New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sooo Many Choices...

post #1 of 28
Thread Starter 
OK, I'm no noobie; in my time I've streamed my own video files to a Mediagate MG-35, XBMC on XBox, PS3, PCH A-110 and C-200 (different solution for audio). They all served their time and purpose, and the XBMC, PS3, and A-110 still remain (the MG-35 was my first box, and was replaced by the XBMC...and the C-200 was ahead of its time, and not really suited for me).

However, I'd like to take the next step...which for me means both online content, and also trying to focus on one solution around the house. After I tried and dumped the C-200, I decided to try my first hand at HTPC with the Dell Zino HD. I don't have the time to fiddle with the set-up that HTPCs seem to require, so that solution isn't going to work for me either.

So...that leaves me looking to what's next. The XBMC is comfortably in my Bedroom system for now, and the A-110 rests happily in the HT. So that leaves the Family Room. Believe it or not, this is where I have the most trouble, because the Bedroom just needs to play my own SD files...so XBMC works like a charm...and the HT just needs to play my own HD files, so the A-110 kicks that out. It's in the Family Room that I'd like to do it all; SD, HD, online, etc.

I don't really know what's out there, online-wise, but I suspect my focus will initially be Hulu, Netflix, Fancast, etc. The PS3 is already in the Family Room, and does too many other things to make itself obsolete...so in the interim I'm trying to bend it to serve that room. PlayOn has proved to work OK with Hulu...so far as I can tell in my limited experience...but I'm not sure which other sites it works well with, how well it does HD, and I know the My Media is a bust for me; so is it worth $40 just for Hulu? I suppose I could try some other media servers, like ps3mediaserver, but I'm not interested in changing my ripping process, and stripping down my files...and I don't have a scream-machine of a PC that I'd want to do on-the-fly transcoding from, so I don't know that the PS3 will really fill all my needs (realizing, early on, what the PS3 could and could-not do well is what drove me to a PCH A-110 in the first place).

So just as I was searching for the next thing, along comes the announcement for the PopBox. I love the A-110, and even though the C-200 didn't work out for me, I'm happy to back Syabas as my one solution around the house.

Of course, as I'm looking around, I decide to see what the XBMC on Acer Revo is all about. Hmm...I love the little form-factor of the Revo; and I have to admit, XBMC is obviously an awesome media server, and has never been anything but simple, simple, simple to use...albeit for the limited functionality of streaming my SD files to the Bedroom system.

So I'm torn, and looking for a little feedback. I know everyone has their favorite, but...can I do anything with the PS3 without bending my files too much? Is the Acer Revo going to be, basically, like my experience with the Dell Zino HD; it's a PC and HTPCs require a lot of tweaking? Or does just sticking an XBMC build on it eliminate some of that hassle with drivers, set-up, and tweaking? The PopBox looks very promising; should I just hang in there until March and give that a try?

Thoughts?

CD
post #2 of 28
I'm kinda drifting in the opposite direction. The streamers ALMOST do it right. My WD HDTV box ALMOST did it....just one or two more firmware updates... that never came. My Brite-View CinemaTube ALMOST does it. One or two firmware updates MIGHT fix the networking, and might give a better UI. Maybe.

Truthfully I'm beginning to think about something like your Zino (not the low-end one tho) or perhaps one of the little Shuttles. XBMC looks cool. The streamers try to cram all that functionality into one chip, and they ALMOST do it, but not quite. How many times have you seen the plaintive complaint in the forums... "but the file plays fine on my computer". Maybe we expect too much of the streamers and a computer is what we really need. But the RIGHT computer, set up properly with the RIGHT software. Otherwise, it ALMOST works. I don't know but I'm beginning to really wonder.
post #3 of 28
Thread Starter 
LOL...you might want to peek at the new Goodbye HTPC post. As I chimed in there, I agree with that guy; HTPCs might do "everything", once you get them dialed-in just right...but IMO it's a lot of tweaking and set-up to get there.

If you have any interest in my Zino, PM me.

