Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dirk Cavalier 
David,
In your totally unbiased opinion (ha ha) how does the Dac*it compare to the Arcam rDac? Seems like an inevitable comparison. Based on what I've read, the rDac gets brownie points for asynchronous usb, but lacks galvanic isolation. Of course, I am most interested in how they sound. I am helping a friend put together a budget-minded mac-based system, and I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks!
P.S. He'll be using the DAC with a NAD 356BEE integrated amp and Maggie MMGs.
Well, we have a bit of an advantage since the chip is the ESS 9022, 32bit D/A. While we're not async, we still get the advantage of lowered jitter... Measured at the master clock, we're less than 3ps... Those doing async act is if it's the only way to basically eliminate jitter, but the ESS does just fine by itself. We also found that galvanically isolating the USB makes a bigger difference... I'm not discounting asynchronous applications at all. I like the technology. But the simple fact is that if you're using a BB, Wolfson, TI or most any standard chip set, you better be using async or you have a big mess on your hands...
So to end this rant...I do like our Dac*it better in a couple of ways. 1. I happen to like the Peachtree signature and we also add a nifty remote control. Hope this helps...