Quote:
Originally Posted by slimer777 
I know that the profiling was only at the 100% point so at least at 100IRE they should measure the same, right?
And lets just say the color space of a monitor is really 'funny' and does not accomodate to normal specification. Would the grayscale results be different from 10-90IRE and only measure the same at 100IRE after profiling?
It is very obvious that the i1Pro's measurements are tainted after being profilied to the i1D3. Or I just do not know what I am talking about?
** By the way, I tested that unplugging either one makes no difference to the results.

I know that the profiling was only at the 100% point so at least at 100IRE they should measure the same, right?
And lets just say the color space of a monitor is really 'funny' and does not accomodate to normal specification. Would the grayscale results be different from 10-90IRE and only measure the same at 100IRE after profiling?
It is very obvious that the i1Pro's measurements are tainted after being profilied to the i1D3. Or I just do not know what I am talking about?
** By the way, I tested that unplugging either one makes no difference to the results.
This is really odd. I just cannot reproduce this.
i1Pro Grayscale

D3 Native Grayscale

D3-i1Pro Corrected Grayscale

This particular D3 reads considerably too low in red, so the correction is easy to see. The post-correction results are within 0.001-0.002 of the i1Pro.
I am stumped. The only thing I can suggest is to reinstall .Net.
Is anyone else seeing this?






































But the grayscale is near perfect! Do you think I should be overly concern about the under-saturation? Do you think I should use Wide gamut? Or perhaps increase the color to dial the primaries (RGB) near to the reference points?



