AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Official JTR speaker thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official JTR speaker thread - Page 143

post #4261 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by MX48 View Post

I know it can be a pain but you guys should really get REW or an Omnimic or similar. It is a real eye opener as to what you are hearing, where your peaks and valleys are in your frequency response and what your personal listening preferences are.

It is definitely worth the time to implement it. Once you start running graphs it can become addictive tho .

I am guessing you are correct in that the "edginess" is from a peak in the voicing area, but you may be cutting way more than need be. You won't know until you run graphs. Of course if you are happy with it now there is something to be said for not digging too deep .

Moto

You make a very valid point. When I altered the response, I was pretty much winging it and trusting my ears. I very much liked the result, but it certainly is not the most scientific approach. I used to be an REW user, but only for the purpose of eq'ing the subs. I've never used it full range. When I got an SMS-1 for the subs, I quit using REW altogther. It might be time to breakout the laptop, etc.
post #4262 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by MX48 View Post

I know it can be a pain but you guys should really get REW or an Omnimic or similar. It is a real eye opener as to what you are hearing, where your peaks and valleys are in your frequency response and what your personal listening preferences are.

It is definitely worth the time to implement it. Once you start running graphs it can become addictive tho .

I am guessing you are correct in that the "edginess" is from a peak in the voicing area, but you may be cutting way more than need be. You won't know until you run graphs. Of course if you are happy with it now there is something to be said for not digging too deep .

Moto

Good advice, should I get to the point where I can make manual adjustments to the frequency response I will go that route. At the same time I added the JTR's I also added an external amp and Audyssey xt32 to the mix. All of this certainly changed the character of my system (generally for the better) but I can't even say that the things I'm picking at now are due to the speakers or something else.... and to make things clear I am quite pleased with the JTR's overall.
post #4263 of 8265
What these speakers do is play the source accurately and as loud as you like. Your ears, and in most cases your room will fail long before the speakers do.

Audiophiles appreciate music and are constantly looking for their version of perfect sound. Audio is a fun hobby and the fun is in the learning and experimenting. Some take a clinical, scientific approach while others take is more emotional/subjective.

My approach was simple. I wanted a system that would give me an IMAX and live concert feeling at venue appropriate SPL's. For me, commercial mid to high end speakers I heard and owned could not produce the sound I wanted.

Notwithstanding their differences, I'm convinced that the Seaton, Danley, JTR (and a few others) class products all could do the job for me in my room. What I was left with was the value proposition and that framed my system as it exists today.

The grass is always greener... and that's cool too.
post #4264 of 8265
The grass is always greener... and that's cool too.

Yes, it is as I have gone through 4 sets of speaker setups in the past 6 years. And to add, 18 subwoofer in the same amount of time. Now that I have JTR's along with Submerisve's, I'm truly in happy land.
post #4265 of 8265
After a little bit of mild midrange tweaking, I'm now loving my JTR's.
post #4266 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

After a little bit of mild midrange tweaking, I'm now loving my JTR's.

Glad to hear it! Stopped by the local Guitar Center on my way to run an errand and as it turns out they have the dbx 215 & 231s on sale through tomorrow at what appears to be a good price. I may go back tomorrow...
post #4267 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

After several weeks of listening critically to music in particular through my T8 pair, I've come to realize what a big difference a db or two in midrange can make. To me, the mids in the T8's seem somewhat prominent. This seems to be the case even after Audyssey is applied. With really well-recorded material, this can sound great. If there are any rough spots in the recording, they stand out like a sore thumb. I have a huge collection of music, some which are not necessarily state-of-the-art recordings. I'm a hard-core blues guy and there are a lot of excellent blues recording made over the last half-century or longer. The music is great, but sometimes the recordings themselves, not so much. The T8's show them for what they are, warts and all.

What I also found is that with that strong midrange, it makes for very strong vocals, placing the image of the vocalist somewhat forward of the stage. This sort of imaging can seem to actually detract from the presentation of a wide stage.

I decided to re-hook up my old Behringer 31-band graphic eq to try some tweaking. With a slight reduction of no more than 1-2db in the region from about 800 to 3.1Khz, the transformation is nothing short of amazing. The effect is has is multi-fold. It almost eliminates the harshness in many recording. It pulls back the vocal image and incorporates it back into the soundstage. Also by reducing the prominence of the vocals which are typically centered, it appears to significantly widen the soundstage at the same time.

The net effect here is that this slight tweaking of the mids imparts upon the JTR's a smoothness similar to that of so-called "hi-fi" speakers while losing no detail, and taking nothing away from the superb dynamics the JTR's are known for. In my opinion, it's turned them in a fantastic pair of speakers for 2ch music. The effect on movies seems to not be siginificant, but I never felt any improvement was needed in that area.

mojomike, i finally got around to trying this and I have to agree in my room I liked the sound for 2 channel music much better with the midrange taken down a bit. i ended up liking -3db for 1k and -3db fo 2.2k. seems smoother and less fatiguing at higher SPL. thanks for the tip.
post #4268 of 8265
Cool. I'm glad to hear you got a good result. I think you'll find that with a slight reduction in that area, you won't really lose any of the detail. In fact at least to my ears, by taking away the apparent prominence in the midrange, it seems to actually bring out the details that were there before but were somewhat masked by the mids.

