AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › The Pioneer Elite BDP-09FD Owner's Thread...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Pioneer Elite BDP-09FD Owner's Thread... - Page 102

post #3031 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post

Yes imo 2ch LT/RT is the way to go. You are right when you say "more 3D like"

Thanks for verifying, SS. I still don't really get why both options are there, but I'm glad to at least understand what appears to be the slight difference.

And thanks to prepress for your original response.
post #3032 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post

I will tell you what worked before with the BDP-05/51 and getting a big fix firmware release from Pioneer. Of course if we do it be warned you will get a lot of personal attacks, as I did. And because of that I will not post on that thread.

What I did along with a online reviewer was to start to blast Pioneer, along with a few of the regulars on that thread and Walkamo.
By doing that I am guessing we cost Pioneer sales, and imo that's all they care about. Maybe I am wrong about that, but after the mess with the BDP-05/51, Its Pioneers turn to show us they really are tiring to turn things around.

I will give them a little more time before I start to blast Pioneer, but not two weeks more.

ss

Agreed. This is very frustrating. I am new to the forum, so you will have to let me know who Walkamo is.

I own an 09 and have it paired with an 111fd.
post #3033 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by progprog View Post

Thanks for verifying, SS. I still don't really get why both options are there, but I'm glad to at least understand what appears to be the slight difference.

And thanks to prepress for your original response.

Also if you have a good 2ch amp as I do. You can really hear big differences between Core DTS and DTS HD MA as well as True HD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan_colorado View Post

Agreed. This is very frustrating. I am new to the forum, so you will have to let me know who Walkamo is.

I own an 09 and have it paired with an 111fd.

Walkamo works for Pioneer Blu Ray division. Last time I checked he was VP of marketing for Pioneers Blu Ray division.
post #3034 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by joerod View Post

Any complaints? I still don't like the fact that if you hit Stop on the remote (by accident) you have to completely reload the entire movie again and start from scratch. I wish Blu ray player remotes would lose the Stop button. These are not VCRs! Speaking of load times the 09FD is not bad. It is not as fast as a couple other players but more on that later...

I too hate when the stop button stops the disc. I just had a great idea. Since you are using a programmable remote, don't program stop, or reprogram stop to be pause. If you want a stop button, move it to an unused and unlikely to be accidentally pressed button.

thoughts?...joe
post #3035 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by a guy View Post

I just finished playing with a Sony S5000es, a Denon 3800bdci, a Pioneer bdp-09, and a Pioneer BDP 51FD. (...and an old Denon 5900). I spent literally 3 weeks on my days off going at it...

..........
Good luck to you all...(and myself whom I may have made single by spending too much time with blu ray players instead of my girlfriend)

Very interesting observations. Thanks for taking the time to do that write-up. Can I ask how the comparison came about? I.e., did you buy all these players with the idea of returning the "losers?"
post #3036 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by a guy View Post

Hi Guys and Gals,

I have been reading these threads for a while in trying to decide, and had to give it a go myself.

I just finished playing with a Sony S5000es, a Denon 3800bdci, a Pioneer bdp-09, and a Pioneer BDP 51FD. (...and an old Denon 5900). I spent literally 3 weeks on my days off going at it...

All Players had the latest updates.

After listening and watching all four, here are my opinions...

1. Loading Speed: Batman Dark Night BR
Denon 3800 loaded about 20 sec. All three of the others took about 35 seconds. The Denon's latest update apparently is just about 2/3 faster than the other machines for loading BR discs which were virtually identical for load speeds. Denon wins the load contest, but they are all liveable.

2. Power on's to tray open were all almost identical on all four.

3. Picture: I have a 65" HD CRT TV. Those of you with GIANT or better screens should evaluate further, but here were my results;

In most tests, the Pioneer 51 and 09 were very similar in that you can tell they are both designed with the same characteristics, but the 09 has everything tweaked just better and has a few more adjustments, and I assume better componentry.

The Pioneer 09 (on my tv) is very rich, excellent, and, i'll say, cleaner than the 51, but the 51 is not bad. 51 was the darkest, least defined and most grainy of the 4 players.

Denon 3800 had a decent picture, but on my best adjustments it was no better, if not worse than my Denon 5900 when it comes to upsampling regular dvd's.

