AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Definitive Technology Mythos Series Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Definitive Technology Mythos Series Thread - Page 114

post #3391 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnbum88 View Post

I have my ST's plugged into those Monster individual surge protectors for a piece of mind since they could not reach my Panamax. IMO worth the 20-30 bucks or whatever I paid for them.

I suggest getting a surge suppressor that has a power filter/conditioner included. AFAIK, UPS models usually do this by default. Power lines can carry a lot of garbage noise, especially in shared buildling (condo) complexes (not sure if that is the case here).
post #3392 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolplazma View Post

I suggest getting a surge suppressor that has a power filter/conditioner included. AFAIK, UPS models usually do this by default. Power lines can carry a lot of garbage noise, especially in shared buildling (condo) complexes (not sure if that is the case here).

This is what I bought.

http://www.amazon.com/Monster-PowerP...548419&sr=8-10

I have a house that is less than 5 years old and I have not had any issues. I was just noting for the other post.
post #3393 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolplazma View Post

Why would you need to, and why would that be any better?

If you have fuse issues, I'd seriously consider using a power filter/surge suppressor first, and if you have brown-out issues (low wall power capacity) use a small UPS bar (APC is one mfr) to handle buffering power drops. If you are in a condo complex, this can be especially critical... who knows what your neighbors are doing ?!

The HiFi tuning fuse have got some rave reviews. People are saying they are surprised of how much improvement it made over the stock fuse.
post #3394 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by bamboo5354 View Post

The HiFi tuning fuse have got some rave reviews. People are saying they are surprised of how much improvement it made over the stock fuse.

Let me guess...

Every frequency has increased transparency and clarity. Inter-note silence is dramatic, resulting in a velvety black background. Treble is sweet but never strident, midrange is strikingly clean, and bass is strong and nimble - never bloated. Transient response is fast with a smooth natural decay. Imaging is greatly enhanced both on and off-axis, and the soundstage is more three-dimensional.
post #3395 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by palmfish View Post
Let me guess...

Every frequency has increased transparency and clarity. Inter-note silence is dramatic, resulting in a velvety black background. Treble is sweet but never strident, midrange is strikingly clean, and bass is strong and nimble - never bloated. Transient response is fast with a smooth natural decay. Imaging is greatly enhanced both on and off-axis, and the soundstage is more three-dimensional.
GAWF snakeoil and complete waste of money. These are nothing more than an "improved electrical current fuse element and contact points", there are no line conditioning properties are there? NOT. Buy a proper surge suppressor with a builtin line conditioner instead... they're actually cheaper and actually work.
post #3396 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by palmfish View Post

Let me guess...

Every frequency has increased transparency and clarity. Inter-note silence is dramatic, resulting in a velvety black background. Treble is sweet but never strident, midrange is strikingly clean, and bass is strong and nimble - never bloated. Transient response is fast with a smooth natural decay. Imaging is greatly enhanced both on and off-axis, and the soundstage is more three-dimensional.

I have to take you at your word. I find it hard to believe though. I have worked with electronics for over 30 years and a fuse is a fuse. None of us like to feel we spent our $'s to improve sound and it doesn't work including me. We then perceive we hear a difference. You must have miracle ears. Think of it this way; if you use a $.99 light switch and change to a $15 light switch, does the light look brighter or different when you turn it on?
post #3397 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maddmaster View Post

I have to take you at your word. I find it hard to believe though. I have worked with electronics for over 30 years and a fuse is a fuse. None of us like to feel we spent our $'s to improve sound and it doesn't work including me. We then perceive we hear a difference. You must have miracle ears. Think of it this way; if you use a $.99 light switch and change to a $15 light switch, does the light look brighter or different when you turn it on?

Sorry guys, I used all of those hyperbolic stereotypical audiophile terms as a (poor) attempt at humor.

