AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official Panasonic DMP-BD35/55 Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Panasonic DMP-BD35/55 Owners Thread - Page 195

post #5821 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by mchalebk View Post

With Amazon, I don't think you have to pay for return shipping if the item is defective (I think you have to make the claim before 30 days is up). You might want to check Amazon's policy. You might get a new unit instead of having to wait for Panasonic to fix your's.

Thanks, I did not know that. I'll find out in the next day or two if I can fix it with a properly burned update disk so I'll know well before the next 30 days.
post #5822 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by boylan13 View Post

The message I got from an engineer at Panasonic (senior guy there, actually) suggested that any time mixing is done (which is necessary when there is Secondary Audio or menu clicking sounds in the mix), it will revert to lossy core tracks, whether you're in PCM, bitstream *OR* analog. As long as there is not Secondary Audio or menu clicking sounds in the mix, then you'd be fine, but the problem is you don't always know there are menu clicking sound in the mix (and in PCM or multi-channel analog mode, you don't know it's being converted to lossy) so it's a bit of a crap shoot.

Set Secondary Audio=OFF if you want to be sure to get lossless sound, whether it's analog, PCM or bitstream.

I'm trying to get confirmation back from them but the time zone/date diffrence makes things a litte difficult. If it's true, it shoots apart a feature that many thought was there (including myself).

-CB

If this is true, doesn't it remove the only reason for doing the decoding in the player rather than the receiver (assuming the receiver is capable of handling the lossless formats)?
post #5823 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by milacqua View Post

Thanks a bunch. That may be the problem, an incorrectly burned update disk. I simply sent the file to my cd-r disk without thinking of making it a data disk. In fact, I don't know how to do that and I do not have Roxio or Nero. I may have to do as you suggested and get the trial copy of Nero. It may have specific instructions on how to create a data disk. In the meantime I will look at the update thread. I'll let you know how I make out.

If it works, and I hope it does, then you will be taking back "Now I have to send it back to them - what a pile of crap! I knew I should have stuck with Sony!!"
post #5824 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by milacqua View Post

Thanks, I did not know that. I'll find out in the next day or two if I can fix it with a properly burned update disk so I'll know well before the next 30 days.

Here's from their "General Returns Policy":

You may return most new, unopened items sold and fulfilled by Amazon.com within 30 days of delivery for a full refund. We'll also pay the return shipping costs if the return is a result of our error (you received an incorrect or defective item, etc.).

Note the reference to "defective item".
post #5825 of 14895
As the owner of a projector (Optima HD70) I was wondering if I would be able to send a 480p signal to it with this player, in order to display DVDs in their native format, if I wish. (Sometimes it's better to stick with the native resolution rather than blow it up to 720p.)

Thanks for any insight about output choices for these machines.
post #5826 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by mchalebk View Post

Here's from their "General Returns Policy":

You may return most new, unopened items sold and fulfilled by Amazon.com within 30 days of delivery for a full refund. We'll also pay the return shipping costs if the return is a result of our error (you received an incorrect or defective item, etc.).

Note the reference to "defective item".

Amazon sent me a new unit before I rutned the fective one. In this case it was a Slim Devices Duet. The new unit came two days after I informed them of the problem on their website. I also got an RMA to ship the defective unit ack. Very efficient.

Joel
post #5827 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by boylan13 View Post

Yes, the Panasonic rossover is fixed at 100 Hz. I doubt that sending a 100-150Hz signal is going to damage your speakers, but if that's the recommended crossover frequency, and if they really can't reproduce 100-150 Hz then you're going to have a gaping hole in the mid bass response. The subwoofer is going to get 100 Hz and down, the satellites are going to get 100 Hz and up but will not be able to reproduce 100-150Hz, so where is that going to come from?

If your speaker system has an option where you drive the subwoofer from the MAIN SPEAKERS output, instead of line level input, then this may be a better option for you. This way, the subwoofer gets a full range signal, but it most likely has a built-in crossover at 150 Hz that sends information above 150 Hz out to the satellite speakers via a speaker level OUTPUT on the subwoofer itself. Most integrated sub/sat systems have an option to work this way, and it's usually the best way to get the right blend between woofer and satellites.

If you do it this way, then you should actually configure the BD55 with *NO SUBWOOFER* so it will redirect the LFE bass output to the front speakers. This means you connect only 5 cables (for a 5.0 system) or 7 (for 7.0), the front two speakers will get a full range signal, but the subwoofer will grab the bass out of that and send the midgrange and treble on their happy way to the main left/right (teeny tiny) speakers. Set the rest of your speakers to small so they will not get anything above 100Hz either.

-CB

What I've noticed with my system setup is that the HD audio (analogs to my receiver) does not sound as full or wide upfront as does the DD (via coax) while watching Batman Dark Knight.

