AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Recorders › The Official AVS Dish DTVPal DVR Topic!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Official AVS Dish DTVPal DVR Topic! - Page 216

post #6451 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay427 View Post

I did a factory reset, formated the dive twice, disabled the updates and tried to watch the 10:00 news and the thing rebooted twice.

So after having the unit for a day and a half its rebooted/froze 17 times.

Now what?

Have any of you returned a unit and got a working one back?

I did not try the firmware update but from what I here that does not change anything or correct this issue.

Jay

I had a problem with multiple reboots. A friend installed a larger drive and the problem ended. He believes that the SATA cables are the problem. Possibly opening up the case and reseating the cables could help--but make sure someone opens the case who understands all the clips and hidden screws. Info elsewhere in this site.
post #6452 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick1204 View Post

I had a problem with multiple reboots. A friend installed a larger drive and the problem ended. He believes that the SATA cables are the problem. Possibly opening up the case and reseating the cables could help--but make sure someone opens the case who understands all the clips and hidden screws. Info elsewhere in this site.

Look at first post on how to take it apart.
post #6453 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay427 View Post

I did a factory reset, formated the dive twice, disabled the updates and tried to watch the 10:00 news and the thing rebooted twice.

So after having the unit for a day and a half its rebooted/froze 17 times.

Now what?

Have any of you returned a unit and got a working one back?

I did not try the firmware update but from what I here that does not change anything or correct this issue.

Jay

F206 fixed the reboot for almost everyone. If it is a new unit it should already have F207 or F208. Again if it is a new unit I would check the firmware version and if it is F206 or greater send it back while it is still in warranty. Once you start trying to open it there is no going back.
post #6454 of 17068
The post you are responding to is over 6 months old. He is talking about an original Gen-1 unit (before it was pulled from the market for 2 months) and the firmware update he cites is pre F206.
post #6455 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillN937 View Post

F206 fixed the reboot for almost everyone. If it is a new unit it should already have F207 or F208. Again if it is a new unit I would check the firmware version and if it is F206 or greater send it back while it is still in warranty. Once you start trying to open it there is no going back.

I got a new unit last week from solidsignal and it came with F202.
post #6456 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by sivartk View Post

I'm so paranoid, I block the 5 trackers that appear on this website with Ghostery --> Info https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9609

[ot] I checked out this addon and it still lists the trackers even though they are blocked with Adblock. So what's the purpose of Ghostery?? Disclaimer . . . since I am still on FF 2x, I had to install an older version. Don't know what features the new version has. [/ot]
post #6457 of 17068
The unit I got yesterday came with F206. Updated to 208 right away.
post #6458 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdchance View Post

I got a new unit last week from solidsignal and it came with F202.

Wow, that one's been sitting around in a dark corner for a while. How much dust was on the box.
post #6459 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by LenL View Post

Anyone reading this forum with doubts about the PAL let me tell you my experience.

I never used a DVR before. I bought the PAL at the end of June and only used it till now for the tuner, program guide and the neat ability to pause LIVE TV. Which is great if you get a phone call you have to take.

Not much on TV to record during the summer but I thought I would record some Law and Orders and watch them Sunday night.

Well I did the record and viewing and the PAL works super. Now I can see what all the fuss is about using a DVR in place of a VCR. The picture was great! Setting the PAL up to record was simple.

Don't hesitate...get one.

I'd have to disagree and recommend that it's not worth the gamble to pick up this device.

Sony (or someone who really knows how to make CE products) should come out with a subscription-free DVR that is more akin to a traditional VCR. Use PSIP data, which is mandatory ala FCC anyway now for digital broadcasts, to populate a rudimentary program guide, and provide a basic DVR, flat free no subscriptions (people hate subcriptions), and there will be a box in every home in America.
post #6460 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelson View Post

Wow, that one's been sitting around in a dark corner for a while. How much dust was on the box.

No dust on the box that I saw...and more important it's worked flawless so far.

13 days, 1 hour, 23 minutes and 12 seconds since last (first) boot.

