AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The Onkyo TX-NR3007/TX-NR5007 common questions/issues/hints/answers thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Onkyo TX-NR3007/TX-NR5007 common questions/issues/hints/answers thread - Page 84

post #2491 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by mx_se View Post

Hi, when you press 'TONE' to display receiver status T:037 means realtime temperature readings. When temperature increase to 50°C fan turn on - F:L. It goes off below 45°C -F:x.

Regards, Maksim

Any idea what the temperature display is when you press Display/Standby and then Setup (instead of Tone)? It displays a temperature with degress C after it but it's different to the temperature displayed when you press Tone.

Kind Regards,

Keith
post #2492 of 4660
I'm thinking of purchasing one of the 3007/5007. The differences appear to be that the 5007 has better DACs and a toroidal transformer. Are there any other differences? For a person who will use this primarily for 7 channels of movies/music, but who will run 2-channel music through a completely different circuit, is the extra cost of the 5007 worth it over the 3007? Thanks.
post #2493 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctviggen View Post

I'm thinking of purchasing one of the 3007/5007. The differences appear to be that the 5007 has better DACs and a toroidal transformer. Are there any other differences? For a person who will use this primarily for 7 channels of movies/music, but who will run 2-channel music through a completely different circuit, is the extra cost of the 5007 worth it over the 3007? Thanks.

5007 has better room correction also. That was my reasoning for getting the 5007, I don't even use the internal amps.
post #2494 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mopar_Mudder View Post

5007 has better room correction also. That was my reasoning for getting the 5007, I don't even use the internal amps.

It is my understanding that the implementation of Audyssey (if this is what you are referring to) is identical for these two models... If this is not correct then please provide some details.

Otherwise the fundamental differences are essentially as ctviggen stated, these are subtle differences in # of HDMI inputs and USB ports but unless you need or want them hardly a deal breaker between the 3007 and the 5007. These models are very similar, in fact they share the same owners manual, only needing to note differences in the small number of items that the 5007 has that the 3007 does not.

The best way to note these differences is to go to the Onkyo website and use the 'compare' function to see how they differ.
post #2495 of 4660
I was thinking that the 3007 didn't have the XT version but it looks like you are correct they are the same. I ended up getting a refurb 5007 for the same price as a 3007
post #2496 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mopar_Mudder View Post

I was thinking that the 3007 didn't have the XT version but it looks like you are correct they are the same. I ended up getting a refurb 5007 for the same price as a 3007

Great price on the 5007, when I bought my 3007 locally they did not have the 5007 in stock, special order only so I couldn't get the same 'deal' as I did on the 3007, the 5007 would have been full retail which was not even a dream!


Yes both models have:

Quote:


Audyssey MultEQ XT Dynamic EQ Dynamic Volume
(1) Audyssey MultEQ XT for System Equalization
Removes much of the distortion caused by speaker enclosures and the typical room environment; Produces far superior sound than on comparable products that lack correction capabilities.
(2) Audyssey Dynamic Volume
Maintains the desired listening level for all content, while optimizing the dynamic range.
(3) Audyssey Dynamic EQ for Loudness Correction
post #2497 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Sherwood View Post

These models are very similar, in fact they share the same owners manual, only needing to note differences in the small number of items that the 5007 has that the 3007 does not.

The features are indeed very similar - I think the main difference is in the specifications of various internal components designed, allegedly, to provide superior sound quality. The 5007 is quite a lot more expensive than the 3007. I decided in the end that I was incapable of understanding the differences between the two, so I bought the 5007 on the basis that "if it costs more it's sure to be better" I also got an exceptionally good deal on my 5007 which helped swing the decision that way. Both the 3007 and the 5007 have had excellent reviews and I think that the OP would be delighted with either of them.

Kind Regards,

Keith
post #2498 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Any idea what the temperature display is when you press Display/Standby and then Setup (instead of Tone)? It displays a temperature with degress C after it but it's different to the temperature displayed when you press Tone.

Kind Regards,

Keith

I've wondered about this myself. If I were to hazzard a guess, I'd say that it may be the average operating temperature since the last time the display was reset. Just a guess though. Mine displays 95 deg F (35 deg C ) which sounds reasonable.
post #2499 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Sherwood View Post

It is my understanding that the implementation of Audyssey (if this is what you are referring to) is identical for these two models... If this is not correct then please provide some details.

