp would have to be significantly overloaded for that to occur.
post #12 of 29
Thread Starter 
I appreciate the input . I attached my TV Fool report per coordinates here. I ran a report for today and after the transition. Digital only. To add input:

'Flaky' stations are those a little hard to grab, or suffer occasional dropouts. In general, I receive pretty much all in green and yellow into the pink. My stations here generally no problem, except for WKAR-DT. That is extremely hard to grab no matter the weather. However, I think I may be blocked by an industrial plant in that direction. Once the neighbor trimmed a tree in that direction, it did gain me about 10 dB on WKAR and a somewhat watchable signal. Strange thing is WILX-DT and to a lesser extent WLAJ-DT in the same general direction are much easier to grab. In fact, I can point away from WILX and receive it quite well.

WWJ-DT and WTVS-DT (CBS and PBS respectively) are Detroit locals for me and a priority. I suffer occasional dropouts on these, and depending on weather the same on WDIV, WXYZ and WJBK. However, I am shooting right through the trees on these. I can see some multipath on the analog signal for WWJ. I think that is my issue. We are in a pretty tree filled area.

On the inverse, WDCP, one of the farthest signals for me, comes booming in and I can pick it up pointing away from the tranny. You figure it out! I note that that direction is clear sailing and very flat. Helps me for WNEM, WJRT and WEYI as well - I don't have to use the rotor for those three.

In general, I am pretty happy as my main networks (ABC, NBC and PBS plus Fox) pose me no problems. CBS is my problem maker. WLNS comes in fine, but I have to turn the antenna for that one network. In general, I can point SE and receive everything in Detroit. WADL is a no show no matter what.

My amp is a Winegard AP 8700 mast mount. I am far enough away from all stations that overload doesn't seem to be a problem, even with WFUM. I don't have any hills in the area. There is a small ridge to my SE in the direction of Detroit, but it slopes gently either direction.

As you can see, a rotor is a must in my area, but I am pretty well covered with DT in the area. Yes, I do get a very slight bump in signal rating (add a dB or two) if I use a two way vs four way splitter. Not enough to tear up the whole set up, however. I am at a point now where I receive everything, I just want just a touch more reliability to cover weather issues.

I got rid of cable and rely only on OTA and only digital. I receive enough and with reliability that I don't need to return to cable for the OTA stuff. I like the Detroit locals as the picture quality is generally a bit better and I do business in the area. Otherwise, I use the web and download/stream content.

Hope the attachments work. This is the first time I tried. You also might be interested in a spreadsheet that lists the subchannels and other data I gathered.
LL
LL

 

Signal-Test-Worksheet.zip 12.10546875k . file
post #13 of 29
I'm looking at the new Channel Master Catalog and it shows some new combo designs:

http://www.channelmasterintl.com/doc...g_20080731.pdf

Check out the new Advantage series with 60" widths (on page 4). This is wider than they would need for 7-13, so I'm wondering if they are trying for FM reception as well (though it is not advertised).

There are also the new 7-69 Winegards, but they are quite a bit narrower and probably won't be useful for FM. Here is an example.

http://www.solidsignal.com/prod_disp...p?prod=HD7694P
post #14 of 29
I'm in exactly the same boat, and I was starting to wonder if anyone else is still interested in FM reception until I found this thread!

I'm thinking of getting a VHF-high/UHF antenna, seeing how it does on FM and then add an FM antenna if necessary.

Bozzmonster (or anyone)... What have you tried--is it working well for you? And does anyone have experience with either the Winegard HD7694P or the CM-2016 or CM-2018? Those all seem to be designed exactly for 2009 TV...
post #15 of 29
I thought the new CM Advantage line was going to have antennas covering FM, Upper VHF and UHF. I see them on the following page, but when I click on them it loads a page with the older models.

http://www.channelmasterintl.com/terr/outdoor.html
post #16 of 29
I have used 2 of these in my life and very pleased.

