AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Official JVC RS20/HD750 Owners Thread!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official JVC RS20/HD750 Owners Thread! - Page 108  

post #3211 of 5082
I have the latest firmware the 1.25a. I just got home from Best Buy. Just as luck would have it they had a Dark Knight Blueray playing on the sammy A650 120 HTZ LCD. I tested the scene out and it is just like mine so this means it is in the source. The Blueray Player there was the Sammy one.
post #3212 of 5082
henrich3

Thanks for the setup information. The image is so much better after the adjustments. Looks like my unit has the original firmware so it needs some updating. The picture and sound via analog outputs is better than the Panasonic BD55.

Thanks again for your help.
post #3213 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by kutlow View Post

I have the latest firmware the 1.25a. I just got home from Best Buy. Just as luck would have it they had a Dark Knight Blueray playing on the sammy A650 120 HTZ LCD. I tested the scene out and it is just like mine so this means it is in the source. The Blueray Player there was the Sammy one.

Good to know it's not your equipment. Not much you can do if the problem is source related. You must be over sensitive to this pecuilar artifact (you mentioned you've seen it on many films - not just Dark Knight). It would be interesting to see how DLP handles it.
post #3214 of 5082
Am I the only one to notice an unacceptable level of 'judder' on this unit ? With PAL and NTSC 50/60 material on both SD and HD one has the impression that frames are being dropped. Scrolling titles at the end of a movie are jerky and exhibit combing artefacts. Watching an action movie is something of an eye-strain. (24 fps is marginally better but hardly smooth). Reverting to my old Sony Vw100, these problems disappear. Should I dump it and buy the Vw200 ?
post #3215 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich wu View Post

henrich3

Thanks for the setup information. The image is so much better after the adjustments. Looks like my unit has the original firmware so it needs some updating. The picture and sound via analog outputs is better than the Panasonic BD55.

Thanks again for your help.

You're welcome! You mention picture via analog. Hopefully you're connecting the 3800 to the RS20 via HDMI? (Audio via HDMI would be preferable too, if you can swing an HDMI 1.3 A/V receiver.)
post #3216 of 5082
Why hasn't Projector Central reviewed any of the new JVC projectors yet? It's odd they are so behind the ball on this one.
post #3217 of 5082
For those of you who have been bothered by excessive grain on the RS20, what are some of the dvd or BR's that are the worst offenders? I would like to try the DNR feature on my BR player to see if it has a noticeable effect (as some have recommended).
post #3218 of 5082
There are some scenes in Band of Brothers in Episode One...primarily when Lt. Shobel? (David Schwimmer) gets re-assigned. I think it's more video noise than true film grain though. That's probably not a good example though as most of the time, the image on that disc looks pretty terrific.
post #3219 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by millerwill View Post

For those of you who have been bothered by excessive grain on the RS20, what are some of the dvd or BR's that are the worst offenders? I would like to try the DNR feature on my BR player to see if it has a noticeable effect (as some have recommended).

Which BR player are you using that has DNR? (Panny?)

The best disc I have found that shows exacerbated noise/grain is Blu-ray version of 7th Voyage Of Sinbad (1958). You'll notice it right from the first frame. Sky blue scenes are filled w/ noise (and peoples faces have a "crawly" quality to them). If you turn down the brightness (via iris) it does help a lot.

This disc was grainy w/ the RS1 - but the grain looked like natural film grain (a good thing). At least the film was quite watchable. And you could always use (I rarely did) the RS1's NR feature if needed. Again - I do understand that the film grain was left in on purpose and that is a good thing (vs DNR usage), as long it is not exacerbated (which it is via the RS20).

However 95% of the movies I have watched (over 70 now) on the RS20 have not had noise or exacerbated grain issues. (there will always be certain problem titles w/ any machine)
post #3220 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Ballentine View Post

Which BR player are you using that has DNR? (Panny?)

The best disc I have found that shows exacerbated noise/grain is Blu-ray version of 7th Voyage Of Sinbad (1958). You'll notice it right from the first frame. Sky blue scenes are filled w/ noise (and peoples faces have a "crawly" quality to them). If you turn down the brightness (via iris) it does help a lot.

This disc was grainy w/ the RS1 - but the grain looked like natural film grain (a good thing). At least the film was quite watchable. And you could always use (I rarely did) the RS1's NR feature if needed. Again - I do understand that the film grain was left in on purpose and that is a good thing (vs DNR usage), as long it is not exacerbated (which it is via the RS20).

However 95% of the movies I have watched (over 70 now) on the RS20 have not had noise or exacerbated grain issues. (there will always be certain problem titles w/ any machine)

I have a Sammy 1200; it has DNR though I've never used it. I don't have the Sinbad BR, but I suppose I could check out Casino Royale (opening fight scenes); though I think the grain there is intentional, it might nevertheless be a good test of the DNR on the BR player.

