AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The year of more features, but lower quality?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The year of more features, but lower quality?

post #1 of 53
Thread Starter 
I lost a lot of money selling a very solid Yamaha RX-V2600 that I never took out of the box, so I could buy a receiver to handle 1080p. I'd like to spend less than $1000, but the new $850 Denon AVR-2310CI is now made in CHINA! The next step up is a $1500 AVR-3310CI. The only new Yamaha receivers I've seen top out at $600 for a RX-V765. Who knows where that thing is made, because none of the pictures of the back show this information. The newer receivers are lighter, just like Onkyo's receivers, which probably means cheaper power supplies and amps, along with higher THD ratings.

Although better video processing from Anchor Bay in the new Denons sounds promising, I don't want Chinese junk. They skipped over the 2800 series this year. So, it looks like Denon isn't an option for me. Any other suggestions? I'm hoping that Yamaha comes out with something decent for the price.
post #2 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post

I lost a lot of money selling a very solid Yamaha RX-V2600 that I never took out of the box, so I could buy a receiver to handle 1080p. I'd like to spend less than $1000, but the new $850 Denon AVR-2310CI is now made in CHINA! The next step up is a $1500 AVR-3310CI. The only new Yamaha receivers I've seen top out at $600 for a RX-V765. Who knows where that thing is made, because none of the pictures of the back show this information. The newer receivers are lighter, just like Onkyo's receivers, which probably means cheaper power supplies and amps, along with higher THD ratings.

Although better video processing from Anchor Bay in the new Denons sounds promising, I don't want Chinese junk. They skipped over the 2800 series this year. So, it looks like Denon isn't an option for me. Any other suggestions? I'm hoping that Yamaha comes out with something decent for the price.

To start, I certainly prefer Made in Japan electronics to Made in China ones but I think that the product reliability/quality is really dependent on the quality control in place at the factories that the products are built in. For the record, Japanese factories also used to churn out a lot of junk and then people were insistent on purchasing "Made in U.S.A." electronics. There are plenty of quality "Made in China" products all the way from Thinkpads to the Pioneer EX Line of Speakers. A lot of companies use the whole country of origin issue as a marketing strategy. For all you know half the components in today's "Made in Japan" AVRs are from China or alternately half the components from the "Made in China" models may in fact be made in Japan. Thanks to globalization parts for electronics come from all over the world. The point I'm trying to make is that there are so many variables associated with production that the country of origin doesn't mean as much as most people think. The way I see it is that you get what you pay for. If you want the "Made in Japan" product, then you have to spend a little more (money I don't mind spending).

I do agree with you on the whole Power Supply vs Features trend in AVRs today. It's pretty well documented in this Audioholics article: http://www.audioholics.com/education...nology/trading.

The way I see it is that your only options are to either get the older 09/08 Denon models which can be had for well under MSRP prices or you can spend a little more on the higher end 3310/4310/4810 models which don't compromise on Features or their Amp sections but at the same time don't come cheap.

Yamaha AVRs are made in Malaysia AFAIK (except for the Z11)
post #3 of 53
Why do you need to buy only the most current model? You can still find 3808s for $1000, or refurb Onkyo 876s (*not* by any means cut down).
post #4 of 53
Have you looked into the Pioneer Elite SC05 or SC07? Don't know where they are made, but thats something you shouldn't worry about anyway. Excellent prices on either of these two. As for the Yamaha offerings I agree with you on the "spring" releases. You'll have to wait for the "fall" releases to get the better ones and they will be higher than your budget. You can wait for the prices of the Yamaha 3900 to come down when the new ones are released. Give a look at the Pioneers and see if they have the features you want and read their thread, very few complaints and by far one of the most popular releases this year of the anorexic receivers.
post #5 of 53
The power on the 665 seemed adequate. I heard it at Ultimate Electronics. But I don't really care for the overall package, such as the lack of the assignability.
post #6 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantom52 View Post

Have you looked into the Pioneer Elite SC05 or SC07? Don't know where they are made, but thats something you shouldn't worry about anyway. Excellent prices on either of these two. As for the Yamaha offerings I agree with you on the "spring" releases. You'll have to wait for the "fall" releases to get the better ones and they will be higher than your budget. You can wait for the prices of the Yamaha 3900 to come down when the new ones are released. Give a look at the Pioneers and see if they have the features you want and read their thread, very few complaints and by far one of the most popular releases this year of the anorexic receivers.

AFAIK the Pioneer ELITE model line for North America and Europe is made in Malaysia (same situation with Onkyo/Yamaha). I do know for a fact though that the JDM Pioneer ELITE AVRs are Made in Japan (presumably to cut down on shipping and import duty costs and maybe political reasons too).

