AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official OPPO BDP-83 Owner's Thread [technical talk only]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official OPPO BDP-83 Owner's Thread [technical talk only] - Page 573

post #17161 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuromancer View Post

For 1080p output, I doubt you will see any difference when playing Blu-ray movies.

What about on a 1080i set? Would that make a difference BDP-83 vs PS3.
post #17162 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Htdude14 View Post

What about on a 1080i set? Would that make a difference BDP-83 vs PS3.

I doubt it. My buddy has the PS3 hooked up to a 1080i 65" Mitsubishi and I think that's as good as it gets.
post #17163 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowghost View Post

I doubt it. My buddy has the PS3 hooked up to a 1080i 65" Mitsubishi and I think that's as good as it gets.

Thanks!
post #17164 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cate View Post

Could we get an update on your listening experience with the five new SACD's and the new Firmware Release, along with the Stags leap 2004 Cabernet?

The Stags Leap was definitely fine. SACD play... not so much.

That said, I am (and have always been) overly critical of the -83's SACD current state. Playback is excellent, although I do favor the MC sound slightly more than 2 channel stereo. Arguably, the sound quality may be slightly better in analog 2ch mode. However, I just prefer the presentation of a properly engineered multi-channel SACD.

It is odd then, that I found Norah Jones' "Come Away With Me" to be more enjoyable in 2ch. But, I did. I think it has something to do with the blending of vocals and piano. To my ears, that sounds more natural, spacious and clear, in 2ch - without any added information.

I did notice a small number of rice crispies littered throughout the disc. I find them more noticeable when listening in 2ch mode. Strange?

I should note that my current configuration is HDMI, not analog. I finalized on that connection since, to my ears, I don't think analog is worth the tradeoffs of using audio management in the -83, versus processing (including Audyssey) in my Denon. I did notice similar artifacts, however, when using an all analog path.

"Time Out," by David Brubeck and Paul Desmond was amazing. Not only was the music wonderful, but the production was outstanding. I felt as if I was on the stage or in the studio. Instrument placement and moreover, microphone placement, was superb. An excellent recording overall. Yes. Snap. Krackle and Pop showed up from time to time. Even that could not spoil my enjoyment of this disc.

Digressing, I think the newer vintages of this Cabernet benefit more from an open bottle, than do earlier years. The 2nd half of bottles from 2005 and up, usually do well by breathing, while the first half is enjoyed. The two bottles of 2004 that we opened for this listening were very neutral from first glass to last. So as not to give the appearance of over-consumption, let me point out there were four of us present and consuming. Sadly, I may have to stop inviting people over to drink this wine. I opened my last case and... well, you know.

Quote:


The reason I ask is that I have been listening to several stereo CDs and SACDs using the stereo/analog outs, with my pre/pro set to "analog bypass." - While also enjoying a lovely, full-bodied 2005 Dry Creek Mariner cabernet-blend. - IMO, the audio from the analog stereo outs is definitely better than that with the MC or the HDMI outs, particularly when half-way into the Dry Creek Mariner.

Many people share your thoughts on mc vs. 2ch playback. Especially those that are using analog connections. I found many redbook CD's sound better that way. But, again - I use HDMI for my single connection between the -83 and my AVR. I suppose that I could also use 2ch analog simultaneously, yet for whatever reason, I don't. Perhaps, it is because I often flip between 2ch and MC listening.

I'm sure the 05 DCM helps, but you're probably right about the sound, even without it.

Quote:


What Firmware Release do you have? And do you recommend the Stags Leap?

Jim

I'm running the latest public beta firmware. The SACD rice crispies have been plaguing me since the day I opened the box - regardless of firmware version. Oppo has done great work reducing them, especially with the last release of firmware. I applaud them for that. There is still (admittedly) more work to be done, though. I believe they will correct the problem completely. I just hope it is with the next release of firmware!

I highly recommend the Stags Leap. If you can find the 04, you will be amazed. The 05 is not up to the standards of the 04, yet it is still superior in its own rights. The 2004 vintage was very well produced. It may be the casking, which is alternated every other year. I'm anxious to open the 2006 to see if it feels like the 2004. We'll know at Thanksgiving!

Perhaps by then, the -83's SACD problems will be history.
post #17165 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Dressler View Post

I tried turning off auto-play, and found it made no difference. The glitched playback also happens when stepping to a track in the middle of the disc. Easily repeatable on Let it Be--Naked CD, track 7. The only way to hear the beginning of the track is to back up a few secs into track 6 so it gets a running start. I'm optimistic that software can fix this.

I loaded the current beta software today. It solved the glitched beginnings problem! Great stuff. And what a nice/easy update process it is via USB drive!
post #17166 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevec325 View Post

Digressing, I think the newer vintages of this Cabernet benefit more from an open bottle, than do earlier years. The 2nd half of bottles from 2005 and up, usually do well by breathing, while the first half is enjoyed. The two bottles of 2004 that we opened for this listening were very neutral from first glass to last.