(BTW, I'm going to get the new Panny BDP-70V in a few months. It's the same BR player as the new 60 (which is essentially the same as the current 35), but it will be convenient to have a VHS player and see those old family tapes upconverted to 1080p!)
post #3221 of 5082
I feel and see, indeed, the fully opposite sensations ...

Casino Royale .... Airport scene from hangar and forward:

I always noticed both grain and some noice both on clear or dark background with my old HD100/RS2, so that this was a chapter that intentionally always have skipped during the demoes

Well .... now .. with RS20 all seems more clear, polished and stable like it hase been filtered in a such way ...
I'm not speaking about edges that obviously are more defined due to the new lens in RS20, but about backgrounds frying for grain or noise that in RS20 appear attenuate like if is engaged a DNR ...
post #3222 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by millerwill View Post

I have a Sammy 1200; it has DNR though I've never used it. I don't have the Sinbad BR, but I suppose I could check out Casino Royale (opening fight scenes); though I think the grain there is intentional, it might nevertheless be a good test of the DNR on the BR player.

(BTW, I'm going to get the new Panny BDP-70V in a few months. It's the same BR player as the new 60 (which is essentially the same as the current 35), but it will be convenient to have a VHS player and see those old family tapes upconverted to 1080p!)

Geeeze. I assumed everybody had the Sinbad BD in their collection

Yes - Casino Royales' grain was intentional. Love the grain in Sinbad - just don't want it to be exacerbated.

I'm waiting for Panny BD/Laserdisc combo!
post #3223 of 5082
Have any intrepid RS 20 / HD 750 owners peeked inside to see the make and model of the main fan? As an RS-1 owner who didn't make the leap to the RS20, but who would appreciate its much quieter cooling solution, I (and other RS-1 owners) would be very interested to know what fan JVC used. Granted, a fair portion of the improvement probably lies with lower internal resistance to airflow, as well as better fan isolation, but I'm pretty sure that the lamp power is the same, so the same amount of power needs to be removed. The Nidec fan used in the RS-1 is pretty cheap; I think that it was ~ $6. In addition to make and model, full knowledge of its replacement would also require that the fan voltage be measured, for at least low lamp / low altitude. Anyone know anything, or willing to look?

Kevin
post #3224 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin McCarthy View Post

Have any intrepid RS 20 / HD 750 owners peeked inside to see the make and model of the main fan? As an RS-1 owner who didn't make the leap to the RS20, but who would appreciate its much quieter cooling solution, I (and other RS-1 owners) would be very interested to know what fan JVC used. Granted, a fair portion of the improvement probably lies with lower internal resistance to airflow, as well as better fan isolation, but I'm pretty sure that the lamp power is the same, so the same amount of power needs to be removed. The Nidec fan used in the RS-1 is pretty cheap; I think that it was ~ $6. In addition to make and model, full knowledge of its replacement would also require that the fan voltage be measured, for at least low lamp / low altitude. Anyone know anything, or willing to look?

Kevin

The fan is only one part of the heat dissipation system in the JVC projectors. The whole layout of the optical path is different in the RS20 including the location of lamp, the light path and hot air exit.
From an engineering point of view - making assumptions about the fan from the RS 20 being usable in the RS1 or 2 is unrealistic.

KT
post #3225 of 5082
I was thinking the same thing. I had thought about replacing my RS1 fan w/ a quieter fan way back when - but didn't want to chance overheating. Especially during the Summer months. I assumed the engineers made it as quiet as was possible anyway (for that design). The quieter fan in the RS20 is a nice feature (over RS1).
post #3226 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Ballentine View Post

I was thinking the same thing. I had thought about replacing my RS1 fan w/ a quieter fan way back when - but didn't want to chance overheating. Especially during the Summer months. I assumed the engineers made it as quiet as was possible anyway (for that design). The quieter fan in the RS20 is a nice feature (over RS1).

Simple fix...turn the volume up.
post #3227 of 5082
I respectfully disagree. As my post points out, the internal air flow impedance was almost certainly reduced from the RS1 to the RS10/20, and the fan isolation may have been improved, but the net power removal (in watts) appears to be the same. In a number of products I design, air cooling is required. To simplify things (within 15%), a liter per second of airflow is required to keep the delta T at one degree C for a heat load of one watt. The fan in the RS1 is reasonably well isolated, but it is a cheap POS with readily discernible cogging and imbalance when hand held. JVC could have and almost certainly did spend more and got more when they selected the RS10/20 fan and determined its operating voltage, and this was after a fair degree of consumer complaints about the RS1. There is a very simple metric for fan model and voltage adequacy, and that is the air inlet to outlet delta T. If, as I expect, a fan with better aerodynamics, cogging, and balance was chosen for the RS-10/20, and an owner would identify the make/model and voltages, I could easily find the applied voltage on that fan (assuming that it has the same frame size and thickness) that would match the RS-1's inlet to outlet delta T, and hence provide equivalent lamp cooling.

