AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › What's Your System Configuration › The Ever-Changing HT
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Ever-Changing HT - Page 44

post #1291 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Just wanted to post some better pics of the new ride.

Fresh out of the detail shop....






Hey, I know that area.........I'm a Universtiy Place resident working in Lake- hood, I mean Lakewood, my wife works in Fife.

Rain rain rain, can't wait to get back home to Texas, been here in WA for far too many years. That's cool though, just a few more years to go.........
post #1292 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Hey Geoff -

Sorry you're not diggin' the weather here in the evergreen state. It wouldn't be evergreen if it weren't forever raining.

I've been to Texas on business once and funny enough, there was a fair amount of rain when I was there. But the weird thing was that was like 90 degrees and down-pouring! Great people though, and some of the nicest and best looking women in the country.
post #1293 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post
Hey Geoff -

Sorry you're not diggin' the weather here in the evergreen state. It wouldn't be evergreen if it weren't forever raining.

I've been to Texas on business once and funny enough, there was a fair amount of rain when I was there. But the weird thing was that was like 90 degrees and down-pouring! Great people though, and some of the nicest and best looking women in the country.
Hey Tim, it's been tolerable lol. I've been in the N.W. long enough to enjoy and appreciate it's beauty, heck, by now I've spent the better part of my life here since getting stationed at McChord AFB back in '79, going back to TX in '82 and coming back in '83. If anything, I've learned how to be a successful racer in the rain being licensed with WA and OR motorcycle road racing associations.

The one thing I haven't been able to get used to is that no one here knows how to eat a decent breakfast

I've enjoyed the pictures of your H.T. very nice!!!

Portlands straight;



Seattle's turn 4; note the local sponsors Freeway trailer and NW Mortgage



and one more, Portlands turn 9



Just for info, photos 1 and 3 were in 2005 on a Suzuki GSX-R 750, photo 2 was 2006 on the monster Suz GSX-R 1000, by far the coolest bike I ever rode.

Okay, what the heck, one more photo of the beast;





Oops, how did that crash picture get in there, not always fun and games huh?

Peace my N.W. now H.T. brother

Geoffrey
post #1294 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Looks like fun, all except that last pic. I fear that if I ever attempted to get on a bike, I'd have more crash than turn pics.

I've been on the back of a few of those super bikes, and I've yet to experience that sort of blinding speed with anything on four wheels.

Be careful out there.
post #1295 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post
Looks like fun, all except that last pic. I fear that if I ever attempted to get on a bike, I'd have more crash than turn pics.

I've been on the back of a few of those super bikes, and I've yet to experience that sort of blinding speed with anything on four wheels.

Be careful out there.
Thanks Tim. I've been out of racing since the end of '08, economy put a crunch in my sponsor budget, expenses rate right up there with your H.T. configuration

The absence of racing is what put me in the H.T. drivers seat in the first place, dog gone obsessive hobby habits. But I've started with a very modest entry level and have been upgrading to a less modest level. After seeing your system changes and experiencing my own personal tastes, I see this thing is for life
post #1296 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post
Thanks Tim. I've been out of racing since the end of '08, economy put a crunch in my sponsor budget, expenses rate right up there with your H.T. configuration

The absence of racing is what put me in the H.T. drivers seat in the first place, dog gone obsessive hobby habits. But I've started with a very modest entry level and have been upgrading to a less modest level. After seeing your system changes and experiencing my own personal tastes, I see this thing is for life
Well, if you read the last few posts, you'll see that I'm on the way out..... finally. The last few years have been interesting, as I got to experience first hand what the high-end has to offer and the sort of differences exist between different types of AV components, but that "investigation" turned obsession is now over. I won't pull out completely, but I won't be throwing the continual money at it like I have been. Now I just need to figure out what to do with all of my free time.

Since you are starting to dig your heels in, all I can say is, be skeptical, put most of your money into the speakers and the room, and learn to appreciate what you have.

Just out of curiosity, what sort of gear have you collected so far?
post #1297 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post
Well, if you read the last few posts, you'll see that I'm on the way out..... finally. The last few years have been interesting, as I got to experience first hand what the high-end has to offer and the sort of differences exist between different types of AV components, but that "investigation" turned obsession is now over. I won't pull out completely, but I won't be throwing the continual money at it like I have been. Now I just need to figure out what to do with all of my free time.