CD
post #4 of 28
I spent a lot of my Christmas break researching these devices. I need something that will stream Blu-Ray movies (ISO or BDMV) from unRAID to a tv. It has to be small, simple, and USABLE, if I expect the rest of my family to use it. These are the players I have found that show a lot of promise. Although Syabas started this thing a few years ago with the Popcorn Hour, the choices have grown considerably and they are having a hard time with their current devices. There is supposed to be a Popcorn Hour A-110 replacement model, but nothing has come out yet about what, how much, or when. Some of these players have lots of bugs; some have open forum support; some have beautiful user interfaces. I agree that HTPCs are the ultimate in flexibility, but I need a simple box to do a few things simply. I really can't wait to see what the reviews have to say about some of the newer devices...

HDX BD-1
Manufacturer: HDX
Release Date: Jan 15
Price: $219
Not reviewed yet, but promises complete playback of all Blu-Ray formats. Can contain hard drive.
Website: http://www.hdx1080.com/index.php?pag...&Itemid=100094
Forums: http://www.hdx1080.com/index.php?opt...tid=22&id=9785
http://www.mpcclub.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22467
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1207528

Popbox
Manufacturer: Syabas
Release Date: March - April
Price: $130
Not a replacement for the Popcorn Hour A-110. Does not play Blu-Ray formats. No hard drive.
Website: http://www.popbox.com
Forums: http://www.networkedmediatank.com/sh....php?tid=34082
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1213012

Popcorn Hour C-200
Manufacturer: Syabas
Release Date: Now
Price: $340
Not a replacement for the Popcorn Hour A-110. Plays Blu-Ray formats and can add a PC Blu-Ray drive. Up to now has been VERY buggy.
Website: http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinesto...nfo&item_id=12
Forums: http://www.networkedmediatank.com/fo...lay.php?fid=74
http://www.mpcclub.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=91

Dune HD Base 3.0
Manufacturer: HDI
Release Date: Now
Price: $350
Plays all Blu-Ray formats and can have an internal hard drive.
Website: http://dune-hd.com/hd_players/110-dune-hd-base-3.0.html
Forums: http://www.mpcclub.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=99
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1175778

Dune HD Prime 3.0
Manufacturer: HDI
Release Date: Now
Price: $450
Plays all Blu-Ray formats and has a Blu-Ray loader, exactly like a Blu-Ray player would have.
Website: http://dune-hd.com/hd_players/111-du...prime-3.0.html
Forums: http://www.mpcclub.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=99
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1175778

Boxee Box
Manufacturer: Boxee/D-Link
Release Date: Q2 2010
Price: ~$200
Plays everything possible, beautiful UI modeled on XBMC. Probably won't support DTHD/DTSMA streaming via HDMI as it uses the NVIDIATegra 2 chipset.
Website: http://www.boxee.tv/box
Forums: http://www.mpcclub.com/forum/showthr...ighlight=boxee
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1204222

Boxee Remote
Manufacturer: Boxee/D-Link
Release Date: Q2 2010
Price: ?
This is the best media remote I have seen yet. Supposedly it will be available separately from the Boxee...
http://blog.boxee.tv/2010/01/05/by-t...his-way-comes/
post #5 of 28
Thread Starter 
Aiden, we've been through this before...in regards to the A-110; when you say the PopBox "does not play Blu-Ray formats"...you mean BD .ISO, yes? Certainly it will play .m2ts?

CD
post #6 of 28
Yes, I mean Blu-Ray ISO and lossless audio. I didn't realize we had discussed this before. I was just contributing my shortened list. Didn't mean to create issues. My media is all Blu-Ray ISO, so my target player must be capable of reading that format, and streaming the audio unmolested. Sorry if I've repeated myself.
post #7 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aiden_is View Post

Yes, I mean Blu-Ray ISO and lossless audio. I didn't realize we had discussed this before. I was just contributing my shortened list. Didn't mean to create issues. My media is all Blu-Ray ISO, so my target player must be capable of reading that format, and streaming the audio unmolested. Sorry if I've repeated myself.

No, no...sorry; not you and I personally. Just others, when talking about the PCH units. They would say "PopcornHour doesn't stream BD" and I think that causes a lot of confusion for noobies; they think "I shouldn't get a PCH because it won't play BD files".