I've been following that thread about going back to less sensitive speakers after having highly sensitive ones.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1412527

I was almost considering doing just that for 2ch music until I tweaked things a bit a few day ago. Not any more!
post #4269 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

Cool. I'm glad to hear you got a good result. I think you'll find that with a slight reduction in that area, you won't really lose any of the detail. In fact at least to my ears, by taking away the apparent prominence in the midrange, it seems to actually bring out the details that were there before but were somewhat masked by the mids.

I've been following that thread about going back to less sensitive speakers after having highly sensitive ones.
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1412527

I was almost considering doing just that for 2ch music until I tweaked things a bit a few day ago. Not any more!

I am wondering if getting the sealed version (with less mid bass) would solve this issue altogether?
post #4270 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolgeek View Post

I am wondering if getting the sealed version (with less mid bass) would solve this issue altogether?

That is very unlikely. The area that going to be different between the ported and sealed versions is going to be much lower down, most likely between about 80-150hz or so. We're not talking about tweaking anything near the bass range here at all. We're talking about tweaking right smack in the mid range area.
post #4271 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

That is very unlikely. The area that going to be different between the ported and sealed versions is going to be much lower down, most likely between about 80-150hz or so. We're not talking about tweaking anything near the bass range here at all. We're talking about tweaking right smack in the mid range area.

Aa, I see.. thanks for clearing that up...
post #4272 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by mojomike View Post

That is very unlikely. The area that going to be different between the ported and sealed versions is going to be much lower down, most likely between about 80-150hz or so. We're not talking about tweaking anything near the bass range here at all. We're talking about tweaking right smack in the mid range area.

Is it possible to tweak it with just the receiver without having to get a separate equalizer?... I am thinking of either getting the onkyo 1009, or 3009...
post #4273 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolgeek View Post

Is it possible to tweak it with just the receiver without having to get a separate equalizer?... I am thinking of either getting the onkyo 1009, or 3009...

It probably is possible, but I think it would cause you to have to switch off Audyssey to do it. I'm not certain about that with the Onkyos, but that is the case with my Denon.
post #4274 of 8265
Hmm... this is confusing... wouldn't the Audyssey fix it automatically if the mid is a bit loud? I mean, how did you do it?

Say, for example, your out from your receiver goes to an equalizer, then you adjust the equalizer to lower the mids, and then wouldn't audyssey automatically increase them right back to before?
post #4275 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolgeek View Post

Hmm... this is confusing... wouldn't the Audyssey fix it automatically if the mid is a bit loud? I mean, how did you do it?

Say, for example, your out from your receiver goes to an equalizer, then you adjust the equalizer to lower the mids, and then wouldn't audyssey automatically increase them right back to before?

I would have thought Audyssey would have taken down that prominince, but it didn't seem to do it sufficiently, at least for my tastes.

This adjustment I made is applied after Audyssey. Audyssey doesn't "know" that I did it. If I were to have to rerun Audyssey for any reason, I would probably bypass my external eq first, and then engage it again afterward.
post #4276 of 8265
I have the sealed T8's and Audyssey xt32 and have made some of the same observations Mojomike has with 2 channel music. I'm not an Audyssey expert but it seems a lot to ask of the product to be able to completely address all acoustical challenges possible given the universe of electronics, speakers and room effects it will deal with... Not to mention the role personal preferences may play.

I picked up the DBX 231 earlier today and will try it out later.
post #4277 of 8265
Audyssey does allow you to configure the eq directly.
post #4278 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by ifor View Post

Audyssey does allow you to configure the eq directly.

Does this mean you'll have to turn audyssey off? Or, use audyssey first, then fine tune?
post #4279 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolgeek View Post

Does this mean you'll have to turn audyssey off? Or, use audyssey first, then fine tune?

It's my understanding that certain settings (e.g. distance or channel level) can be applied in addition to the settings resolved with auto setup and be included when you use Audyssey. Others, like tone or eq adjustments cannot be applied along with other Audyssey settings, so if you wanted to go that way you would not run Audyssey and make any adjustments you wanted yourself. So if you wanted to make a treble adjustment or adjust certain EQ bands along the lines of what Mojomike did, you would not be able to use Audyssey, or more specifically the settings you get in auto setup.

If anyone knows otherwise, please chime in. The 4311 manual and others I've seen suggest this and I have not been able to specify a proper search to easily find an answer.
post #4280 of 8265
I can't say for sure that this applies to all receivers, but with my Denon if you use the manual eq settings, it turns off the Audyssey eq. That's why I used the external eq for the tweaks on my system.
post #4281 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpc716 View Post

It's my understanding that certain settings (e.g. distance or channel level) can be applied in addition to the settings resolved with auto setup and be included when you use Audyssey. Others, like tone or eq adjustments cannot be applied along with other Audyssey settings, so if you wanted to go that way you would not run Audyssey and make any adjustments you wanted yourself. So if you wanted to make a treble adjustment or adjust certain EQ bands along the lines of what Mojomike did, you would not be able to use Audyssey, or more specifically the settings you get in auto setup.

