Quote:
Originally Posted by buddahead 
They should have just called it the hw-10.But a littel cheaper.Art did not seem to impress by my reading.Also can't Sony ever make a bright FP.Pretty much a movie only fp'Also at 3k I see it being trounce by the new Epsons with double the contrast and brightness and cheaper.Only thing I like is the Sony has a good look.Maybe I could put epsons guts in the sony body.Thanks 703 for the link.

They should have just called it the hw-10.But a littel cheaper.Art did not seem to impress by my reading.Also can't Sony ever make a bright FP.Pretty much a movie only fp'Also at 3k I see it being trounce by the new Epsons with double the contrast and brightness and cheaper.Only thing I like is the Sony has a good look.Maybe I could put epsons guts in the sony body.Thanks 703 for the link.
The review needs to be cleaned up a bit, lot references to the Sharp 15K on the IQ page, but I like Arts reviews the best anyways.
He mentions blacks are quite close to the Epson's, and brighter in best mode (if I read it correctly). The new Epson 8500 have been previewed by Cine4Home and it appears they didn't really improve the black level at all, mainly the FI was fixed.