Sony s5000, for me was the Clear Winner (but only slightly over the 09) The main reason that makes it win over the Pioneer 09 is that with the 'reality enhancer' on, really did give a "3d" effect which really put people in a spacial setting in the pictures. ... almost like you could walk past one of them and talk to the person behind them and know exactly how many steps you would have to take. It was almost scary. (I have also seen this feature on smaller tv's and cheaper Sonys and they really got something there!) Otherwise, I would call the Sony picture a little cleaner, clearer, and brighter than the 09, but the 09 a little richer and more color saturated. So between the 09 and 5000, you should do your own comparison and choose your preference.

4. Analog Audio out sound:

The 51FD sounded just fine. As I said, the 09 is similar sounding in characteristic, but just ever so slightly richer sounding in its presentation. However, the 09 definitely lacks fine detail and ambiance in the analog outs that you would expect from a $2200 player. I would describe the sound as slightly bass heavy (not in a bad way, I liked the bass), and smooth. Similar to a system I had previously with B&K amplification and Paradigm Studio speakers. ...But definitely lacking if you have a higher end system. If I had to buy on analog sound alone, I would have a hard time paying 5-10x more for the 09 over the 51, and I quite frankly expected more with all those Wolfson DACs. Between the two, I would go for the 51 and not buy the 09 for it's analog sound. The 51 is similar style of sound and so close to the 09 I just could not justify.

The Denon 3800: I wanted to like the 3800 because, of the 4 players, it is the ONLY one with adjustable Bass Management. It had a great bunch of selections, and I loved its menus and remote, on screen display, and also you can a/b directly from the analogue to digital outs instantaneously. (On the other3 you have to go back in to the menu and stop the movie every time). The only problem was that after I got it all set up (Cool!!!...or so I thought...) The Sound Absolotely SUCKED from the analog outs. It sounded like a cheapo $50 player. It was clean and clear, but just dead boring. NO ambiance, NO richness, NO fullness, NO spatial effect, NO transient attack, NO detail, NO Nothing... just plain and clear but cheapie sound.

Sony S5000es:
Sony's Sound BY FAR was the best on my system. It actually has two settings on the DACs. "Sharp" and "Slow".
Sharp: Excellent in; Transient attack and Detail, Very good in; Ambiance, spatial effect, Richness, fullness (Not quite as rich/full bass as the 09 but seemed more accurate in that regard rather than a slightly maybe overemphasized rich/full in the 09)
Slow: Excellent in Ambiance, Spatial effect, and Detail, but slightly more "laid back" and less transient attack and detail than 'sharp', and similar in rich/full to 'sharp'.

For me I HAVE TO HAVE the best possible Analog outs of the players because my system does not have HDMI, but is very high end. To replace it with the new Krell, Classe, Meridian, etc. starts at $8000 and goes up from there.

If you have a "high end" system, say main speakers that start at $5000 up (Like, say, B&W Nautilus or Diamond series, or Paradigm signature series, Wilson, etc. or better), and/or older processor without HDMI like starting with say Krell, Classe, Theta, Proceed, you have no choice but to go with the Sony S5000es for sound.

If you have a GIANT or plasma display But Mid-fi (say Anthem, Denon, Sony, Pioneer processor, and Speakers that don't have the ultra tweeters, (like say Paradigm studio series, Klipsch, Polk Audio, B&W CDM, etc.) or an HDMI Pocessor that you already like the sound of, you should look at both the Sony 5000 and Pioneer 09. And if your system is slightly bright sounding (like maybe w/Klipsch speakers) you may prefer the sound of the Pioneer to the Sony.

Any other "lesser system", I thought the Pioneer 51 is just fine especially since it is around $300 now compared to $1500-2200 for the others. And then I would have to check out the Sony PS3 and Maybe the Panasonic, and maybe wait for Pioneers or Sony's New ones that are coming out soon.

As far as Denon is concerned, (I have and like other Denon Products), The 3800 is just a waste of money as far as sound, and the Pioneer 51 picture is almost just as good... So....

The things I didn't like about the Sony 5000 are:
Only one bass management setting (Speakers 'small' or 'Large')
It's hard to ff or rw to an exact spot on a disk.