Otherwise the fundamental differences are essentially as ctviggen stated, these are subtle differences in # of HDMI inputs and USB ports but unless you need or want them hardly a deal breaker between the 3007 and the 5007. These models are very similar, in fact they share the same owners manual, only needing to note differences in the small number of items that the 5007 has that the 3007 does not.

The best way to note these differences is to go to the Onkyo website and use the 'compare' function to see how they differ.


Thanks all for the info. That is what I did, I compared the two at the Onkyo website. I also am not going to use the internal amps. (Would buy the 5507, but it's also more expensive for what doesn't seem to be a great deal more features.)

One thing I still haven't been able to determine is what the video processing is like. For instance, I'll need a Bluray player. I want to buy an Oppo, but do I buy the more expensive one with better video processing, or the cheaper one and use the video processing in the 3007/5007? What about 480i or other inputs into the 3007/5007? Will those be processed?
post #2500 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctviggen View Post

Thanks all for the info. That is what I did, I compared the two at the Onkyo website. I also am not going to use the internal amps. (Would buy the 5507, but it's also more expensive for what doesn't seem to be a great deal more features.)

One thing I still haven't been able to determine is what the video processing is like. For instance, I'll need a Bluray player. I want to buy an Oppo, but do I buy the more expensive one with better video processing, or the cheaper one and use the video processing in the 3007/5007? What about 480i or other inputs into the 3007/5007? Will those be processed?

They will process the 480 to 1080 yes. And from what I have been told do a good job it it. All my content runs from a HTPC wich convertes everything to 1080 for me. I did a little quick test last night running the HTPC at 720 (lowest setting it has) playing a DVD and letting the 5007 upconvert -vrs- just letting the HTPC do it. I couldn't tell any difference on a 145" screen. Now granted this was an old movie that was not great quality to start with (American Grafitti) so I should retry with a new DVD release. Point is I don't think it matter where you do it as long as it is a quality converter. For me it is way easier to let the HTPC do it because I would have to change the resolution of the HTPC based on what I am watching to let the 5007 do it.

I haven't tried it with my dish box. But I don't know how that would work either. You would have to change the output based on if you are watch SD or HD material, not very user friendly.
post #2501 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mopar_Mudder View Post

They will process the 480 to 1080 yes. And from what I have been told do a good job it it. All my content runs from a HTPC wich convertes everything to 1080 for me. I did a little quick test last night running the HTPC at 720 (lowest setting it has) playing a DVD and letting the 5007 upconvert -vrs- just letting the HTPC do it. I couldn't tell any difference on a 145" screen. Now granted this was an old movie that was not great quality to start with (American Grafitti) so I should retry with a new DVD release. Point is I don't think it matter where you do it as long as it is a quality converter. For me it is way easier to let the HTPC do it because I would have to change the resolution of the HTPC based on what I am watching to let the 5007 do it.

I haven't tried it with my dish box. But I don't know how that would work either. You would have to change the output based on if you are watch SD or HD material, not very user friendly.

I don't want to derail the thread, but I'd be interested in how you do the processing with your HTPC. My HTPC's output looks horrible.

Why do you have to change the output depending on SD or HD material. Won't it automatically detect that and upconvert to 720p (for me)?
post #2502 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctviggen View Post

I don't want to derail the thread, but I'd be interested in how you do the processing with your HTPC. My HTPC's output looks horrible.

Why do you have to change the output depending on SD or HD material. Won't it automatically detect that and upconvert to 720p (for me)?

I run an Intel i3 with intergrated graphics. When you set the display resolution to 1080p everything is upconverted and output as 1080p. I order to output 720p you need to change the display resolution to that.
post #2503 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Any idea what the temperature display is when you press Display/Standby and then Setup (instead of Tone)? It displays a temperature with degress C after it but it's different to the temperature displayed when you press Tone.

Kind Regards,

Keith

HI, it has something to do whith overall temperature in a period of time from starting up the receiver. 00:20 meaning running time. If you want to display correct temperature reading press return button below and repeat Display/Standby/Setup.

Regards Maksim
post #2504 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesE View Post

I've wondered about this myself. If I were to hazzard a guess, I'd say that it may be the average operating temperature since the last time the display was reset. Just a guess though. Mine displays 95 deg F (35 deg C ) which sounds reasonable.

