AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › Curiousity . . . Flicker and Default GrayScale in Standard Mode at 1080p/24 on 5020FD
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Curiousity . . . Flicker and Default GrayScale in Standard Mode at 1080p/24 on 5020FD - Page 6

post #151 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by teiresias View Post

So between this and testing when ControlCal adjustments stick and when they don't we've pretty much gotten to the point where there is no way to make ControlCal adjustments that will be active when you're playing a 1080/24p signal at 72Hz?

On a non-Elite anyway.

yep

thanks bogney
post #152 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmwolf View Post

Thank you Bogney! That is exactly what we thought, but couldn't prove!

You're welcome. I would still be interested in D-Nice's (and others) opinion of the measurements. There is always a chance I could have overlooked something.
post #153 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrmgic View Post

I have D-Nice coming on Saturday to calibrate my set.. he has said he will bring his equipment that measures refresh rate

I'll post pictures of the results if possible.

It was never said that there is no difference between PC: Off and PC:Advanced.. only that PC: Off will process 24p content with 3:3 pulldown at 72Hz.

This is still an interesting topic

So what did D-Nice show you?
post #154 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogney Baux View Post

I borrowed a device from the guys in the engineering lab of the TV network that I work at. It has a photoelectric cell that you point at a monitor and will give a measurement of the refresh rate when hooked up to a frequency counter.

I have a Pioneer 09 Bluray player that can easily change output resolutions on the fly. This feeds a Pioneer Elite 111 display. (I assume Pure Cinema acts the same on Elites and non Elites?)

That's a good point, and I have heard that the PC modes are a bit different between the Elite's and NE's, and also their effect can differ from TV to TV! I wish someone could clarify that. Thanks for posting that info.
post #155 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogney Baux View Post

I borrowed a device from the guys in the engineering lab of the TV network that I work at. It has a photoelectric cell that you point at a monitor and will give a measurement of the refresh rate when hooked up to a frequency counter.

I have a Pioneer 09 Bluray player that can easily change output resolutions on the fly. This feeds a Pioneer Elite 111 display. (I assume Pure Cinema acts the same on Elites and non Elites?) I sampled 6 different 1080p 24 movie discs and got the same results for each.

Here are my Pure Cinema refresh frequency results for each setting.


Advance
480i – 71.93 Hz
480p - 71.93 Hz
720p - 71.93 Hz
1080i - 71.93 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 - 71.93 Hz


Smooth
480i – 59.94 Hz
480p - 59.94 Hz
720p - 59.94 Hz
1080i - 59.94 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 - 59.94 Hz


Standard
480i – 59.94 Hz
480p - 59.94 Hz
720p - 59.94 Hz
1080i - 59.94 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 – 71.93 Hz


Off
480i – 59.94 Hz
480p - 59.94 Hz
720p - 59.94 Hz
1080i - 59.94 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 - 59.94 Hz

This is assuming that PureCinema actually detects 1080p24 encoded content and changes the refresh rate to 72Hz, right?

Say if you are feeding a signal that is 720p60 and it was not encoded at 24p, then would it still change to 72Hz when set to Advanced?

I am unsure about the whole PureCinema technology detecting 24p encoding within a stream that set to 60Hz...
post #156 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by iatacs19 View Post

This is assuming that PureCinema actually detects 1080p24 encoded content and changes the refresh rate to 72Hz, right?

That's the way it's supposed to work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iatacs19 View Post

Say if you are feeding a signal that is 720p60 and it was not encoded at 24p, then would it still change to 72Hz when set to Advanced

It shouldn't, but I just sent a pm to Bogney Baux suggesting that he confirm that by measuring the actual refresh on native 720p60 content (like sports or live news) from ABC, FOX, and/or ESPN.
post #157 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by bfdtv View Post

It shouldn't, but I just sent a pm to Bogney Baux suggesting that he confirm that by measuring the actual refresh on native 720p60 content (like sports or live news) from ABC, FOX, and/or ESPN.

Excellent.
post #158 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogney Baux View Post

I borrowed a device from the guys in the engineering lab of the TV network that I work at. It has a photoelectric cell that you point at a monitor and will give a measurement of the refresh rate when hooked up to a frequency counter.

