AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "OFFICIAL" Pioneer MCACC thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"OFFICIAL" Pioneer MCACC thread - Page 14

post #391 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Stangs View Post

Well something has to be wrong then, and I have no idea what it could be!?! I'm listening at exactly 0 on the volume indicator or the receiver after MCACC.

My room is only 10x14x7. I'm running Klipsch Reference speakers as well (RVX Series) I've double checked just about all of my speaker connections and whatnot.

Any ideas?

input attenuation?

try resetting the receiver


bob
post #392 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Stangs View Post

BTW, if I turn MCACC off then it does gets a lot louder at the '0' volume setting. I have the VSX-01TXH.

Have you looked at your EQ settings? I'm wondering if MCACC is really attenuating some lower frequencies?


bob
post #393 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregLee View Post

Perhaps you're deaf.

Not much of a comedian huh?
post #394 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsoko2 View Post

So, which one do you listen to at -0? Music at? Movies at ? Is it analog, digital, or Multi Channel? What I'm getting at is that all of these different modes will not all have the same listening setting.

Bill

Movies via HDMI. Havn't tried music yet.

My last receiver was a Kenwood model but I didn't have to turn it up so high.
post #395 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by spongebob View Post

Have you looked at your EQ settings? I'm wondering if MCACC is really attenuating some lower frequencies?


bob

I'll look at them in more detail tommorow.

I'll also try resetting the receiver as well and see if it makes a difference. Thanks.
post #396 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Stangs View Post

Movies via HDMI. Havn't tried music yet.

My last receiver was a Kenwood model but I didn't have to turn it up so high.

I had a Kenwood at one time too, I also didn't have to turn it up as high either. That said, don't get hung up on the what the number says on the dial. The Pioneer is much more powerful than the Kenwood!
post #397 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gov View Post

I had a Kenwood at one time too, I also didn't have to turn it up as high either. That said, don't get hung up on the what the number says on the dial. The Pioneer is much more powerful than the Kenwood!

Yeah, but "0" ??


bob
post #398 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by spongebob View Post

Yeah, but "0" ??


bob

You have a point....
post #399 of 4077
Ok guys, I had a feeling I should try another player just in case so I brought my PS3 down from the bedroom and set it up for PCM. I tried two discs, T2 and The Incredible Hulk.

Big difference! I had to listen to the Hulk starting around -15 as I couldn't push it any further.

Maybe it's just the titles I chose, or something wrong with my HD-A2?
post #400 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Stangs View Post

Ok guys, I had a feeling I should try another player just in case so I brought my PS3 down from the bedroom and set it up for PCM. I tried two discs, T2 and The Incredible Hulk.

Big difference! I had to listen to the Hulk starting around -15 as I couldn't push it any further.

Maybe it's just the titles I chose, or something wrong with my HD-A2?

The issue could be in the speaker setting of the HD-A2 player. I know that early on there was an issue with this when setting the XA2 settings for Multi Channel and it carried over into the bitstream side. Had to do with the reciever and player both controlling the speaker settings and the PLAYER took charge. So, check those settings and make sure they are set for SMALL and not LARGE.

Bill
post #401 of 4077
The mic included with these receivers doesn't inspire a lot of confidence for a set-up. Anyone have any experience with something better, but not too expensive?
post #402 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard in SF View Post

The mic included with these receivers doesn't inspire a lot of confidence for a set-up. Anyone have any experience with something better, but not too expensive?

This comes up fairly often. The furnished mic is a known quantity to Pioneer, and their software matches it. A "better" mic is unlikely to produce better results.
post #403 of 4077
It may be a known quantity, but I still think the principal of GIGO (garbage in - garbage out) applies. Other thoughts?
post #404 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard in SF View Post

It may be a known quantity, but I still think the principal of GIGO (garbage in - garbage out) applies. Other thoughts?

Don't let the cheap looks fool you. I'm pretty sure Pioneer is using the same Panasonic mic capsule that is used in nearly all measurement mics under $1000. Its quality is really quite excellent even though, in the quantities Pioneer buys them, they are under $1 each. If you try a more expensive mic, it will most likely use the same sensing element as the Pioneer but it won't be calibrated correctly for your receiver.

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/Dk...&name=P9925-ND
post #405 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsoko2 View Post

The issue could be in the speaker setting of the HD-A2 player. I know that early on there was an issue with this when setting the XA2 settings for Multi Channel and it carried over into the bitstream side. Had to do with the reciever and player both controlling the speaker settings and the PLAYER took charge. So, check those settings and make sure they are set for SMALL and not LARGE.

Bill

I think you want all the speakers set to large, sub on, all levels at 0dB in the player so the player isn't doing any bass management or volume control of its own and leaves it to the receiver.
post #406 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard in SF View Post

The mic included with these receivers doesn't inspire a lot of confidence for a set-up. Anyone have any experience with something better, but not too expensive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by catapult View Post

Don't let the cheap looks fool you. I'm pretty sure Pioneer is using the same Panasonic mic capsule that is used in nearly all measurement mics under $1000. Its quality is really quite excellent even though, in the quantities Pioneer buys them, they are under $1 each. If you try a more expensive mic, it will most likely use the same sensing element as the Pioneer but it won't be calibrated correctly for your receiver.

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/Dk...&name=P9925-ND

catupult is right.

When I upgraded my RS dB meter to a flat response curve and an external mic element, I bought the same mic element that most people are using in their professional mic's for less than $5, that being the Panasonic from DigiKey.