Not a bad guess Further developments: after having removed the bi-amping as described before, yesterday I watched The Dark Knight at pretty loud volume levels. The S: indicator started at :H and the temperature was T:43 when I first checked it. At the end of the movie T: was 53, but S: had gone back to :M. As the unit cooled down and T: drpped back below 50, S: changed back to :H. So I am totally confused now. This would imply that as the amp gets hotter, not only do the fans kick in, but also the power automatically goes into Medium mode. No indication of any of this of course as you watch/listen to the movie.

My old dad used to call the oil gauge and so in his car "worry gauges". Maybe these indicators on our amps fall into the same category

Also, why S for 'Power'? It's T for Temperature and F for Fan so surely it should be P for Power. Any thoughts?

Kind Regards,

Keith
post #2505 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by mx_se View Post

HI, it has something to do whith overall temperature in a period of time from starting up the receiver. 00:20 meaning running time. If you want to display correct temperature reading press return button below and repeat Display/Standby/Setup.

Regards Maksim

Hi Maksim. Yes, LesE is thinking along the same lines. A sort of average indicator. Any thoughts on my post to Les just a few moments ago?

Kind Regards,

Keith
post #2506 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctviggen View Post

I don't want to derail the thread, but I'd be interested in how you do the processing with your HTPC. My HTPC's output looks horrible.

I also have a HTPC, uses an ATI HD3650 outputing 1080p from the DVI port and HD-DVD, Blu-Ray and DVD's look awesome! Have you set the output from your HTPC to match the exact resolution of your set (720p is what you said, right)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctviggen View Post

Why do you have to change the output depending on SD or HD material. Won't it automatically detect that and upconvert to 720p (for me)?

Yes you can set the output of the Onkyo to automatically upconvert the video input to 720p as required, see page 53 in the manual.
post #2507 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

Not a bad guess Further developments: after having removed the bi-amping as described before, yesterday I watched The Dark Knight at pretty loud volume levels. The S: indicator started at :H and the temperature was T:43 when I first checked it. At the end of the movie T: was 53, but S: had gone back to :M. As the unit cooled down and T: drpped back below 50, S: changed back to :H. So I am totally confused now. This would imply that as the amp gets hotter, not only do the fans kick in, but also the power automatically goes into Medium mode. No indication of any of this of course as you watch/listen to the movie.

My old dad used to call the oil gauge and so in his car "worry gauges". Maybe these indicators on our amps fall into the same category

Also, why S for 'Power'? It's T for Temperature and F for Fan so surely it should be P for Power. Any thoughts?

Kind Regards,

Keith

That's interesting. My 1007 has never reached 50 deg C so I haven't observed this. But, it does make sense that the amp power would get cut back in order to drop the operating temperature a few degrees. In my case, the difference between S:H and S:M is 5-6 deg C. I imagine that it would further drop to the lower power setting (S:L) if the temp continued to rise. I wonder if this is the sort of thing that was happening when reviewers attempted to run the all channels driven power output test.

I tend to agree with your dad in that sometimes too much information just causes us to worry unnecessarily. I'm sure that Onkyo didn't provide these displays for individuals like myself who tend to obsess over such things.

Over in the 1007 thread, I drew a comparison between the displayed parameters on the X007 and previous models such as the 905. On those earlier models, they indicate "SEC:" instead of "S:" . From this, I speculated that perhaps "S" or "SEC" may be an indication of the secondary power supply voltage being applied to the power amps.
post #2508 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesE View Post

That's interesting. My 1007 has never reached 50 deg C so I haven't observed this. But, it does make sense that the amp power would get cut back in order to drop the operating temperature a few degrees. In my case, the difference between S:H and S:M is 5-6 deg C. I imagine that it would further drop to the lower power setting (S:L) if the temp continued to rise. I wonder if this is the sort of thing that was happening when reviewers attempted to run the all channels driven power output test.

