I think much of the success of The Sound of Music was the way it won over its audience, many of whom went into it expecting "syrup and silliness", as you say. All those "happy" poster images of sweetness and light, the awareness that we're going to have to listen to kids sing "Do-re-mi" and all had people like me bracing for the worst as I was dragged into the theater to see it in 1965.
But the great surprise, imo, is how NON-"syrupy and silly" it is in the actual viewing of it. There is such a sharp, professional, knowing effort by everyone involved to avoid an overly cute presentation while still delivering laughs, charm, romance, lots of fine music and a little suspense that it totally wins you over.
Credit for this naturally goes to the shrewdness of screen-writer Ernest Lehman, the entire cast, particularly Andrews, and, most especially, director Robert Wise. His understanding of how to put a movie together goes all the way back to his editing job on Citizen Kane.
In fact, there is in The Sound of Music an homage of sorts to one of his, Kane director Orson Welles' and composer Bernard Herrmanns' signature sequences in Citizen Kane, although few might realize it.
In Citizen Kane there is a justifiably famous montage sequence that illustrates the passage of time and the evolution of the relationship between Charles Foster Kane and his wife from its honeymoon romance stage to a middle age stoic tolerance that is a brilliant whirlwind combination of direction, music and Wise's editing.
So too in The Sound of Music, during the "Do-re-mi" montage (late edit: along with the "My Favorite Things" bridge preceding it), Wise illustrates the evolution of the relationship between Andrews and the children during the Summer their dad is off visiting his fiance through another whirlwind montage of direction, music (of course) and editing.
Now, how many movie musicals can you say inherited the pedigree of arguably the greatest movie of all time in the personage of its editor and, in at least one sequence, in its technique?
But the great surprise, imo, is how NON-"syrupy and silly" it is in the actual viewing of it. There is such a sharp, professional, knowing effort by everyone involved to avoid an overly cute presentation while still delivering laughs, charm, romance, lots of fine music and a little suspense that it totally wins you over.
Credit for this naturally goes to the shrewdness of screen-writer Ernest Lehman, the entire cast, particularly Andrews, and, most especially, director Robert Wise. His understanding of how to put a movie together goes all the way back to his editing job on Citizen Kane.
In fact, there is in The Sound of Music an homage of sorts to one of his, Kane director Orson Welles' and composer Bernard Herrmanns' signature sequences in Citizen Kane, although few might realize it.
In Citizen Kane there is a justifiably famous montage sequence that illustrates the passage of time and the evolution of the relationship between Charles Foster Kane and his wife from its honeymoon romance stage to a middle age stoic tolerance that is a brilliant whirlwind combination of direction, music and Wise's editing.
So too in The Sound of Music, during the "Do-re-mi" montage (late edit: along with the "My Favorite Things" bridge preceding it), Wise illustrates the evolution of the relationship between Andrews and the children during the Summer their dad is off visiting his fiance through another whirlwind montage of direction, music (of course) and editing.
Now, how many movie musicals can you say inherited the pedigree of arguably the greatest movie of all time in the personage of its editor and, in at least one sequence, in its technique?










![Aliens [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/4/4b/50x50px-ZC-4bd4fe1c_B004RE29PO-61Iz4u6bADL.jpeg)
![The Godfather Collection (The Coppola Restoration) [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/3/36/50x50px-ZC-36a764f4_B000NTPDSW-51ek2BlM5IIL.jpeg)




