I have read reviews like that for everything from cable lifters to demagnetizers and I always just laugh. I guess my sarcasm didn't translate well to the written word.
post #3398 of 5241
I have this theater room with Definitive Tech Mythos series speakers.
Front L-R : Mythos STS (built in Sub)
Front Center : Mythos Nine
Front Heights : ProMonitor 100
Side Surrounds : Mythos Twos
Rear Sides: Mythos Six
Extra Sub : BIC PL-200 12" Sub (inside the front right cabinet-next to door)

FRONT VIEW:

FRONT RIGHT (STS-R and PM100-Top side wall):

FRONT LEFT (STS-L and PM100-Top Side wall):

REAR RIGHT (M2 Side and M6 Rear):

REAR LEFT (M2 Side and M6 Rear):


All are ran by a 9.2 Onkyo 3007 Receiver with Audessey. 100" screen drops down from ceiling in the front.

For some reason, I just dont feel that it sounds as it should.
1. how does this layout look to you?
2. Are the side surrounds too high?
3. since there are two rows of seating (with the side surrounds right in front of the first row seating) is it better to go Bi-polar speakers?
4. I know that most movie audios throws the surrounds to the side surrounds..which is great sound for the first row but the second row is not that strong...should I have the main surrounds wired to the rear surrounds on my Onkyo?
5. I have another 12" sub (BIC PL200) in the front right side inside the cabinet. Is this a good location since my front STS has a built in subwoofer in both fronts?
5. any other improvements or suggestions to my layout?
post #3399 of 5241
Thread Starter 
Hi, hipertec:

First of all, what a beautiful room!

What exactly sounds off to you? Is it a muddy center channel, lack of bass, too much bass, non-convincing surround field?
post #3400 of 5241
thank you. well, I just expected to be much more surrounding where you feel as if you are all in the movies. thats why I even added the height speakers (could do the wides since with must be farther apart from the STS and my layout would not allow this.)

Im also wondering if I should try the BPX for the sides and move the M2s to the rear OR move the Side surrounds to the rear walls to get more of the full surround in the two rows of seats. BUt i have read this is the correct way of doing the surrounds. (having the main surrounds on the side walls instead of the rear.)

I also noticed that during music, it doesnt perform as well as my B&W inwall speakers I have in my living room (5.1 setup with the surrounds on the rear wall-no side walls to mount) Are the Mythos designed more for movies thank music?
post #3401 of 5241
Are you using any EQ? I didn't notice you mentioning what you did to dial in the system regarding distance/levels, etc, but I noticed moving the speakers and subs around bit-by-bit, along with fine tuning levels on the STS's, subs, distance setting on the AVR can make a rather significant change in experience. If you already have, sorry, it's just something a lot of people don't bother with and miss out on what their systems are capable of so I tend to ask that question first.

Also, in regards to auto-eq systems, I am for them but with the caveat that they take a bot more effort than some people originally think. If you are using Audyssey there is a great setup guide available and a very useful and active thread in the AVR section of the forum. Same goes for MCACC if you are using a Pioneer.

That would be the first place I'd check. If you are looking at adding things, maybe some room treatments or an upgraded sub (surprising what good base does for the sense of spaciousness in a system), but I'd hate to change the decor in that room of yours. You have a great looking room and some fabulous speakers, you should be able to have a very satisfying experience with those. Also, I personally think the STS's do a great job for music, but that may depend on the music type you listen to. If it is metal, hard rock, rap, maybe not so great. Jazz, blues, acoustic, choral, classical, folk-rock, etc (should) sound great once the speakers are set up properly.
post #3402 of 5241
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipertec View Post

thank you. well, I just expected to be much more surrounding where you feel as if you are all in the movies. thats why I even added the height speakers (could do the wides since with must be farther apart from the STS and my layout would not allow this.)

Im also wondering if I should try the BPX for the sides and move the M2s to the rear OR move the Side surrounds to the rear walls to get more of the full surround in the two rows of seats. BUt i have read this is the correct way of doing the surrounds. (having the main surrounds on the side walls instead of the rear.)

