AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official OPPO BDP-83 Owner's Thread [technical talk only]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official OPPO BDP-83 Owner's Thread [technical talk only] - Page 95

post #2821 of 38774
Sheesh, I checked in this morning and then my wife asked me to fix her itunes... most of the day and 9 pages later...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Princess Aurora View Post

...you might literally be the only person who needs it. The only reason a composite output is provided is for troubleshooting...

Leaving out an s-video output keeps the cost down for Oppo. It's probably not much in terms of connectors/hardware, but it makes the output circuit board slightly less complicated and is one less thing that needs to be worried about in firmware. It probably saves them several dollars per unit in that regard.

Perhaps not many but it looks like I am not alone. I think the implementation of s-video is well understood and of no material cost impact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmcclain View Post

Note that s-video, like composite, it limited to 480i/576i. You can't get high-definition or even progressive standard definition signals over either. So they have almost no usefulness on a Blu-ray player. For diagnostic purposes, as was said, but you don't need both for that.

-Bill

Understood. In the near term my setup is all s-video, and with an older video switching only AVR, one change in hookup requires that all others be changed too (converters not withstanding). Soon I will go to HDMI, but with a DVDR it now require a second analog connection for recording inputs which I prefer to be s-video.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gonk View Post

The 83's output can provide 1080i in many cases, including Blu-ray content (assuming nobody starts turning on the ICT), video files, and non-CSS encrypted DVD's. If you have a commercial DVD, it will typically have CSS and will thus be limited to 480p via component output.

Are you saying that HD video won't be output on the composite connection? If it does down convert then the s-video would be little more trouble.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamZX11 View Post

I don't see why the player would need s-video to do that. I connect both my DVD player and BD player with HDMI. On both my PR-SC885 and RX-V1500, even though the source is HDMI, both the s-video and composite will output video to my garage (zone 2), and computer room (zone 3). No need to hook s-video from the player to the processor.

I am looking at the Z7 which will up/down convert to the monitor outputs. This is a possible compromise buy won't let you record one source while viewing another, so limits flexibility. I like Yamaha receivers yet they have no current unit that support s-video as a zone 2 or greater output.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shinksma View Post

Very few medium-end receivers (like my Onkyo 606) will do the down-conversion from HDMI to analog composite/S-video. If the poster doesn't have a pre-pro of the same caliber as yours, then S-video/composite direct from source may be the only option for the kitchen TV.

That being said, considering composite to S-video converters are available pretty cheaply, I wouldn't call it the end of the world to use that solution as a work-around to the lack of S-video on the Oppo.

See http://www.svideo.com/rcatosvideo.html for example. Not sure if this is the best device, but it sure is cheap!

True, though I am looking at one that does, but see my note above re. flexibility. The recording loop for a DVR/DVDR is best served as analog in and out. Thanks for the tip on the converter, I am checking it out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

If you need to, you can use an inexpensive Composite to S-Video in-line converter, e.g.:

http://www.amazon.com/Dayton-SVC2-Ja...ref=pd_sim_e_1

Thanks Bob, I didn't know these types of converters existed, certainly cheap enough to try. I was looking at a $150 composite to s-video converter, this may be a better option. Any idea how it works?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stof View Post

Paul you can get a component to S-video converter...

http://www.thenerds.net/CABLES_TO_GO...0058-2&affid=3

Thanks Stof, though the round end does not appear to be s-video on that unit.
post #2822 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuromancer View Post

Yes it was, but that doesn't mean you did not lied. Hell, when I was younger, I would get into porn sites by stating I was 18 (when I was not).

More information than needed?

Joe
post #2823 of 38774
The easiest way to tell if the audio DACs are being fed DSD or PCM is to look at the analog waveforms coming off the analog jacks on a scope. DSD decoded waves have noise on top of the waveforms.....lots of out of band stuff......no amount of filtering can eliminate all of this......PCM decoded waves are very clean thin looking.....very different. I actually hope the 83 is being fed PCM as I modify Oppo players with the latest 32 bit DACs from AKM and the way I run them is in PCM mode.
post #2824 of 38774
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronco70 View Post

More information than needed?

