AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Input lag wars!, post your input lag results of your LCD display here for reference
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Input lag wars!, post your input lag results of your LCD display here for reference - Page 42

post #1231 of 4030
If you considered the V20 then why not the G20?
post #1232 of 4030
Whats the difference with V20? Is there a lag test somewhere on the g20?
post #1233 of 4030
Someone had posted about lag on that set. It's pretty low. Less then 30 ms which is great.
post #1234 of 4030
Frito

I need your expertise. Im looking at the Sony KDL46HX701. OutGod got the TV and posted these lag results.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...3#post18813083

"Gaming - I game a lot. I tried my ps3 with it and quite frankly....i don't see any lag. I tried with the Rock Band 2 calibration and here are the results i got :

Scene Normal : Audio 24 ms, Video 56 ms
Scene Game : Audio 5 ms, Video 11 ms

Don't know if it's a good indication but i tried NHL10, Uncharted 2 , Singstar, Final Fantasy and Fifa World Cup and did not notice any problems. So, to conclude, i guess it differs from person to person but i game a lot and my games genres go from music games to shooters and so far so good. I don't have a problem with the TV. Will update when i have played more with other games."


Are these good numbers? I would like to purchase this set if the lag isnt too bad.

Thank you for your time sir.....
post #1235 of 4030
Thread Starter 
it sound promising but its worth noting that RB auto cal has been known to be inaccurate by at least 1 frame and that the Sony EX70x has been tested and had horrible input lag even in game mode.

if you really want an answer on what the real lag level is on that model please ask the owner in that thread to test it properly, point him to this thread if he need instructions or help on how to perform the test. otherwise its up to you really, from the sound of it and from what i've seen on RB tests on known models it could be dead on or it could be 16ms higher than what it says. either way its not bad though
post #1236 of 4030
I never know if people are doing the auto calibration with the light sensor on the guitar or if they are doing it manually. Because even on my old CRT set I never got the auto calibration to give me 11ms video.
post #1237 of 4030
Frito

I appreciate your time to answer the question. I think I will get the tv and try myself.

Thanks
post #1238 of 4030
So what is the measured inputlag on the KDL-..EX402?
post #1239 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mootje View Post

So what is the measured inputlag on the KDL-..EX402?

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...9#post18777749

about 40ms according to this owners test with SMTT
post #1240 of 4030
I'm currently looking for a 47 inch tv, that I would mainly use for gaming. I'm currently using an sd crt, so I'm pretty sure I'm sensitive to input lag. Originally I wanted to buy an LG 47LH4000, but I've read some very different input lag results of it, ranging from 20 to 80 ms. As far as I know 100 hz and other features only increase lag, so when you switch to game mode they are automatically switched off, so your left with a blurry picture, which I honestly don't really like.

Therefore I started to look for plasmas, especially Panasonics, because they have a reputation for having the least amount of input lag. Unfortunately the G10/G20 modell, that has the new NEOPDP panel is a bit too expensive for me. I've read a review on www. hdtvtest. com, where they claim that the S20 is also equipped with this new panel, so it would be ideal for me, since it has a beutiful picture, but all panasonic homepages (except the UK site) list the S20 among the NON neopdp models.

I'm quite lost now, I'm really short on useful information regarding input lag, so every help is very appreciated.
Do you guys have any suggestions on specific models, or where I should start looking?
post #1241 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnaby88 View Post

I'm currently looking for a 47 inch tv, that I would mainly use for gaming. I'm currently using an sd crt, so I'm pretty sure I'm sensitive to input lag. Originally I wanted to buy an LG 47LH4000, but I've read some very different input lag results of it, ranging from 20 to 80 ms. As far as I know 100 hz and other features only increase lag, so when you switch to game mode they are automatically switched off, so your left with a blurry picture, which I honestly don't really like.

Therefore I started to look for plasmas, especially Panasonics, because they have a reputation for having the least amount of input lag. Unfortunately the G10/G20 modell, that has the new NEOPDP panel is a bit too expensive for me. I've read a review on www. hdtvtest. com, where they claim that the S20 is also equipped with this new panel, so it would be ideal for me, since it has a beutiful picture, but all panasonic homepages (except the UK site) list the S20 among the NON neopdp models.

