Quote:
Originally Posted by
candre23 
Since Flash is currently handled entirely by the CPU, any additional tasks that use up processor cycles will detract from its ability to decode video. It sounds like it is just barely not capable of 720p Hulu playback now. Anything else running in the background would make it even worse.
No. HDD throughput is definitely not the bottleneck here. Even a slow HDD should be able to do 30MB/sec. Streaming HD video will never take more than maybe 15Mbps (mega
bits vs mega
bytes).
Since he didn't mention Flash specifically and because there are few HD movies available for streaming, I was going on the assumption that he was playing back an HD movie stored on hard drive with working hardware acceleration. Sure, a slow HDD can easily do 30MB/s sequential read/writes. However, the scenario I was picturing is heavy on random read/write and that's a particular shortcoming of mechanical drives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
candre23 
Personally, I'd love to see a detailed shootout between the various Intel Atom, Intel CULV, and AMD Neo 2 processors. Since the Neo 2 is so new, I suspect I might be waiting a while.
The Intel CULV's are just underclocked and undervolted Penryn/mobile 45nm processors. You could just use the clockspeed to figure out how their performance would compare to Wolfdales with the same FSB/cache. Given that Core 2 processors tend to annihilate the Atom clock-for-clock and core-for-core, well you get the picture. The mobile Neo X2, yeah, not enough reviews/info yet. By the way, the Athlon 3250e used on the Zino HD seems to be a straight underclocked/undervolted Brisbane. Kinda like a slower Athlon 4050e.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
STL 
Do you mean 1080i/p fullscreen (via the HDMI output) or fullscreen on the notebook's screen (like a 1366x768 resolution)?
It was actually on a Sharp 32" 720p HDTV at 1366x768 resolution. Alas, I can't test it on higher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeffkro 
I saw a benchmark that put the 18W 1.6ghz neo X2(L625) as about 25% faster then atom 330. It looked to be pretty much on par with the Core Duo T2350 SL9JK (C0) 1.86 GHz 2 MB 533 MT/s 14x 0.762 - 1.3 V 31 W Socket M. Huh, amd looks to be getting the same performance at a lower clock and lower wattage then intel here.
I do believe the T2350 is a discontinued 65nm part. It'll be interesting to see the Neo X2 compared to a Core 2 Duo SU9600 1.60GHz TDP 10W or a Core 2 Duo SL9300 1.60GHz TDP 17W. Clock for clock, I have a feeling the Intel ULV and LV chips will win, but performance on the dollar, AMD would probably nab.