Since you are starting to dig your heels in, all I can say is, be skeptical, put most of your money into the speakers and the room, and learn to appreciate what you have.

Just out of curiosity, what sort of gear have you collected so far?
Wow, I hadn't read that, there's hope for the hopeless, man can come to his senses

"Words of wisdom Loyd", I can appreciate that after being in for a year and half - being skeptical of what manufactures and others hear-say of what a particular component can do for your system, speakers is what your sound ultimately comes from, and room acoustics will help harness the sound. Right so far?

And yes, I've been nothing but tickled with my set up and enjoying every aspect of it from the beginning.

Thanks for asking, original set up, LG42" LCD, LG370 bluray player, Onkyo TX-NR870 and Onkyo SKS-HT870 7.1 with an additional Energy sub from the Classic take 5 series.

Upgrades; LG50" plasma, LG390 bluray player, PolkAudio Monitor's 70, 40, 30 and matching CS2.

This tax return, in addition to prioritizing bill paying, the boss, I mean wifey gives the ok for one toy. I had been considering an Emotiva XPA-3 for my front three, but after careful consideration, I've decided to upgrade my subs and run a single Epik Empire.

What else you can advise?
post #1298 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post

Wow, I hadn't read that, there's hope for the hopeless, man can come to his senses



Quote:


"Words of wisdom Loyd", I can appreciate that after being in for a year and half - being skeptical of what manufactures and others hear-say of what a particular component can do for your system, speakers is what your sound ultimately comes from, and room acoustics will help harness the sound. Right so far?

It's not so much that the speakers are the last point in the chain or because they are responsible for producing the sound we hear, the quality of the speakers is important because they are mechanical devices. Those buzzing cones and domes need to play every frequency from 20 cycles to 20,000 cycles with equal amplitude and imperceptible distortion in every direction. In motorcycle terms , it would be like having equal power and equal torque for all revs. The room is important because it has the potential to distort the sound to a much greater degree than just about anything you feed into it. Placing speakers into an untreated room is like taking the image from a high-def projector, shining it onto a brick wall and expecting an excellent picture. Not likely.

Quote:


And yes, I've been nothing but tickled with my set up and enjoying every aspect of it from the beginning.

That's great. Stop now.

Quote:


Thanks for asking, original set up, LG42" LCD, LG370 bluray player, Onkyo TX-NR870 and Onkyo SKS-HT870 7.1 with an additional Energy sub from the Classic take 5 series.

Upgrades; LG50" plasma, LG390 bluray player, PolkAudio Monitor's 70, 40, 30 and matching CS2.

Quote:


This tax return, in addition to prioritizing bill paying, the boss, I mean wifey gives the ok for one toy. I had been considering an Emotiva XPA-3 for my front three, but after careful consideration, I've decided to upgrade my subs and run a single Epik Empire.

What else you can advise?

That's a beefy AVR you have. I think you made the right choice by going with the sub upgrade. I think there would have been questionable gain from the new amp, but you'll definitely hear the improvement by going from a Energy Take series sub to the Epik.
post #1299 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post





It's not so much that the speakers are the last point in the chain or because they are responsible for producing the sound we hear, the quality of the speakers is important because they are mechanical devices. Those buzzing cones and domes need to play every frequency from 20 cycles to 20,000 cycles with equal amplitude and imperceptible distortion in every direction. In motorcycle terms , it would be like having equal power and equal torque for all revs. The room is important because it has the potential to distort the sound to a much greater degree than just about anything you feed into it. Placing speakers into an untreated room is like taking the image from a high-def projector, shining it onto a brick wall and expecting an excellent picture. Not likely.



That's great. Stop now.





That's a beefy AVR you have. I think you made the right choice by going with the sub upgrade. I think there would have been questionable gain from the new amp, but you'll definitely hear the improvement by going from a Energy Take series sub to the Epik.

Right on Tim, thanks for all the positive information. Being a total newby, I have tons of education waiting for me.

As a racer, having huge amounts of horse power is one thing, being able to put it to the ground and have it manageable is another. In racing, the rule is to work on the suspension to improve handling before increasing horsepower, it would make since the same rule applies in H.T., work on improving the sound before pumping up the power.

