AVS › AVS Forum › A/V Control & Automation › Home A/V Distribution › Actiontec MI424WR - a cheap MoCA bridge for all!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Actiontec MI424WR - a cheap MoCA bridge for all! - Page 36

post #1051 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnick View Post

NAS
The site that's home to that hack is pretty close to a nightmare in terms of reconciling pages that don't agree about what version of the hack to put on a particular version of the router, or at least it was when I was doing that, complete with an interactive version chooser that was accompanied by pages that said it was completely wrong! I counted myself lucky to have found my way through that maze, so I'm not anxious to repeat the experience with my main router.
l

LOL. Agree 100% soI don't blame you at all! smile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnick View Post

NAS
I've toyed with avoiding the surge or static electricity buildup - which fits my situation more closely - by not physically connecting the Actiontec to the router with a cable but via WiFi. According to the DD-WRT site, putting that hack onto an Actiontec disables its coax jack completely, which would render it useless for MoCA, so I'd like to put my present DD-WRT into service as the main router and use its WiFi bridging capability not as a client but as a hub, connecting my unmodified WRT54G and Actiontec to it to provide ethernet jacks and MoCa capability to different spokes off that hub.
Would that work, or does the DD-WRT WiFi bridging function only work as a client, not a host?
It seems to me that since the communication is bi-directional, it should work either way.
-Phil

Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the wifi bridging capabilities of the DD-WRT so I'm not sure if that would work or not. As a betting man though, I don't see why you wouldn't be able to do that given all of the added functionality that DD-WRT provides.

NAS

BTW...my weird fix for my problem has been going strong for 4 days now. So odd...confused.gif
post #1052 of 1141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnick View Post

Even if my ground strap solves the problem, if the DD-WRT hacked router can be used as a host via WiFi bridging, it would enable electrical isolation of all the branches off the hub, and thus would be of widespread usefulness. (This would be particularly good if a version of DD-WRT has been created that supports WiFi N and its higher speeds.)

Just thought I would mention that I have a ground loop isolator at my POE. Maybe that would help?

http://www.amazon.com/Viewsonics-VSIS-EU-Cable-Ground-Isolator/dp/B0017I3K9M/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1349444380&sr=8-9&keywords=ground+loop+isolator

xnappo
post #1053 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by xnappo View Post

Just thought I would mention that I have a ground loop isolator at my POE. Maybe that would help?
http://www.amazon.com/Viewsonics-VSIS-EU-Cable-Ground-Isolator/dp/B0017I3K9M/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1349444380&sr=8-9&keywords=ground+loop+isolator
xnappo

Couldn't hurt! BTW, this afternoon will be five days since I installed my ground strap and so far all's well - it had been failing at the five-day point recently. If it makes it through the weekend I'll feel pretty good about it.

That this problem didn't crop up between last September (when I set up my MoCa network) and this July, and then happened more and more often implies to me that there may have been some changed configuration out on the pole in the street - maybe Comcast added a booster amp that wasn't fullly grounded, and puts a tiny voltage on the shield of the coax.

I've put the device you linked to in my shopping cart at Amazon.

Thanks,

-Phl
post #1054 of 1141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnick View Post


I've put the device you linked to in my shopping cart at Amazon.
Thanks,
-Phl

Depending on your cabling, this male/female one may fit into your system better:
http://www.amazon.com/TII-Ground-Loop-Isolator-220/dp/B0070Q6URO/ref=pd_sim_e_4

xnappo
post #1055 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by xnappo View Post

Depending on your cabling, this male/female one may fit into your system better:
http://www.amazon.com/TII-Ground-Loop-Isolator-220/dp/B0070Q6URO/ref=pd_sim_e_4
xnappo

Since it doesn't require an extra cable, it would indeed be more useful. And it's a bit less expensive as well!

PS Now officially past the "5 full days" point and still working.