Link to the JDM LX71/81 (It's in Japanese so... you might have some trouble navigating the site)

see: http://pioneer.jp/components/avamp/lx81/index.html

But as I said... country of origin is not a very important factor though its snob value (including me ) or a political statement for some people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s44 View Post

Why do you need to buy only the most current model? You can still find 3808s for $1000, or refurb Onkyo 876s (*not* by any means cut down).

Agreed here...

I have no use for Audyssey DSX, PLIIz or the "enhanced" GUI. The one nice thing about the newer models is Anchor Bay VRS processing but I think I can live without this (my Panasonic Z800 seems to do a fine job of processing the image for me so...)
post #7 of 53
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

I think that the product reliability/quality is really dependent on the quality control in place at the factories that the products are built in.

True, in some circumstances, but I don't think China is there, yet. Chinese quality is generally an oxymoron. It's almost impossible not to buy Chinese products, but when it comes to something expensive (for my budget) I plan to rely on for years, I'll look elsewhere if I have a choice. My XBOX 360 and PS3 are Chinese, and I would've paid $100 more each, if they were made in Japan. Besides, I'm really not fond of the Chinese government.

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

Yamaha AVRs are made in Malaysia AFAIK

I know my RX-V2600 was made in Malaysia, but I'm still curious about the new, low end receivers.

Thanks for the links, by the way!

It's not that I absolutely have to have this years receiver, but I loved my old Denon AVR-2500. It had the Apple II-like on-screen display, which was OK for 1995, but it seems like Denon's display is still outdated. I was hoping the new versions are updated, and I believe they are. I was burned on my last purchase of a "future proof" receiver (the Yamaha), and I'm trying my best not to get burned again. You have to admit that it's a confusing time to buy a receiver. Most people don't find out about the limitations until later. The specs don't tell the whole story, unless you dig through this forum. For instance, even though my XBOX can pass a 1080p signal through component, most receivers won't convert this to 1080p HDMI. I'd have to plug the components into my TV (which may or may not accept 1080p through component-doubtful), then run a digital optical wire to the receiver, which may or may not allow this.

The Pioneer SC05 looks like a great deal, but I'd really like to get Anchor Bay video processing. My Oppo has Faroudja DCDi, so if I can be patient and get a smokin' deal on a Yamaha RX-V3900, that would be ideal. That thing looks amazing by my standards, and I'll never fully explore its capabilities.

Which brings me to another problem I have with receivers...Why don't the manufacturers design feature packed receivers with great amps and video processing technology that don't have added "features," like controlling A/V systems in a 10 bedroom mansion while cleaning your swimming pool and monitoring the security system in your home? It reminds me of cable companies charging you for all these garbage channels, just so you can access one or two you really want.

I also noticed that Pioneer has opted to switch to a blue display like Yamaha has done. Some people are upset about this, but I like the blue. Someone provided a link to a soon to be released Yamaha RX-V1065, but the digital optical and coaxial are fixed, and can't be assigned to anything else. Stupid. This would be a problem for me, because my Oppo uses a DVI-HDMI adapter, so I'd be limited to standard RCA connections.

I guess I'm just going to be patient for now.
post #8 of 53
I found this very good deal on a 3900, still over what you want to spend, but you wouldn't have to wait and still don't know how much lower they will be after that wait. Just something to think about.



http://cgi.videogon.com/cgi-bin/cl.p...989&class&3&4&

And if your'e not bothered by refurbs, this one is considered still as one of the best.

http://www.accessories4less.com/make...r-BLACK/1.html
post #9 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantom52 View Post

I found this very good deal on a 3900, still over what you want to spend, but you wouldn't have to wait and still don't know how much lower they will be after that wait. Just something to think about.



http://cgi.videogon.com/cgi-bin/cl.p...989&class&3&4&

And if your'e not bothered by refurbs, this one is considered still as one of the best.

http://www.accessories4less.com/make...r-BLACK/1.html

I like the 3900 but I chose the 3808 over it for a couple of reasons:

1) I liked the ability to stream FLAC files from the network
2) I liked the GUI a little better, it seemed a little more classy
3) I thought the 3808 sounded better
4) The 3808 is made in Japan as opposed to the 3900 which is made in Malaysia - This was snob value for me in this case but I have no doubt that the quality on the Yamaha is good. The Yamaha also had a 5 year Mfr warranty which to me indicates a high quality product.
5) I liked the beefier Amp section on the 3808CI. Yes I know Yamaha claims 140W x 7 but the unit is only capable of drawing 500 Watts from the wall so realistically you could expect around 60-70W x 7.
6) I liked Audyssey Dynamic Volume/EQ over YPAO.

The nice things about the Yamaha though I feel are :

1) Nicer Web Broswer UI
2) Superior ABT-2010 VRS Processing
3) Better DSP Modes
post #10 of 53
Thread Starter 
Thank you for the links, phantom52. That's a deal I would definitely go for, but I want a warranty. I'm kind of picky, so I don't think I'd buy a refurb.