Here shows it's the same antenna

http://www.ham-radio.com/k6sti/fm6.htm

Believe it or not Summit Source beats Solid Signal on the price hands down. Might even find one cheaper.

http://www.summitsource.com/antennac...le-p-6055.html

http://www.solidsignal.com/prod_display.asp?PROD=FM6
post #17 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcon_77 View Post

I thought the new CM Advantage line was going to have antennas covering FM, Upper VHF and UHF. I see them on the following page, but when I click on them it loads a page with the older models.

http://www.channelmasterintl.com/terr/outdoor.html

I think you're looking for these:

CM DIGITAL ADVANTAGEtenna
They compete directly with Winegard HD7694P.

They are not designed for FM, just VHF-high and up, but they will probably get most FM, just not the lower end. I'm also wishing there were an FM/VHF-high/UHF antenna. The older CM-3016 series covers FM/VHF/UHF but they're much larger.
post #18 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukequazar View Post

I'm in exactly the same boat, and I was starting to wonder if anyone else is still interested in FM reception until I found this thread!

I'm thinking of getting a VHF-high/UHF antenna, seeing how it does on FM and then add an FM antenna if necessary.

Bozzmonster (or anyone)... What have you tried--is it working well for you? And does anyone have experience with either the Winegard HD7694P or the CM-2016 or CM-2018? Those all seem to be designed exactly for 2009 TV...

For tv reception, the 7694 wins the competition handily over the two CM. The winegard has much better gain in the high vhf range and for some channels in the UHF range.
post #19 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukequazar View Post

They compete directly with Winegard HD7694P.

I am not ganging up on your just a second opinion that says they were no where close to the new Winegard 769xP line of antennas.

It's probably just words you choose but compete directly makes sound like they are as good and they aren't as far as money for gain.

In my opinion the Antennacraft HBU22 is closer to competition

To me the problem with the new CM line is there is not enough VHF in their antennas.

I don't work for any body at the moment, that is my problem!
post #20 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDRick View Post

For tv reception, the 7694 wins the competition handily over the two CM. The winegard has much better gain in the high vhf range and for some channels in the UHF range.

Yeah, I just looked at that, MUCH better! Wow, it seems that they shouldn't be calling it a VHF antenna at all. Do you have one?
post #21 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggie View Post

I am not ganging up on your just a second opinion that says they were no where close to the new Winegard 769xP line of antennas.

It's probably just words you choose but compete directly makes sound like they are as good and they aren't as far as money for gain.

In my opinion the Antennacraft HBU22 is closer to competition

To me the problem with the new CM line is there is not enough VHF in their antennas.

I don't work for any body at the moment, that is my problem!

No, you're completely right, I hadn't looked at the specs closely enough--they compete in marketing only... And the HBU22 seems to be between the two in VHF gain. I think I'll order the Winegard--it's the best on paper, at least.

Has anyone here actually tried any of these new antennae?
post #22 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukequazar View Post

No, you're completely right, I hadn't looked at the specs closely enough--they compete in marketing only... And the HBU22 seems to be between the two in VHF gain. I think I'll order the Winegard--it's the best on paper, at least.

Has anyone here actually tried any of these new antennae?

No, they came out after I upgraded my antenna system for the new channels in my area. I could have bought the 7696P with a rotor for what I have in 2 YA-1713s, and a CM4221.

There is a thread here about them. No one though very few reports has been unhappy.

Some of to me the Ford vs Chevy debate, which today is the Toyota vs Nissan vs Honda debate.

Over the years CM was always a good choice. But the new antennas they have come out with in the last year to me are below par for their history. Remaking the 4220, 4221, 4228 from antenna that were known to work to very slight improvements for now double the price. The new line you pointed out misses the point. If you read enough threads here and in the Local HDTV you see normally the problem is more gain on VHF.

Though the HBU22 seems to be a good antenna, for $20 more about you can get the 7694P, which is twice the antenna. One thing good about the HBU like the 769xP series is the UHF and VHF are balanced.

I am a little miffed at Ant Direct for the same thing I see on the CM add. They say their antenna cover channels 7 thru 13, HD. Are there special HD channels? Special antennas? NO NO NO.. hype. Also they rate their antennas in miles. Look at the 2018 vs 2020. They claim the 2020 has more VHF range than the 2018, but from the limitation of the pictures, I appears to me both of those antennas have the same VHF section.