Things I didn't like about Pioneer:
Lack of detail and ambiance in sound in analog
Only one bass Management setting (speakers 'small' or 'large')
No DTS MA (they say they are working on it)

Okay, so I think I probably left some things out, and I am sure I probably pissed someone off with my opinions and/or terminoligy, but after reading Joerod's review I really thought I would want the Pioneer even though it was slightly higher priced..., but then Denon had all the Fancy Jazzy Bass management adjustments, coolest remote, and best on screen menu presentation, it loaded fastest, and is easiest to get a deal on (But the sound SUCKED!) and picture was nothing special, and some guys on here said they have had breakage issues with their Denon Blu ray and DVD players. (My Denon 5900 DVD player has had NO defects since I bought it new)

Initially, I least expected to like the Sony S5000, but I figured I should try it, and after using it in MY system, I can't even consider the other 2g'ish players. Oh yeah, and the Sony has a 5 year Warranty as well.

I hope this review is helpful to all of you out there as it's a lot of $$$ to just lay down, and then decide you got the wrong one.

I'm sure next year we will all be kicking ourselves because Sony and Pioneer will have a newer better one and maybe you will be able to get a Denon A1-UD for 2g by then... and it specs out a lot better than the 3800 so maybe it will be (alot better).

Good luck to you all...(and myself whom I may have made single by spending too much time with blu ray players instead of my girlfriend)

This is why I'm glad I did a lot of research (too much as far as my eyes are concerned); the variety of experiences available offer an important perspective and resource. On another forum someone made similar comments about the 09's analog sound in comparing it with the 3800, and felt the 3800's sound was much better; many on this thread rave about the 09's sound. Your preference for the Sony's picture makes sense to me also, given your TV (65"!). I have a Pioneer PRO-111FD TV, and auditioned the 09 on one. I have no worries about PQ, as the picture was excellent.

You sound like me, an audio-first person who's gotten into video; I base that comment on your system. I'd say my system is a low/middle high-end one, not as heavy-duty as yours, but I've been pleased with it.

I should be receiving my 09 today or tomorrow and plan to experiment with interconnects. The 09 does have good bass energy, but how that sounds (tight, tubby, etc.) is system-dependent. The 5000's stereo outs were a big plus in my eyes, but a convergence of events led me to the 09 instead. I'd think the Sony's dedicated stereo outs will sound less heavy than the multichannel fronts for the same purpose. Did you try a comparison? I have a McIntosh MCD301 on the way for audio playback, so the 09 will be a video machine exclusively.

Thanks for the review/analysis. I'm thinking of posting my impressions once everything is up and running, but time will be a factor on that. I'll have to see.
post #3037 of 8425
yes, nice write up. That had to take some time.

That's why its so important if possible to decide for yourself. Seems like in alot of online reviews, the Sony ES is the least favored for audio and yet it's his favorite. I think it's fine. who can dispute the sound that you like or what I may like!

Worth repeating: Audio & Video ARE Subjective.

Actually I suspect if you put several of us in the same room and had differing players, we would all have preferences that may not line up.

Anyway, thanks for sharing this.
post #3038 of 8425
Ahhh just think where the Toshiba XA2 line would be by now if only someone wasnt paid off.

I tried the Sony as well and didnt like it. Using the original low end Toshiba parts I guess was a step in the right direction though.

I found the analog outs on the Pioneer vastly superior to Sony. I don't like the viewfinder appearance on some of the new projectors and bluray players.

What I would recommend is that one uses their own judgement. I appreciate that everyone has their own opinion and everyone will have their own preference.

*********************************************************

As far as a stop button I would just program a page on your remote to minimize the size of the stop button. Easy to do. and also move it to an alternate spot on the remote.
post #3039 of 8425
I think I have read that review previously on a UK message board. I think the discussion afterwards there was the poster was a Denon dealer with a lot of leftover 3800s......

EDIT:

A Guy

New member, 3 total posts, all the same post in different threads.

Sony player thread, this thread and help a guy decide thread.......
post #3040 of 8425
Update: my 09 arrived about an hour ago. I will probably wait for my new equipment racks to arrive (likely Saturday) before setting it up. I did inspect the 09's box, removing it from the shipping box, and all seems well. And I will experiment, as mentioned previously, with "Lt/Rt" vs. "Stereo" when it's up and running.