I don't know what FLAC files are, and I don't plan on networking. I'm not into IPODs, MP3s, or compressed computer audio, if that's what it is. I'm really surprised you were able to tell a difference in sound between receivers so closely matched. I'd like to do some reading. Where did you get the information about the amps being beefier in the Denon? I did com across a Sound & Vision test of the RX-V3900, and you're right, it doesn't do 140w x 7. I looked for a similar test from Denon, but there was none. Here is an image from the article:


Since it will only be a 5.1 setup, and I'm pretty sure my Paradigms are 6 ohms, I wonder if that will make much difference?

The warranty is listed at 2 years. I think the only major manufacturer with a 5 year warranty is Sony's ES series.

The 3808CI is being heavily discounted right now, and from what I've read, the replacement for the higher end Yamahas won't come until 2010. I hope this is incorrect.

I've seen pictures of the 3808's GUI, and it looks modern. I don't plan to browse the web, and I never had any use for artificial DSP surround modes, if that's what you're referring to. No receiver that I know of in this price range will pass a 1080p component signal through HDMI. So, it comes down to video processing, and this article doesn't exactly give the 3808 a glowing review:

http://www.hometheatermag.com/receiv...at/index2.html
post #11 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post

Thank you for the links, phantom52. That's a deal I would definitely go for, but I want a warranty. I'm kind of picky, so I don't think I'd buy a refurb.

I don't know what FLAC files are, and I don't plan on networking. I'm not into IPODs, MP3s, or compressed computer audio, if that's what it is. I'm really surprised you were able to tell a difference in sound between receivers so closely matched. I'd like to do some reading. Where did you get the information about the amps being beefier in the Denon? I did com across a Sound & Vision test of the RX-V3900, and you're right, it doesn't do 140w x 7. I looked for a similar test from Denon, but there was none. Here is an image from the article:


Since it will only be a 5.1 setup, and I'm pretty sure my Paradigms are 6 ohms, I wonder if that will make much difference?

The warranty is listed at 2 years. I think the only major manufacturer with a 5 year warranty is Sony's ES series.

The 3808CI is being heavily discounted right now, and from what I've read, the replacement for the higher end Yamahas won't come until 2010. I hope this is incorrect.

I've seen pictures of the 3808's GUI, and it looks modern. I don't plan to browse the web, and I never had any use for artificial DSP surround modes, if that's what you're referring to. No receiver that I know of in this price range will pass a 1080p component signal through HDMI. So, it comes down to video processing, and this article doesn't exactly give the 3808 a glowing review:

http://www.hometheatermag.com/receiv...at/index2.html

Both the receivers I listed come with full warranties, even the refurb is a manufacturers warranty. The one listed for the 3900 is from an authorized dealer new in box with Yamaha's full warranty and from here.
http://www.hifiheaven.net/

The other one is the refurb and it also comes with a full warranty from Onkyo. Both are excellent buys with the Yamaha price the best one I could find at this time for that receiver. You do realize that the 3900 is also a networking receiver. It and the Denon are very close in that regard. If there are a lot of the features you won't use on either the 3808 or the 3900 you may want to consider the Yamaha 1900 or the Denon 2809. Both of these can be had for under your budget. Have you considered the Pioneer Elite SC-05? As I've stated before its a very well received AVR with its ICE amps and for the money involved it seems to me the AVR to own especially for what they are selling for. It has Pioneers Elites 2 year warranty. The link I provided you with is the ones selling the SC-05 at very good prices, give them a call and discuss the pros and cons of the receivers you are looking into. They sell the 1900/3900 and the Elites SC-05/07 and other brands. They are authorized for thier all of their products from what I was told by them after I called.
post #12 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post

Thank you for the links, phantom52. That's a deal I would definitely go for, but I want a warranty. I'm kind of picky, so I don't think I'd buy a refurb.

I don't know what FLAC files are, and I don't plan on networking. I'm not into IPODs, MP3s, or compressed computer audio, if that's what it is. I'm really surprised you were able to tell a difference in sound between receivers so closely matched. I'd like to do some reading. Where did you get the information about the amps being beefier in the Denon? I did com across a Sound & Vision test of the RX-V3900, and you're right, it doesn't do 140w x 7. I looked for a similar test from Denon, but there was none. Here is an image from the article:


Since it will only be a 5.1 setup, and I'm pretty sure my Paradigms are 6 ohms, I wonder if that will make much difference?

The warranty is listed at 2 years. I think the only major manufacturer with a 5 year warranty is Sony's ES series.

The 3808CI is being heavily discounted right now, and from what I've read, the replacement for the higher end Yamahas won't come until 2010. I hope this is incorrect.