Thanks for looking in, I appreciate all the experienced input I can get.
post #1300 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Hey Geoff -

HT audio priorities (as I see it):
Recording / soundtrack quality
Speakers
Room
Placement
Calibration / proper set-up / EQ
Processor
Amp
source / player
cables
post #1301 of 1722
Speaking of enjoying what you have, you should watch the Pacific HiFi. One of the best soundtracks I've heard in awhile, the use of the surround speakers in the battle scene's is fantastic. Which soundtrack has impressed you the most since your new speakers were installed?
post #1302 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by weird 23 View Post

Speaking of enjoying what you have, you should watch the Pacific HiFi. One of the best soundtracks I've heard in awhile, the use of the surround speakers in the battle scene's is fantastic. Which soundtrack has impressed you the most since your new speakers were installed?

Cool, I'll check that out.

The coolest thing I've heard recently wasn't a movie soundtrack, it was music in 5.1 surround. I had a friend over to listen to the WBs last Thursday. Both he and I have been into electronic music for a while, so he brought over the surround version of Goldfrapp's "Supernature", among others. We turned off the lights completely, turned up the volume to -6 from reference (loud), and let er rip. It was amazing. I felt like I was immersed in some sort of trippy cosmic soup.

Then we were playing around with different surround modes (DPL2 vs. DTS Neo6 vs. stereo) while flipping though music on my music server and with the Denon in DPL2 mode we stumbled across a track by "Alex Smoke" (another electronic music artist). Wow! The bass line in this song was insane! The whole room was throbbing.

I want to watch Sherlock Holmes again though. My wife and I watched that one in 3.1 (B&W's) and it was very impressive even without the surround channels.
post #1303 of 1722
I have a question for you if you don't mind HiFi. I'm replacing my receiver with a Marantz AV7005 and am wondering about the matching amps. Do think it makes a big difference that the Marantz power amps are rated with only two channels driven vs all channels driven? Most power amps are rated with all channels driven if I'm not mistaken. I like to listen to my Paradigm Studio 100's full range for two channel and like to drive them hard once and awhile. Right now I've got five Emotiva UPA-1 monoblocks but would like everything to match if possible. I still have a couple of weeks left in the thirty day trial and hope the processor arrives before it's up, Marantz Canada is very slow at filling orders. Any thoughts?
post #1304 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by weird 23 View Post

I have a question for you if you don't mind HiFi. I'm replacing my receiver with a Marantz AV7005 and am wondering about the matching amps. Do think it makes a big difference that the Marantz power amps are rated with only two channels driven vs all channels driven? Most power amps are rated with all channels driven if I'm not mistaken. I like to listen to my Paradigm Studio 100's full range for two channel and like to drive them hard once and awhile. Right now I've got five Emotiva UPA-1 monoblocks but would like everything to match if possible. I still have a couple of weeks left in the thirty day trial and hope the processor arrives before it's up, Marantz Canada is very slow at filling orders. Any thoughts?

Hard to say. I think it could get the job done, but the MM7005 is a bit lightweight for a multichannel A/B amp. HT Mag tested the MM8005 amp and it output 100 WPC with all channels driven, which is 40 WPC lower than the stated spec, so the MM7005 is probably going to top out at 80 WPC all channels driven. How far away do you sit from your speakers?
post #1305 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Hard to say. I think it could get the job done, but the MM7005 is a bit lightweight for a multichannel A/B amp. HT Mag tested the MM8005 amp and it output 100 WPC with all channels driven, which is 40 WPC lower than the stated spec, so the MM7005 is probably going to top out at 80 WPC all channels driven. How far away do you sit from your speakers?

12 ft. Like you this is the last kick at the can for awhile and I like everything to match but I would also like the best performance. I'd like to get some room treatments next and then move on to something else for awhile. We'll be taking similar paths as a sports car is next on my list. It looks like Marantz just takes a receiver amp and puts it in it's own box, Integra seems to do the same thing. So far the Emotiva's are getting the job done well enough, they don't seem to change the sonic signature very much. The pre-amp seems to have more of an effect on that.
post #1306 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by weird 23 View Post

12 ft. Like you this is the last kick at the can for awhile and I like everything to match but I would also like the best performance. I'd like to get some room treatments next and then move on to something else for awhile. We'll be taking similar paths as a sports car is next on my list. It looks like Marantz just takes a receiver amp and puts it in it's own box, Integra seems to do the same thing. So far the Emotiva's are getting the job done well enough, they don't seem to change the sonic signature very much. The pre-amp seems to have more of an effect on that.