I don't think the majority of streamers think of "BD" as the whole image in a .ISO file; they think of it as an .m2ts or .ts container, and of course PCH plays those just fine.

CD
post #8 of 28
Ah... I see. I guess I just assume a BD rip is to ISO or BDMV, not m2ts. That's my mistake for making an assumption I suppose. Although the Dolby True HD / DTS Master Audio streaming is not available on the A-110, and I consider that to be a critical piece of a true Blu-Ray streaming solution.
post #9 of 28
Thread Starter 
Well...after my experience with the C-200, I'm not sure I'll jump quite so early at the PopBox. I'm excited about it...and if this is really going to have traditional retail partners, it'll have to hit the shelves at better than the beta-testing stage...but I don't know that I need to catch all the slings and arrows; it'll be there when I'm ready.

So with the money from the Zino HD attempt, I think I'm going to give something else a try in the meantime. I've never tried XBMC on anything other than my modded XBox, but I love that...and have never heard anything but praise for it on other platforms.

Right now I'd say I'm torn between trying it on the Acer Revo 1600 or the ATV. Again, here's what I'm looking for:

- I'd love to play the .m2ts rips that PS3 (which will be at the same location) can't; that's my VC-1 encoded, and lossless audio files (the Kuro at this location is only 720p, so I don't need to go any higher than that).

- Need to play SD .ISO

- Even though I am extremely happy with my Squeezebox Duets, and have one at this location...if there were a way to stream my FLACs with high audio quality, that would be a bonus

- And lastly, I really want the online content thing. Although I can use PlayOn on the PS3 for some of that, like Hulu...if I could keep from paying the $40, and just wrap it into this solution, that would be best.

Thoughts?

CD
post #10 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by aiden_is View Post

Ah... I see. I guess I just assume a BD rip is to ISO or BDMV, not m2ts. That's my mistake for making an assumption I suppose. Although the Dolby True HD / DTS Master Audio streaming is not available on the A-110, and I consider that to be a critical piece of a true Blu-Ray streaming solution.

OK, but yet another thing that many noobies will misunderstand. The A-110 can't process TrueHD and DTS-HD MA, but it passes it just fine. In other words (for the noobies), as long as you have a Pre/Pro or AVR that can decode it (which is like ANYTHING made in say the last 2 years)...you can get TrueHD and DTS-HD MA from an A-110.

CD
post #11 of 28
Noob question, but this seems on track for my dream -- I would love to be able to rip my BD movies, store them somewhere and then play them back with no transcoding. So basically rip the movie and playback the audio/video as exactly what I'm getting from my PS3 from this media server into my AVR over HDMI. Menus, all audio options, and of course the HD codecs.

I'm guessing here such a solution is still kind of fluid?
post #12 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by flaminio View Post

Noob question, but this seems on track for my dream -- I would love to be able to rip my BD movies, store them somewhere and then play them back with no transcoding. So basically rip the movie and playback the audio/video as exactly what I'm getting from my PS3 from this media server into my AVR over HDMI. Menus, all audio options, and of course the HD codecs.

I'm guessing here such a solution is still kind of fluid?

Well...you have plenty of options for keeping the video uncompressed, and lossless audio intact (again, as long as your AVR will decode the pass-thru). However, if you want all the menus, and extra features, etc...you're looking at either BD .ISO or file structure...and to my knowledge only PCH C-200 and the Dune player do that.

Keep in mind...if you're a true noobie...setting aside, for now, that you'll need to familiarize with the ripping process and software...if you intend to keep BDs completely intact, you'll need a HUGE amount of storage space; say @ ~40G per title...100 movies = 4T.

Just my opinion, but you should really think about whether the previews, menus, and extra features are really worth all that.

CD
post #13 of 28
You're probably right, I don't need the menus and I don't care about the features. In my head though, an iso is just easy being a virtual disk.