Have their been any changes to the hardware itself made since early units?
post #6461 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by usmcartillery View Post

I'd have to disagree and recommend that it's not worth the gamble to pick up this device.

Sony (or someone who really knows how to make CE products) should come out with a subscription-free DVR that is more akin to a traditional VCR. Use PSIP data, which is mandatory ala FCC anyway now for digital broadcasts, to populate a rudimentary program guide, and provide a basic DVR, flat free no subscriptions (people hate subcriptions), and there will be a box in every home in America.

But wouldnt they then run into the same legal problems that Dish is now running into due to the TiVo patents and such?

I'm sure once their patents expire, which may not be for a while, there will be a jump in DVR mnufacturing. For now the DTVPal DVR is probably the only non subscription DVR to be had...unless one acquires an older model with a seperate tuner box and g-link cable to control it.
post #6462 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdchance View Post

Have their been any changes to the hardware itself made since early units?

I don't think anyone knows for sure.
post #6463 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwiser View Post

But wouldnt they then run into the same legal problems that Dish is now running into due to the TiVo patents and such?

It has certainly been a topic of speculation but I don't believe anyone has established that Dish's Pal DVR has fallen afoul of the TiVo patents.
post #6464 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by usmcartillery View Post

Sony (or someone who really knows how to make CE products) should come out with a subscription-free DVR that is more akin to a traditional VCR. Use PSIP data, which is mandatory ala FCC anyway now for digital broadcasts, to populate a rudimentary program guide, and provide a basic DVR, flat free no subscriptions (people hate subcriptions), and there will be a box in every home in America.

Sony, and others, already came out with them a few years ago. They were expensive and a market flop. I think Dish marketing is exploring the waters of using the Pal DVR as an entry device for their on-line VOD service. If they cannot establish that market, I would not be surprised to see the Pal DVR go the way of the Sony.
post #6465 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelson View Post

The post you are responding to is over 6 months old. He is talking about an original Gen-1 unit (before it was pulled from the market for 2 months) and the firmware update he cites is pre F206.

Didn't notice that since I was responding to something only a couple of posts back but the main point still exists. F206 seems to have fixed the problem so load F206 or F208 before trying anything else.
post #6466 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdchance View Post

No dust on the box that I saw...and more important it's worked flawless so far.

13 days, 1 hour, 23 minutes and 12 seconds since last (first) boot.

Have their been any changes to the hardware itself made since early units?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelson View Post

I don't think anyone knows for sure.

The people who have looked didn't notice much differance. The early boxes that have had the F206+ firmware loaded seem to be working OK (for the most part, a few are still reporting lockups) so the evidence suggests that the hardware has not changed but "only the Shadow knows".
post #6467 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by usmcartillery View Post

I'd have to disagree and recommend that it's not worth the gamble to pick up this device.

Sony (or someone who really knows how to make CE products) should come out with a subscription-free DVR that is more akin to a traditional VCR. Use PSIP data, which is mandatory ala FCC anyway now for digital broadcasts, to populate a rudimentary program guide, and provide a basic DVR, flat free no subscriptions (people hate subcriptions), and there will be a box in every home in America.

The Pal DVR does all that plus it can use TGVOS if it is available. Turn TVGOS off and it will use PSIP.

Even though Echostar seemed to rush this thing to market before it was ready (to meet the Christmas market?), they have fixed most of the problems. I think the problem is not that they don't know how to build a CE product but that they are not used to dealing with the consumer market and the way they handled the problems has left a bad taste in peoples mouth.
post #6468 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelson View Post

Sony, and others, already came out with them a few years ago. They were expensive and a market flop.

That's a shame. It seems to me that the consumer market either was not ready for them at the time or was not aware of them. I, for one, had never heard of them until I first came to AVS Forum a year or so ago.

It almost seems like Dish wants their OTA products to fail because they haven't really promoted them. I mean if you could buy the DTVPal DVR at brick and mortar stores, they would probably be flying off the shelves. Due to the DTV transition, many OTA viewers are either getting by using a converter box and a VCR or have purchased a DVD recorder partly because they don't know that there is another alternative available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelson View Post

I think Dish marketing is exploring the waters of using the Pal DVR as an entry device for their on-line VOD service.

