AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Video Processors › New DVDO iScan Duo [2.0 firmware released]
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New DVDO iScan Duo [2.0 firmware released] - Page 50

post #1471 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

Still waiting for mine to come in October.

One bad thing about using one of the good, national calibrators, is waiting for a tour.

I do like the benefits of being a repeat customer.
post #1472 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

Still waiting for mine to come in October.

Why not do your own?

I get fantastic results using S & M Disc for basic adjustments then a cheap Display 2Lt meter coupled with Chromapure software on my laptop.

The Duo's grayscale is so easy to do as is the gamma and color gamut.
post #1473 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElwayLite View Post

One bad thing about using one of the good, national calibrators, is waiting for a tour.

I do like the benefits of being a repeat customer.

This guys is very good has all the proper equipment, best in Australia and does all the Asia Pacific also.He lives in the other side of the country but comes to my part at least 3 times a year.
post #1474 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by PE06MCG View Post

Why not do your own?

I get fantastic results using S & M Disc for basic adjustments then a cheap Display 2Lt meter coupled with Chromapure software on my laptop.

The Duo's grayscale is so easy to do as is the gamma and color gamut.

I can wait for him He has the proper equipment.
post #1475 of 3697
I have my own meter, and prefer to let the guy I normally use do my main TV. Meter is more for bedroom TV and friends/family.

Other perks to using a calibrator, that a meter does not give. Also, once the upfront calibration is done on a new tv, revisits are very cheap, considering meter recertification and such. It's a hobby for me, and my main tv get's left to the professional.
post #1476 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

This guys is very good has all the proper equipment, best in Australia and does all the Asia Pacific also.He lives in the other side of the country but comes to my part at least 3 times a year.

Good deal.

I amazed when these guys pop out $15k+ worth of gear.
post #1477 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElwayLite View Post

Good deal.

I amazed when these guys pop out $15k+ worth of gear.

Same. Thats why I leave it to them.
post #1478 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElwayLite View Post

I have my own meter, and prefer to let the guy I normally use do my main TV. Meter is more for bedroom TV and friends/family.

Other perks to using a calibrator, that a meter does not give. Also, once the upfront calibration is done on a new tv, revisits are very cheap, considering meter recertification and such. It's a hobby for me, and my main tv get's left to the professional.

Though I love learning from him. Hes looking forward working on the Duo.

That reminds me has Ken Worked on the Duo yet? Love to get his impression.
post #1479 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

Though I love learning from him. Hes looking forward working on the Duo.

That reminds me has Ken Worked on the Duo yet? Love to get his impression.

Ken is the engineer at AnchorBay that's been working on my audio issue, and unit replacement. Gregg Loewen, with LionAv is the calibrator I use. He knows Ken and another guy at AB, so he's worked with the Duo and other stuff before. Gregg is the one that recommended the Duo to me, primariliy for its Gamma/Grayscale/CMS features.

Another guy I talk to on another forum has his own meter, and a calibrated Samsung 8500. He bought his Duo right after me and has been working with it. He said it's improved the calibration results and PQ.
post #1480 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElwayLite View Post

Ken is the engineer at AnchorBay that's been working on my audio issue, and unit replacement. Gregg Loewen, with LionAv is the calibrator I use. He knows Ken and another guy at AB, so he's worked with the Duo and other stuff before. Gregg is the one that recommended the Duo to me, primariliy for its Gamma/Grayscale/CMS features.

Another guy I talk to on another forum has his own meter, and a calibrated Samsung 8500. He bought his Duo right after me and has been working with it. He said it's improved the calibration results and PQ.

Sorry Im talking about Ken Whitcomb(D6500Ken) the ISF calibrator.
post #1481 of 3697
Oh, haha.
post #1482 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

This guys is very good has all the proper equipment, best in Australia and does all the Asia Pacific also.He lives in the other side of the country but comes to my part at least 3 times a year.

Sorry my friend. Not trying to belittle the service you get from your Professional Calibrator.

Must admit my equipment is not the best you can buy but it still manages to verify that my great perceived PQ is technically accurate.
post #1483 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by PE06MCG View Post


Sorry my friend. Not trying to belittle the service you get from your Professional Calibrator.

Must admit my equipment is not the best you can buy but it still manages to verify that my great perceived PQ is technically accurate.