Not to digress more, but at the price point you referenced, is this this "Fay" offering?
post #17167 of 38730
well i installed the experimental firmware to fix 12 rounds. so far working fine. partway into the movie, everything ok, loads as fast as any other java laden BD. now if we can just get the split bitrate meters............
post #17168 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevec325 View Post

The Stags Leap was definitely fine. SACD play... not so much.

Try some good SACDs of more recent vintage than the wine.
post #17169 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrell View Post

well i installed the experimental firmware to fix 12 rounds. so far working fine. partway into the movie, everything ok, loads as fast as any other java laden BD. now if we can just get the split bitrate meters............

Is thi s possible?
post #17170 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post

The OP is about a DTS-CD, which is a different animal. The Oppo does play them, but they sometimes cause glitches.

The Oppo is also fully capable of bitstreaming any ES/EX audio, but will not decode it internally. If you are decoding in the player you will get the core 5.1 audio. (which is identical, just not decoded to 6.1) This will not likely change.

Thanks rdgrimes and Neuromancer for responding to this issue today. I had not realized DTS-CD is a separate format.

I'm still a bit confused about what the 83 is doing. Playing the BD of T2 Judgment Day, both case insert and on-disc menu say it has "5.1 DTS-ES". I'm using m-ch analog outs only (no digital connections) into a 5.1 system. With the DTS 5.1-ES track selected, I appear to be getting full 5.1 sound which I presume means I'm hearing the core as decoded by the 83. But the 83's OSD bottom left field says "DTS 6.1" -- what is this indicating? That it is the Discrete 6.1 variant of ES that is actually on the disc? And the case insert and on-disc menu are incorrect?
post #17171 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by piketech View Post

Not to digress more, but at the price point you referenced, is this this "Fay" offering?

I think it's SLV, but now you have me wondering. I will have to find out.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal Rubinson View Post

Try some good SACDs of more recent vintage than the wine.

I think an accompaniment of fine firmware would be better
post #17172 of 38730
It appears that somehow (I have no idea how) my parental control was put "on". I can't get it off, and I don't know what the password is.

Any ideas?
post #17173 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Tomlin View Post

It appears that somehow (I have no idea how) my parental control was put "on". I can't get it off, and I don't know what the password is.

Any ideas?

you never told us.

[ sorry. i had to. ]
post #17174 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by alull View Post

you never told us.

[ sorry. i had to. ]

It just doesn't make sense. I mean, if I set the Parental Control, I would have had to put in a password, right? I never did.
post #17175 of 38730
0000
post #17176 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by tngiloy View Post

Just a thought about this 'snap,crackle and pops' some users are experiencing with sacd's. Since Oppo thinks its a handshaking issue, is it possible that the 'cec' function may be enabled in one or more of the components in the hdmi chain. The 83 has its cec disabled by default, but another component like a receiver or display may have its cec enabled.
The cec control may be buried in the set-up menu and called something other than 'cec'. On my Panasonic plasma its called 'viera link'.
I am not an expert like a lot of the beta testers, so feel free to correct me, but I was having problems related to the 'cec' function causing audio drop outs, etc., before I disabled it in all my components.
Tom

I found this possibility intriguing, since I have a Panasonic display with Viera Link. It was enabled by default, but unfortunately when I disabled it and played an SACD, it didn't change the rice krispies. Thanks for the suggestion, though.
post #17177 of 38730
Quick question for people with a good knowledge of how these machines actually work. If the rice krispie thing was not an issue, is there any reason to expect the audio quality to be different on a SACD between the -83 and the 980H if both are simply being used as a transport? If you're bitstreaming DSD via HDMI to a capable receiver or processor, what if anything would make one player "better" at sending 1's and 0's? I don't discount the possibility that there is a difference, I'm simply curious if there is.
post #17178 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevec325 View Post

It is odd then, that I found Norah Jones' "Come Away With Me" to be more enjoyable in 2ch. But, I did. I think it has something to do with the blending of vocals and piano. To my ears, that sounds more natural, spacious and clear, in 2ch - without any added information.

It could be that the 2 channel is just a better mix.

Believe it or not, there are a number of audiophiles (myself being one of them) who will often prefer the mono version of a golden oldie to the stereo one. The mono was the one that was going on the radio, in the jukeboxes, and on the 45s, so they put a lot more attention into it.

But I digress ..........
post #17179 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradandbree View Post

Quick question for people with a good knowledge of how these machines actually work. If the rice krispie thing was not an issue, is there any reason to expect the audio quality to be different on a SACD between the -83 and the 980H if both are simply being used as a transport? If you're bitstreaming DSD via HDMI to a capable receiver or processor, what if anything would make one player "better" at sending 1's and 0's? I don't discount the possibility that there is a difference, I'm simply curious if there is.