One thing that occurs to me is that most of my DVDs are music, which I'm used to hearing in stereo. I hope Lt/Rt won't sound weird to my ears. I preferred stereo by a bit in the store; even though Lt/Rt sounded more complete, it didn't sound quite right to me either. But my home system may be another story, where I can use familiar material. Here, I preferred stereo to surround mode with my DV8400; maybe the 09 will be different.
post #3041 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgfred View Post

I think I have read that review previously on a UK message board. I think the discussion afterwards there was the poster was a Denon dealer with a lot of leftover 3800s......

Could be, but if so why would he be dissing the Denon and recommending the Sony?
post #3042 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by kemitchell View Post

Could be, but if so why would he be dissing the Denon and recommending the Sony?

Brain Damage on my part on the Denon Dealer mention... Maybe it was a Sony ES dealer they had said. I just know I have read it before. Plus the poster is a new member with 3 total posts, the same post in 3 threads.

post #3043 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

I'm giving it 2 weeks
Then if no update I start PM'ing Walkamo. I recommend we all consider doing that to get his attention. He'll get tired of getting spammed. Better yet if someone knew his work email. ..ss9001

Take this: "For more information, or to contact a Pioneer spokesperson, please respond to Christina Ramirez, christina.ramirez@pioneer-usa.com."

and rework it to his name with the same domain. Just a guess.
post #3044 of 8425
From the 51/05 thread:

This fw update is in the final stages of development. The development process has been
extended to ensure the integrity of the update, and we thank you for your patience.

Please continue to check our website for announcement of update release.

Thank You,

Pioneer Support Group
post #3045 of 8425
Translated: keep waiting. Saw that email 3 mos ago. Let's see an exact date. I wonder what is going on at Pioneer.

But if true, I'll have my 09 sooner than later to review.
post #3046 of 8425
Hi again,

Just read a couple of replies here...

Why did I 'dis' the Denon? Reread the review. The reason I "dissed" the Denon was because that was the one I wanted... until I hooked it up, and it totally sounded whatever the opposite of high end is. Sound is half the battle, and the picture wasn't $1500 better than the PIO 51 for me. Isn't that what these reviews are for?

I am totally unbiased by brand and could care less who is trying to sell what. After spending all that time with them, I figured I should share.

Unfortunately, I have been playing with Stereo equipment for over 20 years and once you have heard sonic nirvana, it's very hard to go back.

If you have your basic surround sound system and TV, The Denon would be fine, but why pay $1500-$2000 for it when the PIO 51 (and probably some others) would be just fine for under $300 now?

This, for me, started out as I just wanted to add blue ray to my system, and read some reviews here so I bought a PIO 51. At first, Blu ray didn't seem all it was cracked up to be (long load times etc.) but for a few hundred, I could enjoy the discs I have.

Then I thought about what a couple of sales people told me and they offered me a chance to try theirs to see if it was worth spending a bunch more money.

My current HT processor, amp and speaker system retail for over $25,000. I don't want to spend $8-12,000 or more for a 'new' processor just to listen to Blu ray discs... So I decided to see if for 2g range one of these players with it's own Analog 7.1 DACs would suffice.

There is a difference between good electronic sound, and 'sounds like you are really there'.

I originally expected Pioneer 09 to be the winner based mostly on Joerod's review, and Sony and Denon to be similar but to what degree??? The sales people convinced me that the only way is to see for myself, so I did, and I figure I owe it to all the people here to share.

In my order of preference, regardless of price, analog 7.1 outs, the sound I preferred was:

SONY S5000ES: YOU ARE THERE, But your amp, processor pass through (doesn't mess with what the player is putting out), and speakers, have to be capable of "you are there" sound. For ME in MY system, The S5000ES is the only one worth spending $1200-$1500 extra for sound over the PIO 51. For example, on Eagles Live Hell freezes over: Hotel California; You can hear their fingers move on the guitar strings and each individual 'pluck' and resonation of the strings, even at lower volumes. On the PIO 09 (my second choice for sound), the sound is just sort of smoothed over and you just hear guitar sound, but not the fine detail and ambiance of each guitar string.

PIONEER BDP-09: FULL, RICH, and SMOOTH sound. I.E. it sounds nice and full, but it sounds like electronics and doesn't give you a "you are there" sensation. So if you don't have "you are there" electronics/speakers to match, the 09 may be better if you like the picture better. My highest experience within a brand speaker line is Paradigm. So for example, if you have the latest Sig series paradigm with the beryllium tweeters and you can hear the difference between that and the Studio series, This is the same difference between the Sony 5000 and PIO 09. So if you don't have the beryllium tweeters, you might not hear the detailed high freq differences between the 09 and 5000 and might find the smooth sound of the 09 more enjoyable. But I enjoy hearing ALL of the sound, which only the Sony provides, and therefore would not pay all the extra for the 09 when the 51 sounds nearly just as good for analog sound.