Not really. Just using a real world example of how anonymous, non-verifiable answers can be answered with explicit deception in mind.
post #2825 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by k2_1971 View Post

Ah well... was hoping they'd change their stance on who they'd send out units to. Luckily I have a fair amount of patience. I can hold out til the official release.

don't worry, i'm in the same boat (waipahu, HI).
post #2826 of 38774
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric Schultz View Post

I actually hope the 83 is being fed PCM as I modify Oppo players with the latest 32 bit DACs from AKM and the way I run them is in PCM mode.

Set the player to a SACD Priority of PCM. The decoder will convert from DSD to PCM at 88KHz before it reaches the D/ACs.
post #2827 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Tomlin View Post

Without question, this is the best post in the entire thread!


A Clintonian Moment?
post #2828 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronco70 View Post

A Clintonian Moment?

It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.
post #2829 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasser204 View Post

Where can I find an image of the remote?

See this link. It is backlit. Added to images in 4th post.
post #2830 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuromancer View Post

Not really. Just using a real world example of how anonymous, non-verifiable answers can be answered with explicit deception in mind.

A non denial, denial? That almost worked up until an August day in 1974.

A joke and completely off topic. This thread is at wits end.

I will be very happy with a 983 and a PS3 for the time being. Now if the 83 becomes an option in the next few days, my post count will go way up.

Joe
post #2831 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertazimmerman View Post

One would certainly hope so, but remember "Oppo" is still not a household name and with other players selling for $199-$299, a $500-600 player will appeal primarily to video aficionados, not to the average consumer.

Although we all want Oppo to include features like SACD and DVD-A etc., these features appeal to the .000546% of us who can appreciate them, not Joe Public.

R

You are absolutely correct!

None of my friends have heard of the Oppo brand. If the gear isn't on the shelves of Costco, Sam's, Best Buy, or Walmart they have no idea what it is.
post #2832 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertazimmerman View Post

One would certainly hope so, but remember "Oppo" is still not a household name and with other players selling for $199-$299, a $500-600 player will appeal primarily to video aficionados, not to the average consumer.

Although we all want Oppo to include features like SACD and DVD-A etc., these features appeal to the .000546% of us who can appreciate them, not Joe Public.

R

0.000546%. Quite a dramatic and seemingly definitive statement. Your source for that stat?

Based on the last estimate of US population and plugging in your % only 1670 might feel the need for this product, of the entire population.I will stop at this point.

Joe
post #2833 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

Sure. Decoding in the player makes it easier to take advantage of the secondary audio mixing features in Blu-Ray (something that doesn't exist in the SD-DVD world).

You need a receiver that correctly handles HDMI LPCM anyway or you won't be able to listen to raw (uncompressed) LPCM Blu-Ray tracks properly. And given that, you might as well let the player do the decoding of the lossless compressed formats to HDMI LPCM as well.

---------------------------------------

You can find more info on the Anthem pre-pros in this massive "tweaking" thread:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=678260

Read the first post to begin, and then start reading backwards from the end.
--Bob

bottum line is,you can´t here any difference when oppo decoding against you highend processor decoding
post #2834 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by bakerwi View Post

Can you elaborate on buggy?

well mine has problems with the DTS-HD MA track on The Forbidden Kingdom, and not beable to switch stereo/MC layers on a SACD, which for a SACD player seems important. Especially for someone who doesn't have a display. Now I know this is a BD player first, but there will be people who buy one for SACD/HDCD/CD/DVD-A playback and will not hook it up to a display.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzcat View Post

Have you contacted OPPO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdgrimes View Post

The only way to switch SACD audio streams is in the setup menu. Doing so will re-start the current track.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuromancer View Post

This is not a bug, as the player isn't the DV-983H. It has not been designed to switch SACD layers on the fly using the Audio button.

This may be introduced in a future firmware release.

I will suggest Oppo include this in a future firmware update.
post #2835 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasser204 View Post

Where can I find an image of the remote?

There are also large-scale images of the remote in the last tab of the spreadsheet which contains the remote codes: http://www.oppodigital.com/Download/...emote_Code.xls

-Bill
post #2836 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulF View Post

Are you saying that HD video won't be output on the composite connection? If it does down convert then the s-video would be little more trouble.