I reiterate my request: if anyone, from Cine4home (who first identified the RS1 fan) to individual owners otherwise interested in the RS10/20's internals can determine the make, model, and ideally voltage(s) of the main fan, would you please post it? Thank you.

Oh, and as to the suggested "simple fix" (just turn the volume up), the films that we screen include (I know that this may be unbelievable) silent passages, in which the DP's work shines, and there aren't any car chases to mask projector noise.

Kevin
post #3228 of 5082
Kevin - if anyone does open theirs I'm sure they'd be happy to post about it. However I wouldn't expect this because not many are brave enough to open it plus it voids the warranty.
post #3229 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin McCarthy View Post

I respectfully disagree. As my post points out, the internal air flow impedance was almost certainly reduced from the RS1 to the RS10/20, and the fan isolation may have been improved, but the net power removal (in watts) appears to be the same. In a number of products I design, air cooling is required. To simplify things (within 15%), a liter per second of airflow is required to keep the delta T at one degree C for a heat load of one watt. The fan in the RS1 is reasonably well isolated, but it is a cheap POS with readily discernible cogging and imbalance when hand held. JVC could have and almost certainly did spend more and got more when they selected the RS10/20 fan and determined its operating voltage, and this was after a fair degree of consumer complaints about the RS1. There is a very simple metric for fan model and voltage adequacy, and that is the air inlet to outlet delta T. If, as I expect, a fan with better aerodynamics, cogging, and balance was chosen for the RS-10/20, and an owner would identify the make/model and voltages, I could easily find the applied voltage on that fan (assuming that it has the same frame size and thickness) that would match the RS-1's inlet to outlet delta T, and hence provide equivalent lamp cooling.

I reiterate my request: if anyone, from Cine4home (who first identified the RS1 fan) to individual owners otherwise interested in the RS10/20's internals can determine the make, model, and ideally voltage(s) of the main fan, would you please post it? Thank you.

Oh, and as to the suggested "simple fix" (just turn the volume up), the films that we screen include (I know that this may be unbelievable) silent passages, in which the DP's work shines, and there aren't any car chases to mask projector noise.

Kevin

If you can fimd a new fan that fis in (and fills) the same spot as your original fan in your older JVC projector with the improvements you mention, and then actually measure the temperature differential between the entire air inlet and exhaust areas and adjust the voltage to match the dela T across the oriiginal inlets and outlets at an ambient temperature equal to the highest you will encounter in actual use - and then find the new fan is quieter--go to it, it should work --I like the approach.

I did not get the idea you were going to look into it with this complete an approach in mind. Good luck.

KT
post #3230 of 5082
Kevin,
Can't you check the RS1 and RS20 service/parts manual (for type/size) and then just buy an RS20 fan from JVC parts dept. (if it fits)? Can't cost more than $50. could it?
post #3231 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin McCarthy View Post

I respectfully disagree. As my post points out, the internal air flow impedance was almost certainly reduced from the RS1 to the RS10/20, and the fan isolation may have been improved, but the net power removal (in watts) appears to be the same. In a number of products I design, air cooling is required. To simplify things (within 15%), a liter per second of airflow is required to keep the delta T at one degree C for a heat load of one watt. The fan in the RS1 is reasonably well isolated, but it is a cheap POS with readily discernible cogging and imbalance when hand held. JVC could have and almost certainly did spend more and got more when they selected the RS10/20 fan and determined its operating voltage, and this was after a fair degree of consumer complaints about the RS1. There is a very simple metric for fan model and voltage adequacy, and that is the air inlet to outlet delta T. If, as I expect, a fan with better aerodynamics, cogging, and balance was chosen for the RS-10/20, and an owner would identify the make/model and voltages, I could easily find the applied voltage on that fan (assuming that it has the same frame size and thickness) that would match the RS-1's inlet to outlet delta T, and hence provide equivalent lamp cooling.

I reiterate my request: if anyone, from Cine4home (who first identified the RS1 fan) to individual owners otherwise interested in the RS10/20's internals can determine the make, model, and ideally voltage(s) of the main fan, would you please post it? Thank you.

Oh, and as to the suggested "simple fix" (just turn the volume up), the films that we screen include (I know that this may be unbelievable) silent passages, in which the DP's work shines, and there aren't any car chases to mask projector noise.