Hey I'm sure it is and I'm sure many that do it themselves get fantastic results. But speaking for myself I still prefer him to do it. When it comes to pq I hate fiddling around with it because I know I will make a complete mess of it.
post #1484 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franin View Post

Hey I'm sure it is and I'm sure many that do it themselves get fantastic results. But speaking for myself I still prefer him to do it. When it comes to pq I hate fiddling around with it because I know I will make a complete mess of it.

Must admit I had no idea when I started but I have found it easy, precise and predictable but as you say its down to personal preference.
post #1485 of 3697
The I1 is a great meter, as proven by folks here.
post #1486 of 3697
Quote:


Ken, from AnchorBay told me, if my Display would accept 4:4:4, to send the 4:2:2 out of the BR player to the Duo, and let the Duo do it. Both methods are color interpolation, but if the Duo is gonna expect 4:2:2 in, it's best to reduce the conversions.

If you have not read our article on how to choose the best color space, I recommend reading it. It goes into detail on the various conversions and why there is no one best color space for every situation.

http://www.spearsandmunsil.com/artic...olorspace.html

Quote:


You may still have better results with 4:4:4 from your player if its is greater than 8 bit depth.

4:2:2 and 4:4:4 conversion does not change the bitdepth, nor will it make any diffence on a luma ramp. It only changes the color resolution. 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 can be served at the same bitdepths. Just like choosing a color space, you really need to go through all of the bitdepth choices as well and figure out which ones work best. e.g. Lets say you send 10-bit from the OPPO into a display. If the display does not work at 10-bit, it may round down, which may introduce banding. e.g. I feed an SP-A900B 10-bit (dithered) 4:4:4 from an OPPO BDP-83 to get the best results.

Quote:


Whats wrong with us just setting all these to AUTO and let the player and the Duo sort it out by itself?

Auto often uses the EDID information stored in each device. There is no one forcing companies to correctly set EDIDs. Runco plasmas once placed invalid values into the EDID, which resulted in 480p being sent to the plasma. The Pioneer plasmas they were based on had better EDIDs. Somehow Runco overwrote the good values with bad values.

Auto is about sending a signal to the display that works, not about sending the highest quality signal.

It is possible to convert an original 4:2:0 source from 4:2:2 to 4:4:4 to 4:2:2 without any loss at all. Problem is we have not told anyone how to do it yet.
post #1487 of 3697
I used the S&M test patterns when sending 4:4:4 36bit out of the BD85, to the Duo, then 4:4:4 36bit to the TV. Passed all tests, using your instruction.
post #1488 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by sspears View Post


4:2:2 and 4:4:4 conversion does not change the bitdepth, nor will it make any diffence on a luma ramp. It only changes the color resolution. 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 can be served at the same bitdepths. Just like choosing a color space, you really need to go through all of the bitdepth choices as well and figure out which ones work best. e.g. Lets say you send 10-bit from the OPPO into a display. If the display does not work at 10-bit, it may round down, which may introduce banding. e.g. I feed an SP-A900B 10-bit (dithered) 4:4:4 from an OPPO BDP-83 to get the best results.


Hi Stacey,

I think my Pioneer player only outputs deep color bit depth using 4:4:4. At least that is what I read. That is why I made that comment. I also believe the Pioneer only outputs 12 bit so the Duo would need to round down. It actually looks better with out it turned on in my setup so I use 8 bit output from my player. I don't see much of a differnce between 4:4:4 and 4:2:2 into the Duo.

Can the Duo force 10 bit output using 4:2:2 out? Reason I ask is that is the only way the RS1 wil accept 10 bit. So I was told.

Ron
post #1489 of 3697
Quote:


Can the Duo force 10 bit output using 4:2:2 out?

They expose deep color on/off on both input and output. That may mean 10-bit. Don't really know. This is why I am so happy with OPPO. You can specify 8, 10, or 12-bit. 8 and 10-bit have dither on / off options.

They are using the capability of the ABT2010, so the Duo could do the same thing.

More patterns need to be created to deal with bitdepth. Its on the to do list. Right now we are working on a lip sync pattern.
post #1490 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by sspears View Post

They expose deep color on/off on both input and output. That may mean 10-bit. Don't really know. This is why I am so happy with OPPO. You can specify 8, 10, or 12-bit. 8 and 10-bit have dither on / off options.

They are using the capability of the ABT2010, so the Duo could do the same thing.

