AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Input lag wars!, post your input lag results of your LCD display here for reference
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Input lag wars!, post your input lag results of your LCD display here for reference - Page 39

post #1141 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaddix View Post

Could someone PM me or post a link to that program that lists the timers down the left side of the screen !

http://www.prad.de/new/monitore/testsoftware/smtt.html
post #1142 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaddix View Post

Could someone PM me or post a link to that program that lists the timers down the left side of the screen !

PM me your e-mail and what os you are using

i only have copies of win7/vista x64 and winxp 32 bit
post #1143 of 4030
Just wish there was some way we could hook up HDMI 1.3 mini to the iPad, from the PS3 or 360, because the iPad is one heck of an amazing IPS Display.

I am also liking DELL IPS series. But hows the Input Lag?
post #1144 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by d34dl1n3r View Post

I think I'm going to bite on a Tosh 670U.

How much longer do you all think these will still be available at Walmart?

I don't know but I just ordered a 46" from walmart.com Once it finally arrives, I'll evaluate it closely and if all is fine, I'll return this 670u to best buy so I don't have "live with" a dead pixel starring at me in tha face. It's a 100 bucks cheaper too and best buy says they won't price match "online prices"

Btw, I still think it's 40ms of input lag in game mode since i DID use SMMT app which according to these fine gents here, windows areo is taken out of the equation. I forgot to post the pics last night, I will for sure though.
post #1145 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by KVW View Post

I don't know but I just ordered a 46" from walmart.com Once it finally arrives, I'll evaluate it closely and if all is fine, I'll return this 670u to best buy so I don't have "live with" a dead pixel starring at me in tha face. It's a 100 bucks cheaper too and best buy says they won't price match "online prices"

Btw, I still think it's 40ms of input lag in game mode since i DID use SMMT app which according to these fine gents here, windows areo is taken out of the equation. I forgot to post the pics last night, I will for sure though.

Another TV again (even though it's technically the same one). Wow, you just can't stop yourself. Really KVM, come forward and admitt you have a problem. First step is the admitt it.
post #1146 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guibs View Post

Another TV again (even though it's technically the same one). Wow, you just can't stop yourself. Really KVM, come forward and admitt you have a problem. First step is the admitt it.

I know, I need a distraction or something. I get like this when I'm between girlfriends. Haha!
post #1147 of 4030
I misread. I guess it's 40ms like you stated, but considering I used to have a Sammy A650 I should be fine with the lag - which I swear had to be more than 1-2 frame delay in 1080p HDMI game mode.

So 40ms = how many frames?

The reason I want to stay away from a Panny plasma is due to the diminishing blacks issue.
post #1148 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by d34dl1n3r View Post

I misread. I guess it's 40ms like you stated, but considering I used to have a Sammy A650 I should be fine with the lag - which I swear had to be more than 1-2 frame delay in 1080p HDMI game mode.

So 40ms = how many frames?

The reason I want to stay away from a Panny plasma is due to the diminishing blacks issue.

about 2.5 frames of lag
post #1149 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by d34dl1n3r View Post

The reason I want to stay away from a Panny plasma is due to the diminishing blacks issue.

This only affects the credits and letterbox bars. The black level when there is actual content on the screen does not change drastically like the MLL does.
post #1150 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaddix View Post

This only affects the credits and letterbox bars. The black level when there is actual content on the screen does not change drastically like the MLL does.

yeah as an owner of a completely black risen panasonic plasma its really only an issue if you intend to use the TV in a theater room where there is little to no lighting and your going to have black bars on the top/bottom of the screen and also in certain dark movie scenes etc.

the Temp IR increase actually to me is more of an annoyance but we still love our plasma.
post #1151 of 4030
I have a bad news for the TC-L42D2. I'm not buying it.

The pic tell all.


I when to check for it with my digital cam & took a macro out of it. Indeed, it's not an IPS alpha. Also the screen is semi gloss.
post #1152 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Deap View Post

I have a bad news for the TC-L42D2. I'm not buying it.