I've seen pictures of the 3808's GUI, and it looks modern. I don't plan to browse the web, and I never had any use for artificial DSP surround modes, if that's what you're referring to. No receiver that I know of in this price range will pass a 1080p component signal through HDMI. So, it comes down to video processing, and this article doesn't exactly give the 3808 a glowing review:

http://www.hometheatermag.com/receiv...at/index2.html

FLAC is an open source lossless audio format, you can read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAC. I have a fairly large FLAC library (25 gigabytes) that I stream to the Denon so I find the feature handy. You could transcode FLAC files and then stream to a device like a PS3 or XBox but I prefer not to do that.

Take this with a grain of salt but I preferred the sound of the Denon (I felt it sounded a little more "fuller") but this is just my personal opinion and you'd have to give both of them a listen before you make up your mind. The Yamaha is a fine receiver in its own right but I just prefer the 3808.

Home Theater Mag did a test on both the 3900 and the 3808 and they measured the following:

Yamaha RXV-3900

Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 69.2 watts
1% distortion at 81.5 watts

Seven channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 62.9 watts
1% distortion at 68.9 watts

http://hometheatermag.com/receivers/...er/index3.html

Denon AVR-3808 CI

Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1 percent distortion at 118.9 watts
1 percent distortion at 138.0 watts

All channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1 percent distortion at 113.5 watts
1 percent distortion at 130.7 watts

http://hometheatermag.com/receivers/...08/index2.html

I don't know whether YOU will find the 3900 underpowered but I guess you have to give them both a try. Since it is only a 5.1 setup, my guess is you'd find the 3900 sufficient. I'm upgrading to a 7.1 setup soon so I would prefer to have a little more power.

The sticker on the 3900 at my Yamaha/Denon dealer said the 3900 came with a 5 year warranty but it might have just been a third party warranty that they bundled with the product (it was free for me).

Also, I would NOT base my purchase decision on how the receiver's OSD looks but I really do like the Denon GUI (nice and classy). When I first got it, I felt the menu structure was a bit labyrinthe but after reading the manual I found it pretty intuitive.

With regards to video processing on the 3808, I would be the first to agree that it's garbage. The Faroudja chip wasn't initially designed to handle High Def content so you'll notice it fairs poorly with it (unlike the Yamaha 3900). For DVD upconversion, I think you'd find the Faroudja to do a fine job but I prefer to let my BDP-05FD do the upconversion.
post #13 of 53
OP, if you're really concerned about amp power and video processing, you really should be looking at the Onkyo.
post #14 of 53
Hello!

I read that 3900 vs 3808 power difference, and I am a bit surprised. Are we sure they measured them the same way? It seems they should be, as HT Labs is likely the same person or people.

In my opinion, the 3900 is no where near underpowered. It would seem the Denon is more powerful, but it surprises me given their similarity in price. Since when can Denon produce more power cheaper than Yamaha? (Just teasing, but Denon has often seemed to have been more expensive than Yamaha for what seems to be the same performance/feature set)
post #15 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

Hello!

I read that 3900 vs 3808 power difference, and I am a bit surprised. Are we sure they measured them the same way? It seems they should be, as HT Labs is likely the same person or people.

In my opinion, the 3900 is no where near underpowered. It would seem the Denon is more powerful, but it surprises me given their similarity in price. Since when can Denon produce more power cheaper than Yamaha? (Just teasing, but Denon has often seemed to have been more expensive than Yamaha for what seems to be the same performance/feature set)

I was a little shocked too when I saw the power difference. In terms of the features offered, the Yamaha seems to have the edge (ABT2010, excellent DSP modes, 2 HDMI outs as opposed to one on the Denon etc.) The tradeoff ofcourse is that they had to cut costs on the Amp section.

I do agree that the 3900 isn't underpowered especially if all you're going to do is run 5.1. HT Mag also reviewed the DA-5400ES which had far less power and they concluded that for most speakers, the power was sufficient.

DA5400 ES Power Measurements

Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 39.4 watts
1% distortion at 45.0 watts

Seven channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 37.3 watts
1% distortion at 41.9 watts

http://hometheatermag.com/receivers/...er/index3.html

The only time power is going to be an issue is if you:

A) Feel like listening to everything at Reference level
B) Have horribly inefficient speakers
C) Are running 7.1

I think the reason the Yamaha is competitive with the Denon in terms of pricing is because it's made in Malaysia whereas the Denon is made in Japan (higher labour costs). That's not to say the RXV-3900 is junk as I'm sure both units have excellent build quality (we've been over this ). Of course being a Denon owner, I felt that the Denon was the better performer overall.

Note on ONKYO

Although the Onkyo units seem to be the best bang for the buck in the U.S. (PCM-1796 DACs, Reon HQV, Beefy Amps, THX Ultra 2 Certification etc. etc.) I was unable to test out the Onkyo because most dealers here in Canada don't even bother to let customers demo the unit before buying. In addition, it seems that Onkyo Canada loves to gouge and the Canadian price is often more than $800 above the US price thus making it a less attractive proposal.
post #16 of 53
For the record, I run 7.1. I seem to have plenty of power. I find movies at -20 dB to be plenty loud though. Your needs may vary.