I also noticed that during music, it doesnt perform as well as my B&W inwall speakers I have in my living room (5.1 setup with the surrounds on the rear wall-no side walls to mount) Are the Mythos designed more for movies thank music?

Here's a few thoughts:

1. The most important instrument in your room is the room. Many problems can be traced back to the room characteristics. What are the dimensions of your room. Where are your seating positions located? If they are on any of the even fractions of any axis, your system will not reach it's full potential.

2. Distances are tough to judge on photos, but I think that if you are looking to improve the surround image, your side/rear surrounds are too close to your seating positions to use direct radiators. I would suggest moving your side and rears up as high as you can go to make them less localizable. Also, you might consider switch to bipole/dipole speakers to avoid firing towards the listening positions. (I used the Def Tech UIW surrounds as my side surrounds for this reason--they are voiced the same, but have a bipole-like configuration that are much more diffuse). If that is not feasible, you might be able to aim your direct radiators to bounce off a side surface to diffuse things better than you have currently.

3. I agree with Snowmanick. Audessey has been known to do some weird stuff at times. I'd try a manual/SPL meter calibration first and use a laser to aim your fronts and center to see how things sound with Audessey off. If you aim your fronts so that their axis intersects just in front of your primary listening position, you may find you have a much better soundstage (this is the case in my set up). Also, it's surprising how many centers are misaimed.

4. Be sure you are blending that extra sub carefully. I use a Velodyne sub-EQ; SVS makes one as well. If you aren't careful with your phases and EQ, those subs could be causing peaks which could be harming the midbass and treble of your Mythos' This will result in just a dull sounding set up. I was surprised at how much better things sounded in my dual sub setup when I carefully EQ'ed things and was able to see an FR curve.

5. The Mythos are excellent at music. In fact, it's a real strength in terms of how articulate the midbass and upper end are. (there is no midbass hump by design.) However, the subs need to be blended carefully (not an issue with your STS, but that second sub may be messing with things--see above). You might also try moving the STS away from the boundaries a little to see if that helps--the ideal space for your subs may not be the ideal place for your mains--you'll have to experiment to find out, and it's amazing what a few inches will do.

6. You mentioned that one of your subs is in a cabinet. Are any of your front three in a cabinet? That may be the issue right there. Mythos' need to be free!

7. Perhaps the most efficient way to solve your issues is to get a professional calibration. You'd end up with a top tuned system if the calibrator is good, and you wouldn't have to mess with it yourself (although I personally think that's half the fun!) They can also make better recommendations than I with regards to room treatments, etc.

Good luck!
post #3403 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipertec View Post

I have this theater room with Definitive Tech Mythos series speakers.
Front L-R : Mythos STS (built in Sub)
Front Center : Mythos Nine
Front Heights : ProMonitor 100
Side Surrounds : Mythos Twos
Rear Sides: Mythos Six
Extra Sub : BIC PL-200 12" Sub (inside the front right cabinet-next to door)

FRONT VIEW:

FRONT RIGHT (STS-R and PM100-Top side wall):

FRONT LEFT (STS-L and PM100-Top Side wall):

REAR RIGHT (M2 Side and M6 Rear):

REAR LEFT (M2 Side and M6 Rear):


All are ran by a 9.2 Onkyo 3007 Receiver with Audessey. 100" screen drops down from ceiling in the front.

For some reason, I just dont feel that it sounds as it should.
1. how does this layout look to you?
2. Are the side surrounds too high?
3. since there are two rows of seating (with the side surrounds right in front of the first row seating) is it better to go Bi-polar speakers?
4. I know that most movie audios throws the surrounds to the side surrounds..which is great sound for the first row but the second row is not that strong...should I have the main surrounds wired to the rear surrounds on my Onkyo?
5. I have another 12" sub (BIC PL200) in the front right side inside the cabinet. Is this a good location since my front STS has a built in subwoofer in both fronts?
5. any other improvements or suggestions to my layout?

Move the sub to a corner in the back of the room. It is probably cancelling out some of the bass from the Front 2 towers with the subs. I had to move mine because of the same thing you are probably experiencing.

