Quote:
Originally Posted by kenshin-san 
Yes. The 1680ix has known compatibility issues with a wide range of sata hdd's. My understanding is that Western Digital and Seagate NS (Enterprise) are the only recommended sata hdd's at this point.
After almost 2 weeks of troubleshooting I have a raid 6 array of WD1001FALS that is FINALLY solid. It has run for 15 hours with Winthrax thrashing it with no problem; I'm now running IOMeter against it with no issues (Currently on hour 24). Unfortunately it is only capable of sequential write speeds up to 80MB/sec (500MB/sec for sequential reads). I measured write speeds of 300-400MB/sec with Seagate 1TB AS drives (SD15 fw), so I know that something is up. I'm guessing it's firmware related.
Odditory has a 1680ix and a set of WD1001FALS hdd's. I'm waiting to hear what his experience is like once he's done testing.
I've attached my communication string with Areca Support. Axan has also posted his email communication's with Areca support over on hardforum.

Yes. The 1680ix has known compatibility issues with a wide range of sata hdd's. My understanding is that Western Digital and Seagate NS (Enterprise) are the only recommended sata hdd's at this point.
After almost 2 weeks of troubleshooting I have a raid 6 array of WD1001FALS that is FINALLY solid. It has run for 15 hours with Winthrax thrashing it with no problem; I'm now running IOMeter against it with no issues (Currently on hour 24). Unfortunately it is only capable of sequential write speeds up to 80MB/sec (500MB/sec for sequential reads). I measured write speeds of 300-400MB/sec with Seagate 1TB AS drives (SD15 fw), so I know that something is up. I'm guessing it's firmware related.
Odditory has a 1680ix and a set of WD1001FALS hdd's. I'm waiting to hear what his experience is like once he's done testing.
I've attached my communication string with Areca Support. Axan has also posted his email communication's with Areca support over on hardforum.
Thanks for the info. Seems like the 1280ML is the safer route to go if you plan on using SATA drives.
I've asked Areca if they support the 1.5TB Seagate's but they did not give me a direct answer. Instead they went on about using enterprise drives instead as they and the hard drive vendors will provide support only for enterprise drives.



















), and it requires FB-DIMMS which are much more expensive than DDR2. I'd be suprised if Odditory didn't include that layout as one of the suggested templates. As was already mentioned, Corsair, and PC P&C are both good PSU's to use.
that it meant that if OS drive that had the RAID software failed, than my data went with it. You're saying that is not the case, so for my needs, cheap large data storage, really just a NAS with limited CPU functionality for say DNS update client, I should be OK with older system with couple of the 8 SATA cards at about $140-$200 each in that 20 drive case. Now I'm really excited to see what odditory or others recommend.