I have a Pioneer 09 Bluray player that can easily change output resolutions on the fly. This feeds a Pioneer Elite 111 display. (I assume Pure Cinema acts the same on Elites and non Elites?) I sampled 6 different 1080p 24 movie discs and got the same results for each.

Here are my Pure Cinema refresh frequency results for each setting.


Advance
480i – 71.93 Hz
480p - 71.93 Hz
720p - 71.93 Hz
1080i - 71.93 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 - 71.93 Hz



Smooth
480i – 59.94 Hz
480p - 59.94 Hz
720p - 59.94 Hz
1080i - 59.94 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 - 59.94 Hz


Standard
480i – 59.94 Hz
480p - 59.94 Hz
720p - 59.94 Hz
1080i - 59.94 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 – 71.93 Hz



Off
480i – 59.94 Hz
480p - 59.94 Hz
720p - 59.94 Hz
1080i - 59.94 Hz
1080p - 59.94 Hz
1080p 24 - 59.94 Hz

Thanks for posting your test results.


Are all of the other input signals 60fps? Is 24fps only available at 1080p resolution?

Also, can you test the refresh rate you get on the HDMI Input with PC Mode signal type?
post #159 of 268
Bogney's post prompted me to do some testing of my own. As some background, I had a 5010 for two weeks. I've had the 5020 since July. I think I might be able to identify the source of the confusion as to what PC Off (versus PC Standard) does when fed a 24fps signal at 1080p (I'm talking from a Blu-ray player - Panny 35 in my case - set to output at 24fps).

My 5010 had a dithering problem when in 72hz. I'm talking massive dithering. Which made it pretty easy to determine when 72hz processing was engaged. On the 5010, feeding a 24fps signal resulted in 72hz processing for PC Advanced and PC Off. Not for PC Standard.

On my 5020, I took a long look at scrolling credits (my favorite way to see 3:2 judder) last night. Of course, PC Advanced engaged 72hz and did not display any 3:2 judder. PC Off did not engage 72hz processing - 3:2 judder was visible. PC Standard had no 3:2 judder - it was doing 72hz processing. These results conform to Bogney's results. I was surprised.

In summary, PC Off does not equal PC Advanced when fed a 24fps signal. But PC Standard does. I think all the confusion comes from Pioneer making a change in which setting did what (essentially Off and Standard were switched) between the 8th and 9th generations.

Anyway, that's my report. Feel free to ignore it.

-R
post #160 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahlsim View Post


Are all of the other input signals 60fps?

Yes, 60 fields for the interlaced and 60 frames for the progressive.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahlsim View Post


Is 24fps only available at 1080p resolution?

Yes, at least in this case.
post #161 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahlsim View Post

Also, can you test the refresh rate you get on the HDMI Input with PC Mode signal type?

I had to return the device to the lab. I may borrow it again in the future to do your test.
post #162 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogney Baux View Post

I had to return the device to the lab. I may borrow it again in the future to do your test.

Please keep us posted, it's a most useful tool for not only this thread but every other Kuro thread. Thanks.
post #163 of 268
Interesting note about the 5010.. that might explain it..
post #164 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by teiresias View Post

So between this and testing when ControlCal adjustments stick and when they don't we've pretty much gotten to the point where there is no way to make ControlCal adjustments that will be active when you're playing a 1080/24p signal at 72Hz?

On a non-Elite anyway.

Yeah, unless the Elite is indeed different than the non-Elite when it comes to refresh rates in the various PureCinema modes. But, honestly, between the evidence which started this thread, and the fact that the Elite behaves exactly as we all figured it would, I'm willing to say that it has basically been confirmed at this point that there is no way to get 72 Hz refresh along with the calibrated grayscale.

We still haven't heard what happened when D-Nice visited Andrmgic to calibrate his set and do the refresh rate measurements. Andrmgic, whatever happened? I see you've been on since then, but never reported back.
post #165 of 268
D-Nice refuses to discuss this. I tried and tried, pointed him to Bogney's post, he won't discuss it.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...7#post16061377
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...3#post16061423
post #166 of 268
When it comes to pure cinema modes, just leave it turned OFF.
post #167 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zues View Post

When it comes to pure cinema modes, just leave it turned OFF.