You'll get 480i.

-Bill
post #2837 of 38774
A question for experts
Why people is reporting that multichannel analog listening is better than digital through hdmi if the player is using the same dac ?
post #2838 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUYSED55 View Post

A question for experts
Why people is reporting that multichannel analog listening is better than digital through hdmi if the player is using the same dac ?

Generally because they have poor quality receivers... also, many are fooled by slight volume changes as well, the player analog may be louder than the track when played via HDMI.
post #2839 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-HD View Post

If someone is using the Denon 3808, what should he hear?

I'd have to have one to know.. Use what's best..

But in general, HDMI from the player offers the most advantages unless your receiver is a piece of ****.
post #2840 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUYSED55 View Post

A question for experts
Why people is reporting that multichannel analog listening is better than digital through hdmi if the player is using the same dac ?

DACs aren't the only component that determines the "sound". Clocking of data into DAC, number of DACs, filtering of digital data before D->A, and analog section after DACs are some things that could be different in various players (and receivers).

larry
post #2841 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by PooperScooper View Post

DACs aren't the only component that determines the "sound". Clocking of data into DAC, number of DACs, filtering of digital data before D->A, and analog section after DACs are some things that could be different in various players (and receivers).

larry

Larry,
I don't want to get into a DAC debate, but I read in a few places that it is not the name of the DAC but the implementation of that DAC. Someone pointed out that some of the best known DACs are less than $8.00 in bulk.

Brian
post #2842 of 38774
So the analog section (card) might be an audiophile one;
Is there anyone who can give an opinion on the analog section (card) from the photo?
post #2843 of 38774
"so much is just rambling back and forth, it's nice to see someone with far more Electronics experience than I show a way formally of testing assumptions rather than basing it on hunch (or a manual that's undergoing changes)."

Thanks, for the record I don't have a BD83. The above picture was sent to me so I have not scoped one to see if the DAC is getting DSD or PCM when playing back SACD with HDMI set to output DSD.

Shawn
post #2844 of 38774
42/50 voted yes - great result i would say.
post #2845 of 38774
DSD over HDMI sounds pretty good to my ears to my Onkyo Pro 885.
post #2846 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUYSED55 View Post

So the analog section (card) might be an audiophile one;
Is there someone who can give an opinion on the analog section (card) from the photo?

Opinion on the card itself, as opposed to performance? I haven't collected links to performance reports here, but this is one from a beta tester: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...9#post15982979

-Bill
post #2847 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by wmcclain View Post

Opinion on the card itself, as opposed to performance? I haven't collected links to performance reports here, but this is one from a beta tester: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...9#post15982979

-Bill

So the analog section is a separate card?

Sure would be nice if they gave a lower priced option excluding this card
post #2848 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebland View Post

I'd have to have one to know.. Use what's best..

But in general, HDMI from the player offers the most advantages unless your receiver is a piece of ****.


Trying to temper my response, but that is just laugh out loud! I have always thought that the best sounding receiver/pre-pro was the one that did nothing to colour the sound when sending it to the amps. The sound quality is more of a function of how your particular amp section are matched with your particular speaker selection.

If the oppo has the ability to convert the high res audio to analog acceptably, that is a huge advantage in backwards compatibilty to those of us that have high quality audio sections that are not hdmi compliant.

Maybe I misread your comment is suggesting that a audio section is **** if it doesn't have hdmi. I suppose that you could just be talking about the implementation of hdmi on low budget receivers.

I still hope that the difference between oppo's analog conversion and that of the current pre/pros is insignificant as that would be a huge draw for me.
post #2849 of 38774
Quote:
Originally Posted by rick240 View Post

So the analog section is a separate card?

Sure would be nice if they gave a lower priced option excluding this card

There is already a hardware mod site saying they will take it out for you for $1000. And make other changes, of course. Copper shielding!

-Bill
post #2850 of 38774
sfogg,

What about the section of the 4392 used for the 2 channel analog output...have you gotten a picture of it?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Blu-ray Players
AVS › AVS Forum › Blu-ray & HD DVD › Blu-ray Players › Official OPPO BDP-83 Owner's Thread [technical talk only]