AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Turner Classic Movies (TCM) in HDTV!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Turner Classic Movies (TCM) in HDTV! - Page 43

post #1261 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

Are those still in rotation on TBS? Those rights may have been granted for just shorts runs of the films, TBS may not even have the rights to show the films currently.

Turner owns the rights to both films, as well as owns the channel, so that's not the case.
post #1262 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

I don't quite understand his response ,
unless he is just stating the obvious. Your question asked him why they were different, not confirm that they are different.

Using Chrome with Google Translate.

I think the question posed translates as "Are there differences?" and the answer is "Yes, they are run independently".

It doesn't really answer the HD question per se, but implies we cannot assume anything in common other than their name.
post #1263 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan54 View Post

OK. What is "downconverting?"

Are you saying that TCM takes a beautiful HD transfer (like what we see from France) and "downconverts" the video quality of the transfer prior to transmitting it on a 1080i television system?

You got it. Downconverts HD masters (where they have them) and then upconverts to HD -- but of course, what is lost is lost, so then it's fake HD.
post #1264 of 1697
Downconverting means removing pixels of picture information?
post #1265 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan54 View Post

Downconverting means removing pixels of picture information?

Yes.
post #1266 of 1697
The Adventures of Robin Hood to remaster HD :

http://tcmcinema.fr/films/fiche/the-...hood-1938_738/

post #1267 of 1697
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan54 View Post

OK. What is "downconverting?"

Are you saying that TCM takes a beautiful HD transfer (like what we see from France) and "downconverts" the video quality of the transfer prior to transmitting it on a 1080i television system?

Correct. Downconversion is the process of taking a higher resolution source and reducing the output to a lower video format. In this case they are taking HD transfers, converting them to 480i, then upconverting to 1080i for broadcast. I believe this is due to the much greater amount of preexisting 480i content that TCM airs, and the existing technical infrastructure at their broadcast origination facility.


Quote:


Remember the comment of the doctor at the end of Bridge on the River Kwai? .................. Madness!!!!

It would seem so. But one thing I've learned after visiting a number of network origination facilities is that none of these issues are ever as simple to understand as they would seem. There are always technical constraints that have to be accounted for.
post #1268 of 1697
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe3 View Post

The Mayans predicting the end of the world in 2012 is a mystery. But defending the fact TCM.....

Whoa.

No one is defending them. All I'm doing is trying to explain what I think is happening.

I feel that TCM is doing itself a disservice by not airing the films it does have in HD, in HD.
post #1269 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken H View Post

Whoa.

No one is defending them. All I'm doing is trying to explain what I think is happening.

I feel that TCM is doing itself a disservice by not airing the films it does have in HD, in HD.

Mainly in getting distribution. I'd bet they would have a better chance of getting paid for their HD channel if it actually showed HD.

While I would love to at least have a higher bit rate version of the ugly SD version I get on D*, I'm glad they haven't added them when they aren't showing HD. It was a waste for them to do it for TBS early on, though at least TCM isn't stretching the SD like TBS was.
post #1270 of 1697
You know, it is worth noting that the clips Urga has posted are a step above anything I have seen on ANY high definition channel in 6 1/2 years of viewing HD.
post #1271 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan54 View Post

You know, it is worth noting that the clips Urga has posted are a step above anything I have seen on ANY high definition channel in 6 1/2 years of viewing HD.

That's because it's been at least 7 years since HD looked its absolute best here. You bought in too late...
post #1272 of 1697
Cinéma : Man Who Would Be King, The , Master HD .





post #1273 of 1697





post #1274 of 1697
Geez, do you have to keep rubbing it in?? ;-)


EDIT: running, rubbing ... (stupid auto-complete )
post #1275 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruce73 View Post

Geez, do you have to keep running it in?? ;-)

Really, Urga is killing us here!
post #1276 of 1697
I'm actually curious (envious) of the screenshot mechanism.

With TWC/LA where everything (including basic cable channels as well as TCMHD) is marked copy-once (i.e. "copy protected" to WMC), it's not possible to take a screenshot like this. WMC itself has no "frame grab" capability and because it's copy-protected you can't even use a program like VideoRedo to read the WTV recording you've made. You're limited to recording with WMC and then playing it back with WMC. Period. Only local network OTA channels carried by TWC/LA are copy-freely and are open to all players/editors.

So just seeing this type of frame capture capability which is impossible to me makes me crazy.
post #1277 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urga View Post

" Vertigo " Csat HD :




Quote:
Originally Posted by DSperber View Post

I'm actually curious (envious) of the screenshot mechanism.

