Quote:
Originally Posted by p5browne 
Once you go 125 Point 3D LUT, you'll never go back! The results are a more natural looking PQ. Full screen Colour and Grayscale patterns look more like silk, the graininess is gone! Skin colours aren't just great looking skin colours, now they have all the subtlies of different colours, shades and detailling! I'm amazed at how good my set looks now. When you're watching anything with water, it looks so real now, you expect to find the floor beneath your TV to be wet, if not soaking wet!
Watched `Into the Wild' Blu-ray last night - check out Hal Holbrook - his facial features are just unbelievablely real!
Asked about the 125 Point for the Duo - negative - but competitive forces have a habbit of causing change!

Once you go 125 Point 3D LUT, you'll never go back! The results are a more natural looking PQ. Full screen Colour and Grayscale patterns look more like silk, the graininess is gone! Skin colours aren't just great looking skin colours, now they have all the subtlies of different colours, shades and detailling! I'm amazed at how good my set looks now. When you're watching anything with water, it looks so real now, you expect to find the floor beneath your TV to be wet, if not soaking wet!
Watched `Into the Wild' Blu-ray last night - check out Hal Holbrook - his facial features are just unbelievablely real!
Asked about the 125 Point for the Duo - negative - but competitive forces have a habbit of causing change!
Well here are my Colorchecker results:
You will note the facial dE's are well below the visible threshold as indeed are other points.
ColorChecker 25.10.12.jpg 121k .jpg file
Seems it depends on the linearity of your Display or how hard you try to find where it gives best linearity..
I grant it is easier to just rely on 125 point but I honestly believe checking a different % saturation calibration will give results that cannot be improved upon by using 125 point calibration.
Edited by PE06MCG - 12/23/12 at 8:45am

