If anyone knows otherwise, please chime in. The 4311 manual and others I've seen suggest this and I have not been able to specify a proper search to easily find an answer.

This is correct. You would have to use manual EQ on your processor/AVR for the midrange cut. You could always use Manual EQ for 2 channel music listening and then turn on Audyssey for movies. If you purchase the Audyssey Pro Kit you can tweak the FR at multiple points (+or- 3db).
post #4282 of 8265
OK I'm getting carried away but I can say after a little experimentation that this adjustment, for me, does make 2 channel music smoother at higher volumes. Unfortunately the DBX unit has added a little hiss to the mix that I need to try to get rid of. More tweaking to follow.

RMK thanks for confiming my understanding of Audyssey.
post #4283 of 8265
You shameless flatterer!

You may be able to reduce the hiss by raising the output levels of the two channels and reducing the gain on the eq unit.
post #4284 of 8265
Hmmmmm, less midbass eh? Maybe my assumption and advice here that an S8 would be more than enough for LCR is making more sense (reaching for my wallet).
post #4285 of 8265
Have a question on Triple 8's vs. Triple 12's.

My room is 26' 3" X 16' 3" X 10' and ~ 3850 cubic feet once the ceiling soffit, stage, and riser are subtracted. This is a dedicated, fully treated room, that is used for 90%+ movies.

With my size theater am I gaining anything by running Triple 12's as my LCR vs. the Triple 8's? The $1200 difference between the two options would likely go to a submersive to aid my single Velodyne DD15 on the low end. Which would you choose, Triple 12's with just the DD15 or Triple 8's with the DD15 + a submersive?
post #4286 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brady84 View Post

Have a question on Triple 8's vs. Triple 12's.

My room is 26' 3" X 16' 3" X 10' and ~ 3850 cubic feet once the ceiling soffit, stage, and riser are subtracted. This is a dedicated, fully treated room, that is used for 90%+ movies.

With my size theater am I gaining anything by running Triple 12's as my LCR vs. the Triple 8's? The $1200 difference between the two options would likely go to a submersive to aid my single Velodyne DD15 on the low end. Which would you choose, Triple 12's with just the DD15 or Triple 8's with the DD15 + a submersive?

T8's & Submersive.
post #4287 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brady84 View Post

Have a question on Triple 8's vs. Triple 12's.

My room is 26' 3" X 16' 3" X 10' and ~ 3850 cubic feet once the ceiling soffit, stage, and riser are subtracted. This is a dedicated, fully treated room, that is used for 90%+ movies.

With my size theater am I gaining anything by running Triple 12's as my LCR vs. the Triple 8's? The $1200 difference between the two options would likely go to a submersive to aid my single Velodyne DD15 on the low end. Which would you choose, Triple 12's with just the DD15 or Triple 8's with the DD15 + a submersive?

It would be crazy not to get the 12's.
I can't imagine not having mine.
I will be getting t8's for my 4 surrounds but
i want more 12's. submersive can come next.
wvchris
post #4288 of 8265
It's quite simple really, the 12 are going to afford a slight bit more efficiency and a little more low end, but not that much. the Submersive will certainly take care of the low-end part, and are you planning on running your speakers at more than reference in that room? I bet not, so the added efficiency isnt going to make a huge difference for you. With all that said, I have always had a more than capable sub setup, and dont need the t12's for my room either, yet I still got them hehe
post #4289 of 8265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brady84 View Post

Have a question on Triple 8's vs. Triple 12's.

My room is 26' 3" X 16' 3" X 10' and ~ 3850 cubic feet once the ceiling soffit, stage, and riser are subtracted. This is a dedicated, fully treated room, that is used for 90%+ movies.

With my size theater am I gaining anything by running Triple 12's as my LCR vs. the Triple 8's? The $1200 difference between the two options would likely go to a submersive to aid my single Velodyne DD15 on the low end. Which would you choose, Triple 12's with just the DD15 or Triple 8's with the DD15 + a submersive?

Put your money toward the sub. Your going to need more bass to keep up with the JTR's. Assuming that you cross over at 80hz, you will never miss the deeper extension of the T12's and you will also never miss their additional 3db sensitivity.
post #4290 of 8265
The triple 12s are effortless.
My room is 20' x 24' x 8' and that matters alot.
the triple 8s are excellent speakers.
triple 12s are the same only 50% bigger with much more midbass.
When watching movies this is a big deal.
This is something that confused me when making
my purchase of the 2012 triple 12s [vented]
because of all the happy and satisfied triple 8 owners.

Best to ask RMK he has both.
for me personally,
if i came home and my 12s were replaced with the
8s + $1200 to boot
I WOULD BE FURIOUS.
that is the best I can put it
hope it helps
WVChris
this is providing that a high quality subwoofer is your next purchase
if not then 8s with a submersive would be the clear choice.
I chose 12s because i am tired of continually upgrading every
single year. I have a subm hp and will be adding the s2 shortly.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Official JTR speaker thread