Quote:
Originally Posted by Carled 
Or it's a mea culpa. Calling an 120Hz panel with backlight scanning "240Hz" fits into the same sort of dodgy specmanship that Philips used when they claimed their panels had a "2ms" response rate. It'd be nice to see the industry move away from that.
Zones, not LEDs, and the dimming algorithm, determine how bad blooming is. They could have 6,220,800 LEDs and still have blooming problems if the zones were too big.
Sounds like a Chi Mei backlight. Panels don't have colour gamuts.
Chi Mei can make 55" panels though, but as far as I'm aware they're MVA not IPS.
Yeah, a 55" IPS LED-LCD with local dimming, motion interpolation, backlight strobing and HD media playback for $2k sounds like a terrible idea.
I'm curious as to what would be required in a TV for you to find it acceptable.

Or it's a mea culpa. Calling an 120Hz panel with backlight scanning "240Hz" fits into the same sort of dodgy specmanship that Philips used when they claimed their panels had a "2ms" response rate. It'd be nice to see the industry move away from that.
Zones, not LEDs, and the dimming algorithm, determine how bad blooming is. They could have 6,220,800 LEDs and still have blooming problems if the zones were too big.
Sounds like a Chi Mei backlight. Panels don't have colour gamuts.
Chi Mei can make 55" panels though, but as far as I'm aware they're MVA not IPS.
Yeah, a 55" IPS LED-LCD with local dimming, motion interpolation, backlight strobing and HD media playback for $2k sounds like a terrible idea.
I'm curious as to what would be required in a TV for you to find it acceptable.
$2000 is a lot of money to many people, especially here in America where thousands of jobs are being lost every day. The 55" screen isn't a big deal since people can buy a 73" RPTV for less. Motion interpolation is crap unless it's implemented properly. Same with the backlight. This display may be the 8th wonder of the world, we'll eventually find out. But to imply that people have no need to worry they may have an inferior product despite the 2K price tag that has "loaded" features is irresponsible. It's still a $2000 TV. A $2000 TV where there are still many people in this country who are freaking out because they have to switch to a digital converter. Vizio still needs to be accountable like all other OEMS no matter how many features you get with the low cost. I do hope this display turns out to be a gem, if it is, well, it could be in my living room also.

















I get the impression from the article that they are more married to this scheme than just throwing parts together for a prototype. I can't believe they would even float a prototype model with a color scheme that hideous!?