BTW, great looking room.
post #3404 of 5241
Does anyone think I such change my M2 or M6 surrounds to the BPX? Would a bi polar speaker help in my layout config? Anyone with a direct comparison from the M2/6 against the BPX or BP1.2?
Also, does anyone think I have my M2/M6 too high?
post #3405 of 5241
MVP makes some great points. We both agree that your surrounds can be moved higher not lower as you are wondering. You still really never said what part of the sound you are not happy with. Front sound stage, surrounds, bass response. I was somewhat disappointed with the STS Towers after using the One's until I played with their positions. A slight toe-in and a inch or two move made a huge difference. Also they sound alot better now that they are broken in.
post #3406 of 5241
thanks for the response. Truly, Im just not too happy with the surrounds. The front row seems to be good but the back row is not as developing to the sounds. It may be because of the M2 closer to the 1st row that is why I am wondering if the BPX would be a better speaker for me.
Also, for some reason the bass is also lacking in the front row. the back row is awesome bass but not in the 1st rown.
I will try moving the STSs a slight toe in...but I dont see how much more since the area where the STSs are confined.
post #3407 of 5241
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipertec View Post

thanks for the response. Truly, Im just not too happy with the surrounds. The front row seems to be good but the back row is not as developing to the sounds. It may be because of the M2 closer to the 1st row that is why I am wondering if the BPX would be a better speaker for me.
Also, for some reason the bass is also lacking in the front row. the back row is awesome bass but not in the 1st rown.
I will try moving the STSs a slight toe in...but I dont see how much more since the area where the STSs are confined.

Hi, hipertec:

If the bass in one row is markedly different that the other, that implies that your first row is sitting in a bass null.

Can you show us a schematic with actual measurements in terms of the placement of your head in the front row at the primary seating position? I'd guess you are sitting at some multiple of 1/2; 1/4; 1/6; or 1/8th dimension of your room length, width, or height. If that's the case, you'll need to adjust the positon of the row to get the best results.

You can smooth out your bass with a second sub, but it has to be thought out well and there is some trial and error--you'll need at least an SPL meter and the ability to adjust phases on your subs. It's not that complicated usually, but it does require some care.

As others have pointed out, I'd start with optimizing your room, seat positions, and speaker placement first before investing in new equipment--you'll likey be amazed at the results.

PS: Before I forget, the rear surrounds problem is likely because your second row is behind the main surrounds. (Even if your receiver has the capability to matrix 5.1 mixes into 7.1 mixes in your receiver, the majority of the sound you're going to get in the rear row (from the rear surrounds) won't provide a great surround experience. ) One way to deal is to raise those surrounds up and consider moving the back row forward or move the side surrounds back a little and/or bounce them off something. All bipoles in the back might help, but I suspect the position is the key. If space is an issue, you might even consider going ceiling mounted for the side surrounds--this is what I did with the Def Tech Bipoles and it worked out really well for me. In addition, those beautiful rear drapes are probably also helping deaden some of the reflections from the rears, which may be hampering the surround effect as well.
post #3408 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipertec View Post
thanks for the response. Truly, Im just not too happy with the surrounds. The front row seems to be good but the back row is not as developing to the sounds. It may be because of the M2 closer to the 1st row that is why I am wondering if the BPX would be a better speaker for me.
Also, for some reason the bass is also lacking in the front row. the back row is awesome bass but not in the 1st rown.
I will try moving the STSs a slight toe in...but I dont see how much more since the area where the STSs are confined.
Take a breeze through the sample configurations at:

http://www.audioholics.com/tweaks/ge...-part-1-page-6

With the STSs and sub-corner, you currently have a mix of these configurations (figures 26a, 31a and 33a). Viewing fig 33a of single sub-right, you can see the front left side level is lowest, while the level ramps up toward the rear (@16ft), and even more so in fig 26a where there are 2 subs in the front right (like your STS & sub). Fig 27a may be of interest as a solution because of how the rear sub lifts up the middle section which is something you say is lacking.

