AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Epson Calibration Guide! (1080, 1080UB, 6100, 6500UB, 7500UB)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Epson Calibration Guide! (1080, 1080UB, 6100, 6500UB, 7500UB) - Page 17

post #481 of 718
ok i think i used you conv matrix and used it as ref followed stereodan inst

ok i did ftl at 10.5 did the grey scale got it close as possible to 2.22 think it became 2.20 with the 2.15 10%

then setup rgb and had to bump up gain r all they way and offset just a little this using 6500k

after that i used the chart that stereo did and could not do the 75% method couldnt get close, but with the 100% i can

once done i saved the picture has nice punch and the 75% i tried to do since i do not have the brightness control was more pale....

so i up the colour temp on 7000k with the 100% method it seemed to tame the colour a bit....

is this the right way i am doing it...

if anyone has any tip for the 1080 non ub without the brightness

would be awsome i think its better than normal....settings.. so i can live with it.

thanx denis
post #482 of 718
whats the settings for hcfr when doing the conv matrix for a eye1 what needs to be set in the settings.. and soforth

thanx denis
post #483 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

ok i think i used you conv matrix and used it as ref followed stereodan inst

ok i did ftl at 10.5 did the grey scale got it close as possible to 2.22 think it became 2.20 with the 2.15 10%

then setup rgb and had to bump up gain r all they way and offset just a little this using 6500k

after that i used the chart that stereo did and could not do the 75% method couldnt get close, but with the 100% i can

once done i saved the picture has nice punch and the 75% i tried to do since i do not have the brightness control was more pale....

so i up the colour temp on 7000k with the 100% method it seemed to tame the colour a bit....

is this the right way i am doing it...

if anyone has any tip for the 1080 non ub without the brightness

would be awsome i think its better than normal....settings.. so i can live with it.

thanx denis

We need a little more information. It sounds like you got your gray scale dialed in pretty well, but then you mentioned doing rgb gains and offsets. Gains and offsets are only used for gray scale (not the 75% method).

Also, are you using 75% saturations (and not stimulus?). 75% stimulus are at the outside triangle points (the 100% stimulus points), just less brightness. 75% saturations are inside the 100% triangle.

You might want to attach your .chc files so we can look at them.

Farther back in this thread is a user that has the 1080 without brightness controls, so you should read back through how they made adjustments.
post #484 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

whats the settings for hcfr when doing the conv matrix for a eye1 what needs to be set in the settings.. and soforth

thanx denis

I'm not sure I understand the question. Basically you take RGBW readings (either 100% or 75% stimulus windows) for your most accurate meter (in my case the i1Pro). You then do the same thing for the meter you want to offset from your reference meter. You then open both files, and select the reference box for your reference meter, go to window and select the offset meter view, go to advanced, XYZ coordinates adjustment matrix, compute conversion matrix from reference document.

The border of the offset meter screen should turn pale green, and the XYZ adjustment box should be checked. This file is now setup as your offset meter to your reference meter. You can take readings with your offset meter and the software will adjust the results to your reference meter, as long as the XYZ adjustment box is checked. You can uncheck it and see how the dE's change and then check it to see them change back.

EDIT: If you are asking how to create the conversion matrix that I provided in one of your files, you go to advanced, XYZ coordinate adjustment matrix, manually edit XYZ conversion matrix.
post #485 of 718
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

ok i think i used you conv matrix and used it as ref followed stereodan inst

ok i did ftl at 10.5 did the grey scale got it close as possible to 2.22 think it became 2.20 with the 2.15 10%

then setup rgb and had to bump up gain r all they way and offset just a little this using 6500k

after that i used the chart that stereo did and could not do the 75% method couldnt get close, but with the 100% i can

once done i saved the picture has nice punch and the 75% i tried to do since i do not have the brightness control was more pale....

so i up the colour temp on 7000k with the 100% method it seemed to tame the colour a bit....

is this the right way i am doing it...

if anyone has any tip for the 1080 non ub without the brightness

would be awsome i think its better than normal....settings.. so i can live with it.

thanx denis

It is fairly common to max out red gain, especially once the bulb ages.. It is the weakest of the colors on the Epsons.

Not sure the 1080 reacts the same as my 1080UB, but I need to start with the main user color setting at about -12 in order to be able to hit some of the 75% saturation points in the RGMCMY menu.

