Quote:
Regardless of calibration, if Panasonic allows you to blow the picture out to a ridiculous level, would that not make it the panel capable of being brighter? runner66 was suggesting that Samsung panels are brighter than Panasonics. That is not true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Citivas 
You also have previously posted about the 1080 lines of motion resolution as if the Samsung doesn't have it even though on this point it has been proven that it does. The shadow detail point is arguable too, and certainly not a "fact." Some reviews and calibration reports have favored the Panasonic on this point and others the Samsungs. It is commonly stated in this forum as if it is a given, but don't mistake that as a fact.

You also have previously posted about the 1080 lines of motion resolution as if the Samsung doesn't have it even though on this point it has been proven that it does. The shadow detail point is arguable too, and certainly not a "fact." Some reviews and calibration reports have favored the Panasonic on this point and others the Samsungs. It is commonly stated in this forum as if it is a given, but don't mistake that as a fact.
CNET's review (and presumably others who tested motion resolution) says that the '09 Samsung's "only" achieve 800-900 lines of motion resolution, while '09 Panasonic's achieve the full 1080 lines. Is that not proof enough? It's also widely accepted that Panasonic's have better shadow detail than even the Kuros. I don't know about that, but I have personally witnessed better shadow detail on Panasonic plasmas than my own Samsung plasma.