I'm quite lost now, I'm really short on useful information regarding input lag, so every help is very appreciated.
Do you guys have any suggestions on specific models, or where I should start looking?

Sharp's Un810/UN820 have been tested with excellent input lag results (30 ms) if you don't mind edge led.
post #1242 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by szymon247 View Post

Yeah but still far from last year's Alphas if it comes to input lag. I played Xbox360 with last year's G10 and could play with 100/120hz on with 30-40ms of input lag which made gaming really awesome as it felt like everything was ultra-smooth. It also worked on PC games. Feels like 100frames per second on a 50fps game.

However still it makes this year's Panasonics great if the price is right. Very huge improvement. At least according to first tests.

Does the G10 have 30-40ms of input lag no matter what, or only when the 100/120hz feature is activated? If it does get better when turned off, is the lag around the same as the S10 model or does it seem a bit higher (the S10 being tested at ~15ms by frito)?
post #1243 of 4030
I know this is the LCD forum but does anyone know how LCD compare to plasmas in regard to input lag. I'm trying to decide between these two...


Panasonic TC-L42U22 1080p LCD

Panasonic TC-P42U2 1080p PLASMA


also on my short list...
TOSHIBA 40E200U LCD
Sharp LC40D68UT LCD
LG 37LD450 LCD

any advice?
post #1244 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Untitled0101 View Post

I know this is the LCD forum but does anyone know how LCD compare to plasmas in regard to input lag. I'm trying to decide between these two...

Panasonic TC-L42U22 1080p LCD

Panasonic TC-P42U2 1080p PLASMA

also on my short list...
TOSHIBA 40E200U LCD
Sharp LC40D68UT LCD
LG 37LD450 LCD

any advice?

I'm pretty sure it depends on many factors, so you really need to check the individual model. Some folks will say that plasmas have no lag because of the fast pixel response time, but that just isn't the case, so watch out and good luck with your search.
post #1245 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Untitled0101 View Post

I know this is the LCD forum but does anyone know how LCD compare to plasmas in regard to input lag. I'm trying to decide between these two...


Panasonic TC-L42U22 1080p LCD

Panasonic TC-P42U2 1080p PLASMA


also on my short list...
TOSHIBA 40E200U LCD
Sharp LC40D68UT LCD
LG 37LD450 LCD

any advice?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hossenstein View Post

I'm pretty sure it depends on many factors, so you really need to check the individual model. Some folks will say that plasmas have no lag because of the fast pixel response time, but that just isn't the case, so watch out and good luck with your search.

Panasonic's track record with plasma's in the past few years is that they have anywhere from 15-30ms input lag.

i tested our Panny 50X1 with SMTT and came up with 30ms of lag but i was not giving it native 720p due to my CRT not accepting the signal so there was some scaling lag.

if you want to see more results go back to the first post on this thread and i have a link in there to Orta's plasma input lag thread that is much like this one
post #1246 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by frito View Post

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...9#post18777749

about 40ms according to this owners test with SMTT

Thnx, but it is not tested in game mode, maybe it's less than 40 ms?
post #1247 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mootje View Post

Thnx, but it is not tested in game mode, maybe it's less than 40 ms?

i don't honestly see it getting any lower than 30ms, if you look a few more posts down from there he i think managed to get it into game mode and those shots came up with a reading around 34ms but i'm not positive it was in game mode (his responses were kind of vague)
post #1248 of 4030
The KDL EX-400 is quite fast. I wouldn't worry about it.
post #1249 of 4030
definately get an LCD for gaming...my personal opinion...
post #1250 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semp1 View Post

definately get an LCD for gaming...my personal opinion...

ONLY because of no burn in risk. Other then that. They suck. If they were as fast as plasma. They'd be perfect
post #1251 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JukeBox360 View Post

ONLY because of no burn in risk. Other then that. They suck. If they were as fast as plasma. They'd be perfect

burn in risk is not really a risk after the first 100-200 hours of use on a Plasma, Temp IR becoming an annoyance can be however but its not going to break your TV
post #1252 of 4030
I've seen people have "temp" IR for 6 months. Burn in and IR may not be an issue for everyone. But it sure is for me. I game far to long and often do forget about my game. Or even fall asleep leaving the system or comp on. I prefer LCD. even though i do like plasma more. I like the "safer" choice.
post #1253 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JukeBox360 View Post