I haven't gotten into ripping BD yet. Until I have a playback solution in the living room, I haven't invested in a drive or did more than skim the process.
post #14 of 28
Excellent thread thanks for really narrowing things down for me. I want iso playback over network and retain the HD audio and menus so I guess CDLehner said what I was thinking, comes down to the PCH C-200 and the Dune player as the only devices that do it all so far.
post #15 of 28
So, with all the new Media streaming components coming out of CES what is the top choice; inclusive of all current and new devices, using these MAJOR deciding factors to choose one:
-Under $200
-1080P
-Wired and Wireless Network
-As many web services as possible (Youtube, Netflix, Pandora, etc.)
-External storage capable
-Best UI
-Plays as many file formats as possible

Here are some of the new / old ones (others are listed above and in the compare thread):
WDTV Live
http://www.boxee.tv/box
http://gizmodo.com/5439293/syabas-po...streamer-champ
http://gizmodo.com/5443319/monsoon-v...ed-up-into-one
http://gizmodo.com/tag/hdmediaplayers/
And of course the PS3
post #16 of 28
CD,

Great thread. As you know I'm in the same boat and our needs match. I've been struggling with comments from people smarter than me about ISO, "folder structure", and just a plain or m2ts file. Care to give a brief summary of the three?

I was all set on doing just .m2ts files as you've described in other threads. But then someone in the Dune thread talked about a parred down BD ISO that was smaller than the full ISO. The advantage of this being chapter support and menus. Of course fewer players can deal with this. I think they're using "ClownBD" to create these ISOs.

Thanks.
post #17 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejhuzy View Post

CD,

Great thread. As you know I'm in the same boat and our needs match. I've been struggling with comments from people smarter than me about ISO, "folder structure", and just a plain or m2ts file. Care to give a brief summary of the three?

I was all set on doing just .m2ts files as you've described in other threads. But then someone in the Dune thread talked about a parred down BD ISO that was smaller than the full ISO. The advantage of this being chapter support and menus. Of course fewer players can deal with this. I think they're using "ClownBD" to create these ISOs.

Thanks.

EJ, sometimes people do confuse .ISO to mean "everything on the disc". .ISO is simply another file format, which keeps the file-structure of a disc intact. I think the biggest thing .ISO used to have going for it was the fact that it could be easily rendered back to a DVD or BD. I say used to because I think this is becoming less and less important, and kind of reflects an "old-school" way of thinking.

That being said, it's a format a lot of people are comfortable with and still use (I have most of my SD stuff in .ISO still). However, even if you have your reasons for going .ISO, doesn't mean you have to grab everything on the disc. If you just wanted menus, but not extras, etc., you could pull that off with software like Clown BD.

One of the reasons I think .ISO kind of became synonymous with "everything on the disc" is because some decrypting software will let you easily copy a whole disc to an image (.ISO) without the need for additional software, that would allow you to pick and choose. Again, back in the "good 'ole days", this might have been a way to go for some.

Hope that clears some things up,

CD
post #18 of 28
ISOs are favored for three primary reasons:

1 - You can recreate the original.
2 - You keep everything intact.
3 - Playing it back should be identical to the original disc.

If these aren't important to you there's no reason to go with ISOs. I want all the extras and all the extra tracks and bonus features available on my ISOs; stripping things out is pointless to me when storage is so abundant and I *like* the whole disc-based experience of a good copy of something (think Criterion with all their extras).

It's very similar to a lossy vs lossless debate in the audio world regarding file formats. Do you go with MP3/M4A or something like FLAC/M4A-lossless? I always go with the latter because of the storage aspect (ie, it's not a problem anymore), and it's built in future-proofing. I used to think high-bitrate MP3s wouldn't be distinguishable, and for the most part, they're not... until I built a good set up designed around listening (not just home theater stuff). MP3s can still sound good, but sometimes, there will be a glaring artifact, and I don't consider that acceptable. As a more common example, plenty of people ripped to 128kbit mp3s back in the day because it was good enough, and now you can easily tell how horrid those sound.

So really it depends on your threshold for "completeness" and experience (plus quality if you're recompressing).
post #19 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDLehner View Post

EJ, sometimes people do confuse .ISO to mean "everything on the disc". .ISO is simply another file format, which keeps the file-structure of a disc intact. I think the biggest thing .ISO used to have going for it was the fact that it could be easily rendered back to a DVD or BD. I say used to because I think this is becoming less and less important, and kind of reflects an "old-school" way of thinking.

