AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Official Sony VPL-VW80 Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Sony VPL-VW80 Owners Thread - Page 11

post #301 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyHome View Post

Ken,
I see that you are in Australia so why are you so curious about this being compatible with 120hz.

Based on these information I decided to go ahead and buy the VW80 from a Korean seller. I got good price due to exchange rate difference.

Congratulations on the purchase, and the good price, damn fine projector. My interest in it's 120hz ability is for the benefit of others, mainly those in the USA which is where most of the Australian delivered VW80's ended up going and no doubt where most of the next batch will end up as well.
post #302 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Tripp View Post

Congratulations on the purchase, and the good price, damn fine projector. My interest in it's 120hz ability is for the benefit of others, mainly those in the USA which is where most of the Australian delivered VW80's ended up going and no doubt where most of the next batch will end up as well.

As you have questioned I too wonder why this unit is not available for sale in US rather than the VW70.

Thanks. My VW80 should be here in about a week. I first got the FPJ1 and decided to send that back and was going to get the HW10 but after reading some reviews of VW80 decided to get this instead. From the reviews I read it stated it was just as good or better in some areas than VW200.
post #303 of 368
The black in this VW80 is just incredibly black, much better than my old VW60, but I do have a better screen this time but I think the improvement is quite significant and low lamp mode is bright enough for me.
post #304 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtb5 View Post

The black in this VW80 is just incredibly black, much better than my old VW60, but I do have a better screen this time but I think the improvement is quite significant and low lamp mode is bright enough for me.

Nice to hear that. I'm planning to buy Carada BW 126" 16x9 screen so I hope they are good fit.

From reading the reviews it sounded like this was excellent in every aspect so I'm looking forward to getting the unit in about a week.

Thanks.
post #305 of 368
Wow 126", I'm watching in my study so it's a tiny 62", if I have that size I will definitley go for a 1:2.35 masking screen for that full aspect ratio instead of gray bars on top & bottom (although the "gray" is already quite darkly produced), but of course a good conversion lens is more expensive than the VW80.
post #306 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtb5 View Post

Wow 126", I'm watching in my study so it's a tiny 62", if I have that size I will definitley go for a 1:2.35 masking screen for that full aspect ratio instead of gray bars on top & bottom (although the "gray" is already quite darkly produced), but of course a good conversion lens is more expensive than the VW80.

1:2.35 won't work for me since I do plan to watch lots of Satellite and little PS gaming with my son and daughter. Also I really don't want to put too much more into this. VW80 is already $2000 over my self imposed budget and now seller told me he's out of stock until 4/15 so for now I asked him to refund my payment. I'll have to see what my other options are but I'll probably still go with VW80.
post #307 of 368
Can't go wrong with VW80 even if it's a bit out of your budget since it will be quite a while for the need to upgrade again with that kind of quality, can also consider HD-750 of course.
post #308 of 368
Can somebody tell me about the picture in picture feature of the vw80? Can you watch 2 hdmi or component sources and can you vary the size of each? Thanks.
post #309 of 368
The vw80 was not offered in the US so as to not hurt vw200 sales in the US. There is not much difference between the 80 and the 200 except for the xenon bulb. While the bulb makes quite a difference, most just don't perceive it. So Sony decided only to offer a dumbed down version of the 80 in the US, calling it the 70, the idea that the extra features besides the xenon bulb, would help sell the more expensive 200. A bad move in today's global market. Sony won't do that again with the 70/80 replacement coming in the fall.
post #310 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by elemtyong View Post

Can somebody tell me about the picture in picture feature of the vw80? Can you watch 2 hdmi or component sources and can you vary the size of each? Thanks.

Don't think you can do that.
post #311 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

The vw80 was not offered in the US so as to not hurt vw200 sales in the US. There is not much difference between the 80 and the 200 except for the xenon bulb. While thebulb makes quite a difference, most just don't perceive it. So Sony decided only to offer a dumbed down version of the 80 in the US, calling it the 70. A bad move in today's global market. Sony won't do that again with the 70/80 replacement coming in the fall.