I can appreciate your interest in keeping everything matching. I'm not much for the eclectic system look either.

So here are some numbers and info that should help ya:

Assuming that the MM7055 amp uses a shared power supply, you are going to get higher wattage output when running in 2CH than multi channel, which is a good thing since your interest is in having the most power when running the Studio 100s full range. I'm sure that Marantz can hit their 140 watt spec in stereo. Based on the Studio 100's sensitivity and the distance you sit from them, in stereo you can hit 96 dB with 106 dB peaks at your listening seat with 140 watts. That's pretty damn loud.

With five channels driven, I suspect that the MM7055 will put out roughly 80 watts (because it uses a common power supply that must now feed 5 channels not just 2). With five speakers all rated at 90dB sensitivity, you can hit 107dB peaks with 80 watts. It takes less power to hit these levels because each time you add a speaker to the system it takes less power to each of them to hit the same dB level. However, this is based on equal power being sent to all channels, which rarely happens. Often times more power is needed in the front three channels than the rears during dynamic movie passages. But the advantage of the common power supply is that when less power is needed for the rears, there is more power available for the fronts. For instance if the rears only need 40 watts at a given moment, the available power to the front speakers should be around 100 watts. 100 watts is enough power for most people most of the time.

If you want to be conservative though, and ensure that you front speakers always have the full available power, buy the MM7025 stereo amp for the front pair and the MM7055 for the center and surrounds.
post #1307 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Porsche performance upgrades and parts are actually affordable compared to much of high end AV, AND.... the gains are much more concrete. Just as an example, for $1200 in parts and $600 in labor, I can upgrade the suspension to a firmer, more responsive and visibly lower ride. Sport exhaust is under $500. Those two things alone would undeniably improve the driving experience. You could spend that much and easily more on a high-end disc player or DAC and get questionable results at best

funny, I'm an active "gear-head". I follow much of the popular major-league auto racing series (ie. F1, ALMS, NASCAR). I've spent a number of years playing around with my modified Honda cars (which are very popular here in Southern Calif- the "Fast & Furious" rice-burner capital).

I owned two brand-new Acura Integra's (over like a 17 year period), these were the coolest, fun, little fast cars ever. And the after-market accessory variety was infinite and mostly cheap or moderate in cost. Intakes, headers, exhaust's, cam-gears, shocks, springs, sway-bars, rims, tires, computer chips, it's endless. Always something new to buy or have. And price-to-performance is/was fairly cheap depending how deep one chooses to modify or "tweak". It's a lot of fun.

But after years of driving around as a "marked-man" in my cool-sounding, low, Integra's I've moved onto a new [stock] Cooper Mini-S and have been so happy and relieved when I drive pass a cop or highway patrol. I used to get [kids] on the freeway's and major boulevards wanting to race me all the time. Are you kidding me?

Also, when the weather (rain) get's bad here in Socal the potholes are life-threatening (to my rims, headers, etc.,...). I've had many mishaps- bent rims, dented/ruined (stainless) headers, etc.,...Always having to have something replaced or fixed.

My Integra's were "racey" but subtle, they had a clean "stock" look to them. The mods were all done in taste. The power gains were noticeable. I kinda wish I held onto one to use in SCCA events. I guess a moderately modified Porsche RS would be nice to have in my garage under a cover, to pull out and drive for fun on weekends, or trips up to Laguna Seca

I'm happy to now "settle" into home theater/audio, it's very engaging in a different way. However the performance cost's [are] rediculous when comparing to auto mod's, this dicotomy really bothers me at times.
LL
LL
post #1308 of 1722
Thread Starter 
WCD - Exterrior pics of the Acuras or it didn't happen.
post #1309 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

I can appreciate your interest in keeping everything matching. I'm not much for the eclectic system look either.

So here are some numbers and info that should help ya:

Assuming that the MM7055 amp uses a shared power supply, you are going to get higher wattage output when running in 2CH than multi channel, which is a good thing since your interest is in having the most power when running the Studio 100s full range. I'm sure that Marantz can hit their 140 watt spec in stereo. Based on the Studio 100's sensitivity and the distance you sit from them, in stereo you can hit 96 dB with 106 dB peaks at your listening seat with 140 watts. That's pretty damn loud.