The pic tell all.

I when to check for it with my digital cam & took a macro out of it. Indeed, it's not an IPS alpha. Also the screen is semi gloss.

I wouldn't rule it out that fast. S-IPS panels are still pretty good, and I have yet to see evidence of a 42-inch Alpha in the wild.

Amazing that the contrast ratio game continues to get crazier. 2 million to 1 on an S-IPS panel? Without local dimming, that's about 2,000x off from reality.
post #1153 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by frito View Post

yeah as an owner of a completely black risen panasonic plasma its really only an issue if you intend to use the TV in a theater room where there is little to no lighting and your going to have black bars on the top/bottom of the screen and also in certain dark movie scenes etc.

the Temp IR increase actually to me is more of an annoyance but we still love our plasma.

Now that almost makes a Panny Plasma (or any other plasma due to input lag with the Sammy's and LG's) a no go for me. I plan on watcing movies and playing games in a finished basement with no lights on. Plus a lot of the movies I own are 2.35:1 so there will be black bars top and bottom.

I am really driving myself crazy with all of this info....lol. The most recent LCD's I have been looking at WERE the Sharp Quattron 810 or 820 and the Toshiba 670u. Now because I am reading about them, there seems to be some issues there as well. Not to mention the price of the Sharp TV's are a little high. At least I have some time (end of July) before I decide. UGH......I just wish I could have a dedicated game TV and a dedicated movie/broadcast TV. Not really a possibility though.
post #1154 of 4030
Thread Starter 
if you look into any TV you will find problems and people complaining about something esp on these forums.

at the end of the day you need to go out and see if you can tell if its a problem for you personally
post #1155 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by frito View Post

if you look into any TV you will find problems and people complaining about something esp on these forums.

at the end of the day you need to go out and see if you can tell if its a problem for you personally


That first statement is beyond true...I am making myself crazy with all the info in this forum...lol. I have to head to some stores to check the TV's out for myself.
post #1156 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by wondras View Post

I wouldn't rule it out that fast. S-IPS panels are still pretty good, and I have yet to see evidence of a 42-inch Alpha in the wild.

Amazing that the contrast ratio game continues to get crazier. 2 million to 1 on an S-IPS panel? Without local dimming, that's about 2,000x off from reality.

I'll be honest here, but for this year, Plasma is the way to go. Even with the Black level rising, everything is better. LCD are way too cheap & they even removed all the candy such as BBE & build quality.

Most people want thin panel, blurry matte screen, low viewing angle with incredible high lag display, super high ghosting fidelity. But that ain't for me. If it's continue like that I won't look at display for quite awhile.
post #1157 of 4030
Samsung's LN46C750 3D ready 46" LED LCD anyone? Searched back through page 30 of this thread and no hits. I've found a few customer reviews on Amazon that say there's no noticeable input lag when you put it on game mode. At a street price of $1300, it looks kinda tempting.
post #1158 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi Def Fan View Post

Samsung's LN46C750 3D ready 46" LED LCD anyone? Searched back through page 30 of this thread and no hits. I've found a few customer reviews on Amazon that say there's no noticeable input lag when you put it on game mode. At a street price of $1300, it looks kinda tempting.

its pretty safe to assume just like last years Samsung models that they all perform the same or worse than other models that have already been tested and it has an ok level of lag (to most people) at around 3 frames of delay.

most major manufactures are settled on that figure for being acceptable and to the average person they are probably right but really 1-2 frames really does perform much better in reality but if you want that you need to get a panasonic, sharp or possibly some LG models. everything else is 3 frames or more of lag these days.
post #1159 of 4030
I'm so glad I bought my TV when quality matter and thin wasn't IN yet. Happy owner of a Samsung LN46A650 a time where everyone knew what they were getting when it came to certain TVs like for example mine all 40" a650 or higher TVs were of high quality same panel. When it came to input lag HDMI2-PC mode or VGA was super fast compare to any other 120hz TVs of the time and in general high quality TVs. Finally calibrated my TV and in both modes PC mode and regular mode after professional calibration the TV looks stunning. Barely can tell the difference between the two modes and it looks great. Before calibration only regular mode looked like great but PC mode not so good and admit it.