Personally I'm very suspicious of them.....if you look at the above quote(from post #1210) you can see the Pioneer label on the bottom of the TV. If this were the case these wouldn't be electronic screen shots but rather photographs of the actual HDTV screen. Whenever I take a screen shot that way it looks just awful
post #1278 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeff View Post

Personally I'm very suspicious of them.....if you look at the above quote(from post #1210) you can see the Pioneer label on the bottom of the TV. If this were the case these wouldn't be electronic screen shots but rather screen shots of the actual HDTV screen. Whenever I take a screen shot that way it looks just awful

You're right! These are actual PHOTOS of the HDTV itself, taken with a camera!

I'd noticed that the earlier shots were slightly "askew" (i.e. rotated slightly from pure rectangular orientation) but somehow discounted that to the manner in which they were attached or processed for uploading to a hosting site or something. Actually I think my mind just tried to come up with some semi-rational explanation or just neglected to fully process it, because I (like you) have NEVER EVER been able to photograph my HDTV and have it look like it looks to my own eyes. Either the color is off (no matter how I try to compensate in the camera white-balance settings) or it's not framed correctly by the camera and has to be cropped with Photoshop which then mandates re-compression to JPG which reduces its sharpness, etc.

So you've actually brought up what we should REALLY be discussing... namely how in the world did Urga "photograph" his HDTV and get it to look so good when those images were posted here? They are JPG, and presumably were cropped/recompressed from the original (NEF? raw of some kind? camera-produced JPG that were cropped and recompressed to second-generation JPG?).

So what's the trick to doing this so well?
post #1279 of 1697
Presumably, you don't use a flash. Some people do and wonder why the result is bad.
post #1280 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan54 View Post

Presumably, you don't use a flash. Some people do and wonder why the result is bad.

No flash ( off ) .

Forum fr :

http://screenshots.leforum.eu/t4-Top...htm?start=2010

APN Bridge Lumix FZ8 Manual Setting .
post #1281 of 1697
Have screenshots of my Kuro Plasma screen.
All my APN settings are manual.
The White Balance is made with a focus 70IRE on the plasma and then shoté and storage.
post #1282 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeff View Post

Personally I'm very suspicious of them.....if you look at the above quote(from post #1210) you can see the Pioneer label on the bottom of the TV. If this were the case these wouldn't be electronic screen shots but rather photographs of the actual HDTV screen. Whenever I take a screen shot that way it looks just awful

OK, jjeff, you're not one of those that takes pictures of the tv screen with a flash, are you?
post #1283 of 1697
No flash but whenever I've done it the picture looks nothing like Urga's. Of course I was hand holding the camera and just used a middle of the line point and shot digital camera(but I did experiment with different shutter speeds and f-stops). I'll see if I can find one of my typical "photographed" screen shots. Did a couple in the SYTYCD programming thread but it was before I knew how to attach the photo and I emailed the photo to someone else who was kind enough to post them for me(under their name).

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showp...&postcount=707
^^link to photos, note when looking on my HDTV it looks much better than the photos but this program was only a HD upconvert and I was trying to point out how the picture had severe jaggies so they were of a time where jaggies were most noticeable. Two of the photos are of my TV and two are from HoustonPerson's(who's photos don't look much better than mine).
I guess none of this is really TCM talk so I'll probably leave it at that, just to say Urga's shots are as good as I've seen using the optical method.
post #1284 of 1697
Hello " jjef ",

Work with a tripod about 1 m 50 of the screen.
AFN manual Balance White, F8, Iso 100, exposure time according to the brightness of the image displayed on your screen.
Self timer 2 s and its is already better.

post #1285 of 1697
AFN Lumix FZ8 settings:

Sharpness : Standard
Contrast: Low
Saturation: Standard

post #1286 of 1697
Some of the most amazing point-and-shoot digital cameras are being introduced now, some the size of cigarette packages.

A longtime photographer friend says this in the Lumix line is a keeper:

http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-...5196446&sr=1-1

Doubtlessly Urga's Lumix is a fine machine as well.

Said friend has this one:

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerSho...5196856&sr=1-1

As do I. A remarkable achievement.

"In addition to being able to shoot Full HD 1080p video at 24* frames per second, the PowerShot S100 can also shoot 720p HD video at 30** frames per second."
post #1287 of 1697
Seen the adventures of robin hood on TCM HD:



Master of good quality with a colo well restored and well saturated.
I referred a few shotes another day.

post #1288 of 1697
Hello ,

A few screens of Robin Hood:










post #1289 of 1697
Maybe it's my eyes, but that doesn't even look like true HD to me. Lacks fine detail, with some edge enhancement added to make it appear sharper.
post #1290 of 1697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rammitinski View Post

Maybe it's my eyes, but that doesn't even look like true HD to me. Lacks fine detail, with some edge enhancement added to make it appear sharper.


I'll it take over what they are giving me in the U.S.!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Turner Classic Movies (TCM) in HDTV!