More patterns need to be created to deal with bitdepth. Its on the to do list. Right now we are working on a lip sync pattern.

If I used the Spears and Munsil test patterns for color, and found it to pass all tests with the BD85 sending the Duo 4:4:4 36bit, and the duo sending the S2 4:4:4 36bit, should I just leave it alone?
post #1491 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElwayLite View Post

If I used the Spears and Munsil test patterns for color, and found it to pass all tests with the BD85 sending the Duo 4:4:4 36bit, and the duo sending the S2 4:4:4 36bit, should I just leave it alone?

The Duo processes at 10 bit so it needs to round off your 12 bit output from the BD85. Just make sure your ramps are smooth. If they are you are good.
post #1492 of 3697
I discovered a problem with my set that was causing it to drift. I would set it correctly and within days, sometimes less, it would shift the grayscale and peak brightness. If I had used a pro-calibrator who was a of national reputation he would have come in cablibrated my set, took my money, and he would have been down the road. Now if he was local be might have come back half a dozen times for nothing (assuming he was a really nice guy) and figured out the problem.... yeah fat chance. It just was not obvious and I can't even imagine trying to get the maker's customer service to do anything positive about it.

I have been messing around for months going through one Duo beta after another recalibrating my set anyway.. but the problem with my set is probably either a hardware problem, a bug, or an undocumted feature. It literally turns down the brightness apparently when it gets to a certain temp on the lamp. How did I figure it out.. well you know what you get when you don't get what you want... in my case lots of trial and error experience.

So while thank goodness for great pro-calibrators, unless they are local they have some limitations on what they can achieve if there are gotchas. The nice thing about a Duo, is with a decent meter and some persistence you can achieve over time, what a pro can not always achieve, they just can't make that kind of investment of time in your set. I have to give some of the great ones credit, day after day, they have to be able to wade into a deep pile somehow and turn it into a silk purse. In my case the efforts of a traveling pro no matter how brilliant would have resulted in a Cinderella effect. After midnight it was all going to turn back into the pumpkin.

The Duo still has warts, but for the money it is an awesome piece. I would buy a couple more of them if I had a few extra bucks around. I have a couple of Panasonics that simply don't have any real adjustability. One gets used as a PC monitor so... it's not important right now, and the other just doesn't get a lot of use. Still when they (Anchor Bay) do the 3 hdmi port "Lite" version for $499, I will stick one on every display I own.
post #1493 of 3697
From tests we've done, it's best to let the electronics be on for at least 1.5 hours before calibrating. (Don't know the timing for Projectors). Lamps age, electronics change values as they warm up and cool off. I doubt you'll ever get the exact values every time. Minor variances yes, major variances would spell some kind of trouble. LCDs, we found to settle down at around 6 months. Up to that point the PQ seems to keep getting better.
post #1494 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronomy View Post

The Duo processes at 10 bit so it needs to round off your 12 bit output from the BD85. Just make sure your ramps are smooth. If they are you are good.

What seems weird to me, if Im looking at the math correctly, is when the BD85 is set to 4:2:2, it's 20 bit

How would you get 20 bit off 3 channels, or is that something more to do with 4:2:2?

Edit: Would that be 4:2:2 10:5:5, for 20? So no rounding would be needed between the Duo and BD85 at 4:2:2 20 bit?
post #1495 of 3697
After coming back from the Spectracal Pro Seminar, and impressed with the Auto Calibration features of the Iscan Duo and Calman 4, I was looking forward to this new feature for calibrating. Disappointment! No Auto Calibration Feature, and still the famous Yellow Tinge, despite the Colour Gamut nailing almost Dead Centre every aspect except the Green, which was a tad out. I'm now going to assume, if you don't have the lot more expensive Pro Licence, the Duo is dead in the Water as far as the Auto Calibrating goes. I also, I assume, I misunderstood the fact that I thought we were calibrating the Duo, not still cailbrating the actual set. So where am I ahead with the Duo for the monies put out for it. Set the Output to RGB and enabled the 1:1 which I seem to remember someone mentioning. Other than the Duo has 8 HDMI inputs, to me, right now, it appears to be an expensive Switch! Also missing the Pluge for Brightness and the Contrast patterns I saw at the Seminar. Are these also Pro Licence related, or have the Patterns been changed to patterns that are harder to setup? Also had a problem with the Blue Filter Colour Mode set - adjusted from Top to Bottom and never saw a change! I get a better setup with the LG's Picture Wizard doing the Colour, Brightness, Contrast and Tint setups!
post #1496 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtgray View Post

I discovered a problem with my set that was causing it to drift. I would set it correctly and within days, sometimes less, it would shift the grayscale and peak brightness. If I had used a pro-calibrator who was a of national reputation he would have come in cablibrated my set, took my money, and he would have been down the road. Now if he was local be might have come back half a dozen times for nothing (assuming he was a really nice guy) and figured out the problem.... yeah fat chance. It just was not obvious and I can't even imagine trying to get the maker's customer service to do anything positive about it.