Now it is good and I would suggest people if they hate the TV trend of today to just search high and low for older TVs and get a warranty and calibrate it and be done with it. Of course uneducated igorant people see I have a Samsung and say horrible for gaming but only if they knew the A650-A860 40-52" models were special thanks to the PC mode or VGA and brought super fast low input lag and this is was a 120hz TV.

PC mode on this TV doesn't do what the Toshiba xv645u does in game mode. Color accuracy is not impaired and it doesnt show pixel smearing in dark images while moving over an even darker background like some games out there like FEAR game and didnt see it over the test to see if it did.

So good luck people in hunting down a good one only real regret I have was not buying the biggest size I can for this model at the time which would of been a 52".

EDIT= I will take my words back and say PC mode looks awesome after I got my TV calibrated and calibrated in PC mode as much as one can do with the limited settings and compare to the regular mode and PC mode it looks almost identical except for PC mode looking slightly softer just slightly but this works for gaming since some games have bad jaggies and it kinda of like a cheap anti-aliasing. I was too use to over sharp images but a calibrated image is not meant to be and finally see it. Get your TVs calibrated when you guys do find a good gaming TV later.

Btw my mom bought a 50" Samsung B550 plasma looks great after calibration (blacks were much better than my TV of course) so anyone need a better input lag test for this TV let me know I'll do it.
post #1160 of 4030
ok, so my first choice was samsung 55C650.. casue I had a 61" DLP samsung

now, after going through that thread, and this one....and input lag was a concern

the Toshiba 55" 670u is a better bet? (trying to get the PQ of the samsung VS the lag issue )


mind you..plan is:

HTPC --> Onkyo HTS7200 reciever ---> TV

HTPC for the following:
Blu ray disks
ripped movies (blu ray/ripped DVD)
ripped TV shows
hulu
netflix
DvD
music
ceton cable card tuner for recording/play

and the big one....

starcraft 2
competive pvp MMOs
FPS games (MW, bad company, L4D2, etc)
post #1161 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by frito View Post

its pretty safe to assume just like last years Samsung models that they all perform the same or worse than other models that have already been tested and it has an ok level of lag (to most people) at around 3 frames of delay.

most major manufactures are settled on that figure for being acceptable and to the average person they are probably right but really 1-2 frames really does perform much better in reality but if you want that you need to get a panasonic, sharp or possibly some LG models. everything else is 3 frames or more of lag these days.

You say also LG.

But in the latest led model (i need a 32) what is the best in imput lag?
post #1162 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Principe Nero View Post

You say also LG.

But in the latest led model (i need a 32) what is the best in imput lag?

what i said was

Quote:


possibly some LG models

this is because last year they had some models that performed at 2 frames of lag like the LH90 but they also had other models that had 3 or more frames of lag. 2010 model's have yet to be tested at all. sharp and panasonic are the only current safe bets
post #1163 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by frito View Post

what i said was



this is because last year they had some models that performed at 2 frames of lag like the LH90 but they also had other models that had 3 or more frames of lag. 2010 model's have yet to be tested at all. sharp and panasonic are the only current safe bets

if he goes with the LD520 (I know it's not a LED but an LCD) I'm pretty sure it was 2 frames of input lag (about 30ms). I tried that TV for 2 weeks and didn't had any input lag and I am usually sensative to it.
post #1164 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by felonyr301 View Post

I would suggest people if they hate the TV trend of today to just search high and low for older TVs and get a warranty and calibrate it and be done with it.

I'm actually hoping I can score a good 34" HD CRT locally someday. They often sell for less than a cheap 32" LCD, and will outperform it by a mile.

