After reading the above comments on s-video....and that s-video connection would have "superior" video quality (as in the case for the Channel Master CM7000) over composite...
However according to Wiki, S-video is not suitable for hd signals...so what gives?
"Due to a lack of bandwidth, S-Video connections are generally not considered suitable for high-definition video signals. As a result, HD sources are generally connected to a monitor by way of analog component video or wideband digital methods (usually HDMI or DVI). However, on the older monitors with S-Video but without HDMI and DVI, some graphics cards have full display (including bootup display) with HDMI, DVI and S-Video and partial full display (displaying only after the OS boots up) with component and composite. So in this case, S-Video works well as it allows the user to see the display in the event that they need to adjust settings in the CMOS..."
"S-Video cables are used for computer-to-TV output for business or home usage. Because it is very simple to convert S-Video to composite signal (just the logical merging of the two through a filter capacitor is required), many electronics retailers offer converter adaptors for signal conversion. Conversion will not improve image quality, but will allow connecting to otherwise-incompatible devices. Converting composite signal to S-Video is harder, because once Luminance and Color are merged it is hard to separate them while minimizing loss. High quality comb filters are commonly used to separate the signals."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-Video
I'm thinking of getting a s-video adapter for the low loss composite Monster 2 video cable I got for the Zen DTT901 routed to my 30" Tantus EDTV...but after I read the above article, it makes me think twice...it could be for naught.
However according to Wiki, S-video is not suitable for hd signals...so what gives?
"Due to a lack of bandwidth, S-Video connections are generally not considered suitable for high-definition video signals. As a result, HD sources are generally connected to a monitor by way of analog component video or wideband digital methods (usually HDMI or DVI). However, on the older monitors with S-Video but without HDMI and DVI, some graphics cards have full display (including bootup display) with HDMI, DVI and S-Video and partial full display (displaying only after the OS boots up) with component and composite. So in this case, S-Video works well as it allows the user to see the display in the event that they need to adjust settings in the CMOS..."
"S-Video cables are used for computer-to-TV output for business or home usage. Because it is very simple to convert S-Video to composite signal (just the logical merging of the two through a filter capacitor is required), many electronics retailers offer converter adaptors for signal conversion. Conversion will not improve image quality, but will allow connecting to otherwise-incompatible devices. Converting composite signal to S-Video is harder, because once Luminance and Color are merged it is hard to separate them while minimizing loss. High quality comb filters are commonly used to separate the signals."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-Video
I'm thinking of getting a s-video adapter for the low loss composite Monster 2 video cable I got for the Zen DTT901 routed to my 30" Tantus EDTV...but after I read the above article, it makes me think twice...it could be for naught.