In the RGMCMY menu, if you have a problem where you have to max out your green saturation for example, and you still can't hit the 75% measurement point, then bump up your main color setting. This also works in the opposite direction, as in my case, which is why I have my main color at -12 to start. A lot of my saturation values end up being negative in my RGBCMY menu. If didn't have my main color at -12, I would run out of negative adjustment.

The main tint setting also works this way. It spins the entire color triangle around the D65 white point. If I remember correctly, a negative main tint setting rotates the whole triangle counter clockwise, and a positive setting rotates it clockwise. So if you are running out of the hue setting in your RGBCMY menu, then the main tint control can help this as well.

For the 1080, you may just be better off calibrating to the 100% saturation points. You can try both and see what happens.

Not having that brightness setting in the RGBCMY menu is a real bummer since reducing saturation tends to reduce brightness as well.

Dan
post #486 of 718
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post
whats the settings for hcfr when doing the conv matrix for a eye1 what needs to be set in the settings.. and soforth

thanx denis
I assume you have an LT meter and want to use Knd's offset to the i1pro meter? Keep in mind that no two meters are equal, so the offset for your LT may be different than Knd's. I can tell you this though, when I use his offset, it gives me, by far, the best calibration I've had to date in Natural mode.

Ive attached the conversion matrix that Knd created for Natural mode, high lamp below. Save it to your desktop and extract it.

Start HCFR and start a new calibration file as you normally would.

Go to: Advanced > XYZ Coordinates Adjustment Matrix > Manually Edit XYZ Conversion Matrix > Load Then find the matrix conversion file on your desktop and load it.

You will notice that the XYZ Adjustment box is checked on the main measures tab (The color of HCFR will change to a light green)

Calibrate as you normally would. HCFR does all the conversion for you.

Dan

 

i1pro to LT Natural, High Lamp 10-26-09.zip 0.4248046875k . file
post #487 of 718
Dan,
Have you tried the dynamic matrix yet?
post #488 of 718
Thread Starter 
No, not yet. It will take a little while because I want to use the offset from both the natural high and the dynamic matrix, both on the Dynamic mode and see which is better.

The Natural High gave me such an improvement that I want to see how it does in dynamic mode.

I still don’t understand why your offsets would be so different. Possible causes are the large difference in lumens, and the color filter moving out of the way of the light path in dynamic mode.

Dan
post #489 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by stereomandan View Post

No, not yet. It will take a little while because I want to use the offset from both the natural high and the dynamic matrix, both on the Dynamic mode and see which is better.

The Natural High gave me such an improvement that I want to see how it does in dynamic mode.

I still don't understand why your offsets would be so different. Possible causes are the large difference in lumens, and the color filter moving out of the way of the light path in dynamic mode.

Dan

I've asked this question over in the display calibration section, but so far no response.
post #490 of 718
thanx stereo and knd
the conv matrix helped with the grey sacle...

one thing im stuck on.....

i did the rgb using the hcfr using the red green and blue cylinders on the left so they match 100 percent....

then i started the 10 % greyscale woindows and got 2.22 with 2.15 on the 10% window...

no i wanted to know am i doing the rgbcmy right, i put in the ftl of y in the spread sheet from dan when i did grey scale....

now for the rgbmcy i used the spread sheet where it say 75% method on the first page ad using hcfr with the red green blue cylinder things on the left and matched the percentages....

im not sure if this is right.... for doing the rgbmcy...

can someone let me know if this is the right way or am i doing something wrong as knd and stereo say something about stimulus???

thanx guys for helping

also i only have a 85 inch screen so ftl is pretty bright....and the projector is not too far back so brightness should no be a problem


thanx

Denis
post #491 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

thanx stereo and knd
the conv matrix helped with the grey sacle...

one thing im stuck on.....

i did the rgb using the hcfr using the red green and blue cylinders on the left so they match 100 percent....

then i started the 10 % greyscale woindows and got 2.22 with 2.15 on the 10% window...

no i wanted to know am i doing the rgbcmy right, i put in the ftl of y in the spread sheet from dan when i did grey scale....

now for the rgbmcy i used the spread sheet where it say 75% method on the first page ad using hcfr with the red green blue cylinder things on the left and matched the percentages....

im not sure if this is right.... for doing the rgbmcy...

can someone let me know if this is the right way or am i doing something wrong as knd and stereo say something about stimulus???

thanx guys for helping

also i only have a 85 inch screen so ftl is pretty bright....and the projector is not too far back so brightness should no be a problem


thanx

Denis

Yes, I think you are doing this correctly, although Dan's spreadsheet requires the cd/m^2 (2 locations, Cal Aid and Input data), not the ftL.

