Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Mullen 
Yes, it has a picture perfect FR for a sealed subwoofer IMO. Mark picked the corner frequency to coincide with the onset of room gain in a typical/average size room and the result is predictable - free extension without resorting to adding a bunch of EQ just to obtain a flat anechoic response to very deep frequencies - that's counterproductive to the goal of a sealed sub.

Yes, it has a picture perfect FR for a sealed subwoofer IMO. Mark picked the corner frequency to coincide with the onset of room gain in a typical/average size room and the result is predictable - free extension without resorting to adding a bunch of EQ just to obtain a flat anechoic response to very deep frequencies - that's counterproductive to the goal of a sealed sub.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Mullen 
Even if both subwoofers were EQ'd for a similar response above the corner, they would still sound different because of the steeper roll-off profile of the bass reflex version below the corner frequency and that will affect your psychoacoustic perception of the subwoofer sound across the entire pass band.
If you want me to say they will both sound identical above the corner if they are EQ'd similarly I can't concede that - the whole FR colors our perception of the entire subwoofer pass band - so we can't isolate the spectrum below the corner and ignore its influence on how we perceive mid/upper bass.

Even if both subwoofers were EQ'd for a similar response above the corner, they would still sound different because of the steeper roll-off profile of the bass reflex version below the corner frequency and that will affect your psychoacoustic perception of the subwoofer sound across the entire pass band.
If you want me to say they will both sound identical above the corner if they are EQ'd similarly I can't concede that - the whole FR colors our perception of the entire subwoofer pass band - so we can't isolate the spectrum below the corner and ignore its influence on how we perceive mid/upper bass.
Thank you for the acknowledgment Ed. It is always reassuring to see others traveling related paths to come to similar conclusions. I'm sure we could have fun debating plenty of other matters over a frosty beverage or three, but differences in product designs and means of solving real problems is what keeps things interesting.

For the record, I agree with Ed's suggestion that there is plenty of material which has staccato and percussive instrument use where some degree of difference can be observed. Of course that first assumes the frequency response is reasonably flat and lacking any giant holes at the listening position and at the levels being listened to. If that added extension is regularly driving your subwoofer into heavy overload/non-linearity, there are likely better compromises to be made.












.

.