I have my sw level boosted in my Denon AVR-2805 receiver by +15 db for my analogs.

My front main speakers are Polk RC85i (in wall). Per their specifications, they can produce 30hz-20kHz. Their lower-3db limit is 50Hz, and their upper -3db limit is 20 KHz. Their efficiency is 90 db. My center channel speaker is also Polk (can't remember the model # I think it was CS9?)

Can I set my main speakers to large in the BD55 with their above specs? If I did that, would I also set the surrounds and center channel to large also?

Does this sound like it would make the sound more expansive in front(if that's the correct term)?
post #5828 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnfromQueensNY View Post

I was wondering if I would be able to send a 480p signal to it with this player, in order to display DVDs in their native format

Sure, except that's not their native format.
post #5829 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnfromQueensNY View Post

As the owner of a projector (Optima HD70) I was wondering if I would be able to send a 480p signal to it with this player, in order to display DVDs in their native format, if I wish. (Sometimes it's better to stick with the native resolution rather than blow it up to 720p.)

Thanks for any insight about output choices for these machines.

There's no 480i option for HDMI. There is for component. According to Panasonic, the 480i component output is first deinterlaced to 480p and then interlaced back to 480i. It's just the way they do it.

These players do not have "source direct" functionality, meaning BDs and DVDs both get output at whatever setting you are using. The only way around that is to use HDMI for BD and component for DVD.
post #5830 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary J View Post

Sure, except that's not their native format.

Thanks --

Only, you say 480p is not the native format of a DVD? Have I been living a lie? (Feel free to school me; I'm not very much of a techie.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

There's no 480i option for HDMI. There is for component. According to Panasonic, the 480i component output is first deinterlaced to 480p and then interlaced back to 480i. It's just the way they do it.

These players do not have "source direct" functionality, meaning BDs and DVDs both get output at whatever setting you are using. The only way around that is to use HDMI for BD and component for DVD.

Ah, thank you. Yes, I'll probably route the player via both component and HDMI.

You think it be easy, then, to have a 480i output on component and 720p on HDMI, without switching settings all the time?

And forgive me, are these output settings accessible via a screen menu or via a switch on the hardware?

One last related question -- can I in fact output in 720p, in HDMI? (My projector doesn't do 1080p, and I have a suspicion it might convert a 1080p signal into 480p.)

Thanks for your patience and responses.
post #5831 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave42 View Post

Can I set my main speakers to large in the BD55 with their above specs? If I did that, would I also set the surrounds and center channel to large also?

Does this sound like it would make the sound more expansive in front(if that's the correct term)?

The large setting merely means the bass frequencies below 100 Hz will be sent to your speakers instead of being routed to the sub. You will likely hurt overall bass performance if your speakers should be set to small.

Bass management does not give you a wider or narrower sound stage. I believe you need to look elsewhere in analog processing for changes in that area. What's happening is that you prefer the processing and analog output of your Denon over the BD55. Given that lossy tracks are encoded at high bit rates on BD, it's quite possible that you may actually prefer lossy processed by your receiver to lossless processed by the player.
post #5832 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnfromQueensNY View Post

Thanks --

Only, you say 480p is not the native format of a DVD? Have I been living a lie? (Feel free to school me; I'm not very much of a techie.)

DVDs are natively 480i, not 480p. "Progressive scan" DVD players were all the rage a few years ago because they produced a 480p output.

Quote:
You think it be easy, then, to have a 480i output on component and 720p on HDMI, without switching settings all the time?

I haven't done this myself. But, you should be able to set the player outputs once at the beginning, using the set-up screens, and never need to touch them again.

You'll have to check your projector to see how to switch between its HDMI and component inputs.
post #5833 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by milacqua View Post

Thanks a bunch. That may be the problem, an incorrectly burned update disk. I simply sent the file to my cd-r disk without thinking of making it a data disk. In fact, I don't know how to do that and I do not have Roxio or Nero. I may have to do as you suggested and get the trial copy of Nero. It may have specific instructions on how to create a data disk. In the meantime I will look at the update thread. I'll let you know how I make out.


Are you using Vista? I assume so as it will not work per my previous post.
Gerry
post #5834 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

DVDs are natively 480i, not 480p. "Progressive scan" DVD players were all the rage a few years ago because they produced a 480p output.

I haven't done this myself. But, you should be able to set the player outputs once at the beginning, using the set-up screens, and never need to touch them again.

You'll have to check your projector to see how to switch between its HDMI and component inputs.

Thanks very much.
post #5835 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnfromQueensNY View Post

As the owner of a projector (Optima HD70) I was wondering if I would be able to send a 480p signal to it with this player, in order to display DVDs in their native format, if I wish. (Sometimes it's better to stick with the native resolution rather than blow it up to 720p.)