I was referring only to the stimulus windows for creating an offset. For Dan's method you use the saturation windows, calibrate to the 75% saturation windows for 6 colors, and then run the 30 windows (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% for 6 colors). You then cut the results from HCFR and paste them into the 2nd tab of the spreadsheet. Once you have pasted all 6 colors, you can move down the tabs in the spreadsheet to see how well you did.
post #492 of 718
Thread Starter 
Sounds like you are doing it correct d4g. Just remember one thing:

The % bar method will give you the correct saturation and Hue, but don't forget that you need to adjust the brightness for each color as well. The %bars do not tell you this, but just to the right of the bars in HCFR is the table that shows the current cd/m2 reading. You need to match that to the values (J4 thru J10) in my spreadsheet, after you've already entered the 100% white cd/m2 value into cell I1 on the Calibration Aid sheet.

Happy calibrating!

Dan
post #493 of 718
well so i can say im doing it ok, but i cant do the brightness part as i do not have this....

but i think i got it pretty good.... not perfect but better.....

i have noticed since i dont have the brightness settings that the colour look a bit pale with 75% method with the brightness setting i guess it fixes this.. might do a 100% later to see how it goes...

the conv matrix works well as i do not have the red grey scale now thanx knd and stereo...

still looking for a 1080ub or higher later on...... but for now this will do
post #494 of 718
stereo and dan... for me to get 75% to match with the percentages i had to reduce to 6000k and move saturation to almost 25 - 31 then i got all the 75% right just blue was a touch off.

is this ok...???

thanx
post #495 of 718
also felt that the green was too much so i bumo it to -6 and upped the saturatiuon to 25 to give the colour some life....

too me for now looks good....

not perfect but best i can get it for 75% method....

with 100% method i feel too much colour but might try again with knd matrix file probally fix the red issue....

thanx both of you guys and others for malking me understand how the calibrations go.....
post #496 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

also felt that the green was too much so i bumo it to -6 and upped the saturatiuon to 25 to give the colour some life....

too me for now looks good....

not perfect but best i can get it for 75% method....

with 100% method i feel too much colour but might try again with knd matrix file probally fix the red issue....

thanx both of you guys and others for malking me understand how the calibrations go.....


I'm glad you were sucessful. Dan is the one that walked me through this a few months ago, so the thanks go to him (from me also).
post #497 of 718
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

also felt that the green was too much so i bumo it to -6 and upped the saturatiuon to 25 to give the colour some life....

too me for now looks good....

not perfect but best i can get it for 75% method....

with 100% method i feel too much colour but might try again with knd matrix file probally fix the red issue....

thanx both of you guys and others for malking me understand how the calibrations go.....

There isn't really anything magical about the 75% method, so if 100% looks better with the Epson 1080, then use the standard 100% method by all means. I developed the 75% method to help resolve the issue that these Epsons have with their Color Management System, and it's worked very well on my 1080UB, but it doesn't mean it HAS to be done that way. I was happy with the 100% method for a while, until I started to notice the undersaturation in the rest of the color gamut, and it started to bother me more and more until I investigated what was going on.

Honestly, if we didn't have the AVSHD REC.709 disc here, I wouldn't have had the test patterns to even check what was happening. (saturation windows) That's why this site is so excellent, with lots of folks helping out other folks and everyone benefits. ...helping developing the free HCFR software, and then the AVSHD disc to go with it.

I haven't contacted Epson about this issue, and not sure how to get to the right folks there anyway to bring this issue to light. Not sure if the 8500UB will have this same CMS issue. Hopefully it has been resolved. Time will tell.

...and thanks for the kudos guys.