You may want to try moving your sub to behind the rear row, then play with shifting it to fire left or right from various distances from the opposing side wall, or if you have the room try firing it forward from the center of the back wall. This is essentially how I have my SVS sub located in the back and firing to a side wall, while my STs dominate the front the bass response is nice throughout the room. Every room is very different accoustically, but the dual front ST(S) subs + 1 config (7.3?) is a similarity.

If your sub must stay where it is in the cabinet, maybe try moving your STSs to the rear corners and your Sixes to the front corners. Asthetically this could work out nice in your room, if you can find a good mount spot for the Sixes.

Lastly, your STSs are on carpet. Are you using the spikes in the base feet? You should give that a try too.
post #3409 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by yosh7 View Post

......if flat speakers are a must - then go with the xtr's... (but) the reality is that if you have speakers that don't go much below 120hz, the sub is going to have to do a ton of work in the mid-range and it may be tough to blend.

I noticed the DF website now lists an XTR-60 which contains two additional 3.5" XTDD Anodized Aluminum Dome Mid/Bass Drivers, and the Frequency Response is now claimed to be 70Hz - 30kHz. I'm wondering what kind of effect the additional 3.5" drivers would have and if it's enough to eliminate the blending issue someone commented about previously. Thanks.

Dave
post #3410 of 5241
Need a little help with trying to decide my next equipment purchase. But I have a couple of lead-up questions:
1. Would a pair of Mythos Ones and 1 SuperCube I or 2 SuperCube IIIs sound as good as a pair of Mythos ST or STSs?
2. Has anyone tried a 9.1 Audyssey High and Wide setup with Mythos?

Here's my purchase question:

Mythos ST or STS (depending on price) vs Onkyo TX-NR3008 (for Audyssey 9.1)

Purchase 1:
Buy Onkyo TX-NR3008 for 9.1 Audyssey setup with Mythos Ones in the front, Mythos Fives in the wide position, Heights - ProMonitor 800, BP2X or Mythos Twos as surround (which would work better here? Are the Twos too much for surround?), and 1 SuperCube III (possibly adding another SuberCube III).

or

Purchase 2:
Buy Mythos ST or STS (budget=$2500), postpone new receiver and the Audyssey setup, continue to use Pioneer VSX-94TXH in a 7.1 setup. Do you think the soundstage and imaging of the ST would sound better than the Audyssey setup?

Long Term, both will probably come true: ST as fronts, Ones as wides, etc. But until then, which upgrade should I do first?

Thanks.
post #3411 of 5241
IMO, do it right the first time. Start off with ST/STS fronts, mythos ten for center and the gem xl or mythos tens for the rears piece by piece. Then I'd look at a receiver. If you feel you need for more lower end then I'd get a sub.
post #3412 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xip Xero View Post

Need a little help with trying to decide my next equipment purchase. But I have a couple of lead-up questions:
1. Would a pair of Mythos Ones and 1 SuperCube I or 2 SuperCube IIIs sound as good as a pair of Mythos ST or STSs?
2. Has anyone tried a 9.1 Audyssey High and Wide setup with Mythos?

Here's my purchase question:

Mythos ST or STS (depending on price) vs Onkyo TX-NR3008 (for Audyssey 9.1)

Purchase 1:
Buy Onkyo TX-NR3008 for 9.1 Audyssey setup with Mythos Ones in the front, Mythos Fives in the wide position, Heights - ProMonitor 800, BP2X or Mythos Twos as surround (which would work better here? Are the Twos too much for surround?), and 1 SuperCube III (possibly adding another SuberCube III).

or

Purchase 2:
Buy Mythos ST or STS (budget=$2500), postpone new receiver and the Audyssey setup, continue to use Pioneer VSX-94TXH in a 7.1 setup. Do you think the soundstage and imaging of the ST would sound better than the Audyssey setup?

Long Term, both will probably come true: ST as fronts, Ones as wides, etc. But until then, which upgrade should I do first?