Good point, that last one. I wish I'd known it would do this beforehand though. My main reason for taking apart the bi-amping and running Audyssey again and then doing all the tweaks needed afterwards, was to get the amp running in High power mode. If I'd known it would drop back to Medium mode when the going got tough, I think I'd have left it like it is. I tend to listen at high levels, approaching reference a lot of the time and the amp is in a small, windowless boot room that is generally fairly warm, so I think I am going to see S:M mode quite often. The thing is, of course, that when it does cut back the power, there seems to be no audible indication of this at all - I guess you'd have to be running totally flat out to observe a difference, which is unlikely ever to happen, here at least. I've read that running in 4-ohm mode, which puts the amp permanently in S:M, reduces dynamics, restricts bass output and affects damping, but I can't detect any of that since swapping from S:M to S:H modes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by LesE View Post

I tend to agree with your dad in that sometimes too much information just causes us to worry unnecessarily. I'm sure that Onkyo didn't provide these displays for individuals like myself who tend to obsess over such things.

Same here. My wife says I obsess about these things too much to be good for me. She's probably right

Quote:
Originally Posted by LesE View Post

Over in the 1007 thread, I drew a comparison between the displayed parameters on the X007 and previous models such as the 905. On those earlier models, they indicate "SEC:" instead of "S:" . From this, I speculated that perhaps "S" or "SEC" may be an indication of the secondary power supply voltage being applied to the power amps.

Ah right. That would explain it. Thanks for the information again.

Kind Regards,

Keith
post #2509 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbarnes701 View Post

I tend to listen at high levels, approaching reference a lot of the time and the amp is in a small, windowless boot room that is generally fairly warm, so I think I am going to see S:M mode quite often.

The difference between high and medium power modes is probably no more than 2 dB or so which you may not notice in normal use with speakers of average to high efficiency. Still, it's nice to have that extra headroom available for momentary peaks when needed. Since you are operating in a fairly warm room, perhaps you should consider using a fan or two which may be enough to keep you below 50C and prevent the power reduction. I run with two 80mm fans and I top out at 45C in high power mode.

Les.
post #2510 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesE View Post

The difference between high and medium power modes is probably no more than 2 dB or so which you may not notice in normal use with speakers of average to high efficiency. Still, it's nice to have that extra headroom available for momentary peaks when needed. Since you are operating in a fairly warm room, perhaps you should consider using a fan or two which may be enough to keep you below 50C and prevent the power reduction. I run with two 80mm fans and I top out at 45C in high power mode.

Les.

Thanks Les. I will research fans and see what I can find. The amp does run hotter since I started using :H mode. In the former bi-amping mode, where it always used :M, it definitely ran cooler so the tech is doing its stuff I guess.

Edit: I just ordered two 120mm ultra-quiet computer case fans made by a company called Noctua. When they arrive I will stick them on top of the amp and report back on the difference they make. Last night I watched Sherlock Holmes, which doesn't have loud explosions etc all the way through it and the amp still managed to get to 53 degrees. Interestingly though, it was still running in S:H mode, so it doesn't automatically drop to S:M when it gets to 50 degrees as I previously though.

Kind Regards,

Keith
post #2511 of 4660
Just to share my experience with 5007/5500 combo. The latter is essentially 5007 amp blocks/transformers less processing circuitry, front display, remocon control. Combo was purchased with explicit intent of multi-amplification (and as a commoner response to provide fairly adequate substitution on a budget to otherwise excellent Bryston amplifiers recommended by speaker manufacturer to drive its stock).
Setup consists of 4 Ohm fronts (tri-amplified), 6 Ohm centre (tri-amplified), 8 Ohm surrounds (bi-amplified) PMC speakers. Global impedance set at 4 Ohm on both avr/amp as per manufacturer recommendation (no Audissey applied). Never monitored temperature display uninterruptedly, but the following observations were made: cold start readout is T:023 C, after sessions of about 15 hours (volume at -18.0dB, i.e. about 85dB SPL) it may reach T:043; F:x remains constant (supposedly fans never kicked in); S:M remains constant.
IIRC Sound&Vision mag testing 5007 stated power to drop to about 68W, with impedance switch at 4 Ohm. L/C/R tweeters are powered by 5007, mid and woofers by 5500. In that case L/C/R are getting about 180W each, but honest' wattage, with fairly adequate headroom, as compared to 145W rated power (likely single channel driven, or two).
It might be perceptual, but my feeling is tri-amping helps to open another bit of resolution, to the extent that I am now listening a lot of FLAC oldies in stereo (direct mode) deriving same satisfaction, as with the multi-ch DVD-A, SACD.
On a side note 5007 gets pretty much hotter at the top right back (near HDMI board), as compared with identically equipped (less processing circuitry) 5500, which is even having the harder task of driving mids/woofers. Evidently, additional circuitry is contributing its fair share to heat generation.
post #2512 of 4660
Interesting conversation. I have a 5007 with two fans on top back left pulling air up through the unit. I have an XPA-5 that runs the the front 5 speakers (L, R, C, Wide-L & Wide-R) the 5007 only runs the surrounds. The unit has been on for 6 hours at -20db, the temp is 34-36 and F=x and S =L and V=000.