Also, I hooked up a Kill A Watt meter to my 3900, and never came close to the max power draw the receiver is rated for. A number of people criticized my use of the Kill A Watt as a tool for measuring max power draw from my receiver, but it's the best tool I have.
post #17 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

For the record, I run 7.1. I seem to have plenty of power. I find movies at -20 dB to be plenty loud though. Your needs may vary.

Also, I hooked up a Kill A Watt meter to my 3900, and never came close to the max power draw the receiver is rated for. A number of people criticized my use of the Kill A Watt as a tool for measuring max power draw from my receiver, but it's the best tool I have.

I usually listen to movies at -30 dB. Of course since we have different receivers, speakers and probably listening preferences, it's hard to do a direct comparison.

What speakers are you using by the way?
post #18 of 53
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantom52 View Post

Both the receivers I listed come with full warranties, even the refurb is a manufacturers warranty. The one listed for the 3900 is from an authorized dealer new in box with Yamaha's full warranty and from here.
http://www.hifiheaven.net/

I compared the zip code the Yamaha would be shipped from, to the zip code at hifiheaven, and they're different. You said you contacted them? I appreciate your research. I saved the link!

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

FLAC is an open source lossless audio format, you can read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAC. I have a fairly large FLAC library (25 gigabytes) that I stream to the Denon so I find the feature handy. You could transcode FLAC files and then stream to a device like a PS3 or XBox but I prefer not to do that.

Thanks for the info. I'll check it out.

Take this with a grain of salt but I preferred the sound of the Denon (I felt it sounded a little more "fuller") but this is just my personal opinion and you'd have to give both of them a listen before you make up your mind. The Yamaha is a fine receiver in its own right but I just prefer the 3808.

There were no other factors involved in your listening test?

Home Theater Mag did a test on both the 3900 and the 3808 and they measured the following:

Yamaha RXV-3900

Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 69.2 watts
1% distortion at 81.5 watts

Seven channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 62.9 watts
1% distortion at 68.9 watts

http://hometheatermag.com/receivers/...er/index3.html

Denon AVR-3808 CI

Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1 percent distortion at 118.9 watts
1 percent distortion at 138.0 watts

All channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1 percent distortion at 113.5 watts
1 percent distortion at 130.7 watts

http://hometheatermag.com/receivers/...08/index2.html

That's a HUGE difference between the two. I'm a bit skeptical of the results, especially since the Yamaha is rated slightly higher in their specs. It makes me wonder if the particular Denon tested was "special."

I don't know whether YOU will find the 3900 underpowered but I guess you have to give them both a try. Since it is only a 5.1 setup, my guess is you'd find the 3900 sufficient. I'm upgrading to a 7.1 setup soon so I would prefer to have a little more power.

I definitely don't need a lot of power, just great sound and video processing.

With regards to video processing on the 3808, I would be the first to agree that it's garbage. The Faroudja chip wasn't initially designed to handle High Def content so you'll notice it fairs poorly with it (unlike the Yamaha 3900). For DVD upconversion, I think you'd find the Faroudja to do a fine job but I prefer to let my BDP-05FD do the upconversion.

Is it really garbage, or just obsolete? My current LCD is just a 31.5" 720p Samsung, and DVDs look fantastic with my Faroudja chipped Oppo. Maybe it's just poor with 1080p? Either way, I'd prefer to get something newer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s44 View Post

OP, if you're really concerned about amp power and video processing, you really should be looking at the Onkyo.

I have read good things about their video processing, but the quality seems kind of iffy. I'm not ruling them out, though.
post #19 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

I usually listen to movies at -30 dB. Of course since we have different receivers, speakers and probably listening preferences, it's hard to do a direct comparison.

What speakers are you using by the way?

Audio Concepts 25th Anniv. Sapphires for L/R. An old Polk center channel. Basic Polk bookshelf speakers for the side surrounds, and Klipsch for the rear.

I also hooked up some Presence speakers. I bought these tiny cubes from Rat Shack for $30 / pair or something
post #20 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post


There were no other factors involved in your listening test?

There were, I wrote a complete list on my third post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post


That's a HUGE difference between the two. I'm a bit skeptical of the results, especially since the Yamaha is rated slightly higher in their specs. It makes me wonder if the particular Denon tested was "special."

The specs may be rated higher but that 140W is most likely in Stereo operation. Besides, how many manufacturers ACTUALLY give the real power output of receivers? My Sony STR-DG800 receiver was rated at 110Wx7 but in reality it could only deliver 40Wx7. If you look at the rear panel of the 3900, you'll see that it can only draw 500 Watts from the wall and since no power supply can be more than 100% efficient, those numbers seem to be accurate.