I've seen people have "temp" IR for 6 months. Burn in and IR may not be an issue for everyone. But it sure is for me. I game far to long and often do forget about my game. Or even fall asleep leaving the system or comp on. I prefer LCD. even though i do like plasma more. I like the "safer" choice.

i won't disagree with you, I used to be a big time gamer in my younger years but these days I don't game as much as i used to but in any event i've never been a big time console gamer either.

we use our plasma in the living room with an asus O!Play a lot to playback music and the text menus thanks to the black rise on panasonic's give temp IR like crazy on our 1000+ hour plasma but not once has it ever taken more than a few hours of normal TV use to remove any IR that was incurred by the oplay's static menu's

if someone had an image persist on their plasma for 6 months before it disappeared it sounds like they left something on the screen when it was new for too long and it was actual phosphor burn in that eventually evened it self out as the rest of the phosphors aged to match those ones. Temp IR will never stay around more than a few hours of normal TV use at the most ever.

also i would like to point out that the phosphor wear on plasma's if you graph it over time is like a hockey stick, they wear very quickly when new at once they hit 2-3k hours they barely wear to the point that it would literally take a week of a paused game to cause real burn in on them, thats how slow they start to age once they get older.
post #1254 of 4030
Quote:
Originally Posted by frito View Post

also i would like to point out that the phosphor wear on plasma's if you graph it over time is like a hockey stick, they wear very quickly when new at once they hit 2-3k hours they barely wear to the point that it would literally take a week of a paused game to cause real burn in on them, thats how slow they start to age once they get older.

I am very interested in seeing a graph or some numbers of phosphor wear if you happen to have something bookmarked. I've seen everything from 100 hours to 1000 hours mentioned but never anything with conclusive data.
post #1255 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaddix View Post

I am very interested in seeing a graph or some numbers of phosphor wear if you happen to have something bookmarked. I've seen everything from 100 hours to 1000 hours mentioned but never anything with conclusive data.

i've come across it a few times, ill see if i can dig up and information on it for you

grr well the only graph i could find was posted by xrox on these fourms but his photobucket account is disabled or the image got removed. xrox is well known on here to provide some excelent scientific data on technical aspects of displays in the past and if hes still around i would love to have him jump in here and post the info he has on the subject.

off the top of my head though one of the places i heard this discussed in the past besides many of peoples experiences on here with older plasma's is an interview someone did of one of the former heads of Pioneer's R & D, they were of course discussing image retention and black rise on panasonic's and he stated that the wear rate of phosphors in plasma's was studied by them extensively in order to implement voltage rise adjustments to drive the pixels as the panel ages, this is actually the heart of the problem with Panasonic's 2009 models, they implemented the same voltage rise that pioneer did to extend the overall lifetime of the panel but they did so too rapidly and it caused two adverse effects increased T.I.R. and increased black levels, both of witch he implied would actually return to new TV levels once the phosphors in the effected sets wore down to their slow wear levels that occurs if i remember correctly around 2000-3000 hours of use.

it is well known though that all phosphors wear extremely rapidly when brand new, the same thing happens with light bulb's that use phosphors.
post #1256 of 4030
So in theory. A plasma is like a baby. You take care of your baby till it's old enough to walk out on it's own.
post #1257 of 4030
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JukeBox360 View Post

So in theory. A plasma is like a baby. You take care of your baby till it's old enough to walk out on it's own.

sure, but the time frame that you need to baby a plasma is less than a week if you use break in slides found on these forums that further accelerate the aging of the phosphors

i used them on ours when we first got it, it does not mean you have to do it but if you want to rack up 100 hours on it real quick and prevent any perm burn in it is the way to go.
post #1258 of 4030
Yeah. That's pretty much what I intend to do. Just because I'd like to be able to use the set as much as possible the way intend to. Got 45 days to make sure burn in doesn't become a problem for me.
post #1259 of 4030
I bought the ex500 ( 32inch ) a few weeks ago , and im disappointed in the input lag
So Im really looking for another tv ( before my warranty ends )
Im looking for a 32inch lcd , thats great for gaming , my budget is 800$ and bestbuy has to carry them ( so i can switch my bravio with it ) , can someone please help me
post #1260 of 4030
Did you try turning on game mode with your set.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Input lag wars!, post your input lag results of your LCD display here for reference