Kevin

I was just kidding. I have an idea though. Jvc uses certain authorized repair centers. Could you call JVC and get a number from them and call the repair center and propose that question? I hope that works.
post #3232 of 5082
The replacement fan angle is a useful suggestion. I would be surprised if they departed from the previous standard 92 mm square x 38 mm thick form factor, so the new one ought to swap in physically. I could fiddle the voltage until the air in / air out delta T was matched. I have no idea how to find the service/parts manual, but suppose that I could try and buy a replacement part through JVC. It would be an odd request, since this isn't something that would be expected to fail, but I could give it a try. I could also just ask Tom Stites. Thanks.

Kevin
post #3233 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin McCarthy View Post

I have no idea how to find the service/parts manual, but suppose that I could try and buy a replacement part through JVC.

Here.
post #3234 of 5082
Hi, I was hoping to get some advise from RS20 owners on how the throw distance will effect the picture. Let me explain.

I will soon be upgrading my pj from a Sharp 720p to the RS20. My HT room is a bit odd because it is wide but the depth from pj to screen is only about 12.5', due to the way the ceiling is sloped in the back of the room (cant move pj back any more).

Using the throw distance calculator from the JVC web site, the optimal placement of the pj is about 16' but using the zoom-out it can be placed as close as 11.9'.

My question is - placing the pj at 12.5 ft with lens zoom at nearly the widest setting, will I be sacrificing much in terms of picture quality? I have read that in max telescope (opposite of what I am doing) the lumens are cut significantly, but I haven't seen any comment on the setup I plan on using. My room is light controlled, with 120" 1.3 gain firehawk screen.

I appreciate any feedback provided

Michael
post #3235 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinhome101 View Post

Hi, I was hoping to get some advise from RS20 owners on how the throw distance will effect the picture. Let me explain.

I will soon be upgrading my pj from a Sharp 720p to the RS20. My HT room is a bit odd because it is wide but the depth from pj to screen is only about 12.5', due to the way the ceiling is sloped in the back of the room (cant move pj back any more).

Using the throw distance calculator from the JVC web site, the optimal placement of the pj is about 16' but using the zoom-out it can be placed as close as 11.9'.

My question is - placing the pj at 12.5 ft with lens zoom at nearly the widest setting, will I be sacrificing much in terms of picture quality? I have read that in max telescope (opposite of what I am doing) the lumens are cut significantly, but I haven't seen any comment on the setup I plan on using. My room is light controlled, with 120" 1.3 gain firehawk screen.

I appreciate any feedback provided

Michael

I have my RS20 near its closest point--~12.5 ft from a 110" wide screen--and the pic is super. You don't get quite as high CR as if it were at long throw, but there's plenty of CR with this pj; and you get the max lumens.
post #3236 of 5082
Me too !
White 1.2 gain screen, projection distance 11.808 ft , All lens to full Wide that produce a base screen large of 8.4624 ft.
Simply Fantastic !
post #3237 of 5082
Lawguy: Thanks, that nearly worked. I hadn't known about that site. JVC sells a replacement fan for the RS1 and RS100, but for the HD350 and HD750 (no RS10/20), no fan is offered. There is an interesting mention of a "fan control PWB" on the HD350/750. This suggests that the reduced audible noise may be at least partially due to a smart fan speed control that trims fan speed to maintain a given cooling air temperature.

Kevin
post #3238 of 5082
Any RS20 owners here also have the new Pioneer Elite BD-09 player? or even the Pioner BDP-51 or 05? Have you tried the YCC 4:4:4 setting? For some reason, I can't seem to do that with the JVC. I just get a purple screen. With my former Sony VW-50, it was no problem. It's not a biggie by any means..just looking at different setting options.

Thanks.
post #3239 of 5082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Glover View Post

Any RS20 owners here also have the new Pioneer Elite BD-09 player? or even the Pioner BDP-51 or 05? Have you tried the YCC 4:4:4 setting? For some reason, I can't seem to do that with the JVC. I just get a purple screen. With my former Sony VW-50, it was no problem. It's not a biggie by any means..just looking at different setting options.

Thanks.

Tim,

I get the same issue. Are you passing video through a prepro or receiver or directly to the DVD? You want to make sure the Proj and Bluray are set to 444. However, I can't get a good image with 422 set on both proj and player through my prepro or direct. I need to dig deeper into that issue.
post #3240 of 5082
Thanks adidino. Well I've tried it both ways. Switching thru my AVR and to the PJ directly. It's probably something simple. Come to think of it..I don't think I've set up the PJ to accept it.

Thanks!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Official JVC RS20/HD750 Owners Thread!