AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › Anybody tried a pro multichannel DAC for HD audio?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anybody tried a pro multichannel DAC for HD audio?

post #1 of 25
Thread Starter 
Hello,

It seems to be the consensus that you need either the Asus Xonar or the Auzentech Hometheater 7.1 for true HD audio from an HTPC.

Since my receiver does not have HDMI, but does have an analog 7.1 channel input, I was asking myself the following question:

Has anybody ever tried a pro multichannel DAC to output HD audio?

These days you can buy for example the Edirol UA-101 or the M-Audio Firewire 610 which feature 10 (!) 24 bits, 192 Hz DACs which should be plenty for HD audio. Since they use either USB or Firewire to connect to the PC, you get rid of the jitter inherent to using HDMI.

My approach would be to use FFDshow audio for decoding and then output the result in 24 bits to the DAC.

The DACs I mentioned above even feature an analogue volume control, so you do not really need a receiver, just a multichannel poweramp.

Bass management etc. can all be taken care of by FFDshow.

Any ideas?

Gerbrand
post #2 of 25
this sounds quite feasible, but I still think a good receiver that supports HDMI would be superior to this solution for most cases.

I'm curious what you mean by HDMI jitter?
post #3 of 25
I was thinking the same thing, with those inexpensive Onkyo 885 prepros currently available.

The Asus HDAV 1.3 Deluxe has an analog daughtercard.
LL
post #4 of 25
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cetrian View Post

I'm curious what you mean by HDMI jitter?

Apparently HDMI has more jitter than e.g. SPDIF (I was going to post a link here but the forum won't allow me), although opinions differ whether this is relevant at all.

I am also a bit hesitant about using an analog output from a HTPC like the Asus Xonar add-on. Allthough I cannot prove it, I would still presume that some of the noise inside the case is present in the analog signal.

Lastly, the solution I propose costs about the same as the Asus Xonar with analog outputs.

Gerbrand
post #5 of 25
Before the current crop of audio cards you mention, Pro solutions were quite popular. The M-Audio, RME, Lynx were all popular with the audiophile crowd.

The problem with most of them are, the drivers are lame for HT type use, no Bass Management, no time alignment, etc.

The problem with using something like ffdshow for BM, is that not every app uses it.
post #6 of 25
I haven't tried that for 5.1, but I do use an EMU 0404 USB for my 2.0 setup. The 2.0 setup does sound better hands down for music. But it's not really a fair comparison as I also use a better amp and better speakers.

For movies, I'm using a Xonar D2X analog out into 2xAMC2445's (any poweramp will work) I think that if you get a phenomenal powersupply in the PC / line conditioner and buy a soundcard with swappable OPAMPS going directly into a good multich poweramp, with good short runs of analog cables with great shielding, you'd be hard pressed to get a better sound for 5.1 for that price range.

At that price point, I really don't know that the noise/jitter is going to be so much better than analog out into a poweramp. Not to mention the simplicity of having Bass Management for all apps, and Vista's builtin Room Correction (phenomenal).

Is it possible? Theoretically yes. Is it practical? Not really. Why not buy both, play around and then return 1.
post #7 of 25
Thread Starter 
All my apps use FFDshow for audio (I am using either Media Portal or MPC-HC, both combined with Reclock), so that really is no issue for me. Of course Vista Room Correction is not available then, but is it really that good?

FFDshow can do both time-alignment and bass-management, so I do not really need it in the driver.

As to trying both: unfortunately in Europe this is not an option. Basically, when you buy something you cannot return it, unless it is broken...

Gerbrand
post #8 of 25
The room correction feature is really something else and takes the 5.1 listening to the next level.

Highly recommend.
post #9 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbrand View Post

As to trying both: unfortunately in Europe this is not an option. Basically, when you buy something you cannot return it, unless it is broken...

Gerbrand

So break it

Obviously if you have the time and skill to set this up properly, then do it.

If you were doing 2.0, I'd recommend external - but for movies the latest offereings from ASUS and Auzentech are really taking soundcard quality to a very clean analog out SQ. The EMI shielding on the Asus cards is also a nice addition.
post #10 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulrider4ever View Post

The room correction feature is really something else and takes the 5.1 listening to the next level.

Highly recommend.

I'm holding out til I can get an AVM50v with ARC
post #11 of 25
You really should give LPCM over HDMI considering it's a <$100 solution which provides HD audio and DXVA video. It's not perfect but I think it's the best solution until bit-streaming is available without any nonsense. If you have a modern receiver that supports the new generation of room correction this setup really takes things to a whole new level.
post #12 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post

I'm holding out til I can get an AVM50v with ARC

Nice!
post #13 of 25
Alot of people use a high-quality consumer soundcard connecting the analog outputs directly to a power amp. This is the alternative to HDMI.

It works well given a soundcard with quality circuitry. The DACs on an ASUS Xonar D2X or HDAV are likely better than a sub-$1K receiver.

I read misinformation often repeated regarding this approach: "noise in the PC contaminates the analog signal", and "a digital connection to the receiver is always the best".

Neither of these statements is correct. A clean analog signal from an HTPC is easy to get with the right soundcard. It makes not one bit of difference if the DAC is in the PC or receiver. Now, if you want to use some DSP manipulation of the audio signal in the receiver, then you should use HDMI to avoid dual conversions. But DSP manipulation of the signal is also availabe in the PC.