The unit is cool and under very light load, so why would the S = L ? I think perhaps it is on L (Low) and goes up to M (med) or H (high) when you drive the unit harder and more voltage is required to power the unit and top of the charge on the Capacitors. The opposite of what was previously suggested. Just my humble opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haemus View Post

Just to share my experience with 5007/5500 combo. The latter is essentially 5007 amp blocks/transformers less processing circuitry, front display, remocon control. Combo was purchased with explicit intent of multi-amplification (and as a commoner response to provide fairly adequate substitution on a budget to otherwise excellent Bryston amplifiers recommended by speaker manufacturer to drive its stock).
Setup consists of 4 Ohm fronts (tri-amplified), 6 Ohm centre (tri-amplified), 8 Ohm surrounds (bi-amplified) PMC speakers. Global impedance set at 4 Ohm on both avr/amp as per manufacturer recommendation (no Audissey applied). Never monitored temperature display uninterruptedly, but the following observations were made: cold start readout is T:023 C, after sessions of about 15 hours (volume at -18.0dB, i.e. about 85dB SPL) it may reach T:043; F:x remains constant (supposedly fans never kicked in); S:M remains constant.
IIRC Sound&Vision mag testing 5007 stated power to drop to about 68W, with impedance switch at 4 Ohm. L/C/R tweeters are powered by 5007, mid and woofers by 5500. In that case L/C/R are getting about 180W each, but honest' wattage, with fairly adequate headroom, as compared to 145W rated power (likely single channel driven, or two).
It might be perceptual, but my feeling is tri-amping helps to open another bit of resolution, to the extent that I am now listening a lot of FLAC oldies in stereo (direct mode) deriving same satisfaction, as with the multi-ch DVD-A, SACD.
On a side note 5007 gets pretty much hotter at the top right back (near HDMI board), as compared with identically equipped (less processing circuitry) 5500, which is even having the harder task of driving mids/woofers. Evidently, additional circuitry is contributing its fair share to heat generation.
post #2513 of 4660
Active cooling almost always works best with air blowing directly at the hot object, unless the path of the air being pulled through is very directional, like through a heatsink.

Because of this, and the fact that the 5007 does not have a great "path" for fresh air to be pulled through the receiver and out the top, I would assume everyone should have their fans blowing down. It's pretty easy to do a temp test, but that would depend on where the temperature diode is.

What is everyone's experience with having fans either going in or out?

Also,

How are you powering these fans?

Thanks,
John
post #2514 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaggeto View Post

Active cooling almost always works best with air blowing directly at the hot object, unless the path of the air being pulled through is very directional, like through a heatsink.

Because of this, and the fact that the 5007 does not have a great "path" for fresh air to be pulled through the receiver and out the top, I would assume everyone should have their fans blowing down. It's pretty easy to do a temp test, but that would depend on where the temperature diode is.

What is everyone's experience with having fans either going in or out?

Also,

How are you powering these fans?

Thanks,
John

I think most have found it easier to suck the hot air out the top thereby 'aiding' the normal air convection cooling.

I would consider the idea of directly forcing the air on the heat generating areas, I haven't looked but does the 3007/5007 have air intakes on the bottom?
post #2515 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaggeto View Post

Active cooling almost always works best with air blowing directly at the hot object, unless the path of the air being pulled through is very directional, like through a heatsink.

Because of this, and the fact that the 5007 does not have a great "path" for fresh air to be pulled through the receiver and out the top, I would assume everyone should have their fans blowing down. It's pretty easy to do a temp test, but that would depend on where the temperature diode is.

What is everyone's experience with having fans either going in or out?

Also,

How are you powering these fans?

