Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordoftherings 
LOL. Dogone, you are for sure a funny dude. HDMI is in fact simpler to use, sort of, but analog multichannel sounds as good, if not better to me than HDMI.
That's my personal opinion.
If we can use 4 digital coaxial interconnects to play the 7.1 digital multichannel from the new high resolution codecs, it will sound better than the HDMI digital connection. (I'm talking about audio only here.)
Better connections, better cables with more signal flow, better construction, tighter fit, better and more solid end connectors; brief, better everything.

LOL. Dogone, you are for sure a funny dude. HDMI is in fact simpler to use, sort of, but analog multichannel sounds as good, if not better to me than HDMI.
That's my personal opinion.
If we can use 4 digital coaxial interconnects to play the 7.1 digital multichannel from the new high resolution codecs, it will sound better than the HDMI digital connection. (I'm talking about audio only here.)
Better connections, better cables with more signal flow, better construction, tighter fit, better and more solid end connectors; brief, better everything.
Bob,
To pile onto ProgProg's comments...
Your post is extremely misleading at best. First off, to my knowledge you don't have a BDP-83 or any direct experience with one, so there's absolutely no way your comment about multichannel (analog) sounding better can carry any weight at all in this particular discussion (which is supposed to be focused on the BDP-83, not a general audio theory discussion). Whether HDMI or multichannel analog will sound better is VERY equipment specific. Among other things, it depends on where the better digital to analog converters are in the owner's system. It also depends on whether the receiver / preamp / processor being used has analog passthrough or will apply an analog to digital conversion on the input (followed by another digital to analog conversion on the way to the amps), whether bass management and room correction gets applied, etc. The ONLY way 4 coaxial digital interconnects MIGHT improve on HDMI is in jitter and even then I'm not sure I buy it.
If you're going to continue to offer people advice on equipment that you don't own or have any direct experience with, please make that point clear so people can take your advice with the appropriate spoonful of salt. I think those of us who follow the Denon AVP-A1HDCI / POA-A1HDCI owner's thread are especially sensitive to this point as you've been doing the same thing there for weeks now.
To the specific point of multichannel analog sounding better than HDMI - most certainly not in my system with the BDP-83 being the source. This isn't to say that the BDP-83's analog outputs aren't very good, but the digital to analog conversion in my Denon AVP-A1HDCI is definitely better and benefits from bass management, flexible speaker configuration, Audyssey, etc.
Regarding all the discussion about how soon the BDP-83 can go to general release - I see no reason to question Neuromancer's take on it (especially since he's most likely using a newer firmware version than those of us in the EAP are using). The fact that I don't think the current firmware is ready for general release doesn't mean it's broken to the point where it will take them another 6 months to get it close enough for a yes vote. If they can fix the HDCD problem, get the SD-DVD audio sync problems addressed, and get DVD-Audio to a more stable state, they've got a shippable product and these are all things that I suspect they're very close on.
























.
- still using a firmware version from June '08 (and for similar reasons of less interesting subsequent functionality).