-Phil
post #1056 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by enrite View Post

Add a third person to having this issue. After spending a week trying to crack it myself and on the phone with WMC support for one hour (very helpful, BTW) I am certain the problem is the moca bridges. I can connect through ethernet when I plug my XBOX into the main gateway router that my HTPC is connected to. In the Windows 7 event log it lists the Media Center error as UPnP timing out so I hope some Windows 7 update hasn't changed how UPnP and MoCa work. Sigh.
Has anyone found a fix? I will reconfigure my moca bridges over the weekend to see if that does it. I think Windows 7 now looks at the XBOX as being on another network which is stopping UPnP from making a connection.

Fixed! Just follow the instructions in post #1045 to hard set the gateway router date and NOT let automating updating update the date to Sept. 2012!

Many thanks!
post #1057 of 1141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by enrite View Post

Fixed! Just follow the instructions in post #1045 to hard set the gateway router date and NOT let automating updating update the date to Sept. 2012!
Many thanks!

Totally weird! But glad a work-around was found.

xnappo
post #1058 of 1141
I have been running 2 Rev C's successfully for a while now. Just received 2 new Rev I's because I wanted the gigbit ports. Decided to change the design of the system while I was at it. But I cannot get it to work.

Current setup:

TWC modem -> Internet port of Rev-I #1 in office
Rev-C -> dlink wifi router connected on ethernet ports upstairs
Rev-I #2 -> in livingroom

Dlink is setup as a wireless access point only.

#1 is setup with both home network and broadband enabled, DHCP and DNS enabled.

If I only have #1 and the Rev-C turned on, everything works just fine. As soon as I turn #2 on, I lose Internet access on all boxes and see DNS errors. In this situation I can access the admin webapp of all 3 boxes, so the coax connection of all 3 works.

For those running more than 2 boxes, ever see this problem? Any ideas?
post #1059 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by erp2863 View Post

I have been running 2 Rev C's successfully for a while now. Just received 2 new Rev I's because I wanted the gigbit ports. Decided to change the design of the system while I was at it. But I cannot get it to work.
Current setup:
TWC modem -> Internet port of Rev-I #1 in office
Rev-C -> dlink wifi router connected on ethernet ports upstairs
Rev-I #2 -> in livingroom
Dlink is setup as a wireless access point only.
#1 is setup with both home network and broadband enabled, DHCP and DNS enabled.
If I only have #1 and the Rev-C turned on, everything works just fine. As soon as I turn #2 on, I lose Internet access on all boxes and see DNS errors. In this situation I can access the admin webapp of all 3 boxes, so the coax connection of all 3 works.
For those running more than 2 boxes, ever see this problem? Any ideas?

Is #2 set up with DNS on (its default setting)?

That could go to war with the DNS setting in #1, causing the problem you're seeing.

If the clients on each box can't get the domain names they're looking for translated into numeric addresses by a Domain Name Server ("DNS") because the various boxes can't agree on which Domain Name Server to ask, the result will be the appearance that the internet connection is down. It's not, but without the "phone book" role played by a DNS, the client devices can't find anything unless they're programmed with the actual numeric address - which is not a good idea, as those change from time to time.
post #1060 of 1141
DNS is turned-off on #2 and the Rev-C. Wondering if there is a limit to how many devices the MI424WR can distribute IP's to?
post #1061 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by erp2863 View Post

DNS is turned-off on #2 and the Rev-C. Wondering if there is a limit to how many devices the MI424WR can distribute IP's to?

The small size of the Actiontec's DHCP assignment table is why xnappo's setup instructions (at the top of this thread) advise turning DHCP off in the Actiontecs and using another router as the master router for the network - in which case you'd connect your incoming internet signal to the master router and connect the first Actiontec to it - LAN jack to LAN jack - as one more client in the network.

If the router you're using merely as a WiFi access point could still do that effectively if relocated, to serve as the master router, alongside #1, that might solve your problem.

Otherwise, pick up an inexpensive router - it needn't have the most-advanced WiFi, just be a solid router - to use as the master router.