Link to 3900 rear panel: http://www.yamaha.com/yamahavgn/Imag...v3900_rear.jpg

The Denon can pull 120V * 7.2A Watts (864) from the wall. In one test it said that in 7 channel operation the Denon could supply 130Watts per channel @ 1% THD but I think that figure is suspect. Anyways, here is the link to the Denon's rear panel: http://usa.denon.com/AVR3808CI_Back_Large.jpg

Note: This is by no means a precise way of measuring amplifier power but it gives one a rough idea of the amp's max power draw.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post


Is it really garbage, or just obsolete? My current LCD is just a 31.5" 720p Samsung, and DVDs look fantastic with my Faroudja chipped Oppo. Maybe it's just poor with 1080p? Either way, I'd prefer to get something newer.

Garbage was an exaggeration but I disable video processing on my receiver. It works fine with 480i but for any HD content, you're better off getting an external scaler like a DVDO Edge, or getting a receiver with better processing. I actually just let my TV do the processing but some TVs may not be up to the task so it really depends on your setup in particular. I don't use it for DVDs either though as I prefer to let my Pioneer BDP-05 do the upconversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

Audio Concepts 25th Anniv. Sapphires for L/R. An old Polk center channel. Basic Polk bookshelf speakers for the side surrounds, and Klipsch for the rear.

I also hooked up some Presence speakers. I bought these tiny cubes from Rat Shack for $30 / pair or something

Ooooh... small and powerful! Must have some great WAF My RF-63s dont
post #21 of 53
Audio Concepts don't have very great bass though, even though they are a bit larger than what I would call bookshelf size and they are ported.

I don't usually listen in Pure Direct mode for that reason.
post #22 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

I was a little shocked too when I saw the power difference. In terms of the features offered, the Yamaha seems to have the edge (ABT2010, excellent DSP modes, 2 HDMI outs as opposed to one on the Denon etc.) The tradeoff ofcourse is that they had to cut costs on the Amp section.

DA5400 ES Power Measurements

Five channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 39.4 watts
1% distortion at 45.0 watts

Seven channels driven continuously into 8-ohm loads:
0.1% distortion at 37.3 watts
1% distortion at 41.9 watts

http://hometheatermag.com/receivers/...er/index3.html

The only time power is going to be an issue is if you:

A) Feel like listening to everything at Reference level
B) Have horribly inefficient speakers
C) Are running 7.1

I think the reason the Yamaha is competitive with the Denon in terms of pricing is because it's made in Malaysia whereas the Denon is made in Japan (higher labour costs). That's not to say the RXV-3900 is junk as I'm sure both units have excellent build quality (we've been over this ). Of course being a Denon owner, I felt that the Denon was the better performer overall.

Note on ONKYO

Although the Onkyo units seem to be the best bang for the buck in the U.S. (PCM-1796 DACs, Reon HQV, Beefy Amps, THX Ultra 2 Certification etc. etc.) I was unable to test out the Onkyo because most dealers here in Canada don't even bother to let customers demo the unit before buying. In addition, it seems that Onkyo Canada loves to gouge and the Canadian price is often more than $800 above the US price thus making it a less attractive proposal.

Just for your information, as a Cdn I ordered the Onkyo 876 from the U.S. on Amazon and had it shipped to a US border town. I paid about $200 in taxes to get it across the border and with a near parity dollar saved about $700.

The earlier comparison from the 805 to the 806 does not apply with the 875 -- 876. The 876 has every feature (still 51 lbs) and more plus the same beefy amp section, but much less of the bugs etc. A charter member on this forum found a source where the 876 could beat its watt rating for 5 channel usage, I think it was 166 x 5. It dipped below 140 watts at 7 channels, around 124. I can't find that source now, but none the less, the 876 is a tank, and not made in China, but Malaysia.
post #23 of 53
Sounds like a nice receiver.

I would be interested in comparing something like that to my Yamaha when pushing higher SPL levels to see if my Yamaha is ever clipping during normal operation.

I wish I had some sort of clipping detector.

I have measured volts AC at the speaker terminals and I see 4 volt peaks with 85 dB SPL at my listening position. I have seen what I think are 12v, or maybe even 40v peaks but I am not sure I read that correctly it was so short of a reading. I don't seem to have any sort of peak hold on my meter which annoys me.
post #24 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

Just for your information, as a Cdn I ordered the Onkyo 876 from the U.S. on Amazon and had it shipped to a US border town. I paid about $200 in taxes to get it across the border and with a near parity dollar saved about $700.