I talked a friend of mine into looking for a 34XBR960, probably the best direct-view CRT ever made. He eventually found one for $300. He sold his LCD for more than that, and he couldn't be happier. I haven't seen it in person yet, but he says that it has the best picture he's ever seen. Even DVDs look stunning. Blacks are so black that in a dark room, a pause icon on a blank screen looks like it is floating in midair.

I will try to do an accurate lag test on it when I see it, but my expectation is that it will have 1 frame or less at 720p, which it scales to 1080i, and *zero* lag at 1080i.

The downsides to CRTs, of course, are the size, weight, power consumption, and limited screen size (they top out at 34".) There are probably issues with outdated or non-existent HDMI inputs, too. But if you can live with these limitations, it's the best of both worlds -- fantastic picture quality and unbeatable gaming performance, at the same time.

Hopefull I will have more to report on this soon...
post #1165 of 4030
32 inch Panasonic for bedroom, 5 feet away, for X-Box 360 and standard definition DVDs.Which one do I go with?

C22 for $400 which is 720p
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Panasoni...&skuId=9745961

U22 for $500 which is 1080p
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Panasoni...&skuId=9740811

X2 for $400 which is 720p
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Panasonic-TC-L32X2/14237659

Also, I don't know if I am going to be happy with the TV and keep it, or have to return it.So will I be able to use the TV without having to screw the TV's base into my entertainment center? I don't want to put a lot of holes into my entertainment center until I am positive that I like/am going to keep said TV.
post #1166 of 4030
Has anyone thought of using a "commercial" display before like the ones you see at airports etc. Right now on logicbuy.com there is a 32" samsung 720p for under 300 bucks on sale. I was thinking that a commercial display might be good for input lag as it is basically a large monitor and doesn't have very much image adjustment controls. Also they always have tons of inputs for different video sources. I know the picture quality wouldn't be the best but for a large low input lag gaming monitor it would work for me!! Just a thought.
post #1167 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamdanwilliamson View Post

Has anyone thought of using a "commercial" display before like the ones you see at airports etc. Right now on logicbuy.com there is a 32" samsung 720p for under 300 bucks on sale. I was thinking that a commercial display might be good for input lag as it is basically a large monitor and doesn't have very much image adjustment controls. Also they always have tons of inputs for different video sources. I know the picture quality wouldn't be the best but for a large low input lag gaming monitor it would work for me!! Just a thought.

"Digital signage" displays have been discussed on the shoryuken.com input lag thread. You have basically the same situation -- there's not enough test data, so you can't be sure that the one you choose will have low lag. It's pretty safe to say you won't have really high lag, but it might not be very low, either.
post #1168 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamdanwilliamson View Post

Has anyone thought of using a "commercial" display before like the ones you see at airports etc. Right now on logicbuy.com there is a 32" samsung 720p for under 300 bucks on sale. I was thinking that a commercial display might be good for input lag as it is basically a large monitor and doesn't have very much image adjustment controls. Also they always have tons of inputs for different video sources. I know the picture quality wouldn't be the best but for a large low input lag gaming monitor it would work for me!! Just a thought.

one owner on here bought a NEC 32" 720p LCD display and he lag tested it and it had 2 frames of lag
post #1169 of 4030
is it possible to quickly estimate input lag by going to Best Buy, looking at all the screens that are on the same signal, and finding the one that changes frames the fastest?

Would there be any reason that this wouldnt work?
post #1170 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nanothis View Post

is it possible to quickly estimate input lag by going to Best Buy, looking at all the screens that are on the same signal, and finding the one that changes frames the fastest?

Would there be any reason that this wouldnt work?

without a camera its pretty hard to determine plus there are variables that could add lag outside of the TV like video splitter setups etc.

stores that run feeds over the antenna input like many do will all get the same signal at the same time but the problem there is you cannot put any TV into a low lag mode when they are on the built in tuner because there is no reason for it so in that setup you will only be getting normal lag figures not absolute minimum lag.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Input lag wars!, post your input lag results of your LCD display here for reference