My Sony panel is an amva 3. I wouldn't consider this bad. It has better viewing angles than spva panels. The blacks are superb.
If I was actually on the hunt for another panel, I'd get the 32" B650, since that's another amva 3.
I suspect that if Sony begins using amva 5 next year, you'll know, because they'll use a native contrast ratio of 16,000:1 that AUO is claiming.
Sony must have a deal with AUO that they have to give AUO's claimed native contrast ratio- 5000:1. It ranks higher than the native contrast ratio given by the spva panels- 3800:1. Although these panels tend to get a little blacker, they may sacrifice some shadow detail.
Basically, I'd be more concerned with Chi Mei panels and some of the spva stuff than AUO, their panel seems to be solid.
If I was actually on the hunt for another panel, I'd get the 32" B650, since that's another amva 3.
I suspect that if Sony begins using amva 5 next year, you'll know, because they'll use a native contrast ratio of 16,000:1 that AUO is claiming.
Sony must have a deal with AUO that they have to give AUO's claimed native contrast ratio- 5000:1. It ranks higher than the native contrast ratio given by the spva panels- 3800:1. Although these panels tend to get a little blacker, they may sacrifice some shadow detail.
Basically, I'd be more concerned with Chi Mei panels and some of the spva stuff than AUO, their panel seems to be solid.

















