Quote:
Originally Posted by barbie845 
If that's truly the attitude SiriusXM is now taking they are sorely mistaken.
If you read through this forum, and the XM forums especially, there are plenty of other 'game's out there now. And many are trying new music sources.
You know it is a little funny. When Sirius and XM made their pitch to merge one of their biggest arguments was they were being hurt by all the other competition out there. So now they are pushing many right into the competition's arms.
Doesn't make much sense to me.

If that's truly the attitude SiriusXM is now taking they are sorely mistaken.
If you read through this forum, and the XM forums especially, there are plenty of other 'game's out there now. And many are trying new music sources.
You know it is a little funny. When Sirius and XM made their pitch to merge one of their biggest arguments was they were being hurt by all the other competition out there. So now they are pushing many right into the competition's arms.
Doesn't make much sense to me.
First off, when the FCC granted licenses to XM and Sirius it was on the condition that there were 2 entities in the satellite radio market b/c they didn't want a monopoly with that same attitude. However, as we all know there are plenty of alternatives to satellite radio. So the notion that its a take it or leave it, I feel, is unfounded, b/c there are so many alternatives.
The idea of any company is to have an advantage over its competition, so that consumers will use their service. You get Sirius or XM for ___ fill in the blank, NFL? MLB? Nascar? Howard Stern? whatever it may be, thats why you get it right, because you can't get that in your car whether your in Chicago or New Orleans with other means.
That's why I had it. Ask yourself why did you get it? For the music or for the content?
There should have been only one company to begin with. Neither company has made a signal cent since they started broadcasting.