With five channels driven, I suspect that the MM7055 will put out roughly 80 watts (because it uses a common power supply that must now feed 5 channels not just 2). With five speakers all rated at 90dB sensitivity, you can hit 107dB peaks with 80 watts. It takes less power to hit these levels because each time you add a speaker to the system it takes less power to each of them to hit the same dB level. However, this is based on equal power being sent to all channels, which rarely happens. Often times more power is needed in the front three channels than the rears during dynamic movie passages. But the advantage of the common power supply is that when less power is needed for the rears, there is more power available for the fronts. For instance if the rears only need 40 watts at a given moment, the available power to the front speakers should be around 100 watts. 100 watts is enough power for most people most of the time.

If you want to be conservative though, and ensure that you front speakers always have the full available power, buy the MM7025 stereo amp for the front pair and the MM7055 for the center and surrounds.

I think I'll order the MM7025 and compare it to the Emotiva's running my speakers full range. If it doesn't compare in performance then it should be fine running my Studio 20's in my two channel system. The MM 8003 is still available though, which would you go with the newer amp combo or the older amp? Price wise they're all close enough that cost is not a factor. The thing that's frustrating is no dealers have either model available for me to listen to in my city.
post #1310 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by weird 23 View Post

I think I'll order the MM7025 and compare it to the Emotiva's running my speakers full range. If it doesn't compare in performance then it should be fine running my Studio 20's in my two channel system. The MM 8003 is still available though, which would you go with the newer amp combo or the older amp? Price wise they're all close enough that cost is not a factor. The thing that's frustrating is no dealers have either model available for me to listen to in my city.

Good call on buying the amp for the comparison. Let us all know how that pans out.

If you are going to use the 7025 for the fronts, then you could get away with the 7055 for the rest of the channels. If you are only going to use a single 5 channel amp for everything, go with the 8003 amp. It is heavier than the 7055, so it is going to have a beefier power supply. Or if money is not an issue, get the 7025 for the L/R and the 8003 for the rest.
post #1311 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Good call on buying the amp for the comparison. Let us all know how that pans out.

If you are going to use the 7025 for the fronts, then you could get away with the 7055 for the rest of the channels. If you are only going to use a single 5 channel amp for everything, go with the 8003 amp. It is heavier than the 7055, so it is going to have a beefier power supply. Or if money is not an issue, get the 7025 for the L/R and the 8003 for the rest.

I'll order the 7025 tomorrow, I just hope it arrives before the trial period on the Emo's is up, Marantz Canada isn't exactly quick at filling orders in my experience. I've got two weeks, so hopefully that will be enough time. I'm running seven channels so I would go with two amps but I'll start with one and see how it goes. I've found that your one of the few people who understands my want for things to match, thanks for the advice.
post #1312 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Hey Geoff -

HT audio priorities (as I see it):
Recording / soundtrack quality
Speakers
Room
Placement
Calibration / proper set-up / EQ
Processor
Amp
source / player
cables

Thanks Tim, sounds like a solid order to me.

Catch you again sometime
post #1313 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

WCD - Exterrior pics of the Acuras or it didn't happen

a few odd shots...........
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
post #1314 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by weird 23 View Post

I'll order the 7025 tomorrow, I just hope it arrives before the trial period on the Emo's is up, Marantz Canada isn't exactly quick at filling orders in my experience. I've got two weeks, so hopefully that will be enough time. I'm running seven channels so I would go with two amps but I'll start with one and see how it goes. I've found that your one of the few people who understands my want for things to match, thanks for the advice.

Good luck.

This sure was a pretty set, eh?



Silly me for selling it off.
post #1315 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

a few odd shots...........

That is pretty tame considering how far you can take the tuner look. So give me some specs. What sort of performance did you start with and what did you end up with?

What is the advantage of the two large exposed red cam sprockets?
post #1316 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

Good luck.

This sure was a pretty set, eh?



Silly me for selling it off.

You'll always have the pictures HiFi. Soon you'll be thinking this sounds just as good as that system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwO_...1&feature=fvwp
post #1317 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by weird 23 View Post

You'll always have the pictures HiFi. Soon you'll be thinking this sounds just as good as that system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYwO_...1&feature=fvwp

That exhaust note is music to my ears.