Either way, you'd then turn DHCP and DNS on in your master router and off everywhere else.

-Phil
post #1062 of 1141
Thanks for the info, that is what I was hoping I could avoid (mainly reducing the # of devices I need on battery backup so the ooma phone line still works).
post #1063 of 1141
Just to update: I added an old wireless router between the TWC modem and MI424 Rev-I #1 with wireless turned-off and everything works now as it should on all 3 boxes. It appears you are correct that the MI424's do not handle DHCP duties very well when too many devices are added. That's a shame.
post #1064 of 1141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by erp2863 View Post

Just to update: I added an old wireless router between the TWC modem and MI424 Rev-I #1 with wireless turned-off and everything works now as it should on all 3 boxes. It appears you are correct that the MI424's do not handle DHCP duties very well when too many devices are added. That's a shame.

Yeah, I would only recommend the rev I for a primary router.

Chris
post #1065 of 1141
Hi Chris (handle: xnappo),

Thanks for posting these instructions and responding to questions 3 years after the original post. Very much appreciated. I got it to work last month with Comcast Cable in the SF bay area using Rev Fs I purchased on EBay. We don't have Verizon FIOS here and people that see the Verizon FIOS modem in my rooms are surprised.

It is working in 5 rooms in my house. These rooms are also getting Comcast TV signal. However it is not working in two other rooms. They don't seem to get the TV signal either. Is this a matter of adding a couple of extra connections in the cable box outside my house so the TV signal is sent to those two rooms as well?

This may have been answered before but this thread has 36 pages and I wasn't sure of the best way to search. I will google after this.
post #1066 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaapopulous View Post

Hi Chris (handle: xnappo),
Thanks for posting these instructions and responding to questions 3 years after the original post. Very much appreciated. I got it to work last month with Comcast Cable in the SF bay area using Rev Fs I purchased on EBay. We don't have Verizon FIOS here and people that see the Verizon FIOS modem in my rooms are surprised.
It is working in 5 rooms in my house. These rooms are also getting Comcast TV signal. However it is not working in two other rooms. They don't seem to get the TV signal either. Is this a matter of adding a couple of extra connections in the cable box outside my house so the TV signal is sent to those two rooms as well?
This may have been answered before but this thread has 36 pages and I wasn't sure of the best way to search. I will google after this.

Since this technique works by piggy-backing on the existing cable TV wiring, it appears that the jacks in those two rooms are not connected to the splitters that feed the other rooms. If you can find unattached cables in the Comcast box, you could try putting them onto a splitter and run a cable from that splitter to an unused jack on a splitter that is feeding the rest of the house.

Otherwise, you'll have to call Comcast and ask to have those rooms added.
post #1067 of 1141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaapopulous View Post

Thanks for posting these instructions and responding to questions 3 years after the original post. Very much appreciated

No problem - and thanks to all the others who still follow this thread and answer questions.

On this one - I agree with Philnick, sounds like those cable aren't hooked up to anything. Hopefully you will find the unconnected end in a box where the cable comes in from the street and gets split out.

Keep in mind that if you add another splitter, you will be taxing your cable signal - be on the lookout for problems with your TV or cable modem - you may need to add an amp if you have problems.

xnappo
post #1068 of 1141
Progress Report:

It's now ten days since I connected a wire from the grounding screw on the diplexer to one of the ground holes in the power strip - twice as long as the five day interval after which the link had been going down recently - and it's still going strong.

I heartily recommend doing this - it has the effect of grounding the entire coax network in your house, unless you've got ground-loop isolators installed, which would deprive the other side of that isolator of the benefit of the ground wire, which is why I haven't yet bought one!

I considered putting such an isolator between the cable from the street and the first splitter, but that would mean putting it in Comcast's box outside the house, and there's no guarantee that the next installer wouldn't just assume it was (a) Comcast equipment that wasn't needed or (b) unauthorized tampering by me - and remove it in either case!

For the moment, I've decided not to fix what ain't broken!

