So im almost ready to pull the trigger on a TV.
Ive narrowed it down to the Pioneer Pro 151 FD or the Pioneer 600 KRP-M.
Here is my thinking and this is where I'm stuck.
Obviously I would like the Pro 151 fd for the extended length of warranty (2 year). I understand and I might be wrong, but that the two tv's internals are basically the same. The only difference is the lack of ISF interface on the 600 Krp-m. Obviously the Krp-m doesnt come with speakers or stand, neither of which I need, so you save there.
Now there is a price difference, and here is where I am stuck. Both tv's have pure mode. But is the ISF that important to pay the difference in the two tv's? My understanding is the ISF allows the 151 to run a bit brighter. But does it effect the picture quality to a degree that it will be noticeable. I do plan on getting which ever tv I get professionally calibrated.
So tell me the pro's and con's. The cost difference between the two is over $1000.
Ive narrowed it down to the Pioneer Pro 151 FD or the Pioneer 600 KRP-M.
Here is my thinking and this is where I'm stuck.
Obviously I would like the Pro 151 fd for the extended length of warranty (2 year). I understand and I might be wrong, but that the two tv's internals are basically the same. The only difference is the lack of ISF interface on the 600 Krp-m. Obviously the Krp-m doesnt come with speakers or stand, neither of which I need, so you save there.
Now there is a price difference, and here is where I am stuck. Both tv's have pure mode. But is the ISF that important to pay the difference in the two tv's? My understanding is the ISF allows the 151 to run a bit brighter. But does it effect the picture quality to a degree that it will be noticeable. I do plan on getting which ever tv I get professionally calibrated.
So tell me the pro's and con's. The cost difference between the two is over $1000.