I think that would be a great feature to have. However, it would probably involve some sort of subscription or pay per use fee; and judging from the sentiment regarding subscriptions here, I doubt that it would be a very popular feature. I think the smarter marketing decision would be to make the DVR more widely available and add name based recording and auxiliary storage to the mix before adding VOD services.
post #6469 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by usmcartillery View Post

Sony (or someone who really knows how to make CE products) should come out with a subscription-free DVR that is more akin to a traditional VCR. Use PSIP data, which is mandatory ala FCC anyway now for digital broadcasts, to populate a rudimentary program guide, and provide a basic DVR, flat free no subscriptions (people hate subcriptions), and there will be a box in every home in America.

If it depended strictly on PSIP, and only being able to program through the guide, it'd probably go over like a lead balloon.

It would have to have a back-up manual timer and manual clock setting, and be priced cheaply enough (like the Pal), before it would sell at all.

And then, at that price, they'd have to be able to make it reliable. Not to beat a dead horse, but you get what you pay for with these things - one way or another (one big reason why the Pal DVR is so cheap is because they don't use any quality control - other than you, the consumer).

Not having TVGOS in it would cut down the cost quite a bit, I'm sure. But as long as it's an HD DVR, it should sell some. Don't know if it would sell enough for it to be worth it for them to make, though. Of course, they'd have to actually market the thing this time.

There was actually a Zenith DVR just like that a few years back (the first, standalone, HD DVR, I think). That didn't sell very well at the time, but maybe now something like that would do better (considering that PSIP was in it's early stages and even worse shape then).

I seriously doubt if Sony will ever make anything of that sort so cheap, though. They seem to only be interested in making $3000.00 "digital entertainment" systems now (under the "VAIO" line). And I imagine the copy-protection or HDCP is atrocious, anyway, like with their DVD recorders (and that's because they're also such a huge content provider now).
post #6470 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by usmcartillery View Post

I'd have to disagree and recommend that it's not worth the gamble to pick up this device.

Sony (or someone who really knows how to make CE products) should come out with a subscription-free DVR that is more akin to a traditional VCR. Use PSIP data, which is mandatory ala FCC anyway now for digital broadcasts, to populate a rudimentary program guide, and provide a basic DVR, flat free no subscriptions (people hate subcriptions), and there will be a box in every home in America.

I have two Sony DHGs and had also considered buying one of these units for extra recording. But since it is the summer and with the fall looking a little on new good programming, I will wait till I have areal need. From what I read, there are problems and those seem to be getting addressed, so when the time comes I'll give it a shot.
The reason VCRs went over so well when they came out was for several reasons: 1- Ability to record a second show while watching something else. 2- To record your favorite shows weekly( since back then the networks did not play games with the time slots) 3- You could use it to watch tapes you bought or rented (movies, adult stuff and such) 4 It was a brand new gadget that had no other competition. It was simple, easy to use.
Today though, we have so much more to choose from: SAT,OTA,Cable, and not to mention Hulu and the like as well as the own networks streaming content to watch on demand. Plus factor in the studios anti-copying schemes and I can see why it is so difficult to make and sell these DVRs. Oh, and not to mention the advertisers who hate the commercial skipping of these devices.
Michael
post #6471 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by fox200 View Post

Has anyone else in the Bay Area lost their guide data for channel 2 (KTVU)?
Both PSIP and TVGOS are missing for (KTVU). I have 3 units and it's missing the info on all 3.

Yes same here
post #6472 of 17068
Has anyone noticed as more and more "positive owner reviews" pour in, the louder a couple of "non-owner" posters become trashing Dish and the DTVPal DVR?


Just saying.
post #6473 of 17068
*crickets chirping*

Or maybe not.
post #6474 of 17068
Seems like a lot of problems might be fixed if Dish just let us turn off the tv guide OTA and then sent it over the ethernet instead.
post #6475 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhe View Post

Seems like a lot of problems might be fixed if Dish just let us turn off the tv guide OTA and then sent it over the ethernet instead.