Thanks for any insight about output choices for these machines.

What you're asking here is which scaler should you use - the BD55's or the HD70's... You should A/B the scalers and see for yourself what results in the best PQ:
A) set the BD55 for 480p and let the HD70 scale up, or
B) set the BD55 for 720p to output in the HD70's native resolution.

My experience w/ my 720p Panny AE700 is that the BD55 has the better scaler.
post #5836 of 14895
Thanks guys, for all your help.

One other question:

The recently released Samsung Blu-Ray Player gave me pause because of its Netflix capabilities.

Is there any possibility Panasonic can/will in future introduce Netflix streaming (or other extras) to its 35/55 player, via a firmware update?

I'd rather buy Panasonic for its reputation and picture quality, but the Netflix thing would be a nice perk.
post #5837 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnfromQueensNY View Post

Thanks guys, for all your help.

One other question:

The recently released Samsung Blu-Ray Player gave me pause because of its Netflix capabilities.

Is there any possibility Panasonic can/will in future introduce Netflix streaming (or other extras) to its 35/55 player, via a firmware update?

I'd rather buy Panasonic for its reputation and picture quality, but the Netflix thing would be a nice perk.

PQ trumps all!
post #5838 of 14895
Chris B,

Figured it out. My rears on my receiver were wired to the back vs surrounds so the whole 5.1 thing would not work. Re-wired the rears as surrounds and it's golden. Now I need to upgrade my 720 DLP to a 1080 screen but the digital sound is much better!!! How do I know if my fronts should be set on Large or Small speakers? Thanks for all your walkthrough help. Man I was getting frustrated.

Michael
post #5839 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggw2000 View Post

Are you using Vista? I assume so as it will not work per my previous post.
Gerry

Nope, I am using plain XP. I went to the update thread and posted there which is probably the right place to ask these questions. I also ordered a firmware upgrade 1.6 disk from Panasonic and it should be here next week. The technician said that since my player is not able to read any kind of disk whatsoever, he doubts it will be able to read the one they are sending me. He might be right but it is worth a shot. I am also doing a trial version of Nero but gosh, it is taking forever to download. According to the download meter over 45 minutes to completion. I just want to see if I can do this upgrade thing myself because I don't want to got through the same thing every time.

At the 35/55 upgrade thread they said that when you "send to cd", which is what I did with the Pana_dvd.fr file, XP defaults to a data disk so I should have been fine. But I don't that is right. When I click on the file's properties, it shows it as a wordperfect 10 file. I don't know what that would be but maybe that indicates it indeed is a data file.
post #5840 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmschnur View Post

Amazon sent me a new unit before I rutned the fective one. In this case it was a Slim Devices Duet. The new unit came two days after I informed them of the problem on their website. I also got an RMA to ship the defective unit ack. Very efficient.

Joel

That is good to know and may be the best solution of all. thanks
post #5841 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by boylan13 View Post

The message I got from an engineer at Panasonic (senior guy there, actually) suggested that any time mixing is done (which is necessary when there is Secondary Audio or menu clicking sounds in the mix), it will revert to lossy core tracks, whether you're in PCM, bitstream *OR* analog. As long as there is not Secondary Audio or menu clicking sounds in the mix, then you'd be fine, but the problem is you don't always know there are menu clicking sound in the mix (and in PCM or multi-channel analog mode, you don't know it's being converted to lossy) so it's a bit of a crap shoot.

Set Secondary Audio=OFF if you want to be sure to get lossless sound, whether it's analog, PCM or bitstream.

I'm trying to get confirmation back from them but the time zone/date diffrence makes things a litte difficult. If it's true, it shoots apart a feature that many thought was there (including myself).

-CB

So while I was switching back and forth between analog and optical to see if I could tell the difference between lossless and lossy I was hearing lossy all the time?

I was watching Batman Begins and Wall-E.

Thanks, Wade
post #5842 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by wstanko View Post

If it works, and I hope it does, then you will be taking back "Now I have to send it back to them - what a pile of crap! I knew I should have stuck with Sony!!"

Yes, I will take it back - if it works. I'll then admit operator error. I'm still not convinced I messed it up however.
post #5843 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

Set the digital audio outputs for DD and DTS to bitstream. Leave secondary audio on. That's it.


one more question. do i leave pcm down conversion set to off and downmix option leave on stereo?

im using optical to non hdmi receiver.
post #5844 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by film235 View Post

...

By the way, does anyone know why you need an SD card for the BD-35? Is it for firmware updates, or just displaying photos?