I haven't had that one professionally calibrated for a response curve, just hoping that it is reasonably flat, BUT, Pioneer will have done this for their mic elements and compensated for any deviations in frequency response in the software. I would consider the mic and receiver a matched set...
post #407 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by catapult View Post

I think you want all the speakers set to large, sub on, all levels at 0dB in the player so the player isn't doing any bass management or volume control of its own and leaves it to the receiver.

Catapult,
I asked a different question. How did you know I was looking for an answer to that one too. (I'm just setting up my new Sammy 2550.) Anyway, this is an official thank you for both answers.
post #408 of 4077
I just tried the micro of the Pioneer's Susano amp;

It looks very nice and not cheap

It sound level is not exactly the same (3 dB less)

Egalisation even at the same than the original micro place is not the same.

I will work more...

Ivan222
post #409 of 4077
uh?
post #410 of 4077
Greetings -- I have a VSX-01THX on order! So, if I set up one set of speakers and add a second set in another room later, what's the procedure? Would one eventually set up the calibration mic in the second room and calibrate two new speakers and can that be done without losing what was already determined for the original speakers?
post #411 of 4077
I don't believe this particular question has been asked.
I used the multi-point set up to calibrate my system. (1018 recieiver)
My projector is table mounted in between the seats that my wife and I use to watch movies.
We will bring in extra seats if another couple is with us, but most of the time there are two of us in the primary seats. (our room is on the small side, so we keep only two seats there permanently).
Since there are two main seating positions and they are either side of the projector, I used the left seat as the first reference point, the right seat as the second reference point and the area above the projector, since it is right between the seats, as the third reference point. That way we have a balanced calibration across the main seating area of the room.
Is there a way of using two reference points instead of three? Or is three the only number of reference points you can use for this. The manual shows only three points, so I was forced to use a central area as the third, even though it isn't a seating position. It seems to work ok, but in our case I'm wondering if there isn't a better way of multi-point calibrating.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on this.
Thank you,
Larry
post #412 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hoffman View Post

I don't believe this particular question has been asked.
I used the multi-point set up to calibrate my system. (1018 recieiver)
My projector is table mounted in between the seats that my wife and I use to watch movies.
We will bring in extra seats if another couple is with us, but most of the time there are two of us in the primary seats. (our room is on the small side, so we keep only two seats there permanently).
Since there are two main seating positions and they are either side of the projector, I used the left seat as the first reference point, the right seat as the second reference point and the area above the projector, since it is right between the seats, as the third reference point. That way we have a balanced calibration across the main seating area of the room.
Is there a way of using two reference points instead of three? Or is three the only number of reference points you can use for this. The manual shows only three points, so I was forced to use a central area as the third, even though it isn't a seating position. It seems to work ok, but in our case I'm wondering if there isn't a better way of multi-point calibrating.
I'd appreciate your thoughts on this.
Thank you,
Larry

Have you tried to "fake it out" by duplicating one of the two positions?
post #413 of 4077
Which way should the supplied mike point? Dome up or towards the front?
post #414 of 4077
Dome facing straight up. The mic should be sitting flat on top of a tripod for best results.
post #415 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedread View Post

Have you tried to "fake it out" by duplicating one of the two positions?

No I haven't. So instead of my using the center position over the projector for the 3rd reference point, I should either stay at the right side or go back to the left? I thought that might skew the readings too much to one area, which could be a problem.
I wanted to have the sound balanced across the seating area.
post #416 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hoffman View Post

No I haven't. So instead of my using the center position over the projector for the 3rd reference point, I should either stay at the right side or go back to the left? I thought that might skew the readings too much to one area, which could be a problem.
I wanted to have the sound balanced across the seating area.

If you go to the middle, it'll really throw it off...
If L is your left position and R your right, here's my suggestion: Calibrate twice: once with LLR, then again with LRR (the mic positions) then manually tweak it to be the average of the two measurements.
post #417 of 4077
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedread View Post

If you go to the middle, it'll really throw it off...
If L is your left position and R your right, here's my suggestion: Calibrate twice: once with LLR, then again with LRR (the mic positions) then manually tweak it to be the average of the two measurements.

That would be good to try. I'll write down the measurements it's at now, (using LRCenter).
Then do LLR and then RRL. (the manual says the last location is supposed to be the prime one, and so I'll end up at Right and then Left). I'll write down the measurements of each and average them. It will be interesting to know how the average compares to my first readings using the Center as the last location.
When I do this, I'll report back with my findings.
I think I'll also remove the chairs from the room during calibration. I've read from a couple of sources, (in AVS and in a Cnet review of a Denon receiver), that it's a good idea to not have the chairs in the room while calibrating. Sort of doesn't make sense, but people with far more knowledge than I recommend it.
Thanks for your help.
post #418 of 4077
Questions on presets ran mcacc set speakers to small have done this several times new speakers etc, liked the sound but hit the mcacc button on the remote 1018 receiver and had different sound on all presets are those saved never saved any or are the just different setting of the mcacc?
post #419 of 4077
What is Bass Peak Level setting? I have mine set to off, what should it set to?
post #420 of 4077
I have a VSX-01TXH or order, and have a question about the MCACC setup when calibrating for two different rooms. If I put two of the attached speakers in a different room, it obviously makes sense to run the calibration separately from the calibration in the first room. Is there a way to only calibrate a particular subset of speakers, or do you have to run the calibration for all of them again and combine the results? Or is it possible to disconnect the ones in the primary room, run the calibration in the second room, and then manually merge the settings somehow? I can't see an obvious way to do the setup without clobbering one setting or the other, or at least without manually somehow combing the two. Thanks in advance!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › "OFFICIAL" Pioneer MCACC thread