That being said, it's a format a lot of people are comfortable with and still use (I have most of my SD stuff in .ISO still). However, even if you have your reasons for going .ISO, doesn't mean you have to grab everything on the disc. If you just wanted menus, but not extras, etc., you could pull that off with software like Clown BD.

One of the reasons I think .ISO kind of became synonymous with "everything on the disc" is because some decrypting software will let you easily copy a whole disc to an image (.ISO) without the need for additional software, that would allow you to pick and choose. Again, back in the "good 'ole days", this might have been a way to go for some.

Hope that clears some things up,

CD

CD, that does help and it confirms what I was understanding from the Dune thread. It leads me to the question then, what's the best format? To me I don't care, but I think the answer lies in the players you have/or will have.

Of course, what file type you choose impacts what you can do. For example, I'd like chapter support so that means ISO or MKV (I think). But if that limits my player choices, maybe I should change my mind on chapter support. My #1 requirements is no loss of video quality and bitstream of HD audio.

BTW, I've given up on the HTPC running XBMC. I just can't get myself to learn all that and deal with all the tweaking. Not to mention that XBMC won't bitstream the HD audio (AFAIK).

My front runners right now are C200, Dune Base, Boxee, PopBox and that new HDX B1 (?). I'm also hoping the A110 replacement will get announced soon. I need two media players. One for the HT and one for the family room. The family room needs to be able to downmix the HD audio (or can I keep the lossy track too?).

Enough rambling...
post #20 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lidocaineus View Post

It's very similar to a lossy vs lossless debate in the audio world regarding file formats.

Well...not to split hairs, but it's not quite the same. Going lossless in audio is like going uncompressed in video; you want to keep the highest possible AQ or PQ intact.

Just because you don't want to keep the menus, extras, trailers, etc. off of a disc, doesn't mean you don't want the best video and audio out of what you do keep...what's important to you, which for me is just the movie (in most cases).

CD
post #21 of 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by lidocaineus View Post

ISOs are favored for three primary reasons:

1 - You can recreate the original.
2 - You keep everything intact.
3 - Playing it back should be identical to the original disc.

If these aren't important to you there's no reason to go with ISOs. I want all the extras and all the extra tracks and bonus features available on my ISOs; stripping things out is pointless to me when storage is so abundant and I *like* the whole disc-based experience of a good copy of something (think Criterion with all their extras).

It's very similar to a lossy vs lossless debate in the audio world regarding file formats. Do you go with MP3/M4A or something like FLAC/M4A-lossless? I always go with the latter because of the storage aspect (ie, it's not a problem anymore), and it's built in future-proofing. I used to think high-bitrate MP3s wouldn't be distinguishable, and for the most part, they're not... until I built a good set up designed around listening (not just home theater stuff). MP3s can still sound good, but sometimes, there will be a glaring artifact, and I don't consider that acceptable. As a more common example, plenty of people ripped to 128kbit mp3s back in the day because it was good enough, and now you can easily tell how horrid those sound.

So really it depends on your threshold for "completeness" and experience (plus quality if you're recompressing).

Thanks for the reply. I think I'm like you, except I don't really care about the extras/previews/etc. I would like menus for selecting the right audio track (see my previous post about keeping both the HD audio and the lossy track).

You do make an interesting point about storage. It is getting cheaper and I plan on building a NAS (unRAID or WHS).
post #22 of 28
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejhuzy View Post

CD, that does help and it confirms what I was understanding from the Dune thread. It leads me to the question then, what's the best format? To me I don't care, but I think the answer lies in the players you have/or will have.

Of course, what file type you choose impacts what you can do. For example, I'd like chapter support so that means ISO or MKV (I think). But if that limits my player choices, maybe I should change my mind on chapter support. My #1 requirements is no loss of video quality and bitstream of HD audio.

BTW, I've given up on the HTPC running XBMC. I just can't get myself to learn all that and deal with all the tweaking. Not to mention that XBMC won't bitstream the HD audio (AFAIK).

My front runners right now are C200, Dune Base, Boxee, PopBox and that new HDX B1 (?). I'm also hoping the A110 replacement will get announced soon. I need two media players. One for the HT and one for the family room. The family room needs to be able to downmix the HD audio (or can I keep the lossy track too?).