PIONEER BDP-51FD: Sounds just like the PIO 09 Characteristicly, and I guess it should since it also has Wolfson DACs and is also Pioneer so specs are probably similar. The 09 did sound ever so slightly Richer, cleaner, and slightly more detailed, Probably because it has better pwr supply, more DACs, and the ever so cool brass screws, etc. ... but not $1900 better than the 51 ON MY SYSTEM.

DENON 3800 BDCI: Dull and lifeless ON MY SYSTEM. I had to leave and come back hours later several times 'cause I thought I maybe had listeners fatigue or something and wanted to give it another shot. But every time I did, I was flat disappointed. ...I was so distraught by this and though my mind was playing tricks so I would then re-hook up the Sony and sure enough, there is a BIG difference ON MY SYSTEM

One time about 10 years ago, I asked an electronics store owner how one could justify all this cash outlay for speakers, electronics, etc. He told me that you only have one set of ears and that with higher end electronics, you don't have to keep turning it up more to sound good, and therefore your ears would allow you to enjoy great sound for your whole life instead of eventually ruining them. I filed that away in my mind at that time.

10 years later this thought resurfaced as I was evaluating the PIO 09. It sounded nice but I kept turning it up. I had my SPL in the 90dbs and still wanted to turn it up to get the full surround effect and detail I was hearing in the s5000es.

With the S5000, I enjoyed it at pretty much any volume and this would be the main reason I would consider spending 2g's on a Blu Ray, but with only one bass mgt. setting I wanted to try the Denon 'cause I was expecting them to be similar, but w/ more bass management.

I did, and was disappointed.

So I will reiterate... The only player that had the "sounds like you are there" sensation was the Sony, which took me by surprise.

This is all system dependent, and personal hearing preference.

I don't want to be a forum hog but it is very diffcult to get an idea what the reviewer is thinking based on a few sentences like "this one was great and the other one sucked" so I am trying to give you all my perspectives and why's during my 3 wk review. Mostly toward analog output sound because that is where I already have a lot invested in my system, and I haven't seen any real thorough reviews in that respect. I think they all have nice pictures compared to 10 years ago, but I still feel that there is a lot of room for improvement shortly on the horizon. Such as PIONEER's plasmas BLOW AWAY any other, but they only make 60" which is too small for me, and projectors are getting much brighter and faster in the last few years. So I'm still waiting on that purchase.

Well anyways... Thanks to people like Joerod and others on here and Kris Deering for his opinions over the years, I am pretty happy with my system.

Take care 'yall
post #3047 of 8425
That may be why I like the 09. Although I wouldn't characterize it as warm. I hear more detail, a bit more clarity.

I'm a HUGE film score nut. Seriously huge Film Score nut. What I really love about the 09 more than anything else perhaps is the 5.1 analog sound. Scores are richer, wider, and more alive. Not overbearingly so....

Now all of that is compared to bitstreaming to my Onkyo 805.
post #3048 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post

I wonder what is going on at Pioneer.

The 3-30 announcement probably helped sales of both the 09 & 51

Seriously, I believe Chris Walker was giving it his best shot estimating when the FW would be out. But who knows for sure...could have been a tease to help move inventory...some companies would do that!

It'll be interesting to see what GM does to keep sales from completely tanking as their day of reckoning approaches.

ss9001
post #3049 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

who knows for sure...could have been a tease to help move inventory...some companies would do that

these companies (Denon, Pioneer, Yamaha, Onkyo, etc.,...) have major japan-based development counter-parts, so USA-based business groups are (commonly) dependant upon groups over-sea's. Chris Walker may be hearing this info 3-layers over, initiated from a group of engineers, or staff-person(s), in japan.
post #3050 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss9001 View Post

Seriously, I believe Chris Walker was giving it his best shot estimating when the FW would be out.

ss9001

I agree! Chris has put himself in a tough position trying to keep us informed as to the status of more than just this firmware upgrade. For the most part Pioneer has been very timely with their fixes.