I have been messing around for months going through one Duo beta after another recalibrating my set anyway.. but the problem with my set is probably either a hardware problem, a bug, or an undocumted feature. It literally turns down the brightness apparently when it gets to a certain temp on the lamp. How did I figure it out.. well you know what you get when you don't get what you want... in my case lots of trial and error experience.

So while thank goodness for great pro-calibrators, unless they are local they have some limitations on what they can achieve if there are gotchas. The nice thing about a Duo, is with a decent meter and some persistence you can achieve over time, what a pro can not always achieve, they just can't make that kind of investment of time in your set. I have to give some of the great ones credit, day after day, they have to be able to wade into a deep pile somehow and turn it into a silk purse. In my case the efforts of a traveling pro no matter how brilliant would have resulted in a Cinderella effect. After midnight it was all going to turn back into the pumpkin.

The Duo still has warts, but for the money it is an awesome piece. I would buy a couple more of them if I had a few extra bucks around. I have a couple of Panasonics that simply don't have any real adjustability. One gets used as a PC monitor so... it's not important right now, and the other just doesn't get a lot of use. Still when they (Anchor Bay) do the 3 hdmi port "Lite" version for $499, I will stick one on every display I own.

So glad you have eventually, dare I say, sorted out what the problem is.

As you know I am so impressed with the Duo and like you feel as though I could take almost any type of Display and get an absolutely first class PQ from it.
Only ever had an LCD TV but have just bought myself a really cheap projector so we will see what the Duo makes of it.
post #1497 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by p5browne View Post

After coming back from the Spectracal Pro Seminar, and impressed with the Auto Calibration features of the Iscan Duo and Calman 4, I was looking forward to this new feature for calibrating. Disappointment! No Auto Calibration Feature, and still the famous Yellow Tinge, despite the Colour Gamut nailing almost Dead Centre every aspect except the Green, which was a tad out. I'm now going to assume, if you don't have the lot more expensive Pro Licence, the Duo is dead in the Water as far as the Auto Calibrating goes. I also, I assume, I misunderstood the fact that I thought we were calibrating the Duo, not still cailbrating the actual set. So where am I ahead with the Duo for the monies put out for it. Set the Output to RGB and enabled the 1:1 which I seem to remember someone mentioning. Other than the Duo has 8 HDMI inputs, to me, right now, it appears to be an expensive Switch! Also missing the Pluge for Brightness and the Contrast patterns I saw at the Seminar. Are these also Pro Licence related, or have the Patterns been changed to patterns that are harder to setup? Also had a problem with the Blue Filter Colour Mode set - adjusted from Top to Bottom and never saw a change! I get a better setup with the LG's Picture Wizard doing the Colour, Brightness, Contrast and Tint setups!

What meter are you using?
post #1498 of 3697
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElwayLite View Post

What seems weird to me, if Im looking at the math correctly, is when the BD85 is set to 4:2:2, it's 20 bit

How would you get 20 bit off 3 channels, or is that something more to do with 4:2:2?

Edit: Would that be 4:2:2 10:5:5, for 20? So no rounding would be needed between the Duo and BD85 at 4:2:2 20 bit?

Yes! bandwidth is reduced by 1/3rd using 4:2:2 so if you are sending 4:4:4 30 bit or 10:10:10 it would convert to 4:2:2 20 bit or 10:5:5.
post #1499 of 3697
Gotcha!

Thanks.

I'm gonna try 4:2:2 20 bit into the Duo on Blu-rays and see how it goes.
post #1500 of 3697
The link Stacey supplies on post #1486 is well worth a read.

The articles on his webpage are really informative and have taken a lot of the 'black art' out of video for me.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Video Processors › New DVDO iScan Duo [2.0 firmware released]