Enough rambling...

EJ, to me...that's a question as old as streaming; do you rip to suit your player, or do you get a player that suits your files? Usually...if you already have a LOT of files in one format or another...you need to find something that works with those, or you're in for a lot of re-ripping

If I were just starting out...like it sounds like you are...I'd look for the player I liked, with good, broad file support, and then start figuring out the best way to rip based on that player.

For myself...in my course...I've been back and forth; you rip to one box, then you find a better rip method or format, but that player won't support it...so you get the next newest thing that does...and on and on it goes...lol.

FWIW, if I was just getting ready to jump in, I'd be the most excited about the Boxee (if it weren't so fugly...lol) and PopBox.

CD

EDIT- P.S. As far as keeping the lossy track...sure, you can keep that too. For example, (as you well know...lol) I have an A-110 in my HT, which I use to play BD movie files (.m2ts) with the lossless audio intact. It passes thru to my Integra Pre/Pro which decodes it with great ease. However, I have a PS3 in the Family Room. Now, the PS3 will play .m2ts files...natively...as long as they aren't VC-1 encoded. However, it won't play the lossless audio. So...in a perfect world, I might rip the BD to keep both the lossless (for the HT) and lossy (for the PS3) audio. Problem is...most new releases don't even have a lossy track anymore; not in English anyway. You get the lossless, and then maybe Spanish lossy, or whatever. So even though it's possible in theory, it doesn't work out so well in practice.
post #23 of 28
Yeah, go for what fits you - if you don't want the extras that's cool. My friend is the exact opposite of me and goes for the super-streamlined experience - he just rips the main feature, and when you browse his list of titles on his media player, it jumps straight into the opening credits. He even cuts out the production logo if the score to the film isn't played on top of it.

He also x264 compresses some of the movies he doesn't really care about quality, such as documentaries with mostly talking heads.

He keeps the hardcopies stored away in case he DOES want the extras, but it's pretty rare.
post #24 of 28
Maybe I am old fashioned in liking ISO's but I think some use them as the fallback method of knowing something is going to work as well as the original.

For myself I ripped all my DVD's to file and on movies I didn't care about extras I ripped a movie only to a DVD file structure folder. I did all this because I spent a LOT of time doing this and figuring out exactly what is going on with these methods and I knew exactly what I wanted to throw away and when I didn't want to throw something out. Heck some are shurnk using the doom9 big three method, learned so much doing that.

But yeah I admit I have no idea whats going on inside bluray movies file structure and generally I don't want to lose quality on these anyway so why not rip to ISO? Convenience and knowing I have something as good as the original are the priorities here. I think the most I will be interested in from here on out is a movie only rip of a bluray, only for some disks though.
post #25 of 28
I thought I read Boxee wasn't going to support passing the lossless codecs. That would seem to rule that out.

I'm quite curious about this also. Based on my reading if I could do MKV w/ lossless audio that should keep chapters intact and require less less processing.

The HDX BD-1 looks promising especially w/ a HDD.

I'm on a Mac and looking at makemkv.
post #26 of 28
I'm watching the HDX BD-1 with bated breath. It comes out next week, and if it actually delivers what it promises, that will be my player of choice.

I personally rip to ISO to keep everything in one filetype. While MOST of my rips are just movie only and lossless audio, some movies DEMAND the full ISO copy with all the menus and extras simply because they are titled "Star Trek" or "Tron" or something similar. While I could care less about "features" on Baby Momma, certain movies command more respect for their content, imho. And tv series on Blu-Ray are the worst, because without that menu, you're going to have a hard time navigating.
post #27 of 28
I thought of another determining factor regarding what file type to choose. That's how to stream the file (ie - smb, nfs, http, etc). For example, it seems that http handles the high bit rate files better for some people, yet http can stream ISO files. Is that right?
post #28 of 28
sorry if this is a bit ot.. I am a total noob and am mostly looking at a feature to organize & stream a large amount of digital photos, music files (itunes), as well as online content (netflix, hulu, pandora). So far, I have had the best success with the PS3 and shared folders, but would like a better UI and something to keep everything better organized. Any recs appreciated on the devices you are reviewing.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home