Dan
post #498 of 718
Hi guys well I got rid of the 1080. And now go the 6100 a tw3000
now I have the brightness settings man this one is bright when I did the ftl I got almost 23.00 since I have a 85 inch screen and the projector is not that far back
ok now some hep from knd / Dan

should I leave the ftl like this or drop the contrast at - 24 I get ftl at 10.800

next issue did grey scale all fine did rgb all good

now rgbmcy hre is the fun for 75 percet
method I get the colours to match you spread sheet but for brightness it's way low on mine it say it needs to be 7.19 but it's on 2.5 when I up the brightness I can't reach 7 as the brightness maxes out and the most I get is 5.7
but the prcent bars change from 378 / 24 / 24 when I up the brightness is this normal. I thought all three need to be matched this is where I'm lost
a step by step would be cool for tuis section as I'm lost between dans and smallpool

sorry for being a newbie


Thanx in advance denis
post #499 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

Hi guys well I got rid of the 1080. And now go the 6100 a tw3000
now I have the brightness settings man this one is bright when I did the ftl I got almost 23.00 since I have a 85 inch screen and the projector is not that far back
ok now some hep from knd / Dan

should I leave the ftl like this or drop the contrast at - 24 I get ftl at 10.800

next issue did grey scale all fine did rgb all good

now rgbmcy hre is the fun for 75 percet
method I get the colours to match you spread sheet but for brightness it's way low on mine it say it needs to be 7.19 but it's on 2.5 when I up the brightness I can't reach 7 as the brightness maxes out and the most I get is 5.7
but the prcent bars change from 378 / 24 / 24 when I up the brightness is this normal. I thought all three need to be matched this is where I'm lost
a step by step would be cool for tuis section as I'm lost between dans and smallpool

sorry for being a newbie


Thanx in advance denis

I wouldn't drop the ftL unless it is causing eye strain because the bulb will dim (mine has dropped rather fast in the first few hundred hours).

I'm not sure what you mean by your brightness comment. Each of the 6 colors will have a different brightness based upon your 100 IRE reading that you put into the top space of the spreadsheet. You get this value from your gray scale reading. Once you put this value into the spreadsheet you will get different brightness values for each of the six colors.

BTW, I end up spending much more time on the gray scale and gamma than I do the colors, so you've got most of the time consuming stuff done.

You might want to attach your .chc file and spreadsheet so we can look at it.
Hope this helps.
post #500 of 718
I did a new dynamic calibration last night for high lamp. I use my i1 LT with an offset from my i1 Pro for the gray scale/gamma calibration. The file is attached for those that are interested.

 

dynamic high lamp 365 hrs.zip 4.3876953125k . file
post #501 of 718
Need some advice..

I have a 1080ub and Oppo BDP 83 player I have noticed that setting HDMI Video range to "Expanded" causes significantly different calibration settings.

Should I keep it at Normal or Expanded.

-------------

another question I have to lower my Colour Temperature to 5000K to get a reading just under 6500K! (calman 3.5) Is this reasonable?
BTW I have convinced myself to use the expanded setting.




thanks zzkazu
post #502 of 718
need help....

i have gotten to the rgbcmy section did the 75% i get the percentages right but in no way i can get the brightness level near what it say example red percentages are right and the brightness is at 2.09 now i up the brightness but cant get to the 11 as the excel sheet says.. am i doing something wrong...

in 100% windows i get the percentages and the brightness right as i can up and down the setting to get it right by the excel sheet

so can someone guve me a hand...coz im stumped

regards Denis
post #503 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g View Post

need help....

i have gotten to the rgbcmy section did the 75% i get the percentages right but in no way i can get the brightness level near what it say example red percentages are right and the brightness is at 2.09 now i up the brightness but cant get to the 11 as the excel sheet says.. am i doing something wrong...

in 100% windows i get the percentages and the brightness right as i can up and down the setting to get it right by the excel sheet

so can someone guve me a hand...coz im stumped

regards Denis

Are you sure you are using the 75% saturation rather than stimulus? The saturation windows are on the AVSHD disk under HCFR Windows, saturations (pink window in the menu, bottom right). There are 30 slides in this menu option. Sorry if I'm stating the obvious, but that all I can think of to cause this problem. Why don't you attach your file and maybe once we look at it we can help.
post #504 of 718
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzkazu View Post

Need some advice..