And then never have any 72hz benefit? (on just the Elites or both?)
post #168 of 268
FYI, someone just posted this on one of the Kuro threads which should clear this up: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...0#post16068240 (That's my reply to it). So (Bogney et al), it would seem there is a difference between Elites and NEs with regards to PC modes' refresh rates. At least in the "OFF" mode.
post #169 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk69 View Post

clint, d-nice has already told us that he used a Photoresearch pr-655 to measure the results he got for PC off. Which was 72hz. this is from the product description webpage on that model:

"Other hardware features include AutoSync® for automatically synchronizing to the source refresh rate insuring the utmost accuracy"

is that not proof enough? he tested it on an actual NE model as opposed to the other gentleman who used an Elite model not to mention a "home made" device. He himself even asked if he's overlooking something, so I wouldnt take his findings over d-nice. No confusion needed.

first time I have heard this
post #170 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_DML View Post

first time I have heard this

As I stated in my reply to him, first time for me as well.

I guess everyone expects you to search through entire threads (with this forum's severely lacking search function), and weed through all the thousands of non-relevant BS posts that only mention a term with no other info for which you're searching, consuming what could amount to days, in order to find a specific post with a specific answer. When it all (both time and confusion and other BS) could be avoided by someone "showing the kindness" and simply taking 5 seconds and answering the post with the info or simply a link. I don't get it.

A forum is supposed to be where users help each other in any way they can. NOT where users can be chastised or met with uncalled for hostility. It's unfortunate the latter exists here, but this forum is unfortunately no exception.

Thanks (finally) to "syk69", it's been answered.
post #171 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogney Baux View Post

I had to return the device to the lab. I may borrow it again in the future to do your test.

I see that you're located on Long Island. I'm in NYC, so if you ever find yourself in the city with your refresh rate sensor, you have an open invitation to test my non-elite 6020.

This is more or less purely of academic interest to me since I almost always feed my monitor 1080p60 through my Edge processor. I do, however, pass through 1080p24 unmolested from the PS3 so a mode that allows 72Hz refresh with modified grayscale would be cool.

As others have stated, visual observation of telecine judder isn't very reliable, although I do think that with the right source material, selected to exagerate judder issues, I could probably detect it pretty consistently.
Specially with a direct A/B comparison.
post #172 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_DML View Post

first time I have heard this

I don't know if it was ever clearly delineated previously that D-Nice had tested this using a NE.

However, as I posted earlier, my observations match Reagan's from a few posts back and seem t conflict with this information. Just looking at what visually is on screen, PC:Standard and PC:Advance look alike and PC:Off DOES NOT look like PC:Advance.

Since we don't know the manufacture date of the set the original tests were done with it is possible something has changed with later-date manufactured 5020s, but that would be odd.

I wouldn't blame D-Nice for any of this, of course. I lay the blame strictly at Pioneer for locking down these sets so unnecessarily that if you can't even properly scratch the videophile's "tinkerer" itch then no wonder they couldn't get enough of a market elsewhere to stay in the business.
post #173 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by teiresias View Post

I don't know if it was ever clearly delineated previously that D-Nice had tested this using a NE.

However, as I posted earlier, my observations match Reagan's from a few posts back and seem t conflict with this information. Just looking at what visually is on screen, PC:Standard and PC:Advance look alike and PC:Off DOES NOT look like PC:Advance.

Since we don't know the manufacture date of the set the original tests were done with it is possible something has changed with later-date manufactured 5020s, but that would be odd.

I wouldn't blame D-Nice for any of this, of course. I lay the blame strictly at Pioneer for locking down these sets so unnecessarily that if you can't even properly scratch the videophile's "tinkerer" itch then no wonder they couldn't get enough of a market elsewhere to stay in the business.

I agree, I think off is 60hz when feed 24fps input or at least on my own 5020.

Just that was the first time him using a specific analyzer to test for 72hz instead of just taking his word for it.
post #174 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint S. View Post

D-Nice refuses to discuss this. I tried and tried, pointed him to Bogney's post, he won't discuss it.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...7#post16061377
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...3#post16061423

This is getting crazy. Clint S, you are going a little overboard.

Let's look at the facts:

1) D-Nice is the master of Kuro's. His word is that PC:Off will do 72. He has tested it with his equipment.
2) Some other guy posted some numbers saying that PC:Off does 60hz with some homemade testing equipment that he made.
3) When I switch between Off and Advanced I do not see one bit of difference. I can tell 60hz from 72hz very easily on a computer monitor.