Lastly, the digital volume control degradation of the signal is much exaggerated, and only comes into play at the very lowest volume levels.
post #14 of 25
Thread Starter 
So, basically the conclusion is that I should save myself the hassle and get an Asus or Auzentech with 7.1 analog out directly into my receiver. Since I do own a high-end receiver (Marantz SR9200) of a few years ago, going the HDMI route is not really an option.

Nevertheless I may still consider going for the pro-DAC, but rather as an experiment.

Thanks,


Gerbrand
post #15 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifespeed View Post

It works well given a soundcard with quality circuitry. The DACs on an ASUS Xonar D2X or HDAV are likely better than a sub-$1K receiver.

Very much agreed, but also need the mention that even in $1 receivers the amplification selection and quality isn't going to match the quality of an equally priced dedicated amp (ie - Emotiva XPA-5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerbrand View Post

So, basically the conclusion is that I should save myself the hassle and get an Asus or Auzentech with 7.1 analog out directly into my receiver. Since I do own a high-end receiver (Marantz SR9200) of a few years ago, going the HDMI route is not really an option.

Nevertheless I may still consider going for the pro-DAC, but rather as an experiment.

Thanks,


Gerbrand

Sounds good, I can't imagine you being unhappy with the quality of sound you will get for the price, now focus on getting a dedicated amplifier!
post #16 of 25
I use an EMU 1820m which has a DAC superior to almost all pre-pros (and should be equal to the most expensive). I use a quality amplifier (analog out of the EMU) and high end speakers and the sound is fantastic. There are no problems with processing (eg. bass delay or filtering) as EMU use a driver which has an integrated effect processor called Patchmix, which very high quality software filters.

As this stuff is built for pro-audio, the quality is better than standard consumer equipment. Also pretty cheap. I don't understand why more people don't do this type of setup (albeit the software processing takes a bit of time to get right).
post #17 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by deandob View Post

As this stuff is built for pro-audio, the quality is better than standard consumer equipment. Also pretty cheap. I don't understand why more people don't do this type of setup (albeit the software processing takes a bit of time to get right).

How do you handle external sources (game consoles, STBs, etc)? That is really the biggest problem with using a PC as more than just a source.
post #18 of 25
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by deandob View Post

I use an EMU 1820m which has a DAC superior to almost all pre-pros (and should be equal to the most expensive). I use a quality amplifier (analog out of the EMU) and high end speakers and the sound is fantastic.

I can imagine that this EMU 1820m is quite a bit higher up the foodchain than the DACs I was referring to, so I wonder if the quality argument still holds there.

However, one other reason that pro stuff is relatively cheap, is that the price of an AV receiver always includes licensing fees for Dolby Digital etc. AND video processing hardware. If you use an HTPC you need neither of those.

BR

Gerbrand
post #19 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post

How do you handle external sources (game consoles, STBs, etc)? That is really the biggest problem with using a PC as more than just a source.

These are switched analog at the amplifier. As the HTPC is so versatile I only occassionaly use an Xbox (HTPC does music, TV, blu-ray, PC games...)
post #20 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post

How do you handle external sources (game consoles, STBs, etc)? That is really the biggest problem with using a PC as more than just a source.

For more flexibility I use the EMU 0404 USB; this allows the use of 1 SPDIF in and TOSlink in, as well as a L/R analog in - so for my living room setup, the PC sends the signal via USB, my DVD player connects via coaxial, and my Wii I use the analog in; so with pro audio equipment - you will find these features quite versatile to handle those additional external sources.
post #21 of 25
I run a Xonar HDAV Deluxe straight to Poweramps...well, via an active crossover.

The HDMI section of the card is useless to me, but I wanted the analogue daughterboard.

I also run Room Correction using Convolver via a filter generated by DRC. It works very well, and is more sophisticated than the Vista room correction. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...550750&page=11


And there is no noise from the Xonar. That's FUD. The drivers are annoying, but the hardware is very good.
post #22 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulrider4ever View Post

For more flexibility I use the EMU 0404 USB; this allows the use of 1 SPDIF in and TOSlink in, as well as a L/R analog in - so for my living room setup, the PC sends the signal via USB, my DVD player connects via coaxial, and my Wii I use the analog in; so with pro audio equipment - you will find these features quite versatile to handle those additional external sources.

You decoding the S/PDIF or do you have the DVD player set to PCM?
post #23 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanger89 View Post

You decoding the S/PDIF or do you have the DVD player set to PCM?

DVD player outputs PCM. 0404USB makes a lovely highpitched beep beep noise for DTS/DolbyD
post #24 of 25
Figured
post #25 of 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by lstepnio View Post

You really should give LPCM over HDMI considering it's a <$100 solution which provides HD audio and DXVA video. It's not perfect but I think it's the best solution until bit-streaming is available without any nonsense. If you have a modern receiver that supports the new generation of room correction this setup really takes things to a whole new level.

Especially as the Slyplayer development suggests that HDMI PCM 5.1 and 7.1 will lose the 48k/16bit limit of the current player apps. The Slyplayer developers are apparently hoping to output 96/192k and 20/24 bit audio via PCM HDMI. (The hardware supports it - it is a licensing issue. AIUI Slyplayer will not be a licensed player - and may not have full functionality - but it should play the movies!)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Home Theater Computers
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › Anybody tried a pro multichannel DAC for HD audio?