You know he may just be on vacation this week and have no idea the beating Pioneer is taking this week in these forums.

I knew when I bought my player I was going to have to wait the FW update. Living with the DTS core on my VSX-59TXi is not exactly water torture.
post #3051 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

these companies (Denon, Pioneer, Yamaha, Onkyo, etc.,...) have major japan-based development counter-parts, so USA-based business groups are (commonly) dependant upon groups over-sea's. Chris Walker may be hearing this info 3-layers over, initiated from a group of engineers, or staff-person(s), in japan.

Not a bad theory!
post #3052 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Glover View Post

yes, nice write up. That had to take some time.

That's why its so important if possible to decide for yourself. Seems like in alot of online reviews, the Sony ES is the least favored for audio and yet it's his favorite. I think it's fine. who can dispute the sound that you like or what I may like!

Worth repeating: Audio & Video ARE Subjective.

Actually I suspect if you put several of us in the same room and had differing players, we would all have preferences that may not line up.

Anyway, thanks for sharing this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by a guy View Post

This is all system dependent, and personal hearing preference.

I think "a guy"s original review and some of the feedback, like Tim's, highlight the seldom-noted point that so much is system-dependent as well as unit-dependent. The 09FD, 5000ES, Oppo, etc, can be ideal in one system but less-than-stellar in another.

This is why posters' reviews are useful primarily in the aggregate here. Few will have exactly the same system we do, and none will have the same set of ears , so we always come back to the necessity for testing new gear in in our own homes and in our own systems. That's really the only way to get it right.
post #3053 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgfred View Post

From the 51/05 thread:

This fw update is in the final stages of development. The development process has been
extended to ensure the integrity of the update, and we thank you for your patience.

Please continue to check our website for announcement of update release.

Thank You,

Pioneer Support Group

I spoke with Pioneer's tech support, and the date has been pushed out to some time in April. The person I spoke with said they are in communication with the dev team daily, and are aware of the desire for the upgrade. He mentioned that the firmware release for the 09 would take priority over releases for 05 or 51. Also, they seem to be feverously coding to include fixes to some movie titles, such as Quantum of Solace. Not sure what the specific issue is with the 09 and the title, maybe someone can comment?
post #3054 of 8425
^^
Thanks for the update.

I'm sure they are working feverishly to get it done - they've advertised the upcoming new players this "spring/summer" will have DTS-MA out of the box! April is upon us & the clock is ticking...

Since all the players have very similar if not identical basic platforms, once core DTS-MA functionality is finished, it can be tweaked for the individual player lines.

ss9001
post #3055 of 8425
You’re preaching to the quire.

My fingers are crossed for April.
post #3056 of 8425
it's already april.
post #3057 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Glover View Post

it's already april.

exactly!
post #3058 of 8425
There are 28 days left.. my apologies for being optimistic.

I don't work for Pioneer.
post #3059 of 8425
I am sorry to report, but I would take whatever Chris Walker says with a grain of salt.

As I recall, anything he said about when firmware updates would be out for the 05/51 never happened.

The same goes for a few of the regular posters on the 05/51 thread.

If the same run around is happening now with the BDP-09 as was and is the case for BDP-05/51, then we should see this update for DTS-HD/MA posted on the Pioneer Euro web page first. And we will be told here in the USA/Canada that the reason why the firmware update is still not posted on the USA Pioneer web page is because of legal.

I hope I am wrong about this and Pioneer has turned over a new leaf, but for now everything I am reading tells me they have not.
post #3060 of 8425
Quote:
Originally Posted by sillysally View Post

I am sorry to report, but I would take whatever Chris Walker says with a grain of salt.

As I recall, anything he said about when firmware updates would be out for the 05/51 never happened.

The same goes for a few of the regular posters on the 05/51 thread.

If the same run around is happening now with the BDP-09 as was and is the case for BDP-05/51, then we should see this update for DTS-HD/MA posted on the Pioneer Euro web page first. And we will be told here in the USA/Canada that the reason why the firmware update is still not posted on the USA Pioneer web page is because of legal.

I hope I am wrong about this and Pioneer has turned over a new leaf, but for now everything I am reading tells me they have not.

What other CE manufacturer gives you exact dates on regular firmware upgrades, never mind being on time?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › The Pioneer Elite BDP-09FD Owner's Thread...