-Phil
Edited by Philnick - 10/10/12 at 7:13pm
post #1069 of 1141
I did some measurements today. I don't seem to be getting more than 15MBps or so. Even between two computers are are both plugged into the same physical Actiontec MI424WR (Rev. F). Similar speeds between actiontecs in separate rooms. I think I have a Cat-5 cable which I think should be able to do 100MBps and the RevFs should be able to do 100Mbps too right? I can regularly get 25 MBps plus downloads from the Internet when directly connected to the comcast modem.

Where do I look/tune or what should I do to speed up things between the actiontecs?
post #1070 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaapopulous View Post

I did some measurements today. I don't seem to be getting more than 15MBps or so. Even between two computers are are both plugged into the same physical Actiontec MI424WR (Rev. F). Similar speeds between actiontecs in separate rooms. I think I have a Cat-5 cable which I think should be able to do 100MBps and the RevFs should be able to do 100Mbps too right? I can regularly get 25 MBps plus downloads from the Internet when directly connected to the comcast modem.
Where do I look/tune or what should I do to speed up things between the actiontecs?

Don't trust online speed tests - Comcast uses a "Turbo" feature to accelerate a download initially, but doesn't apply it on a sustained basis.

It works long enough to artificially inflate speedtest results by up to a factor of two, however.

For comparison purposes, you should be comparing speed between two computers on different ports of your main router to the Actiontec speeds.

-Phil
post #1071 of 1141
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaapopulous View Post

I did some measurements today. I don't seem to be getting more than 15MBps or so. Even between two computers are are both plugged into the same physical Actiontec MI424WR (Rev. F). Similar speeds between actiontecs in separate rooms. I think I have a Cat-5 cable which I think should be able to do 100MBps and the RevFs should be able to do 100Mbps too right? I can regularly get 25 MBps plus downloads from the Internet when directly connected to the comcast modem.
Where do I look/tune or what should I do to speed up things between the actiontecs?

Do you have a solid 'Coax' light or is it blinking?

xnappo
post #1072 of 1141
I bought 2 rev. F a few weeks ago and I have issues when I plug everything into the wall.

It's fine when I connect everything directly ( router --[LAN]--> MI424WR A --[coax]--> MI424WR B --[LAN]--> laptop ), the coax light is on on both MI424WRs and I get a connection on the laptop within seconds.

As soon as I connect to the wall (the exact same schema from post #1), the MI424WRs can't communicate. MI424WR A is on the network of course but B is nowhere to be found.

I read 2 theories: I'd need a MoCa filter between the modem and the diplexer or maybe the frequencies > 1000Mhz are blocked by some kind of device (but I'm pretty sure I've seen satellite antennas in the neighbourhood)

I'm looking for your inputs on this.

tyia,
n
post #1073 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnick View Post

Don't trust online speed tests - Comcast uses a "Turbo" feature to accelerate a download initially, but doesn't apply it on a sustained basis.
It works long enough to artificially inflate speedtest results by up to a factor of two, however.
For comparison purposes, you should be comparing speed between two computers on different ports of your main router to the Actiontec speeds.
-Phil

I gave the comcast download speed as a comparison. I 'm more interested in getting the highest speed possible between the actiontecs. I used a GUI version of the 'iPerf' tool to measure speed between two actiontecs and also between two ports on the same action tecs. Link to that tool is here http://jesterpm.net/downloads/JPerf-2.0.2.dmg . I used a couple of mac laptops to measure it.

xnappo, the "LAN Coax" light is steady green and not blinking.
post #1074 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by neks View Post

I bought 2 rev. F a few weeks ago and I have issues when I plug everything into the wall.
It's fine when I connect everything directly ( router --[LAN]--> MI424WR A --[coax]--> MI424WR B --[LAN]--> laptop ), the coax light is on on both MI424WRs and I get a connection on the laptop within seconds.
As soon as I connect to the wall (the exact same schema from post #1), the MI424WRs can't communicate. MI424WR A is on the network of course but B is nowhere to be found.
I read 2 theories: I'd need a MoCa filter between the modem and the diplexer or maybe the frequencies > 1000Mhz are blocked by some kind of device (but I'm pretty sure I've seen satellite antennas in the neighbourhood)
I'm looking for your inputs on this.
tyia,
n

I ran into the same sort of thing when I initially set up my MoCA network last fall. It turned out that the cabling to the two locations were not connected to the same splitter in the Comcast box on the wall outside my living room window.