I have a 1080ub and Oppo BDP 83 player I have noticed that setting HDMI Video range to "Expanded" causes significantly different calibration settings.

Should I keep it at Normal or Expanded.

-------------

another question I have to lower my Colour Temperature to 5000K to get a reading just under 6500K! (calman 3.5) Is this reasonable?
BTW I have convinced myself to use the expanded setting.




thanks zzkazu


If "Expanded" on the Oppo player is what I think it is, it should only impact the brightness and contrast setting. My assumption is that having it on will allow the player to pass blacker than black and whiter than white to the Epson. For instance, with it off, your brightness might be around zero, as well as your contrast. With Expanded set to on, your brightness might be closer to -10, and your contrast to +8 or so.

There is no problem with having the Epson set to 5000K. I think that is where mine is set at to start with too. As the bulbs age, red starts to diminish before blue and green, so it is natural to move to a warmer color temperature to get it more in balance to start with. Then proceed with your calibration as normal.


Dan
post #505 of 718
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knd View Post

I did a new dynamic calibration last night for high lamp. I use my i1 LT with an offset from my i1 Pro for the gray scale/gamma calibration. The file is attached for those that are interested.

Greyscale looks excellent, and the color gamut is about as good as you can expect from dynamic.

10.5 ftL is still a plenty bright image too.

Dan
post #506 of 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by stereomandan View Post

Greyscale looks excellent, and the color gamut is about as good as you can expect from dynamic.

10.5 ftL is still a plenty bright image too.

Dan

Thanks Dan. I really like using the LT for grayscale via the offset. It is very easy with HCFR and seems to have good results.
post #507 of 718
Thanks for response.. I actually meant expanded on Epson. Yes I'm seeing those type of settings for brightness and contrast.

Grayscale done onto Primary and Secondaries..

.................

Doing customized Gamma and how does the "Gamut, Saturation, Brightness, dE Chart" spreadsheet 9 points of adjustment map to the 7 (9-2 first and last) Epson graph adjustments.


Dan elsewhere I saw where you set these to
0, -6,-10,-11,-12,-13,-11,-15,0

so if -15 if for the 90% gray then I run out of adjustments on the 1080ub with -6 being for 30% gray.

Sorry if I missed some instruction somewhere..


-------------------

Found further explanation that help me.. questions closed.
post #508 of 718
jnd u legend i was using the middle stimulas not as u just said lol

thanx
post #509 of 718
Hi,

After reading this thread and a couple of others a few million times, I ran through a calibration on my 6500UB today. My screen is a N8 custom paint formula from Home Theater Shack and my PJ is a 6500UB with maybe 75 hours on the bulb.

Lamp was on low. Started from Natural and followed the recommended starting point setting and went from there.

My colorimter is a Spyder3, which I understand is not the greatest choice, but its what I have access to.

Attached is the zipped CHC file from my post calibration grayscale. My eyes tell me the results look good, the charts as a I can understand them look decent but I am far from an expert... I think the Spyder 3 does not do well with IRE0 and IRE10 readings, so take them with a pinch of salt...

 

Color-After.zip 4.494140625k . file
post #510 of 718
I spent 9 hours last night trying my first calibration. I'm a complete noob. I'm using an i1 LT with a 6500. 200 hrs on bulb. Throw of 19" with 10.5ftl's read with i1 LT(iris off) low lamp, natural setting, on a 92" 1.0 gain screen with some ambient light. I used stereoman dan's excel with the avshd disk and ps3, hcfr software I used the 10% grey scale windows to do gamma and the 90/30 windows to do primary colours. Gamma with the sliders is very hard for me to do. It caused a lot of frustration for me. I used the 75% saturation windows to do the RBGMCY settings using the excel spreadsheet values with the 100% Y setting used from the cd/m2 box in hcfr. I thought I did quite well at getting the percentage graphs equaled with the proper Y value in all colours. After saving the settings and watching a few minutes of KFP and Star trek I was stunned at how overblown the colours were. Too much red and yellow, it looks terrible. I don't know what the problem is and I really need help. Here are my files.

 

Color_before.zip 0.73828125k . file

 

Color_after.zip 0.75k . file
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP › Epson Calibration Guide! (1080, 1080UB, 6100, 6500UB, 7500UB)