Thanks,
John

I'm waiting on my 5007 to arrive and currently contemplating how to deal with the heat issue. Has anybody tried something like this? http://www.coolcomponents.com/Compon...m-_p_191.html#
post #2516 of 4660
Yes the unit has vent louvers or air openings on the bottom. Pulling the air up and out the top of the unit is most efficient. Thus working with rather than against the laws of rising hot air currents and convection. Cold air is denser and collects near the floor, pulling in air from the bottom of the unit will pull in cooler air. The unit is designed to cool by means of convection, the fans will work with the natural air circulation already at play in the AVR.

I wanted to test my below suspicion. I ran the unit hard for a few hours. As the Temp went up, I started to see voltage numbers register, not much 15-18 was the most I noticed. But, after the unit reached about 43-45 degrees the unit switched from S=L to S=H. Then I turned the volume down and let the unit slowly cool. As the temp dropped back down to 35-38 degrees the S value changed back to L. Has anyone seen something different?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamg (Ret-Navy) View Post

Interesting conversation. I have a 5007 with two fans on top back left pulling air up through the unit. I have an XPA-5 that runs the the front 5 speakers (L, R, C, Wide-L & Wide-R) the 5007 only runs the surrounds. The unit has been on for 6 hours at -20db, the temp is 34-36 and F=x and S =L and V=000.

The unit is cool and under very light load, so why would the S = L ? I think perhaps it is on L (Low) and goes up to M (med) or H (high) when you drive the unit harder and more voltage is required to power the unit and top of the charge on the Capacitors. The opposite of what was previously suggested. Just my humble opinion.
post #2517 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamg (Ret-Navy) View Post

Yes the unit has vent louvers or air openings on the bottom. Pulling the air up and out the top of the unit is most efficient. Thus working with rather than against the laws of rising hot air currents and convection. Cold air is denser and collects near the floor, pulling in air from the bottom of the unit will pull in cooler air. The unit is designed to cool by means of convection, the fans will work with the natural air circulation already at play in the AVR.

I wanted to test my below suspicion. I ran the unit hard for a few hours. As the Temp went up, I started to see voltage numbers register, not much 15-18 was the most I noticed. But, after the unit reached about 43-45 degrees the unit switched from S=L to S=H. Then I turned the volume down and let the unit slowly cool. As the temp dropped back down to 35-38 degrees the S value changed back to L. Has anyone seen something different?

Can anyone point me to where this S=L talk started?
post #2518 of 4660
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamg (Ret-Navy) View Post

I wanted to test my below suspicion. I ran the unit hard for a few hours. As the Temp went up, I started to see voltage numbers register, not much 15-18 was the most I noticed. But, after the unit reached about 43-45 degrees the unit switched from S=L to S=H. Then I turned the volume down and let the unit slowly cool. As the temp dropped back down to 35-38 degrees the S value changed back to L.

Did you see any change in the Fan status?
It has been previously posted that it will not kick in until these threshold degrees are reached: 60 C Low, 65 C Medium and 75 C High but that was a test done with the TX-SR876 and I wonder if these x007 units behave the same way.
post #2519 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaggeto View Post

Can anyone point me to where this S=L talk started?

I believe the most recent discussion on this subject started right around post 2448.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...5#post19098675
post #2520 of 4660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamg (Ret-Navy) View Post


I wanted to test my below suspicion. I ran the unit hard for a few hours. As the Temp went up, I started to see voltage numbers register, not much 15-18 was the most I noticed. But, after the unit reached about 43-45 degrees the unit switched from S=L to S=H. Then I turned the volume down and let the unit slowly cool. As the temp dropped back down to 35-38 degrees the S value changed back to L. Has anyone seen something different?

That seems to be consistant with what has been discussed previously. However, I have found that the switch from S:L to S:H is determined by the status of the V: parameter. When V: exceeds 015-020, S:L goes to S:H regardless of temperature. After a period of one hour of low listening levels, S: changes back to S:L.

Also as kbarnes noted previoulsy, it appears that the power is dropped back from high to medium at some point when the temperatures exceed 50C.

If you go into the setup and change to the 4 ohm mode, S: changes to S:M. As kbarnes discovered, bi-amping also forces S:M. When you switch back to 6 ohm mode, you should see S:H. Again, if the listening levels remain low for 60 minutes, then S: will return to S:L.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › The Onkyo TX-NR3007/TX-NR5007 common questions/issues/hints/answers thread