You need the SD card to use the BD Live capabilities. Also, with at least one movie (Starship Troupers), the movie will not load without an SD card. I don't know if this has been fixed with firmware 1.6? Anyone?
post #5845 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by slider33 View Post

For discs that do not have a lossless track (SD DVD's etc) it is adviseable to also hook up a coax (optical could be used also on BD55) cable so you can get lossy DD/DTS that way.

slider33 and others, I'm curious as to the recommendation of using coax or optical for lossy DD/DTS in addition to the analog connections for the lossless. Why not just use analog and let the player decode. I'm not trolling when I ask is that because you think the receiver can do a better job or am I missing something technical?

It seemed in that reply to the guy who was playing an SD DVD and was only getting 2 channels that the implication was because that is how it is unless you use coax or optical for SD DVD's? I will be using all 7 analog channels as I'm setup for it and just assumed I'd let the player do all the work. Are you thinking I'd be better of letting my receiver to the lossy decoding?

I haven't yet purchased the 55 but I am going to, so I haven't tested any of this. I've just been kind of hanging watching the pricing as Christmas approaches. I've been reading the thread on secondary audio, I think I understand all of it and the implications for my situation, basically in my case with all 7 channels in use, I should probably leave it of?

Been a long time since I was here last, glad to be back!
post #5846 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave42 View Post

IOW, I was told to never watch TV where black bars are present.

You have been mis-informed.
post #5847 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by boylan13 View Post

It's unlikely that Terk switcher is HDMI 1.3 compliant or certified. Even the cheap monoprice HDMI switchers have handshake issues with the BD35/BD55.

Try the more expensive 1.3a-certified monoprice switcher (you can probably search this thread to find the model number or some helpful soul will reply with it), or the Oppo HM-31, both of which are know to work with the BD55. I've also used a Cables-to-Go 5-port HDMI switch to good effect with this player.

-CB

I just got a BD55 and and the Monoprice 1.3a Certified 4X1 HDMI switch and the switch will not pass 1080P video, as advertised. I tried different ports, cables, etc., and the highest resolution the switch would pass from the BD55 was 1080i. When I connect the BD55 directly to the TV via HDMI, it passes 1080P to my Panny 1080P HDTV just fine.

I think this player is very sensitive to anything connected between it and the TV. Has anyone else had this problem or found a good, economical solution to getting 3 HDMI outputs (DVD, BD, HD DBS to one TV HDMI input, not including a hi-end AV receiver?
post #5848 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by boylan13 View Post

Yeah,

I'm sure all the Onkyos and Integras handle it the same way. The same settings are in my 605 and DTC-9.8. The only question is whether the 0db point (the default setting) already has the boost applied, which I suspect it does.

-CB

I'm sure this is way down your to do list, but have you confirmed this yet?
post #5849 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisfc1972 View Post

one more question. do i leave pcm down conversion set to off and downmix option leave on stereo?

im using optical to non hdmi receiver.

Those settings will likely never matter since you are using optical bitstream. PCM downconversion matters to people doing player decoding for multichannel PCM over HDMI to AVRs that can handle 96 kHz audio sampling rates. I'd leave it at the default, which does a 48 kHz output. (But, if you use the player for 2 channel music and your receiver can handle 96 kHz rates, then that might be a better setting. If this makes sense to you, then you'll know what to do. Otherwise, use the deault 48 kHz setting.)

Downmix controls a two channel PCM downmix of a multichannel original. You actually might need this for a movie that only has a 5.1 PCM track and no DD or DTS versions at all. So, I'd set it to Surround Encoded. Your receiver would give you a half-way decent sourround output using that setting (the old fashioned Dolby Surround that was used prior to DD 5.1). There are a few early BDs without any DD or DTS tracks, but not many.
post #5850 of 14895
Quote:
Originally Posted by dougrw View Post

slider33 and others, I'm curious as to the recommendation of using coax or optical for lossy DD/DTS in addition to the analog connections for the lossless. Why not just use analog and let the player decode. I'm not trolling when I ask is that because you think the receiver can do a better job or am I missing something technical?

It seemed in that reply to the guy who was playing an SD DVD and was only getting 2 channels that the implication was because that is how it is unless you use coax or optical for SD DVD’s? I will be using all 7 analog channels as I’m setup for it and just assumed I’d let the player do all the work. Are you thinking I’d be better of letting my receiver to the lossy decoding?

I haven’t yet purchased the 55 but I am going to, so I haven’t tested any of this. I’ve just been kind of hanging watching the pricing as Christmas approaches. I’ve been reading the thread on secondary audio, I think I understand all of it and the implications for my situation, basically in my case with all 7 channels in use, I should probably leave it of?

Been a long time since I was here last, glad to be back!

For most "legacy" AVRs, over analog you'll have to use the BD-55 for speaker management for lossless. The recommendation for AVRs that can decode DD/DTS (but not lossless) is to use, for DVDs without lossless audio, coax/optical and use the AVR's speaker management, which is usually better than the BD-55's.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official Panasonic DMP-BD35/55 Owners Thread