I'm going with D-Nice on this one unless I can actually see the testing equipment and test for myself.
post #175 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint S. View Post

As I stated in my reply to him, first time for me as well.

I guess everyone expects you to search through entire threads (with this forum's severely lacking search function), and weed through all the thousands of non-relevant BS posts that only mention a term with no other info for which you're searching, consuming what could amount to days, in order to find a specific post with a specific answer. When it all (both time and confusion and other BS) could be avoided by someone "showing the kindness" and simply taking 5 seconds and answering the post with the info or simply a link. I don't get it.

A forum is supposed to be where users help each other in any way they can. NOT where users can be chastised or met with uncalled for hostility. It's unfortunate the latter exists here, but this forum is unfortunately no exception.

Thanks (finally) to "syk69", it's been answered.

your welcome when all said and done you got one of the best tv's for picture quality, enjoy it
post #176 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_DML View Post

I agree, I think off is 60hz when feed 24fps input or at least on my own 5020.

Just that was the first time him using a specific analyzer to test for 72hz instead of just taking his word for it.

if you think you're getting 60hz when PC off then maybe you should get d-nice to go calibrate your tv and leave it looking awesome and i'm sure he can test out your refresh rate if you pay him removing your doubt of believing him in the 1st place
post #177 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by syk69 View Post

if you think you're getting 60hz when PC off then maybe you should get d-nice to go calibrate your tv and leave it looking awesome and i'm sure he can test out your refresh rate if you pay him removing your doubt of believing him in the 1st place

as far as I know he does not travel to Socal
post #178 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by timothydog76 View Post

Let's look at the facts:

2) Some other guy posted some numbers saying that PC:Off does 60hz with some homemade testing equipment that he made.

If we're going to talk facts, at least try to get the ones you're citing correct. "Some other guy" never claimed to build the equipment himself. He borrowed it from a television station technician, and said it was "homemade" in that one of the technicians may have built it. Being an electrical engineer myself, the design of building a device that uses an optical sensor to detect regularly oscillating light output levels is hardly rocket science with the right tools and parts. I do wonder why someone in such a position would build one rather than just buying one off of the shelf.

Quote:


3) When I switch between Off and Advanced I do not see one bit of difference. I can tell 60hz from 72hz very easily on a computer monitor.

I'm going with D-Nice on this one unless I can actually see the testing equipment and test for myself.

When was your set manufactured? The difference between Off and Advance is pretty obvious to me, and whether something changed during the manufacturing run (ie. earlier sets show one behavior, and later sets show another) is one hypothesis, but again, as an engineer I can't see any good reason for this to have happened, but I've got no other explanation.
post #179 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by razi View Post

I'm in NYC, so if you ever find yourself in the city with your refresh rate sensor, you have an open invitation to test my non-elite 6020.

Sounds good. The broadcast facility I work at is located in Midtown Manhattan. Hopefully I can borrow the device from the engineering lab and use it on your 6020 in the next couple of weeks.
I will probably contact you by private message sometime next week.
post #180 of 268
TV was manufactured July 08. Do you have anything specific that you think I should look for that you see as an obvious difference between Off and Advanced? Specific scenes or movies?

Again, I'm going to side with D-Nice and put the burden of proof on someone that states something different. Posting some numbers on a message board doesn't cut it for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by teiresias View Post

If we're going to talk facts, at least try to get the ones you're citing correct. "Some other guy" never claimed to build the equipment himself. He borrowed it from a television station technician, and said it was "homemade" in that one of the technicians may have built it. Being an electrical engineer myself, the design of building a device that uses an optical sensor to detect regularly oscillating light output levels is hardly rocket science with the right tools and parts. I do wonder why someone in such a position would build one rather than just buying one off of the shelf.



When was your set manufactured? The difference between Off and Advance is pretty obvious to me, and whether something changed during the manufacturing run (ie. earlier sets show one behavior, and later sets show another) is one hypothesis, but again, as an engineer I can't see any good reason for this to have happened, but I've got no other explanation.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Plasma Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › Curiousity . . . Flicker and Default GrayScale in Standard Mode at 1080p/24 on 5020FD