As I heard from the dealer where I bought the VW80, xenon bulb on VW200 will dim earlier.
post #312 of 368
A xenon bulb is much more expensive than a UHP bulb, raising bulb replace,ent costs substantially. That saidm everything else being equal I would choose a machine with a xenon bulb. Unfortunately the 70\\80 replacement will have a UHP bulb and the 200 won`t be replaced with the goodies in the 70\\80 replacement.
post #313 of 368
Well I decided to bite the bullet and get another VW80 since I was able to get it at the old Oz price of just over $A5200. So I'm going to finally move up to front projection in my upstairs theater area from my current 70" XBR2 SXRD. I've managed to source a 110" Studiotek 130 G3 at a good price, so it should prove a nice combo. It's probably about time I get to enjoy front projection in the place I spend the most time rather then on certain weekends. My experience with my other VW80 is that so far I'm no huge fan of the new motionflow and darkframe insertion modes. On the other hand, having tried both auto iris and fixed iris with the VW80(and projectors since the VW100), I'm still comfortable enough with the auto iris 'compromise' - guess I'm not enough of a purist to let the down side get the better of me (my ISF trained mate who calibrates for me is in the same boat).
post #314 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post

My experience with my other VW80 is that so far I'm no huge fan of the new motionflow and darkframe insertion modes. On the other hand, having tried both auto iris and fixed iris with the VW80(and projectors since the VW100), I'm still comfortable enough with the auto iris 'compromise' - guess I'm not enough of a purist to let the down side get the better of me (my ISF trained mate who calibrates for me is in the same boat).

Does the "motionflow and darkframe insertion modes" work with 1080/24FPS of BR?
post #315 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by A/Vspec View Post

Does the "motionflow and darkframe insertion modes" work with 1080/24FPS of BR?

Ah yes, it does. Has already been discussed in this thread.
post #316 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post

Ah yes, it does. Has already been discussed in this thread.

Can you tell me what you do not like about it?

I have been thinking about upgrading my VPL-VW60 but if the motion flow does not help with picture then I might as well wait for the LED projectors.
post #317 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by A/Vspec View Post

Can you tell me what you do not like about it?

I have been thinking about upgrading my VPL-VW60 but if the motion flow does not help with picture then I might as well wait for the LED projectors.

I don't like Motionflow due to the fact that when watching watching film material, it creates a quite unnatural image. I would say the only real use would be for TV sport, which I haven't tried as yet, but will in my new setup.

With DFI, I don't really like the sort of flicker like feel to the image, just like watching on an old film projector. It does however preserve detail very well in motion as well as re-creating the film look. I must say of the two modes it's one I'm interested in examining it further in the new setup.
post #318 of 368
The dark frame insertion by itself really dims the picture. The motion flow on sports has good and bad effects. Its use depends on how the bad effects bother you. Rapid running down a field, it helps. Watching a slam dunk, all sorts of crazy effects like waves and shimmering. Some have reported banding issues as well. Look for things getter better in the 70/80 replacement.
post #319 of 368
Thanks Oz and Mark for the info.

I will just sit back then and enjoy my VW60 as it has been performing great for some time now and will see if the new models are any better.
post #320 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

The dark frame insertion by itself really dims the picture.

Mode 1 does, a lot, but Modes 2 and 3 are brighter with Mode 3 almost as bright as with it off.

A/Vspec: When it comes to Motion Enhance (DFI and FI) you perhaps do need to see it for yourself (and for some time and with a variety of material) in order to decide if it needs to be "better". IMO as others have given theirs, I think it works just fine.
post #321 of 368
Ken, I agree. I said dark frame insertion by it self. If you increase the gamma for the frames before and after the dark frame (an added trick) your eyes average things out and brightness improves. Of course this would result in the gamma enhanced frames having some crush annd clipping I think.

Add motion flow and one gets a artificial interpolated frame to smooth out the judder. But it is an interpolated frame and certainly something not entirely accurate. The algs get improved, the interpolation gets better, increasing the refresh rate to 240, you would need three interpolated frames. Smoother of course but still artificial. The more up and down motion rather than horizontal movement the worse the artifacts. These tricks on balance can improve things but only if used in moderation. It not like sex, there can be too much.
post #322 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post

Well I decided to bite the bullet and get another VW80 since I was able to get it at the old Oz price of just over $A5200. So I'm going to finally move up to front projection in my upstairs theater area from my current 70" XBR2 SXRD. I've managed to source a 110" Studiotek 130 G3 at a good price, so it should prove a nice combo. It's probably about time I get to enjoy front projection in the place I spend the most time rather then on certain weekends. My experience with my other VW80 is that so far I'm no huge fan of the new motionflow and darkframe insertion modes. On the other hand, having tried both auto iris and fixed iris with the VW80(and projectors since the VW100), I'm still comfortable enough with the auto iris 'compromise' - guess I'm not enough of a purist to let the down side get the better of me (my ISF trained mate who calibrates for me is in the same boat).