The earlier comparison from the 805 to the 806 does not apply with the 875 -- 876. The 876 has every feature (still 51 lbs) and more plus the same beefy amp section, but much less of the bugs etc. A charter member on this forum found a source where the 876 could beat its watt rating for 5 channel usage, I think it was 166 x 5. It dipped below 140 watts at 7 channels, around 124. I can't find that source now, but none the less, the 876 is a tank, and not made in China, but Malaysia.

I was thinking about ordering from the U.S. but I wanted a valid warranty just incase something decided to fail. I'm not surprised about the amp being able to exceed its power rating though. After all, it does have THX Ultra 2 Certification... yes I know its just a logo but it does generally mean more honest power ratings.
post #25 of 53
Jpowers, if you are still reading, you might want to look at alternative brands if the pricing is not too steep for you. Some other brands making recievers with good reputatiuons for quality, both in audio and in general are NAD, Rotel, Cambridge Audio, and Marantz, (Marantz is owned by the same parent company that owns Denon, IE: D&M Holdings, who owns McIntosh, Snell and other A/V brands.) However, avoiding chinese made goods will push you into a limited class of specialty makers.

You could always get a reciever that meet your preamp/processor needs, and as long as it has preout jacks, You could add a good 3, 5 or 7 channel power amp later, frm some vendors like Emotiva, Wyred for Sound, Outlaw, Audio by Van Alstine, Cambridge Audio, Parasound, or several other mid priced makers.
post #26 of 53
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

The specs may be rated higher but that 140W is most likely in Stereo operation. Besides, how many manufacturers ACTUALLY give the real power output of receivers?

It's been a while since I actually tried to make sense of these specifications. I didn't think that seemingly "higher end" companies like Yamaha deceived us with their ratings. It's disappointing for me, but a sign of the times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiovideogeek View Post

My Sony STR-DG800 receiver was rated at 110Wx7 but in reality it could only deliver 40Wx7. If you look at the rear panel of the 3900, you'll see that it can only draw 500 Watts from the wall and since no power supply can be more than 100% efficient, those numbers seem to be accurate.

Link to 3900 rear panel: http://www.yamaha.com/yamahavgn/Imag...v3900_rear.jpg

The Denon can pull 120V * 7.2A Watts (864) from the wall. In one test it said that in 7 channel operation the Denon could supply 130Watts per channel @ 1% THD but I think that figure is suspect. Anyways, here is the link to the Denon's rear panel: http://usa.denon.com/AVR3808CI_Back_Large.jpg

Note: This is by no means a precise way of measuring amplifier power but it gives one a rough idea of the amp's max power draw.

This is great information. I've been looking at the Onkyo TX-SR876. The rear panel states 9.5A. Does this mean it's capable of drawing 1140 watts? This just shows what the power supply can provide the amplifier, correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin' View Post

The earlier comparison from the 805 to the 806 does not apply with the 875 -- 876. The 876 has every feature (still 51 lbs) and more plus the same beefy amp section, but much less of the bugs etc. A charter member on this forum found a source where the 876 could beat its watt rating for 5 channel usage, I think it was 166 x 5. It dipped below 140 watts at 7 channels, around 124. I can't find that source now, but none the less, the 876 is a tank, and not made in China, but Malaysia.

I started looking into the 876 even before I found your post. If I can get one on sale, this might be the perfect receiver for me. I'll have to find out when the new models are released.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlanman View Post

Jpowers, if you are still reading, you might want to look at alternative brands if the pricing is not too steep for you. Some other brands making recievers with good reputatiuons for quality, both in audio and in general are NAD, Rotel, Cambridge Audio, and Marantz, (Marantz is owned by the same parent company that owns Denon, IE: D&M Holdings, who owns McIntosh, Snell and other A/V brands.) However, avoiding chinese made goods will push you into a limited class of specialty makers.

You could always get a reciever that meet your preamp/processor needs, and as long as it has preout jacks, You could add a good 3, 5 or 7 channel power amp later, frm some vendors like Emotiva, Wyred for Sound, Outlaw, Audio by Van Alstine, Cambridge Audio, Parasound, or several other mid priced makers.

I would love to have a NAD receiver, but NAD, and Rotel are out of my price range. I don't know much about Cambridge, other than the catalogs I used to get from them in the mail years ago. I looked at Marantz, and even their high end receivers are Chinese, which is strange. I do appreciate your suggestions, but I don't want to stray too far from $1000. In addition to this, I'll be spending close to $2000 on a new TV, plus a few hundred extra for furniture. I could buy an (almost) ultra high end setup, but I'll be perfectly happy with a non-boutique brand. (I hope!)
post #27 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post

It's been a while since I actually tried to make sense of these specifications. I didn't think that seemingly "higher end" companies like Yamaha deceived us with their ratings. It's disappointing for me, but a sign of the times.

