Quote:
Originally Posted by schultdw 
No. Just hardware.
8 seconds day per day works out to a bit less than 100ppm. Which is a not uncommon accuracy specification for your run of the mill quartz crystals. While you might expect more variation in the +/-100ppm range, I wouldn't. One thing that could happen is that after manufacturing a batch of crystals the manufacturer will run a test on accuracy. Typically a bunch will get pulled out and thrown in the +/-20ppm bin or other more precise bins. So instead of a nice uniform (or normal) distribution over +/-100ppm, there is a big hole in the middle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHBrandt 
Multiple users have reported the identical drift of 8 sec/day, or 1 sec every 3 hours, for an unsynchronized Pal clock. It sounds like the internal clock is very precise but not very accurately calibrated - it's always fast by just about .01%. Probably another firmware bug

Multiple users have reported the identical drift of 8 sec/day, or 1 sec every 3 hours, for an unsynchronized Pal clock. It sounds like the internal clock is very precise but not very accurately calibrated - it's always fast by just about .01%. Probably another firmware bug

No. Just hardware.
8 seconds day per day works out to a bit less than 100ppm. Which is a not uncommon accuracy specification for your run of the mill quartz crystals. While you might expect more variation in the +/-100ppm range, I wouldn't. One thing that could happen is that after manufacturing a batch of crystals the manufacturer will run a test on accuracy. Typically a bunch will get pulled out and thrown in the +/-20ppm bin or other more precise bins. So instead of a nice uniform (or normal) distribution over +/-100ppm, there is a big hole in the middle.
Yes, 100 ppm = .01%. But I'd think the next more accurate "bin" would be +/- 50 ppm at worst. If Echostar bought +/- 100 ppm crystals for the Pal, we should see a range of inaccuracies from 4 to 8 seconds per day (because every crystal would be at least 50 ppm off but no more than 100 ppm off), and there'd be just as many slow clocks as fast ones. But hasn't everyone who's measured their Pal's clock found it to be just about 8 secs/day fast?





















If so, it's like I said - another firmware bug. Of course, under "normal" circumstances no one would notice because the clock would periodically be resynced to either TVGoS or the PSIP average.


but would now do so every 24 hours.)

