I didn't quite know where to post this, so feel free to move it.
I recently saw UP in theaters, and it was a wonderful experience watching it in "Real D 3D". There was no purples, reds or blues, but a regular movie with regular, realistic, three-dimensional graphics. I was telling my friend that us home viewers couldn't experience something like this at home because the image has to be projected, and he called me a dumbass and this and that.
I'm wondering why can't this be done on regular LCD TVs? For these awesome new movies coming out in 3D, it's a shame most of them end up going to red-blue glasses for the home release.
Thanks.
I found this while reading the Blu-ray.com forums:
"I went and actually looked up what the RealD process is and why we aren't doing it in home theaters yet... It has something to do with the speed at which the film is projected. Apparently RealD films are shown at like 144 (?) fps, with oscilating frames for the left and right eye?
The film's speed at which it is shown is for the left and right eye to see the images in 3D with polarized lenses. The technology behind it originally called for dual projectors to show the movie in tandem to achieve the effect, but after Digital projectors got better in theaters, they were able to adapt the technology to digital.
What they need here is technology from the Blu Ray player and the monitor to get the effect to render out correctly on a monitor.
I've seen this tech working on computer monitors, though I don't know if it's the same technology process. If it can be done on video games, I'm sure it can be done right on movies for home video, but I don't think that there's enough data in the video stream to do the high frame rate correctly, and that the display has to be able to show the video back out in this staggered fashion. "
I recently saw UP in theaters, and it was a wonderful experience watching it in "Real D 3D". There was no purples, reds or blues, but a regular movie with regular, realistic, three-dimensional graphics. I was telling my friend that us home viewers couldn't experience something like this at home because the image has to be projected, and he called me a dumbass and this and that.
I'm wondering why can't this be done on regular LCD TVs? For these awesome new movies coming out in 3D, it's a shame most of them end up going to red-blue glasses for the home release.
Thanks.
I found this while reading the Blu-ray.com forums:
"I went and actually looked up what the RealD process is and why we aren't doing it in home theaters yet... It has something to do with the speed at which the film is projected. Apparently RealD films are shown at like 144 (?) fps, with oscilating frames for the left and right eye?
The film's speed at which it is shown is for the left and right eye to see the images in 3D with polarized lenses. The technology behind it originally called for dual projectors to show the movie in tandem to achieve the effect, but after Digital projectors got better in theaters, they were able to adapt the technology to digital.
What they need here is technology from the Blu Ray player and the monitor to get the effect to render out correctly on a monitor.
I've seen this tech working on computer monitors, though I don't know if it's the same technology process. If it can be done on video games, I'm sure it can be done right on movies for home video, but I don't think that there's enough data in the video stream to do the high frame rate correctly, and that the display has to be able to show the video back out in this staggered fashion. "

















The only thing I don't like is the lack of movie support. I do as much PC gaming with my ht as I do movies, though, so the 3d is getting PLENTY of use 