What to do? At this price point, SOMETHING has to give be it Amplifier Power, Features or Quality/Reliability. However, as your budget approaches the money no object point, you don't have to accept ANY trade-offs. See : Yamaha Z-11, Denon 5308/AVP A1HDCI/POA A1HDCI, Pioneer SC-09TX, Marantz AV8003, Anthem D2V etc. etc. etc.

As MichaelJHuman said, HE didn't find the 3900 underpowered but I like a little extra power.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPowers View Post

This is great information. I've been looking at the Onkyo TX-SR876. The rear panel states 9.5A. Does this mean it's capable of drawing 1140 watts? This just shows what the power supply can provide the amplifier, correct?

Yup, it just means that it can pull that many watts from the wall. Ofcourse when it comes to power, you have to keep in mind a bunch of other things including but not limited to:

1) Efficiency of the power supply (i.e. if a PSU is just 10% efficient then you are only going to get 114 Watts from 1140 Watts)
2) Power requirements for other components inside the receiver - Not a HUGE number but it does affect how much power the speakers get.
3) Capacity of each discrete amplifier channel - Even if you are listening in Stereo operation, there is no way you will get 500W x 2 for example.
4) Resistance of the speakers you are using. With lower resistance loads, your amplifier can provide more power to each speaker however there is a chance that at peak loads your receiver's protection circuit will engage.
5) The power rating at the specified THD. Most high end manufacturers use 0.01-0.05% THD whereas people like Logitech specify 10% THD (oh that will sound great won't it? )

However, due to its beefier transformer and its past reputation, I would be inclined to believe that the Onkyo unit would meet or exceed its specifications.
post #28 of 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJHuman View Post

Sounds like a nice receiver.

I would be interested in comparing something like that to my Yamaha when pushing higher SPL levels to see if my Yamaha is ever clipping during normal operation.

I wish I had some sort of clipping detector.

I have measured volts AC at the speaker terminals and I see 4 volt peaks with 85 dB SPL at my listening position. I have seen what I think are 12v, or maybe even 40v peaks but I am not sure I read that correctly it was so short of a reading. I don't seem to have any sort of peak hold on my meter which annoys me.

I tried this experiment again. I am almost 100% sure I saw a few brief peaks of up to 40v. That's not outrageous if the song has 20 dB over average, and my average voltage levels were 1.5 or a bit more. I am starting to think you just can use a voltmeter for this sort of thing as it's response is not fast enough. If the voltmeter is not lying, and my method of taking volts AC from the speaker terminals is not flawed, I think we can safely say clipping could occur more often than we think.

There is no doubt music does have peaks many times the average voltage. I analyzed WAV files with a computer program I wrote, and I can clearly see that's true.

The point being, that while your average per channel power needs may be under a watt, you could still be clipping. If that 40v peak number is correct, my receiver momentarily needed to deliver over 200 watts to that channel to avoid clipping.

One day, I will be able to afford proper equipment to verify this sort of craziness. In the mean time, there's experts saying the same thing, so I don't think I am off base here.
post #29 of 53
I have to agree with Sanlanman. There are many great prodcuts out there that are available. Find the feature set you need and add a good amp. You may be surprised to find that you stay at the same price point or just over. If you're not into the newest music codecs then you won't have to worry about them. Not to sure why you want your receiver doing any video processing any way. Just get one that has passthrough and allow the DVD and/or BD player to do the rest. I am sure your display doesn't accept any of HDMI 1.3 features and most likely neither does the rest of your system so that really isn't a big deal either. My two cents would be not to get caught up in the hype of the latest and greatest "stuff" (features) and just get what you'll be using, then add some good power from an amp and not have to worry about being under powered!!
post #30 of 53
Hello,
Considering that HDMI 1.4 is just down the pike, it might be advantageous to spend on the lower end of your budget. The 3-D aspect of the 1.4 spec could well be a game changer with Hollywood Studios having, last I looked, 40 movies in development that are 3-D. I think much of this is to tame movie downloading with the attendant greatly larger file sizes and other incompatibilities of 3-D movies.

For the past few years, I have you using various Onkyo receivers and processors to excellent effect. Any of the 05 series above and including the 805 are excellent value. The 805 might be the best bang for the buck receiver ever made. THX Ultra2, amazing power reserves for the price, 54lbs, first models were made in Japan, Audyssey XT,etc.. The only negative aside from heat, which I have never had an issue with, is the video processing is only decent at best. The next step up 875 incorporates Reon processing and is a major step up.

The 06 series at or above the 876 are still competitive with anything out there in AVRland. The 806 was somewhat disappointing with it weighing 10 pounds less. Also, it seems all US 06 series are manufactured in Malaysia with none from Japan. Considering Japan has the highest paid labor force in Asia, I do not think it is untoward to prefer it. If I want a product, the place of manufacture is at the bottom of the importance scale all the same.

Here is an article of the 1.4 spec: http://www.widescreenreview.com/news...l.php?id=18503
AD
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The year of more features, but lower quality?