Where did you get it for that price? I'm interested. Could you PM me with the details?
post #323 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

Ken, I agree. I said dark frame insertion by it self. If you increase the gamma for the frames before and after the dark frame (an added trick) your eyes average things out and brightness improves. Of course this would result in the gamma enhanced frames having some crush annd klipping I think.

All good Mark and for anyone interested in Motion Enhance and how it works (or doesn't depending on your point of view) there's this (except ignore the 100hz bit at the top because everywhere else they use 60hz)...

http://www.grobi.tv/system/galleries...flow-100hz.pdf
post #324 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

Look for things getter better in the 70/80 replacement.

I hope their fake frame stuff for motion gets at least as good as Panasonic's mode 1 in the AE3000. From what I saw of the VW80 when I had it, the frame interpolation stuff to smooth motion was much worse than Panasonic's version. To my eyes the frame interpolation stuff in the VW80 for motion (not the dark frame modes) was like a proof-of-concept to prove that something could be done, even if the side effects were so bad that few would actually use it. There is a scene in Inside Man with a long pan around a room where the Panasonic does well, but the VW80 would go from smooth to jumpy to smooth to jumpy. It was way worse than just having the thing be jumpy the whole time. And there were some pretty bad artifacts at the beginning of The Dark Knight with this mode in the VW80. With the Panasonic I like using mode 1, but with the VW80 I would have just left that turned off other than to show people what might be possible some day.

If Sony can up the native on/off CR significantly (I should note that something like 50% improvement probably wouldn't be enough for me) and can get the frame interpolation stuff working at least as well as it does in the AE3000, then I will probably be pretty interested in Sony's next model. Of course depending on what the competition does.

--Darin
post #325 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by darinp2 View Post

I hope their fake frame stuff for motion gets at least as good as Panasonic's mode 1 in the AE3000. From what I saw of the VW80 when I had it, the frame interpolation stuff to smooth motion was much worse than Panasonic's version. To my eyes the frame interpolation stuff in the VW80 for motion (not the dark frame modes) was like a proof-of-concept to prove that something could be done, even if the side effects were so bad that few would actually use it. There is a scene in Inside Man with a long pan around a room where the Panasonic does well, but the VW80 would go from smooth to jumpy to smooth to jumpy. It was way worse than just having the thing be jumpy the whole time. And there were some pretty bad artifacts at the beginning of The Dark Knight with this mode in the VW80. With the Panasonic I like using mode 1, but with the VW80 I would have just left that turned off other than to show people what might be possible some day.

If Sony can up the native on/off CR significantly (I should note that something like 50% improvement probably wouldn't be enough for me) and can get the frame interpolation stuff working at least as well as it does in the AE3000, then I will probably be pretty interested in Sony's next model. Of course depending on what the competition does.

--Darin

How did the motion flow work with say NFL football? Did you see similar issues?
post #326 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyHome View Post

Where did you get it for that price? I'm interested. Could you PM me with the details?

No, read my original thread about the Aus price.
post #327 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzHDHT View Post

No, read my original thread about the Aus price.

LOL! I thought you just got another one recently. You definitely did the right thing by getting more than one at that great price.

My HW10 is still in transit (taking a lot longer than expected for some reason) so I guess I'll have to use that until newer models hit the US.
post #328 of 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyHome View Post

LOL! I thought you just got another one recently. You definitely did the right thing by getting more than one at that great price.

My HW10 is still in transit (taking a lot longer than expected for some reason) so I guess I'll have to use that until newer models hit the US.


Yep, I caught the order cut off for the old price by about a week, which was back in Feb. The new one only arrived early last week and was just returned from calibration yesterday.
post #329 of 368
I modified from Cinema mode.

Low lamp, iris off, motionflow off.

Zoom feature is normally not used.
post #330 of 368
I'm waiting to hear from Rich in Australia about VW80 availability and pricing. Is it worth it to get one for the US market, given that it won't have a warranty?

I hate the idea of waiting until September/October for the 70/80 replacement. Is there something decent to get that can be resold at that point?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Official Sony VPL-VW80 Owners Thread