For bitstreaming DSD over HDMI, there would be no difference at all.
post #17180 of 38730
Could jitter be a factor in that case? I get that the player would be sending 1's and 0's, but is it possible their timing could be different from one machine to another.
post #17181 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Butler View Post

Could jitter be a factor in that case? I get that the player would be sending 1's and 0's, but is it possible their timing could be different from one machine to another.

See, that's one of the reasons I asked the question to begin with. I see audiophiles write about jitter, but A) I am an enthusiast, not an audiophile, and B) I have no idea what the hell they're talking about.
post #17182 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradandbree View Post

See, that's one of the reasons I asked the question to begin with. I see audiophiles write about jitter, but A) I am an enthusiast, not an audiophile, and B) I have no idea what the hell they're talking about.

...and you don't want to either. Do you enjoy your music as it is right now? If yes, then don't ruin it.
I used to enjoy my movies a bit more than I do now. Now I find myself criticizing the PQ and AQ more often than I care too.
I'm staying away from delving into the the abyss of obsessing about how perfect I can get my music discs to sound. Sometimes ignorance really is bliss.
post #17183 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smarty-pants View Post

Sometimes ignorance really is bliss.

Couldn't agree more with this. I do enjoy my system right now, and perhaps knowing more about it is not a good thing!
post #17184 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smarty-pants View Post

0000

Thanks Dave!
post #17185 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smarty-pants View Post


Now I find myself criticizing the PQ and AQ more often than I care too.

THAT'S THE HT BUG TALKING.... gotcha

Steve
post #17186 of 38730
WE all get it from time to time... Some alittle more than others... MYSELF INCLUDED... no use in me lying and tell you that I don't

Steve
post #17187 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevec325 View Post

I think it's SLV, but now you have me wondering. I will have to find out.




I think an accompaniment of fine firmware would be better

Steve,

Still reading about your experiences with noise though attenuated with the latest beta FW.

I appreciate what you've been feeling and articulating about your experience with playing SACDs on the BDP-83 via HDMI and the noise interferences. I also realize that OppO had indicated that it was a known problem (bug?). Your most recent posts mentioned Denon. And I also realize that other BDP-83 owners are having similar experiences feeding other AVR/Pre Pro than Denon as well.

One of the reasons I got rid of my 4308CI (even after the $100 FW upgrade) was the handshake problems, video freezes (same thing?), and loud popping sounds through the speakers all of which I encountered from several sources, i.e., CATV box, HD-DVD player connected via HDMI to the 4308CI. What that particular Denon model contributed to those unpleasant experiences, I am not sure of. They're gone now.

Presently using a Yamaha DSP-A1 (my ole stand-by and no HDMI inputs). BDP-83 connected via M.CH, stereo analogs and digital optical. Except for occasional loud pops only recently through my speakers only from Fios cable box to KDL52XBR5 directly via HDMI, all other problems and noise disappeared.

SQ listening to SACDs, DVD-A, HDCD, Blu-ray music DVDs, DTS MA, Dolby THD over M.CH or stereo analog sound gorgeous and are void of any interference. In fact with the latest beta FW, the SQ sounds even better. I am not imagining that.

I am still sorting out the possible AVRs/Pre Pros, and I know others have trouble free listening from HDMI connections. In the mean time, I am enjoying the music played on BDP-83 as much as I have been when I am playing music on my other players, a Denon DCD3300 and Denon DVD3910 (which I still have and love).

Don't know if and how your Denon may be involved with the interference you're experiencing. In any case, I'll raise a Dr. Frank Reisling Reserve 2005 and wish you well. BTW: the 2L discs (blu-ray & SACD) sound exquisite as Kal may have alluded to indirectly.

As someone who thrives on music, film and enjoys good wine and the performance of BDP-83, just connecting with you.

Hope the solution arrives soon.
Best, Richard.
post #17188 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Carr View Post

THAT'S THE HT BUG TALKING.... gotcha

Steve

On the other hand, remember how many times have you put in a particular movie to check for a certain playback problem, and next thing you know it's two hours later and you have just watched the whole movie. Now that's LOVE of HT.
post #17189 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Tomlin View Post

It just doesn't make sense. I mean, if I set the Parental Control, I would have had to put in a password, right? I never did.

The default password is ''0000''.

I see smartpants already answered 8 hrs ago
post #17190 of 38730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Burk View Post

On the other hand, remember how many times have you put in a particular movie to check for a certain playback problem, and next thing you know it's two hours later and you have just watched the whole movie. Now that's LOVE of HT.

I know that's right...

Steve
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official OPPO BDP-83 Owner's Thread [technical talk only]