Once I figured out which cable was which in that box and made sure they were on the same splitter, MoCA came to life.

The brute-force way to figure out which cable is which: Disconnect them one at a time and see which room stops getting cable TV service when each one is disconnected - not recommended if you're in an apartment house and don't have understanding neighbors!

Otherwise, be prepared to take photos of the wiring in that box from the underside with a telephoto lens so you can trace the loops in the box.

-Phil
post #1075 of 1141
Any idea why my WAN Coax light suddenly started flashing? No change in the system except for the placement of the router in another room.

I am on FiOS with JUST cablecards and two Actiontecs acting as bridges and 1 actiontec as my main router..
Edited by AnthonyB - 10/15/12 at 2:18pm
post #1076 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaapopulous View Post

I did some measurements today. I don't seem to be getting more than 15MBps or so. Even between two computers are are both plugged into the same physical Actiontec MI424WR (Rev. F). Similar speeds between actiontecs in separate rooms. I think I have a Cat-5 cable which I think should be able to do 100MBps and the RevFs should be able to do 100Mbps too right? I can regularly get 25 MBps plus downloads from the Internet when directly connected to the comcast modem.
Where do I look/tune or what should I do to speed up things between the actiontecs?

Are you saying 15 MB/s (i.e. megabytes per second) or mbps (megabits)?

If it is MB/s you are doing exceedingly well.
post #1077 of 1141
I get 12.3MB (MegaBytes) per second.. Pretty happy with MoCA! Saved me from having to wire everything with Cat6 and it runs all three of my HDHR Prime's just fine!
post #1078 of 1141
Thank you so much for this post! I have been pulling my hair out trying to figure this one out. i contacted Verizon and let them know about the issues. smile.gif
post #1079 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by regli View Post

Are you saying 15 MB/s (i.e. megabytes per second) or mbps (megabits)?
If it is MB/s you are doing exceedingly well.

Hi, I think I was getting 80 Mbps (small b) to 90 Mbps (small b) most of the time and over 100 Mbps once or twice. You might me right that all is well and I got the little b and the big B confused. I don't think I ever got 120Mbps so I 'm not sure why I said I got 15MBps (Big B) in my earlier email. Let me repeat this test and I see what I got (should have saved the test results last time).
post #1080 of 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnick View Post

I ran into the same sort of thing when I initially set up my MoCA network last fall. It turned out that the cabling to the two locations were not connected to the same splitter in the Comcast box on the wall outside my living room window.
Once I figured out which cable was which in that box and made sure they were on the same splitter, MoCA came to life.
The brute-force way to figure out which cable is which: Disconnect them one at a time and see which room stops getting cable TV service when each one is disconnected - not recommended if you're in an apartment house and don't have understanding neighbors!
Otherwise, be prepared to take photos of the wiring in that box from the underside with a telephoto lens so you can trace the loops in the box.
-Phil


Hey Philnick thanks for your input. I'm going to open that TWC box that is outside my house this week end.

So I expect to find 2 or more splitters in there. I believe I have 6 coax outlet all over my 2-story house.

I wonder how I get a cable tv signal on outlets that won't allow a MoCa connection? If somebody has a minute to spare to teach me something, I'd appreciate some explanations.

I'll let you know how it goes.

Thanks,
N
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Home A/V Distribution
AVS › AVS Forum › A/V Control & Automation › Home A/V Distribution › Actiontec MI424WR - a cheap MoCA bridge for all!