Originally Posted by SocketAzzWIPE
My question is, why don't people complain about this?
I can understand if they want to do panel lottery on their lower models...they can jack up the price and put cheaper components in them, but doing this silly lottery business with their flagship line?
If I'm paying good money for a top line product, I would hope that I get my money's worth.
The whole point is we don't know what the differences are besides opinions from people who hate the panel they have and those who love the panel they have.
I have not seen ANY hard data at all comparing the 3 panel manufactures.
In fact, if it weren't for this thread, i would never have know there was an issue at all.
I wouldn't have been looking for the problems that supposedly exist between the 3.
Thats why I'm saying we need someone, somewhere to confirm using actual tools to test for things like luminescence at a certain angle, or hard science confirming 1 pixel geometry is better that another.
There is always a trade off.
If you have better viewing angles, maybe you loose PQ dead center.
Better PQ and uniformity gives UP viewing angles.
Is one panel better all specs than others?
Or, is there a trade off?
Thats what we need to know.