Are You willing to then PAY for the guide information ? What's it worth to you ?
$1 / month ? More ?
post #6476 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhe View Post

Seems like a lot of problems might be fixed if Dish just let us turn off the tv guide OTA and then sent it over the ethernet instead.

To me, one of the best things about the DTVPal DVR is that it is 100% functional WITHOUT a connection to the internet. This means that regardless of future lawsuit settlements, or advertising partnership deals, or corporate bankruptcies, or whatever, the functionality of my DVR CANNOT be affected by anyone unless I ACTIVELY CONSENT to download a software update manually. You can't get this "peace of mind" from Tivo or any cable or sat-box DVR.

This factor (and the $400 price advantage) made the DTVPal an easy choice for me. I've had it for a little over 2 months now. Bought it direct from Dish. Shipped with F206, ran perfectly no clock-drift, re-boots or anything. I loaded F208 recently after all the positive reviews on this forum. Still works flawlessly.
post #6477 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrpastore View Post

To me, one of the best things about the DTVPal DVR is that it is 100% functional WITHOUT a connection to the internet. This means that regardless of future lawsuit settlements, or advertising partnership deals, or corporate bankruptcies, or whatever, the functionality of my DVR CANNOT be affected by anyone unless I ACTIVELY CONSENT to download a software update manually. You can't get this "peace of mind" from Tivo or any cable or sat-box DVR.

This factor (and the $400 price advantage) made the DTVPal an easy choice for me. I've had it for a little over 2 months now. Bought it direct from Dish. Shipped with F206, ran perfectly no clock-drift, re-boots or anything. I loaded F208 recently after all the positive reviews on this forum. Still works flawlessly.

I agree. My setup is far from my router. I could run an ethernet cable, but it would likely take 4 hours to do. I like having my HT separate from my computer setup too. When I watch tv, I just want to veg. I got a bad box first (dead tuner) and then the replacement box has worked great. It is now running fw208. My only gripe is that the guide doesn't show the tv that I was watching, like exists in the menu. I put my old samsung STB on ebay too, so upgrading to a DVR will cost $50-100 :-)
post #6478 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by WillN937 View Post

I have MSN as my home page (have to use something) and they had a feature on the worst tech flops of the decade. Number two is the standalone DVR. Obviously someone just does not get it. I would say it is them and I blame it on the assumption that you have to have cable but if the product does not sell that is what the makers look at. I have several friends who have cable for one reason, the programming guide and they just can't understand the concept of PSIP or TVGOS being free.

We should be thankful that Echostar/Dish has given us this wonderful product even with the ocasional wart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelson View Post

I believe you may be mistaken. If that is the same article I saw, the #2 flop listed was the standalone DVD recorder, not the DVR. They showed a picture of a Panasonic recorder.

That makes sense. For me, standalone DVD recorders never had much to offer beyond my old VCRs. Why would I want another device with the same headaches of swapping tapes (or discs) in and out, trying to find your recordings, etc. I could never understand why the box stores carried multiple brands of DVD recorders, but no hard drive recorders. Once I got wind of a hard drive recorder with dual tuners, then I was finally interested in getting rid of the VCRs and getting a DVR.
post #6479 of 17068
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhe View Post

Seems like a lot of problems might be fixed if Dish just let us turn off the tv guide OTA and then sent it over the ethernet instead.

You can turn off TVGOS but then you will have to bug your stations to send more than the minimum PSIP (assuming you want to have a full guide).
post #6480 of 17068
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooper View Post

Are You willing to then PAY for the guide information ? What's it worth to you ?
$1 / month ? More ?

I think it would be great if Dish gave people the option of getting both the clock and guide data over the Internet.

TiVo sets its clock every night using an Internet time server. There are hundreds of free Internet time servers available, so Dish Network could probably improve the reliability of the DVR if they could set the time each night using such a time server.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Recorders
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Recorders › The Official AVS Dish DTVPal DVR Topic!