Just watched How to Train Your Dragon. Charming movie with a great surround score.
post #1318 of 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

That is pretty tame considering how far you can take the tuner look. So give me some specs. What sort of performance did you start with and what did you end up with?

you're somewhat correct, my mods were on the "tamer" side of radical. I purposely kept things more street-clean, driveable, and not over-stress the motor.

Factory power rating specs for the 1.8L Honda (B18B) engine used in the 1996 Acura Integra LS was listed @142 hp. I had my car dyno-tuned without any mods, it outputted 135hp (measured at the wheels) which is decent.

After installation of performance intake, stainless racing headers, (illegal) stainless hi-flow catalytic converter, racing exhaust system and adjustable cam-gears it was re-dyno-tuned at 164hp (measured at wheels), approx 30hp gain.

Moreover I installed H&R coil-over shocks/struts/springs, front strut-tower stress bar, stiffer front sway bar and VolkRacing alloy wheels.

The complete package totally changed the character of the car. It had very noticeably more "punch", improved low-end torque. I could easily spin the front wheels at take-off. The ride was moderately lower and stiffer, but smooth. The strut tower bar really makes a huge difference, roll was minimized. Steering was much more sensitive. It cornered much more stable, like on rails. Mileage was still pretty good as well. The exhaust had a nice deep roar to it. My friends and neighbors used to tease me that they could always hear me coming home from a few blocks away (but so could the police). A very fun car to drive, and reliable all around (trips, etc.,...).

While driving to Vegas maybe 6 years back I got this car over 130mph and sustained it for a few miles, it was fairly stable, and the engine wanted more (was still far from red-line).

Also, you have to realize, this Honda utilized an automatic ("sport-matic") transmission as I use hand-controls to drive (being I'm paralyzed and use a wheelchair). The guys at the various shops thought that was cool.

I avoided screwing with my computer, or turbo-charging, or high-current ignition systems, etc.,...You just get into trouble, and can over-stress and screw things up. This was my main mode of transportation I've seen comparable B18B motors turbo-charged (plus all other mods listed above) dyno-tuned @300hp! They were also using racing fuel (110 octane), crazy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hifisponge View Post

What is the advantage of the two large exposed red cam sprockets?

bottom-line, cam-gears allow for largest HP gain (next to turbo-charging). Adjustable cam gears allow for radical advancement, or retarding, of cam-shaft timing. You can use these cam gears alone (on stock cam shaft), or along with installtion of a racing cam-shaft. Thing is, when you go to this extent, you want to have a very experienced mechanic who has much history with racing engines and related equipment. This installation process is usually performed along-side while dyno-tuning. There are a number of shops in Socal that are equipped in this manner.

http://www.aemelectronics.com/tru-ti...e-cam-gears-1/
http://www.dcsports.com/421headers2acura.html
http://www.dcsports.com/singlecanisteracura.html
http://www.greddy.com/products/exhausts/ti-c/
http://www.hrsprings.com/products/coil-overs/
http://import.neuspeed.com/207/0/0/1...t-tie-bar.html

I notice a lot of whitish dirt in my engine compartment as well as on under-chassis area, I drove through a construction zone, un-mixed concrete powder everywhere Also, if you notice, the cam gears are exposed as the stock Honda valve cover was machined on the side, this allows for easy cam gear adjustments. Otherwise you have to remove the valve cover every time you make an adjustment.

This Integra was 14 years old at this point in time, original paint. I modified suspension and engine maybe two months after purchasing brand-new from dealer. These cars became so popular over the years in local culture that they became targets for trouble- ie. thefts, getting tickets, pulled-over, etc.,...
LL
LL
post #1319 of 1722
Thread Starter 
Very cool. Thanks for going over some of the details. While the Porsche is "relatively" inexpensive to maintain and upgrade (within reason), I bet there is a sense of freedom with tuning the Acura you had that won't ever be there with the Porsche. Easier to tinker with things and try different options. Doing this with the Porsche would add up quickly.

A pleasure as always speaking with you.
post #1320 of 1722
Hey hifi,

Beautiful rack, man!

The Classe stuff is gorgeous. Do I see a PPP hiding in there? Yes I do. Nice.


New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › What's Your System Configuration › The Ever-Changing HT