Thanks.

If you have the space go with the ST's. I went from the One's to STS. I would have purchased the ST's but they were to large for the space I wanted to put them in. They would not have had any breathing room. I like the STS but have found their limit using a 460 wpc RMS to drive them. Your speakers will more then likely give you a bigger bang for the buck then relying totally on an Audyssey setup to do it for you. Most people after setting up their systems with Audyssey still tweak it a little for their personal taste.
post #3413 of 5241
Has anyone with a ST/STS setup tried running the pro monitor 1000's as surrounds? It seems like a good match with the same driver and tweeters. I have the ST/mythos ten as my fronts and just picked up 2 mythos tens for the surrounds but haven't hooked them up yet. Just thinking I could save about $1000 going to the pro monitor 1000's as surrounds.
post #3414 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by leroyjr1 View Post

Has anyone with a ST/STS setup tried running the pro monitor 1000's as surrounds? It seems like a good match with the same driver and tweeters. I have the ST/mythos ten as my fronts and just picked up 2 mythos tens for the surrounds but haven't hooked them up yet. Just thinking I could save about $1000 going to the pro monitor 1000's as surrounds.

I haven't listened to them but it's been my experience that extra large speakers for surround is over kill, but it's a personal preference. You will have to the judge though. You know what you are looking for as far as sound quality. It's subjective as far as what each of us considers as good sound.
post #3415 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by leroyjr1 View Post

Well went with the ST(s). Got (3) Mythos tens coming.

Nice setup! Did you get a chance to listen to the BP8080? Just curious how the ST's compaired to the BP8080.
post #3416 of 5241
Can't remember which BP's they were but they sounded outstanding for HT but I liked the ST's better for double duty.
post #3417 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by leroyjr1 View Post

Has anyone with a ST/STS setup tried running the pro monitor 1000's as surrounds? It seems like a good match with the same driver and tweeters. I have the ST/mythos ten as my fronts and just picked up 2 mythos tens for the surrounds but haven't hooked them up yet. Just thinking I could save about $1000 going to the pro monitor 1000's as surrounds.

Im running Pro Monitor 100's (older version of the 1000) for my Front Heights and they sound good and mixes well. But these are only used for my front heights which dont get too much use.
post #3418 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by voigtskins View Post

The EPIK Empire goes great with the Mythos ST.I have the Empire set in back corner of my Theater and the bass for Movies is fantastic also for Music it is very good with all music .The St have good bass for music but do not go down low enough for movies .The new Bluray movies with the HI DEF sound is very bass loaded and sounds great through a outside sub.Just hook up sub LFE ch. to your processor lfe ch and you are all set to hear a lot of great bass.You would use the crossover in the processor for yor bass settings not in your sub.

voigtskins-
Is the sealed Epik Empire better or a ported Sub to blend with the ST/STS?
I currently have STS with some BIC PL200 and looking towards a higher end sub that would work well with the STS.
post #3419 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipertec View Post
voigtskins-
Is the sealed Epik Empire better or a ported Sub to blend with the ST/STS?
I currently have STS with some BIC PL200 and looking towards a higher end sub that would work well with the STS.
That is the million dollar question as some like Ported and some like Sealed.They say ported is better for Movies as it gives more slam and other say sealed is better for Music.I love my Epik Empire for both as it gives great bass slam for movies and is very musical for music.If tuned in it is NOT BOOMY bass but very acurate. I have my ST playing full and not hooked up to LFE just speaker cables and bass set at 12 and 13 on back settings.The sound is FATASTIC.The Tens for surr.are great for Music and movies and also the TEN center for voice.
post #3420 of 5241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipertec View Post

voigtskins-
Is the sealed Epik Empire better or a ported Sub to blend with the ST/STS?
I currently have STS with some BIC PL200 and looking towards a higher end sub that would work well with the STS.

I have a ported Epik Sentinel running with my ST's and for movies they sound great together, but for music I like the ST's better by themselves.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Definitive Technology Mythos Series Thread