Even weirder the 2018 and 2020 at both Summit and SolidSignal are all $69.95. That is weird. Why have the 2018 if it costs the same as the 2020. Thought it was a typo but if so it's a typo at both stores.

And way, that was not a non-partisan on my part! :@)
post #23 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukequazar View Post

Yeah, I just looked at that, MUCH better! Wow, it seems that they shouldn't be calling it a VHF antenna at all. Do you have one?

Unfortunately, no I don't own one but it would work well in my situation as well. I really like the build quality and superb gain numbers for an antenna it's size.

Best,

Rick
post #24 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDRick View Post

Unfortunately, no I don't own one but it would work well in my situation as well. I really like the build quality and superb gain numbers for an antenna it's size.

Best,

Rick

If you take away what I call "gimmick" antennas everyone sells. Winegard hits the market very well with good fights. Everyone has exceptions. the HD-1080 really need a bigger reflector to improve it's VHF gain, though there are markets for the price where it works well. The old CM422x series were winners. To me AntennaCraft electrically is thinking and has a lot of good market fits. Mechanically I wonder how they hold up in snow and ice. But for example I have their FM6 on a small pole, not exposed to high winds (mostly) and no ice in Florida. For the price it kicks the Llama behind.
post #25 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukequazar View Post

I think you're looking for these:

CM DIGITAL ADVANTAGEtenna
They compete directly with Winegard HD7694P.

All I see there is the CM2016. I was looking for the CM2018 and 2020 that was in their catalog. They are 60" wide and should perform better for FM than the 2016. Solid Signal still shows them as pre-orders:

http://www.solidsignal.com/prod_disp...p?prod=CM-2018
http://www.solidsignal.com/prod_disp...p?prod=CM-2020

I thought they would have been available by now.
post #26 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggie View Post

To me AntennaCraft electrically is thinking and has a lot of good market fits. Mechanically I wonder how they hold up in snow and ice. But for example I have their FM6 on a small pole, not exposed to high winds (mostly) and no ice in Florida. For the price it kicks the Llama behind.

I agree about the excellent performance of the Radio Shack/Antennacraft FM antennas. I have used both of the older Radio Shack yagis' years ago and they held up very well in Northern Virginia winters.(Radio Shack used to sell a double boom 10 foot yagi back in the day) I bought the Radio Shack FM6 equivalent later, and it seemed to work just as well as the 10 footer. They were both selective enough to get as many as 3 different stations on the exact same frequency when rotated.
post #27 of 29
I have the HBU22 antenna. It's working very well for me. Much better than the 25 year old monster it replaced.
post #28 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdoppke View Post

I have the HBU22 antenna. It's working very well for me.

For FM? Not likely, unless you are in a real, non-demanding situation.

Realistically, no one is likely to manufacture an antenna that is tuned for 88-108 MHz, as well as for VHF high and UHF. Fortunately, most people's FM reception needs can be met with just about anything that is up on the roof, regardless of its FM gain, but if someone needs FM gain in their situation, the only answer is to go with two antennas, as suggested above.
post #29 of 29
Thread Starter 
Didn't think this thread would regain life, but it seems it has . I am going to look over some of the suggestions and consider them for spring. The specialized FM splitter is an option I'm seriously considering if I go with the one antenna solution and may even try it now. However, I am thinking the single purpose FM Yagi with one of the VHF Hi/UHF combos might be my best bet. I have definitely decided to stay put until the entire transition is complete (possibly June '09 depending on the whims of Congress.) I did some fine tuning (replaced cables and connectors in the house), so actually the channels that were a bit 'flaky' are somewhat less so. I also gained a few dBs on the signal meter. My goal, which I achieved, was to tweak my set up until received an affiliate for each of the networks that NEVER drops out. That I achieved, so I'm happy for now.

At least I don't have to replace my rotor. It was frozen in one place for about a month. The one day we had above freezing seems to have allowed it to start rotating again. It was kind of nice being able to select from three different NBC afilliates for the Super Bowl (WDIV, WEYI and WILX respectively).

Keep replying... the reading is interesting. Thanks!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › One Antenna Solution for VHF Lo, UHF and FM